bush fisa, Bush Intelligence, Bush intelligence law, Bush Protect America Act, Bush spy law, Dems FISA, Dems Protect America Act, Dems spy law, George W. Bush, Nancy Pelosi, Protect America Act, Silvestre Reyes
bush fisa, Bush Intelligence, Bush intelligence law, Bush Protect America Act, Bush spy law, Dems FISA, Dems Protect America Act, Dems spy law, George W. Bush, Nancy Pelosi, Protect America Act, Silvestre Reyes

Bush Calls Lawmakers 'Irresponsible'

TERENCE HUNT | February 16, 2008 03:55 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

WASHINGTON — President Bush said Saturday that lawmakers' failure to renew an eavesdropping law will make it more difficult to track terrorists and "we may lose a vital lead that could prevent an attack on America."

Democrats faulted the president, who taped his weekly radio address before he left on a trip in Africa, for "whipping up false fears and creating artificial confrontation."

"Their true concern here is not national security," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said in a statement. "Rather they want to protect the financial interests of telecommunications companies and avoid judicial scrutiny of their warrantless wiretapping program."

At issue is a law that made it easier for the government to spy on foreign phone calls and e-mails that pass through the United States. The expiration time: midnight Saturday.

The president wanted the House to approve a Senate bill that would have renewed the law. Bush opposed a temporary extension; lawmakers left for a 12-day recess without extending the law. The Senate measure included legal protections for telecommunications companies that helped the government wiretap U.S. computer and phone lines after the Sept. 11 attacks without clearance from a secret court that oversees such activities.

"Some congressional leaders claim that this will not affect our security," the president said. "They are wrong. Because Congress failed to act, it will be harder for our government to keep you safe from terrorist attack.

"At midnight, the attorney general and the director of national intelligence will be stripped of their power to authorize new surveillance against terrorist threats abroad. This means that as terrorists change their tactics to avoid our surveillance, we may not have the tools we need to continue tracking them _ and we may lose a vital lead that could prevent an attack on America," Bush said.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a former U.S. attorney and attorney general of Rhode Island, spoke for Democrats in the party's radio response.

"We know this president dislikes compromise, but this time he has taken his stubborn approach too far," Whitehouse said. "He is whipping up false fears, and creating artificial confrontation. As the president himself said in the Rose Garden, 'There is really no excuse for letting this critical legislation expire. So let's get it done.'

"But the president instead chose political gamesmanship, rejecting a short extension of the Protect America Act that would allow Congress to complete its work," Whitehouse said. "Make no mistake: If the surveillance law expires, if any intelligence loss results, it is President Bush's choice. Period."

Bush's national security adviser, Stephen Hadley, told reporters traveling with the president in Africa there was little the government could do to compensate for what it considered to be lesser protections against terrorist attacks.

"We're making all the time every effort we can on intelligence, and when one of your important tools is taken away from you for a period of time, it's hard to compensate for it," he said. "That's why we call it a 'gap in intelligence.' Gaps are hard to fill."

Added Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.: "At midnight, the country will be more at risk than it is today. And that risk will increase each day we don't have a solution to this problem."

White House officials seethed over the fact that the House, rather than passing the eavesdropping bill, approved contempt citations against two Bush confidants, chief of staff Joshua Bolten and former counsel Harriet Miers, over their refusal to cooperate with an investigation into the firings of U.S. attorneys.

"House leaders chose politics over protecting the country _ and our country is at greater risk as a result," Bush said.

"My administration will take every step within our power to minimize the damage caused by the House's irresponsible behavior," he said. "Yet it is still urgent that Congress act."

Reid and Pelosi responded that Democrats "will continue to work on a bipartisan basis to finalize a strong law."

"As we do, there should be no question in anyone's mind that U.S. intelligence agencies have the legal ability to take all actions necessary to protect the security of the American people," they said.

Comments for this post are now closed


 
Comments
200
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
- jbunyon I'm a Fan of jbunyon 4 fans permalink
photo

It is time for me to say Kiss off Bush publicly. I have never been afraid of terrorists. Not even when you let them into this country the first time to attack us. Even when you had a memo that said Bin Ladin expected to attack. Your fear mongering only works on Fox noise viewers and old people. You are affraid if we come out of our fear coma you have tried to keep us in we will ask questions. Believe me when I say I am more afraid of what Bush will do than any stupid terrorist, because you yourself are a terrorist. Go pout to daddy and see if you can't arrange another attack on american soil with the Bin Ladins to prove your false point and go to war with Iran. Stand up people "WE WILL NOT BE AFRAID"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 02/17/2008
- Ozarks I'm a Fan of Ozarks 43 fans permalink
photo

The present office holder is worried that his illegal wiretaps will result in successful lawsuits against telecoms.
Successful lawsuits will cause the telecoms to lose millions of dollars. The telecoms will try then to reclaim these lost revenues before the State Public Service Commissions.
As a result, the telecoms will attempt to call as witnesses the present office holder and his Darth VAder. I imagine the Present office holder and his Darth Vader will try to ignore the telecoms' cries for help. But guess who will be subpoeaed into these multiple ongoing administrative hearings for years? Yep, the present office holder and Darth.
Their legal fees will be enormous as they will have to testify, on behalf of the Telecoms,or god forbid as hostile witness, for the foreseeable future and try to defend their illegal actions. They will be the poster child picture on many newspapers for years.
I hope they both end up penniless from legal expenses.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 AM on 02/17/2008
- lungfish I'm a Fan of lungfish 106 fans permalink
photo

I think he is also afraid that he will be confronted on the wiretaps because they began shortly after he took office and long BEFORE 911...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 PM on 02/17/2008
- mojaveblue I'm a Fan of mojaveblue 5 fans permalink
photo

Pres.Bush has repeatedly said that his job is to protect the American people.
Why then isn't he doing that? Why put telecom pocketbooks ahead of our safety.

Fear monger!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 02/17/2008
- Birdman I'm a Fan of Birdman 34 fans permalink

I do not think Bush is concerend about the telocom pocketbooks. I think he is more afraid of any legal action against the telcoms where he will be forced to testify about what he did, when he did it, and how. He will have to testify that he wireteapped US citizens from day one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 02/17/2008
photo

President Bush said Saturday that lawmakers' failure to renew an eavesdropping law will make it more difficult to track terrorists and "we may lose a vital lead that could prevent an attack on America."

Is mr. bush trying to tell us that another attack is imminant? Does he already know when? Does he already know How? Sure sounds like it.

Got Rope?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 02/17/2008

President George W. Bush Press Conference March 15, 2008 :

"Because the Congress sees fit to make my job tougher I'm directing all of the agencies to continue warrantless wiretapping because the Security of the American People is more important than the niceties of the constitution. To implement this policy I am going to sign 500 blank pardons. These will be distributed to all the agents and telecom companies who ask for them. If 500 isn't enough I'll sign more. The Security of the Homeland must not be imperiled by those who would put the constitution before Survival."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 AM on 02/17/2008

The Democratic-led House of Representatives is right, the Democratic-led Senate and Bush are wrong. Bush could have had either an extension of the current despicable law or a compromise that protects both national security and, to a degree, civil liberties. He chose a political response to browbeat a Congress that has regularly given in to his madness. He succeeded in browbeating the Senate, once again getting Dems to collaborate on his assault on the Constitution. This time the House did not collaborate.

Now it's time for Pelosi to do the same thing on the Iraq funding and war the House Dems did on this and to put impeachment and removal back on the table and start moving it. There still is time for Congress to perform it's Constituitional duty and impeach and remove Bush and Cheney for their treason and high crimes and misdemeanors, as there already is overwhelming public evidence of their guilt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 AM on 02/17/2008
- BrickSykes I'm a Fan of BrickSykes 40 fans permalink

Well, I don't think we'll have another "Pearl Harbor" event just because we let this bill die. I could be wrong, of course, but I don't think any interested party has enough time to plan and execute any kind of significant attack solely based on expiration. At least not one that could be blamed with certainty on the "Democrat's failure."

There is NO question that GB43 is blowing some brand of Smoke or other. We've all watched him these 7+ years and we know when he's doing it. We know too, of course, that whoever writes his speeches is blowing smoke, don't we? Now we all get to watch while our country, according to him, is more vulnerable than ever, and about which HE, The Decider, can do Nothing. This event will stand out in History as a critical period of time that The President of the United States of America FAILED to protect the Security of American Citizens, won't it?

We all know that Congressional Democrats will be catching Hell from the MSM, Talk Radio, the RNC, and, the White House, but, SO WHAT? What else is New? The White House and Congressional Republicans have NO ONE TO BLAME BUT THEMSELVES!

So, let's see. The TELECOMS have NO Immunity under the ludicrous 'Protect America Act' and Josh Bolten and Harriet Miers are going to be picked up for Contempt of Congress, is that about right?

Not a Bad Week's Work, Democrats! Providence is indeed smiling down upon you! And, THANK YOU!!

Brick

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 AM on 02/17/2008
photo

One of the major points of discovery that may come out from the trials
that could convene, is that the illegal spying started BEFORE 9-11!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 AM on 02/17/2008

Not only that, but they actually have better (and just as illegal) methods of spying domestically that they've used from the very beginning of the USA/UK/AUS/NZ agreements.

As to the "imminent danger" of the law's expiration, that's 100% spin from the White House. The bill expires, but its provisions only end in April or May, plenty of time to get it fixed properly, or let him veto it. His choice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 02/17/2008

There are two terrorists living in Washington DC and their names are Bush and Cheney.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 02/17/2008
- lisakaz I'm a Fan of lisakaz 27 fans permalink

Bush to Congress: Waaaaaa! I'm gonna throw a tantrum because I didn't get my way!

High time to stop falling for this crap, esp. if a year of grace is involved. Gee, that takes us to January 2009 and the opportunity for a NEW PRESIDENT to reinact said legislation. That is what Bu$h fears!!!! He fears having his house of cards fall down because ppl will see what a scum bucket he really is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 02/17/2008
- incontempt I'm a Fan of incontempt 2 fans permalink

The republicans are just digging themselves further onto the Bowels of history, where they will notably and historically be remembered as the especially stinky turds passed shortly into the new mellenia.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 AM on 02/17/2008
photo

I can see the chapter title now: "The Turds that Wouldn't Flush."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 02/17/2008
- incontempt I'm a Fan of incontempt 2 fans permalink

This is why they fight...to stay out of JAIL


"Their true concern here is not national security," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said in a statement. "Rather they want to protect the financial interests of telecommunications companies and avoid judicial scrutiny of their warrantless wiretapping program."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 02/17/2008
- incontempt I'm a Fan of incontempt 2 fans permalink

It is just the guise of national security
with a wave of the georgies little unworked hand, but this one is trasparent with the facts standing BOLDLY outlined.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 AM on 02/17/2008
- ashabot I'm a Fan of ashabot 9 fans permalink

Throw Bush, Cheney and the rest of the neocon scum into jail and our Democracy immediately becomes safer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 AM on 02/17/2008
photo

Law or no law, Bush is going to do what he pleases anyway. The only hope this holds out is that it might scare some of his collaborators off.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 AM on 02/17/2008
- lldem I'm a Fan of lldem 2 fans permalink

Has anyone else noticed that the "threat of terrorist attacks" seem to go up when republicans want to get elected. I think the terrorists are actualy working for the GOP, otherwise how could they time their threats so well? It's actually kind of sad how the republicans have gone through all their issues. First it was the "Balance the Budget Amdendment", next was the "Protect the Flag Amendment", then came "Preserve the Integrity of Marriage Amendment". Isn't it time this country had real leadership that isn't based on Bu(ll)sh(it)?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 AM on 02/17/2008
- lisakaz I'm a Fan of lisakaz 27 fans permalink

Either collaborators or boogeymen. The latter if you believe Bhutto saying bin Laden was dead, of course.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 02/17/2008
- Lemeritus I'm a Fan of Lemeritus 108 fans permalink
photo

"I think the terrorists are actualy working for the GOP."

I think the terrorists actually ARE the GOP. Bush didn't get his way; I wonder where he's going to strike next.*

I watched on C-SPAN as Republicans rose on the floor of the House of Representatives and cried to the Capital dome at how they were leaving America unprotected. The only things unprotected are the telecomms and Bush's backside. Even if the "illegal" wiretaps expired at midnight last night (which they didn't), the FISA court is STILL ready and almost always WILLING to provide warrants in cases of -- how quaint -- probably cause. To see these (R)s bray and blame was enough to make you doubt honor and truth.

* This is a disclaimer lest anyone of a conspiratorial bent think I blame Bush for 9/11: while I don't believe Bush caused 9/11, I also don't believe he did very much to prevent it. And, in a larger sense, while the terrorists brought down planes and buildings, Bush has dragged our flag through the mud of corruption, causing decades more damage than the terrorists could dream to do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 AM on 02/17/2008

The FISA bill has plenty of "tools" to allow the government to spy on suspects. It even allows *retroactive* warrants!

So there is no excuse for saying that somehow the new bill was in anyway necessary. Just more fear-mongering by Bush, playing the "terror card" again.

The ONLY thing at issue in the proposed amended bill was the immunity of the telecom corporations.

As Senator Kennedy pointed out back in December: “The president has said that American lives will be sacrificed if Congress does not change FISA....Bu­t he has also said that he will veto any FISA bill that does not grant retroactive immunity.

“No immunity, no FISA bill. So if we take the president at his word, he’s willing to let Americans die to protect the phone companies.­”

I'm furious with Feinstein and the other cross-over Democrats in the Senate who voted to allow immunity. (Of course it's only outside of California that people view Feinstein as a "liberal" -- most of her constituents recognize her as a corporate suck-up)

But I'm very relieved that the proposed bill expired and left the original law in place. It's bad enough to shred the Constitution in the name of vague, hypothetical threats of "terrorism­." It's disgusting to do so in the name of protecting corporations from lawsuits.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 02/17/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect