bush fisa, Bush Intelligence, Bush intelligence law, Bush Protect America Act, Bush spy law, Dems FISA, Dems Protect America Act, Dems spy law, George W. Bush, Nancy Pelosi, Protect America Act, Silvestre Reyes
bush fisa, Bush Intelligence, Bush intelligence law, Bush Protect America Act, Bush spy law, Dems FISA, Dems Protect America Act, Dems spy law, George W. Bush, Nancy Pelosi, Protect America Act, Silvestre Reyes

Bush Calls Lawmakers 'Irresponsible'

TERENCE HUNT | February 16, 2008 03:55 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

WASHINGTON — President Bush said Saturday that lawmakers' failure to renew an eavesdropping law will make it more difficult to track terrorists and "we may lose a vital lead that could prevent an attack on America."

Democrats faulted the president, who taped his weekly radio address before he left on a trip in Africa, for "whipping up false fears and creating artificial confrontation."

"Their true concern here is not national security," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said in a statement. "Rather they want to protect the financial interests of telecommunications companies and avoid judicial scrutiny of their warrantless wiretapping program."

At issue is a law that made it easier for the government to spy on foreign phone calls and e-mails that pass through the United States. The expiration time: midnight Saturday.

The president wanted the House to approve a Senate bill that would have renewed the law. Bush opposed a temporary extension; lawmakers left for a 12-day recess without extending the law. The Senate measure included legal protections for telecommunications companies that helped the government wiretap U.S. computer and phone lines after the Sept. 11 attacks without clearance from a secret court that oversees such activities.

"Some congressional leaders claim that this will not affect our security," the president said. "They are wrong. Because Congress failed to act, it will be harder for our government to keep you safe from terrorist attack.

"At midnight, the attorney general and the director of national intelligence will be stripped of their power to authorize new surveillance against terrorist threats abroad. This means that as terrorists change their tactics to avoid our surveillance, we may not have the tools we need to continue tracking them _ and we may lose a vital lead that could prevent an attack on America," Bush said.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a former U.S. attorney and attorney general of Rhode Island, spoke for Democrats in the party's radio response.

"We know this president dislikes compromise, but this time he has taken his stubborn approach too far," Whitehouse said. "He is whipping up false fears, and creating artificial confrontation. As the president himself said in the Rose Garden, 'There is really no excuse for letting this critical legislation expire. So let's get it done.'

"But the president instead chose political gamesmanship, rejecting a short extension of the Protect America Act that would allow Congress to complete its work," Whitehouse said. "Make no mistake: If the surveillance law expires, if any intelligence loss results, it is President Bush's choice. Period."

Bush's national security adviser, Stephen Hadley, told reporters traveling with the president in Africa there was little the government could do to compensate for what it considered to be lesser protections against terrorist attacks.

"We're making all the time every effort we can on intelligence, and when one of your important tools is taken away from you for a period of time, it's hard to compensate for it," he said. "That's why we call it a 'gap in intelligence.' Gaps are hard to fill."

Added Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.: "At midnight, the country will be more at risk than it is today. And that risk will increase each day we don't have a solution to this problem."

White House officials seethed over the fact that the House, rather than passing the eavesdropping bill, approved contempt citations against two Bush confidants, chief of staff Joshua Bolten and former counsel Harriet Miers, over their refusal to cooperate with an investigation into the firings of U.S. attorneys.

"House leaders chose politics over protecting the country _ and our country is at greater risk as a result," Bush said.

"My administration will take every step within our power to minimize the damage caused by the House's irresponsible behavior," he said. "Yet it is still urgent that Congress act."

Reid and Pelosi responded that Democrats "will continue to work on a bipartisan basis to finalize a strong law."

"As we do, there should be no question in anyone's mind that U.S. intelligence agencies have the legal ability to take all actions necessary to protect the security of the American people," they said.

Comments for this post are now closed


 
Comments
200
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
photo

Bush is full of crap. He just wants these corporations to continue to participate in illegal wiretaping.

Where were the guts these CEO's should have shown when asked to participate in an illegal activity?

These CEO's would gladly help eliminate civil liberties, as long as they could still do business.

This is just one more example where substituting Corporate America's judgement for the moral and ethical judgement of the American people is a bad idea.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 AM on 02/17/2008
- lisakaz I'm a Fan of lisakaz 27 fans permalink

Or full of fascism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 02/17/2008
- angelbravo I'm a Fan of angelbravo 3 fans permalink

Laws to protect acts of crime. Is this a first?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 AM on 02/17/2008
- lldem I'm a Fan of lldem 2 fans permalink

What's the big deal. Bush and his band of criminals don't need legal authorization to tap our phones. They'll just do what they want anyway. Bush was flat out lying when he took the oath of office. "Preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" my ass.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:03 AM on 02/17/2008

lldem . It did not stop them before the law was passed so why should it stop them now.? Well said. 1776

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:09 PM on 02/17/2008
- Not Blind I'm a Fan of Not Blind 22 fans permalink
photo

Bush blinked a bit. He went to Africa as planned, despite his threat were his version of FISA not passed. He's been calling Congress irresponsible every time he didn't get exactly what he wanted, when he wanted it, because debate, inquiry, and doing things right aren't what his administration is about.
He & Cheney, Rice (then head of the NSA) began secretly wiretapping immediately after they took office, NOT as a response to 9/11. With unfettered wiretapping, email and internet prowling, memos from FBI field offices and warnings from our own and several foreign intelligence agencies abroad, no extra security measures were taken, and the military was dumb-founded as they watched the towers crumble, Pentagon crashed and UA#93 go down. There was no plan, since this administration wanted their cataclismic event to happen here, so they could circumvent and shred our Constitution, set up a dictatorship, justify pillaging our national treasury as a give-away to the military-industrial corporations in which the administration has direct financial interests, and appease the AIPAC and Israel by doing their dirty work for them.
Halliburton did not provide adequate armor or safe vehicles for our troops, but did rape a female employee in Iraq. They charge cost + so even the unfiltered water for troops is double-billed. Blackwater was Paul Bremmer's pet, and while they protected him, somehow $18 billion (all cash) disappeared under their collective watch, and then BW thugs (paid 10 times what our soldiers get) murdered 17 civilians, and were granted immunity.
We saw a couple of low-level service personnel tried, convicted and imprisoned for torture at Abu Graib, while Rumsfeld, A.G. Gonzalez and military officers gave the orders and were rewarded and praised.
Hopefully, Congressional Democrats will now begin to hold Bush, Cheney, Rice and others accountable for their incompetence, corruption and crimes against our Constitution, which they each swore to preserve and protect.
Maybe this is one instance when our representatives won't bend over and let the administration sodomize them and our nation any more.
Wishful thinking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 AM on 02/17/2008
- ashabot I'm a Fan of ashabot 10 fans permalink

"$18 billion (all cash) disappeared under their collective watch"

18 BILLION. And how many millions of lives lost or permanently disrupted? Plus, under Bush, America has plunged into a recession. But not him. No. He's richer than ever. And his friends.

How long are we going to smile and nod like a field of buttercups?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 AM on 02/17/2008

Is anyone going to ask the administration why getting a warrant within 72 hours AFTER eavesdropping is inadequate? Especially since they have only been denied one time. Where's the media's questioning that matters. I have not even seen this type of question during a White House press briefing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 AM on 02/17/2008
- lisakaz I'm a Fan of lisakaz 27 fans permalink

Because they can't read fast enough to fill out the paperwork, I guess.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 AM on 02/17/2008
- Birdman I'm a Fan of Birdman 35 fans permalink

You won't see this question or any others of substance, reason is that Bush has threatened each and every news service to not ask such questions or they will no longer be allowed in the press room. Some get away with asking some questions of controversial nature like Helen Thomas but then gets the old, well she is kind of old, and we like her anyway, and then gets moved from the front row as a warning to others. I think she got her front row seat back but does not ask many questions anymore. That is what it boils down too, be nice have access, piss us off and you are gone. The media should all get a backbone and tell the adminstration enough is enough. Imagine if all the reporters refused to spread Bush's propaganda where would he be. Damn though there is that stinking Faux news.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 AM on 02/17/2008
- bushmocker I'm a Fan of bushmocker 7 fans permalink

Our Commander in Chief has stated that we are in more danger now because Congress didn't pass this bill.Would­n't a true patriot do what was necessary to protect us?Wouldn't he remove the the one part of the legislation that has nothing to do with keeping America safe?So our President is going to allow a possible attack on America...­.isn't that one of the definitions of treason?Isn't that breaking the oath he took when he was inaugurate­d,swearing to protect and defend America and the Constitution? He must have had his fingers crossed when he took the oath.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:22 AM on 02/17/2008
- truthyguy I'm a Fan of truthyguy 42 fans permalink

Bottom line:

Bush weighed the safety of America against protecting a few large businesses and, as no one is really surprised, the American people lost out again due to the petulant man/child president.

Remind me again - Bush has not been impeached why? Oh, yes, due to Pelosi the Incompetent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:28 AM on 02/17/2008
- Janus I'm a Fan of Janus 19 fans permalink

"He must have had his fingers crossed when he took the oath."

I doubt it. He is our strutting Commander-in-Chief, who believes that he can do whatever he desires to keep us all safe and free.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 AM on 02/17/2008
- sparkey I'm a Fan of sparkey 10 fans permalink
photo

When will the class action suit against ATT start? I predict that it will be right after the ATT board of directors sell every bit of their stock and transfer their holdings to relatives in Florida. The relatives will then file bankruptcy and keep everything. Not to worry about the CEO of ATT. Bush will pardon him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:09 AM on 02/17/2008
photo

It's all a big ploy to vindicate Nixon's wire-tapping. You can't change what he did, but you can make what he did legal. Then, Cheney will finally have done right by his ol' boss and mentor.
It takes a dick to know a dick.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 AM on 02/17/2008
photo

The 30 percent goppers are very gullible into believing your BS, Chimpy McLair, but the rest of us 70 percenters are unto you and your fear mongering rhetoric.

As you said, "fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — we can't get fooled again."

You're a fucking fool, chimpy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 AM on 02/17/2008
photo

Yeah, well if I was affiliated with the overseas hyphenated­-americans hackers consortium, I'd be mad, too...ther­e goes my free R&D....Ein­stein, eat your heart out...LOL
(hey, that looks a lot like MY design...h­ow'd THAT happen? Hmmm)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 AM on 02/17/2008
photo

Yeah, well I think he and his administra­tionererer are a bunch of @#@#$@#, but they don't have to spy on me to find that out, they can navigate to this website like everybody else, no turbo-stealthonium required.
Gross incompetence barely begins to cover it.
And, as far as Dick Cheney goes, well..
www.wexlerwantshearings.com
also:
www.ronpaul2008.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 AM on 02/17/2008
- imsosure I'm a Fan of imsosure 29 fans permalink
photo

Here's a little movie with some of the irresponsible policies and practices Bush and his fun loving assholes have installed.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 AM on 02/17/2008
- bbbbmer I'm a Fan of bbbbmer 30 fans permalink
photo

Bush's empty threats are based merely on the lack of telecom immunity and overreaching authority into the private communications of american citizens -- hopefully the congress will weigh in on the side of the constitution and protect us from this most corrupt regime in our nation's history...­. just 11 months to go, god save us....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 AM on 02/17/2008
photo

I saw Claire McCaskill on Bill Maher's show Friday and Bill asked her why she voted to give telecoms immunity. I was shocked that her answer seemed to be so reasonable. In essence, she said she didn't feel we should punish companies that were forced/coerced to play ball with the Bush administration and their illegal wiretapping activities.

Bush seems downright desperate to get this passed. I wonder if it's because he's afraid that the telecoms' defense would include disclosure of the strong-arm tactics Bush used to pressure them. I mean, this thing already stinks to high heaven, but isn't it just plausible that Bush might have resorted to illegal extortion to get what he wanted?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 AM on 02/17/2008
- tgood I'm a Fan of tgood 8 fans permalink

I think it's more than likely the telecommunications people played along with Bush to get something for themselves--like easing of the rules for monopolies, the implementation of even more sur-charges without explaining them to customers, etc.

Naw, those companies are manned by the "big boys" and don't get bullied easily. They did it with strings attached. There's no doubt in my mind about that at all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 AM on 02/17/2008
- lisakaz I'm a Fan of lisakaz 27 fans permalink

And that's why her answer makes no sense. If phone companies do that, they'll likely get something of a pass and Bu$h's crimes will be exposed. McCaskill has dodged the importance of letting the issue play out in court.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 AM on 02/17/2008
- Birdman I'm a Fan of Birdman 35 fans permalink

I read of one threat that was made to AT&T they were told that they would loose all their government contracts if they did not play ball. I'm sure there were other simialr threats of investigations, tax, and sec audits etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 AM on 02/17/2008

Actually they got more than threats. They also got the object lesson of seeing Qwest - which told Bush where to shove his Big Brother act - ravaged by cancellation of government contracts and its CEO JAILED for "insider trading" (a charge resulting directly FROM the cancelllation of said contracts).

McCaskill has a point - up to a point. But I think that point was passed a long time ago.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 AM on 02/17/2008
photo

You'll get no sympathy from me for ATT.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 AM on 02/17/2008

Terrorists are not idiots. Those who want to get us,know how to get around the wire taps. That is a fact. Therefor, the wire tap really is ineffective. Bush knows this as well. This isn't about fighting terrorism, catching terrorists. Its about money, lots of it. If bush really wanted to go after terrorists, he would be using the latest technology the terrorists are already using. Sorry Bush, this time, you don't get your way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 AM on 02/17/2008
- robotfog I'm a Fan of robotfog 23 fans permalink
photo

I wish someone would wiretap Bush - to a car battery.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 AM on 02/17/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect