CIA interrogations, enhanced interrogations, gitmo, Gitmo detainees, guantanamo, Guantanamo Detainees, Guantanamo interrogations, guantanamo torture, torture
CIA interrogations, enhanced interrogations, gitmo, Gitmo detainees, guantanamo, Guantanamo Detainees, Guantanamo interrogations, guantanamo torture, torture

Gitmo Interrogator Describes Tactics

ANDREW O. SELSKY | February 16, 2008 03:51 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba — Interrogators got intelligence from detainees that helped U.S. troops in Afghanistan attack Taliban fighters last summer _ and they did it through casual questioning and not torture, the military's chief interrogator here said.

In a rare interview with The Associated Press, veteran interrogator Paul Rester complained that his profession has gotten a bad reputation due to accounts of waterboarding and other rough interrogation tactics used by the CIA at "black sites."

Lawyers for Guantanamo detainees, however, allege their clients have been subjected to temperature extremes, sleep deprivation and threats at this U.S. military base in southeast Cuba.

Wearing a blue-striped business shirt without a tie and looking more like a harried executive than a top interrogator, Rester groused that his line of work is "a business that is fundamentally thankless."

He sat hunched over a table in a snack room inside the building where the top commanders keep their offices. In an attempt to keep personnel from blabbing about intelligence-gathering, a poster showed a picture of a hooded gunman and the words: "Keep talking. We're listening" _ today's version of the World War II-era admonishment that "Loose lips sink ships."

"Everybody in the world believes that they know how we do what we do, and I have to endure it every time I turn around and somebody is making reference to waterboarding," Rester said. He insisted that Guantanamo interrogators have had many successes using rapport-building and said that technique was the norm here.

For security reasons, he would only discuss one of the successes, and that was only because his boss, Rear Adm. Mark Buzby, already had described it in a speech last month. Buzby said several detainees, using poster board paper and crayons, drew detailed maps of the Tora Bora area in eastern Afghanistan that enabled coalition forces to wipe out safe houses, trenches and supplies last summer as Taliban forces were returning to the stronghold they had abandoned more than five years ago.

Buzby, in a separate interview with the AP, said a U.S. commander in Afghanistan had requested the information on a Friday and it was obtained and sent to Afghanistan by the end of the weekend.

Rester indicated the interrogators casually asked the detainees about their knowledge of Tora Bora, not letting on that it was tactically important for a pending military strike.

"And it may in fact, since it was five years old, have seemed totally innocuous to the persons we were talking to," Rester said.

Buzby, the top commander of detention operations at Guantanamo, said the intelligence "had a very positive effect ... for us and a very negative effect on the enemy operating in that area." He declined to be more specific.

In the interview, Rester said only two detainees were given rougher treatment in Guantanamo, and that was during the earlier days: Mohammed al-Qahtani, the alleged 20th hijacker who was turned away from the United States by immigration officials just before the Sept. 11 attacks, and an unidentified man Rester said recruited lead hijacker Mohamed Atta.

"Most of the stories (of detainee abuse) that have propagated all stem from those two," said Rester, who began his career in the Vietnam War. "The constant attention on that takes away from the fact that the productive, consistent direct approach ... has enabled us to possess the vast body of knowledge that we actually have."

Al-Qahtani told a military panel at Guantanamo that he was beaten, restrained for long periods in uncomfortable positions, threatened with dogs, exposed to loud music and freezing temperatures and stripped nude in front of female personnel at Guantanamo. He said he admitted meeting Osama bin Laden and agreeing to participate in a "martyr mission" for al-Qaida only because he was tortured, and told the panel that he was innocent.

A 2005 military investigation concluded that al-Qahtani had been subjected to harsh treatment approved by then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld because he would not crack under interrogation. He is one of six Guantanamo detainees who were charged Monday in connection with the Sept. 11 attacks. The Pentagon said it was seeking the death penalty for all six.

Under the Military Commissions Act, statements obtained through torture are not admissible. But some statements obtained through "coercion" may be admitted at the discretion of a military judge.

Joshua Colangelo-Bryan, a lawyer who represents several detainees, scoffed at Rester's contention that rough treatment at Guantanamo was restricted to just two men.

"There are so many accounts by FBI agents ... and others who personally saw non-rapport-building techniques that Rester's statement is just not credible," he said.

The 2005 military investigation stemmed from FBI agents' allegations that detainees were being mistreated, and determined that interrogators used unauthorized techniques when two detainees were short-shackled to an eyebolt on a floor, when duct tape was used to "quiet" a detainee and when interrogators threatened the family of a detainee.

"It distracts from the efforts of every other individual who has been in contact with (military) intelligence," Rester said. "Nothing is a substitute for really knowing the subject matter, having the knowledge of the language and culture and being able to sit down with someone and speak as grown-ups."

Comments for this post are now closed


 
 

Comments
146
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- research See Profile I'm a Fan of research permalink

It's not torture IF "no permanent physical damage"?

rape, sodomy, shock, drugs, burns, dogs, hoods, ... torture...

... American?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 02/18/2008
- DRaymond See Profile I'm a Fan of DRaymond permalink

Police have long known that the most effective means of gaining USABLE and ACCURATE information were psychological and not physical.

Usefull information comes from cooperation, not compliance. Torture gets you compliance but undermines cooperation. You can torture somebody into signing a statement or speaking a statement. Whether the statement has any truth at all is irrelevant.

We engaged in torture because of a sadistic streak among certain individuals at the highest levels of our government.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 02/17/2008
- OliverTwist See Profile I'm a Fan of OliverTwist permalink

It may very well be that the information obtained directly from torture victims while they are being tortured is not generally of good quality. Drugs and the false empathy of interrogators and phoney prisoners would seem to be better tools for obtaining useful information from captives.

It is quite likely, though, that good information is obtained from others who are not captives themselves and are not tortured themselves but who are motivated to give useful information by a desire to avoid torture for their loved ones who are being held in prison - especially when those loved ones are children or women.

Torture is surely a terror weapon. It must be practiced and then publicized as an ongoing practice in order to induce fear in the target population. The Roman practice of crucifixtion is an example of a terror punishment. It was certainly easier to kill people by running a sword though them.

It may very well be a clever pretense that there is any desire to obtain useful information from those who are tortured. The some tortured die only by accident may also be a pretense.

Waterboarding and the other torture techniques being used by the US Government and mercenary agents today are just crucifixtions in disguise.

As long as we allow them to do these things and publicize doing these things they will continue - because they are bound to work in the way they are supposed to work - as terror weapons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 PM on 02/17/2008
- SirReal1 See Profile I'm a Fan of SirReal1 permalink

This seems rational to you? How about the increased potential that our Service Members might be put at risk of being tortured by virtue of OUR TORTURE of our captives.

We are either BETTER THAN THEM, or we are THE SAME. There is no gray area in this debate.

I, for one, choose to be (and this is everyones choice "leonard" and "Oliver" and "Julie")
BETTER!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 02/17/2008
- SirReal1 See Profile I'm a Fan of SirReal1 permalink

Just curious,

Could I see a show of hands of how many of you "Torture Supporters" have actually served in the Military?

Then, could you please explain why you wish to endanger your former comrades, and those who took your place, by advocating for torture? You can claim that those who would engage in it ,would do so whether we did or not, but, NUMEROUS SCIENTIFIC STUDIES have demonstrated that people who are subjected to demonstrations of behavior acceptance by one group are MORE INCLINED to engage in the behavior themselves.

It would be like YOU seeing your Dad beat your Mother. That would lead to a propensity toward violence in YOU.

Oh, wait a sec....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 02/17/2008
- Seattle34 See Profile I'm a Fan of Seattle34 permalink

Did you read the article? Waterboarding (which is the most extreme thing the US has done) has only been done 3 times, and two of the recipients were very high value targets that did not give up any info using other techniques. And they cracked in minutes. Also note that waterboarding hasn't been used since 2004.

You are being played by the dems. They want you to think this is a big dividing issue. In fact, if the dems wanted to nip this issue in the bud, they could have made waterboarding and any other distastful acts illegal in 2001 when it was first brought to their attention.

But they decided NOT to make it illegal, they fanned the flames and instead have used these 3 incidents to make you think they are different that the republicans. And you bought it hook, line and sinker.

Hate to tell you, they are the same.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 PM on 02/17/2008
- research See Profile I'm a Fan of research permalink

Americans! Why do you so many of you believe that waterboarding and other forms of torture prevented attacks?

Why do you believe BushCo after thousands of lies?

Condi couldn't be bothered to stop 9/11, which gave BushCo all it's power. Why would BushCo even WANT to stop more terror attacks?

If you torture someone into saying that they are terrorist and were planning an attack, YOU HAVE NOT PREVENTED A TERROR ATTACK!

All you got was a FALSE confession!

Police get false confession all the time even without torture.

Folks, you know the CYA liars in BushCo would have no qualms about using torture to inflate their anti-terror "success".

Torture DOES NOT WORK!

Are we so cowardly, that we will give up everything our country and constitution stand for, give up our standing and good will in the world, because we think we NIGHT get some shred of evidence by torture?

In the 24 scenario, where they supposedly torture the bomb deactivation codes from the terrorist, do you really believe that a dedicated terrorist, wouldn't lie? What's wrong with you people who advocate torture?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 PM on 02/18/2008
- SirReal1 See Profile I'm a Fan of SirReal1 permalink

Seattle34,

I haven't seen any report that indicates that those who were "tortured", "cracked in minutes". Citation please?

Also, I haven't seen any "suggestion" that ANY OF THE INFORMATION OBTAINED by "HARSH" interrogation methods, was ACTIONABLE! Any citation on that?

I didn't think so.

Throughout the history of mankind, information obtained through torture has provided little of use. What it has done is to provide a "presumed" value for keeping the torturers employed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 02/17/2008
- leonardchilds See Profile I'm a Fan of leonardchilds permalink

-- are MORE INCLINED to engage in the behavior themselves. -- sirreal1

Your assumption is that our behavior has caused them to torture their captives.

The rat bastard terrorists that we are fighting engaged in sadistic torture of captives before they attacked us...while they attacked us...after they attacked us...your correlation missed the mark completely.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 02/17/2008
- SirReal1 See Profile I'm a Fan of SirReal1 permalink

leonard,

I am quite sure you are correct. THEY did torture before WE attacked them (being that we haven't actually attacked the terrorists that attacked us yet), however, how many of OUR SOLDIERS were tortured prior to OUR USE of TORTURE?

I'm not talking about prior to the "reporting" of torture (abu-gharib), I'm talking about prior to the insurgency KNOWING that Iraqi's were being tortured there.

Your "correlation" is fallacious!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 02/17/2008
- ProudNeoCon See Profile I'm a Fan of ProudNeoCon permalink

What is the point of this article?

Some of the prisoners will crack on their own - great. What do you do with one's who do not?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 02/17/2008
- SirReal1 See Profile I'm a Fan of SirReal1 permalink

Given that we have empirically validated evidence that information obtained by torture is at best "unreliable" I guess we just continue to interrogate them without using TORTURE! Is this too difficult a concept for you to grasp? Or, is it just that you like the idea of inflicting "pain" on others?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 02/17/2008
- leonardchilds See Profile I'm a Fan of leonardchilds permalink

Well then lets get to the meat of the coconut.

Lets assume that we have a captured terrorist who we know to have information that will save the lives of many...including YOUR WIFE or CHILD.

Lets also assume that we have tried interrogation your way with no results. Do you continue to believe in your "empirically validated evidence"...and let your family member die?

Careful now...I don't want to hear any pedantic blather...try waterboarding or let your family member die? It's real simple...what say you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 PM on 02/17/2008
- LITU See Profile I'm a Fan of LITU permalink

To the erudite among us, please explain how the Taliban and tribes in general are able to expand their influence and hold if this outdated intel is of any significance? It would seem that a mobile military force would be just that - mobile.

And perhaps while you're explaining the logistics, you can define a terrorist, since nearly all of the detainees were captured by virtue of bounty and localized expedience?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 PM on 02/17/2008
- rabun666 See Profile I'm a Fan of rabun666 permalink

$trillions spent on defense and intelligence and the best that the US interrogators can do is to use torture tactics which are hundreds,even thousands of years old. I feel like I've been ripped off by the government using tax monies for such ancient torture methods that are probably available on the internet, at the local library or in any Bible for that matter. In fact, all they need to do is to pray to gOD apparently.Oh, I forgot I don't pay taxes but I'll still complain although most taxpayers who let the government use their tax monies won't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 02/17/2008
- Lonw See Profile I'm a Fan of Lonw permalink

This alleged integrator's attempt to explain away a bunch of information that the public will never be able to confirm, is just another well timed propaganda injection into the media that seems to appear like clockwork in an effort to try to counterbalance the acceptance of torture as a tool by the Bush administration.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 AM on 02/17/2008
- Sundialsvc4 See Profile I'm a Fan of Sundialsvc4 permalink

"Good cop, bad cop." This is "good cop."

This is, "nothing to see here, pay no attention to the little man behind the curtain."

But let's face it: the "little man" has set up secret torture-prisons, has pretended not to know what torture is or that what they are doing is not really torture. And just how many times do I have to use that little seven-letter word in a paragraph before people really start to see that it's all about that one word?

This country can be... whatever it wants to be. This is not what I want my country to be, or to become.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 AM on 02/17/2008
- rabun666 See Profile I'm a Fan of rabun666 permalink

$trillions spent for defense and intelligence and the best the US government can do is to use torture tactics which are hundreds, even thousands of year old and probably in the Bible.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 PM on 02/17/2008
- musselmanm See Profile I'm a Fan of musselmanm permalink

There are two more people that I believe should be tortured when we are able to use our new laws created by Bush and Cheney!
Well how about that I just named the two I am proposing being tortured.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 AM on 02/17/2008
- beekeeper See Profile I'm a Fan of beekeeper permalink

agreed

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 AM on 02/17/2008
- springsm See Profile I'm a Fan of springsm permalink

They would "break" before the torture began. Both are avowed cowards.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 AM on 02/17/2008
- neem See Profile I'm a Fan of neem permalink

Once we had Saddam Hussein in custody, did we torture him? No. We got information from him by being civilized. Torture is not about getting useful information. Torture is about sadism.

There are very rare cases when limited torture can be useful. I've heard that Israeli police sometimes use torture to get good information about impending bomb attacks. But just because there can be exceptions to the rule, doesn't change the basic truth: under Bush, the USA has gone hog-wild on torture, to no useful purpose at all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 AM on 02/17/2008
- TimN See Profile I'm a Fan of TimN permalink

"the USA has gone hog-wild on torture"


Really? Exactly what techniques does the US use? Who employs these techniques? How often are they done? To whom exactly are these techniques employed upon? Where are they done?

You seem to know alot about the subject. Exactly how has "the USA has gone hog-wild on torture".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:16 AM on 02/17/2008
- LITU See Profile I'm a Fan of LITU permalink

Since its inception, the CIA has used torture techniques (some developed in Canada surprisingly) for ignominious reasons, not the least is the pure pleasure of it. Read the modern histories of several South/Central American regimes.

Black sites are run by the CIA. You remember what the Republicans have always said about surveillance? If you don't have anything to hide, what are you afraid of? Black sites - what are they hiding?

Why is it all the posters on this site named Tim* are on the wrong team? Oh yeah, one and the same. Right Tim-e-e-e?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 PM on 02/17/2008
- SirReal1 See Profile I'm a Fan of SirReal1 permalink

TimN,

What kind of motivation leads a person to put their "Sado-Masochistic" tendencies on display for all the world to see?

Do you kids KNOW that you "embrace" these ideologies?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 PM on 02/17/2008
- calfacon See Profile I'm a Fan of calfacon permalink

Death by torture by Americans was first reported in 2003 in a New York Times article by Carlotta Gall. The military had announced the prisoner died of a heart attack, but when Gall saw the death certificate, written in English and issued by the military, it said the cause of death was homicide. The "heart attack" came after he had been beaten so often on this legs that they had "basically been pulpified," according to the coroner.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 02/17/2008
- scooperss See Profile I'm a Fan of scooperss permalink

First it was none were tortured.
Now it's two were tortured.
And I'm supposed to believe which version?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 AM on 02/17/2008
- Tankan See Profile I'm a Fan of Tankan permalink

How much credability is the word of sadistic thugs and scoundrels worth?

Torture takes many forms and continues unabated!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 AM on 02/17/2008
- wcfar See Profile I'm a Fan of wcfar permalink

Where has Rester been? How many years has it been that American citizens and others have been complaining about Gitmo? Let's clear the air and open up the base to scrutiny by all. That is the only way anyone is going to believe Rester or his colleages. The greatest problem for Rester is the fact that the administration he works for is secretive. This does not lend itself to being trusted by anyone. Bush in fact, wants the freedom of information act done away with and if he had his way, members of his administration would never have to answer to any legal process. This fact alone, secrecy at all costs, makes it easy to suspect wrongdoing or get the wrong idea about wrongdoing. Free flow of information and respect for human values is what we are supposed to be about as Americans. Until Washington opens up we will suspect our government and expect the worst.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 AM on 02/17/2008
- Bibbo See Profile I'm a Fan of Bibbo permalink


Its typical...the decaffeinated mocha grande group are self proclaimed experts on what techniques are appropriate at Gitmo.The closest they've been to combat is when someone cut in line in front of them at starbucks.Please let the grown ups take care of defense and go finish your term paper on the benefits of health care for the poor under Hugo Chavez.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:39 AM on 02/17/2008
- desmirl See Profile I'm a Fan of desmirl permalink

And your name, rank, and serial number, please? Tell us how you came by this level of presumed expertise on matters military.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 02/17/2008