bush fisa, Bush Intelligence, Bush intelligence law, Bush Protect America Act, Bush spy law, Dems FISA, Dems Protect America Act, Dems spy law, George W. Bush, Nancy Pelosi, Protect America Act, Silvestre Reyes
bush fisa, Bush Intelligence, Bush intelligence law, Bush Protect America Act, Bush spy law, Dems FISA, Dems Protect America Act, Dems spy law, George W. Bush, Nancy Pelosi, Protect America Act, Silvestre Reyes

Bush Calls Lawmakers 'Irresponsible'

TERENCE HUNT | February 16, 2008 03:55 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

WASHINGTON — President Bush said Saturday that lawmakers' failure to renew an eavesdropping law will make it more difficult to track terrorists and "we may lose a vital lead that could prevent an attack on America."

Democrats faulted the president, who taped his weekly radio address before he left on a trip in Africa, for "whipping up false fears and creating artificial confrontation."

"Their true concern here is not national security," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said in a statement. "Rather they want to protect the financial interests of telecommunications companies and avoid judicial scrutiny of their warrantless wiretapping program."

At issue is a law that made it easier for the government to spy on foreign phone calls and e-mails that pass through the United States. The expiration time: midnight Saturday.

The president wanted the House to approve a Senate bill that would have renewed the law. Bush opposed a temporary extension; lawmakers left for a 12-day recess without extending the law. The Senate measure included legal protections for telecommunications companies that helped the government wiretap U.S. computer and phone lines after the Sept. 11 attacks without clearance from a secret court that oversees such activities.

"Some congressional leaders claim that this will not affect our security," the president said. "They are wrong. Because Congress failed to act, it will be harder for our government to keep you safe from terrorist attack.

"At midnight, the attorney general and the director of national intelligence will be stripped of their power to authorize new surveillance against terrorist threats abroad. This means that as terrorists change their tactics to avoid our surveillance, we may not have the tools we need to continue tracking them _ and we may lose a vital lead that could prevent an attack on America," Bush said.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a former U.S. attorney and attorney general of Rhode Island, spoke for Democrats in the party's radio response.

"We know this president dislikes compromise, but this time he has taken his stubborn approach too far," Whitehouse said. "He is whipping up false fears, and creating artificial confrontation. As the president himself said in the Rose Garden, 'There is really no excuse for letting this critical legislation expire. So let's get it done.'

"But the president instead chose political gamesmanship, rejecting a short extension of the Protect America Act that would allow Congress to complete its work," Whitehouse said. "Make no mistake: If the surveillance law expires, if any intelligence loss results, it is President Bush's choice. Period."

Bush's national security adviser, Stephen Hadley, told reporters traveling with the president in Africa there was little the government could do to compensate for what it considered to be lesser protections against terrorist attacks.

"We're making all the time every effort we can on intelligence, and when one of your important tools is taken away from you for a period of time, it's hard to compensate for it," he said. "That's why we call it a 'gap in intelligence.' Gaps are hard to fill."

Added Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.: "At midnight, the country will be more at risk than it is today. And that risk will increase each day we don't have a solution to this problem."

White House officials seethed over the fact that the House, rather than passing the eavesdropping bill, approved contempt citations against two Bush confidants, chief of staff Joshua Bolten and former counsel Harriet Miers, over their refusal to cooperate with an investigation into the firings of U.S. attorneys.

"House leaders chose politics over protecting the country _ and our country is at greater risk as a result," Bush said.

"My administration will take every step within our power to minimize the damage caused by the House's irresponsible behavior," he said. "Yet it is still urgent that Congress act."

Reid and Pelosi responded that Democrats "will continue to work on a bipartisan basis to finalize a strong law."

"As we do, there should be no question in anyone's mind that U.S. intelligence agencies have the legal ability to take all actions necessary to protect the security of the American people," they said.

Comments for this post are now closed


 
 

Comments
200
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
- lungfish See Profile I'm a Fan of lungfish permalink

Here is what Olbermann had to say about Dubya and Republican responsibility re Telecom Immunity:

http://www.impeachbush.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5257#video



    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 02/18/2008
- katok See Profile I'm a Fan of katok permalink

Lets hope defending the constitution and our very way of life does not become treason! Repugs would have you believe just the opposite. I for one, liked America in the 20th century, I don't understand why George and Dick hate everything America stood for?
Now. Obama and Clinton are both salivating at their turn as "Masters of the Universe".

See you on the otherside.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 PM on 02/18/2008
- stargazer13 See Profile I'm a Fan of stargazer13 permalink

no free get out of jail card for tel-coms period
if you do not adhere to the law then it becomes lawlessness and that is not a good thing for any of us . Lady Justice is blind for a reason .Justice is the reason the American people want cold hard Justice plain and simple . we the people of the United States of America are a good people and just because we are fighting to Keep our Republic alive does not mean we are a sleep at the wheel un beknown to the world we the giant woke up on 9-11 and did not seek to return to our slumber

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 AM on 02/18/2008
- bb1234 See Profile I'm a Fan of bb1234 permalink

Do you truly think the reason the dems held up this bill was on "Principle"? Get real. The true reason they blocked the bill was due to the retroactive immunity from lawsuits for private telecom firms. The nation's torts bar, who obviously have a storng financial interest, has spent months lobbying hard against immunity. 66 trial lawyers representing plaintiffs in the telecom suits have contributed $1.5 million to Democratic senators and causes. What a coincidence! These people have no principles.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 AM on 02/18/2008
- knowhelpnow See Profile I'm a Fan of knowhelpnow permalink

bb1234
So that is the reason the President wouldn't approve the extension right, we are in such danger and all he wants is the immunity for criminals. That shows us a lot about the man doesn't it, he would fill us with fear and lies just to get immunity. Who made him above the law?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 02/18/2008
- vinny See Profile I'm a Fan of vinny permalink

just like a little whiney bitch republican to blame somebody else for a crime the bush admin and the telecoms committed. what they did was wrong, against the law, and they should pay.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 02/18/2008
- Billar See Profile I'm a Fan of Billar permalink

No way bb1234 your troll response just won't fly. The reason the Democrats will not give telecoms companies immunity is simple-the violated our constitutional rights. Also other telecom companies refused the Bushshit administrations unconstitutional requests.
You Repigs always try to blame things on trial lawyers. Your the party of borrow and spend and tax cuts for the rich.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 PM on 02/18/2008
- jaschrod See Profile I'm a Fan of jaschrod permalink

Republican response, fear, fear , fear.

Reminds me of what Herman Goering said during the Nuremberg trials.

"The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:01 AM on 02/18/2008
- loki See Profile I'm a Fan of loki permalink

The only thing the law expiring does is prevent the NSA CIA the President, and others involved in this, from speaking publicly about it. Things are just as they were before the law was invented. Nothing has changed. They are still spying, still inventing fear for profit and power. They just can brag about it now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 PM on 02/17/2008
- SirReal1 See Profile I'm a Fan of SirReal1 permalink

Lemme see if I've got this right; The guy who TRASHED OUR ECONOMY, LIED US INTO A WAR OF AGGRESSION, HAS FAILED TO ORDER THAT THE V.A. PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES TO THE WOUNDED, HAS FAILED TO ORDER THE SECDEF TO INSURE THAT BASIC PROTECTION BE PROVIDED TO THE SOLDIERS EXECUTING HIS WAR, ALLOWED 9/11, INCREASED THE NATIONAL DEBT BY ANOTHER $4 Trillion, devastated our Education System, Sold out the Average American for Corporate Profits, Put the ENTIRE WORLD in peril with his Climate Policy and Depleted Uranium Proliferation, Ordered Subordinates to IGNORE CONGRESSIONAL SUBPOENAS, and shipped 100's of thousands of jobs overseas...

Is calling Congress "IRRESPONSIBLE"???

I must be having one of those "unpredictable" flashbacks they warned us about back in the 60's!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 PM on 02/17/2008
- RedRooster See Profile I'm a Fan of RedRooster permalink


The Bush Misadministration is as much interested in the FISA extension for politics as for national security purposes.

From the article: "White House officials seethed over the fact that the House, rather than passing the eavesdropping bill, approved contempt citations against two Bush confidants, chief of staff Joshua Bolten and former counsel Harriet Miers, over their refusal to cooperate with an investigation into the firings of U.S. attorneys."

George W Bush has NO interest in protecting and defending the Constitution and the rule of law, instead he is only interested in mythologizing the falsehood that he was "stong on terror". He wasn't. After all 9/11 happened on HIS watch, now didn't it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 02/17/2008
- vinny See Profile I'm a Fan of vinny permalink

let's be sure to tap all of Bush's phone conversations as he tries to settle back down into civilian life.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 02/17/2008
- dwillisno1 See Profile I'm a Fan of dwillisno1 permalink

Any terrorist still dumb enough to be communicating by any of the methods being monitored by the warrantless eavesdropping is too dumb to pull off any attack they would plan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 02/17/2008
- MPCarr See Profile I'm a Fan of MPCarr permalink

Now America is less safe than we were yesterday.

Thanks Democrats!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 02/17/2008
- SirReal1 See Profile I'm a Fan of SirReal1 permalink

Ummmmmm...How exactly are we "less safe"?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 PM on 02/17/2008
- scrzbill See Profile I'm a Fan of scrzbill permalink

You have your head so far up Ann Coulters ass it makes her look like she is a man with your adams apple sticking out. Supporting the rights of a business over the rights of its citizens is called fascism. So you are saying thank you to the democrats for not supporting fascism. Your welcome.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:22 PM on 02/17/2008
- transendentilist See Profile I'm a Fan of transendentilist permalink

It's your fearless leader that's blocking this, not the dems. Bush just wants to save his sorry ass from prosecution.
These telecom companies shut down the program, because the government hadn't paid them. How is that good national security.
Stop being afraid and stand up like a man to oppose these criminals in the white house. America is the Land of the Free, and Home of the Brave, not the Land of Oppression and Home of the Cowardly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 PM on 02/17/2008
- Libsrule See Profile I'm a Fan of Libsrule permalink

And whose fault is it?

Why democrats? IF Shrub was so interested in keeping America safe, then why did he side with the terrorists and telecom companies instead of America?

Why didn't Chimpy McFlightsuit just say, "America's safety is more important than giving the lawbreaking telecom companies immunity from their crimes(and Bush's) so let's take out that part of the bill and get on with the business of keeping America safe"

So tell us oh unwise one, why did Bush INSIST that he would only sign a bill giving the telecom companies immunity from their crimes but could care less about AMERICA?

Seems to me that, as usual, you've got your head where you think it smells like roses.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 PM on 02/17/2008
- The Hedonistic Pleasureseeker See Profile I'm a Fan of The Hedonistic Pleasureseeker permalink

Maybe he was joking?

Safe from WHAT? The Bush/Clinton Crime Families are who we should be afraid of.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 02/17/2008
- Thucydides Jr. See Profile I'm a Fan of Thucydides Jr. permalink

We didn't need this act when it was passed in Aug. 07, and we don't need it now. FISA as it stands allows for all the surveillance we need, and has been amended and expanded so many times it looks like a patchwork quilt now.

Good riddance to bad rubbish. We don't need the protect america act, and we don't need to give telecomms a get out of jail free card.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:45 PM on 02/17/2008
- BrickSykes See Profile I'm a Fan of BrickSykes permalink


Don't any of you think that if the "Democratic Senate" had not passed the "new" FISA with the immunity it wouldn't have given false hope to GB43 and his boot licking sycophants in Congress? Don't you think that if the Repugs hadn't believed that the Dems would "cave" again they wouldn't have let them stall right up until the expiry? Can't you see how the Democrats "threw the GOP a BONE" just to get their confidence built up, and then "BAM!" NO More immunity and Miers and Bolten in the Contempt Dog House?

No, I guess the " Spineless Dems" are not bright enough to think of something so underhanded, but LEGAL?

No, I guess you don't...

Brick

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 02/17/2008
- freespeach See Profile I'm a Fan of freespeach permalink

If Congress would have done their jobs, Bush would be impeached by now....powerless.

But instead he has used neocon traitors in the Democratic party to get the Senate to pass the immunity FISA bill.

Now the bloody fascist criminal has turned his sights on Congress, and he will use every trick in the book to get them to screw the American people with FISA.

Every President in the last 100 years has had to deal with Congress and the Senate to advance his agenda.

Using carrots and sticks, friendship and favors, threats and revenge, respect and rewards.

Whether used for good or evil, the President needs this skill to do his job.

So should Obama turn this FISA mess into a campaign issue?

Should Obama use this perfect opportunity to show us how he can lead, and use his speeches to influence Congress?

Should Obama get involved to prove to us voters that "hope and change" are more than campaign slogans?

Of course he should get involved and lead. So why isn't he doing it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 02/17/2008
- The Hedonistic Pleasureseeker See Profile I'm a Fan of The Hedonistic Pleasureseeker permalink

Because it's not his mission. His Controllers are pretty upset right now. Everything had been falling into place and now . . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 PM on 02/17/2008
- ricchase See Profile I'm a Fan of ricchase permalink

I do worry that ANOTHER false flag operation could be in the works. They had best do a better job of disguising their collusion this time. It may appear they did indeed get away with 9/11, the jury is still out. However any new attacks would most certainly be viewed with all eyes open wider.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 PM on 02/17/2008
- reactionrynihilist See Profile I'm a Fan of reactionrynihilist permalink

If the CIA wants real progress in uncovering terrorist networks, they will (and probably do) have agents inside Caci, Blackwater and all the mercenary companies that are raiding the treasury in their war profiteering. We need a Truman commission to reveal all their treason before they move their operations to Dubai to hide their booty. War profiteers are not patriotic and will sell to whomever pays the most. I have no doubt the mercenaries are arming the terrorists.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 02/17/2008
- The Hedonistic Pleasureseeker See Profile I'm a Fan of The Hedonistic Pleasureseeker permalink

Actually it's already been proven: The Afghan Government (the one the US is supposely trying to help keep order) just busted some M I6 agents who were training new Taliban insurgents.

It's always been the CIA/Mossad/M I6 Master Plan: Arm both sides and profit from the chaos while providing a justification for more funding and a more entrenched presence in the region.

It's been working since the late 1700's at least, so why stop now . . . ?

Now you know why there is no peace in the Middle East.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 PM on 02/17/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in