Anti-US Cleric's Cease-Fire in Doubt

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Anti-US Cleric's Cease-Fire in Doubt stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

PATRICK QUINN | February 20, 2008 07:07 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Iraqi policemen wait for a treatment in a hospital in Baghdad, Iraq, Wednesday, Feb. 20, 2008. Policemen were among 27 wounded when police discovered rockets primed for firing in the back of a truck which exploded while experts were trying to diffuse them. 15 other policemen died in the blast. (AP Photo/Karim Kadim)

BAGHDAD — With deadly attacks against U.S. targets increasing around Baghdad, anti-American Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr raised the possibility Wednesday that he may not renew a six-month cease-fire widely credited for helping slash violence.

The cease-fire is due to expire Saturday, and there were fears, especially among minority Sunni Arabs, that the re-emergence of al-Sadr's Mahdi Army militia could return Iraq to where it was just a year ago _ with sectarian death squads prowling the streets of a country on the brink of civil war.

A surge of violence would also make it all the more difficult for Iraq's Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds to reach agreements on sharing power and wealth, and greatly complicate the debate in the United States on whether and how quickly to withdraw troops.

Rear Adm. Gregory Smith, a U.S. military spokesman, blamed Iranian-backed Shiite extremists for a flurry of rocket attacks _ including one Monday against an Iraqi housing complex near the country's main U.S. military base that killed at least five people and wounded 16, including two U.S. soldiers.

Smith also said one American civilian was killed and a number of U.S. troops and civilian personnel were wounded in a rocket attack in the southeastern area of Rustamiyah Tuesday night. He did not elaborate, but there is a U.S. base in the predominantly Shiite area.

He said those attacks and another on Tuesday were carried out by "Iranian-backed Special Group criminals," a term the military uses to describe groups that broke away from the Mahdi Army militia or refused to respect the cease-fire al-Sadr declared last August.

The U.S. military has angered some Sadrists by carrying out raids against breakaway factions. There have been calls from within the militia and its political wing to call off the cease-fire.

The cease-fire has been a key element in a three-piece puzzle that has come together to help reduce violence since mid-2007. The two other factors are the influx of thousands of U.S. troops last summer, and creation of Sunni-dominated groups funded by the U.S. military to fight al-Qaida in Iraq, the most extremist of the Sunni insurgents.

Story continues below

"Al-Sayyid Muqtada al-Sadr's cease-fire has been helpful in reducing violence and has led to improved security in Iraq. We would welcome the extension of the cease-fire as a positive step," Smith told The Associated Press, using an honorific reserved for descendants of the Prophet Muhammad.

Sheik Salah al-Obeidi, a spokesman for al-Sadr in the Shiite holy city of Najaf, said that if the cleric failed to issue a statement by Saturday saying the cease-fire was extended, "then that means the freeze is over."

On an Internet site representing al-Sadr, al-Obeidi said that al-Sadr "either will announce the extension or will stay silent and not announce anything. If he stays silent, that means that the freeze is over."

Al-Obeidi told the AP that message "has been conveyed to all Mahdi Army members nationwide."

The ambiguity left many Iraqis uneasy.

"The drop in violence and the quiet which Baghdad witnesses is a clear evidence that this militia was behind all the chaos in the past," Sunni parliament member Asmaa al-Dulaimi told the AP.

She said ending the cease-fire "will affect national reconciliation and will further deteriorate the security situation nationwide. Resuming their activities, whether against the government or civilians, will lead to a new confrontation with them."

Smith said that under current conditions, violence was still dropping. He said the number of civilian deaths in Baghdad had fallen from 1,087 men, women and children killed in February 2007 to 178 in the first month of this year.

According to an AP count, at least 238 Iraqi civilians and security forces died in Baghdad last month, compared to 1,148 killed in February 2007.

Smith also said the number of execution-style killings carried out by so-called sectarian death squads had dropped some 95 percent, from 800 in February 2007 to below 40 this month.

The AP accounted for at least 640 bodies found on Iraq streets or in mass graves in February 2007, compared with at least 184 so far in February 2008.

But there has been a recent surge of attacks attributed to al-Qaida in Iraq.

On Wednesday, a U.S. soldier was killed and three were wounded in a rocket-propelled grenade attack in the northwestern city of Mosul, the military said. The military has described Mosul as the last urban stronghold of al-Qaida in Iraq.

Separately, a roadside bomb killed a soldier assigned to Multi-National Division-Center, which is responsible for territory south of Baghdad. The military statement did not give a more exact location.

On Tuesday, three Iraqi children were killed and seven others wounded when they were hit by an insurgent mortar attack while playing soccer outside a military supply area near Balad, 50 miles north of Baghdad, the military said.

In violent Diyala province north of Baghdad, a suicide bomber on Wednesday killed seven people and wounded 17, said an official in the provincial command operation center. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to release the information.

The U.S. military and the Iraqi government have claimed that Sunni insurgents led by al-Qaida in Iraq are increasingly trying to use Iraq's most vulnerable populations as suicide bombers to avoid raising suspicions or being searched at checkpoints that guard access to many markets, neighborhoods and bridges in the capital.

Smith, the military spokesman, said two women used as suicide bombers in attacks earlier this month had undergone psychiatric treatment but that there was no indication they had Down syndrome as Iraqi and American officials initially had claimed.

He said the women used in the Feb. 1 pet market bombings had been identified as residents from the northeastern outskirts of Baghdad who were in their late 20s or early 30s.

The two attacks killed nearly 100 people, and Iraqi and U.S. officials said at the time the women appeared to be unwitting attackers.

"Both had recently received psychiatric treatment for depression and/or schizophrenia. From what we know now there's no indication that they had Down syndrome," Smith said Wednesday, citing records obtained by the military.

He also said one of the women was married but that neither had criminal backgrounds. He said it was not clear how they were linked to al-Qaida in Iraq, which the military has said was behind the bombing.

___

Associated Press reporters Qassim Abdul-Zahra, Sinan Salaheddin and Bradley Brooks contributed to this story from Baghdad.

BAGHDAD — With deadly attacks against U.S. targets increasing around Baghdad, anti-American Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr raised the possibility Wednesday that he may not renew a six-month cease...
BAGHDAD — With deadly attacks against U.S. targets increasing around Baghdad, anti-American Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr raised the possibility Wednesday that he may not renew a six-month cease...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
154
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
- alan2a I'm a Fan of alan2a 10 fans permalink

Well I'm sure MCain will be on the phone to Sadr and offering him the vice-presidency if he'll just keep the cease fire going and continue to validate the phony success of the surge.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 02/20/2008
- 23000Days I'm a Fan of 23000Days 121 fans permalink
photo

While the media have forgotten the war, the American public definitely has not. Just look at any poll on the subject.
AlSadr's tired of a cease-fire where he continues to be attacked; who wouldn't feel the same...
Should he resume attacks, the war will return to the political forefront with disasterous results for McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 02/20/2008
- iPolitics I'm a Fan of iPolitics 33 fans permalink

McCain: "Relax. I plan to fix this within 100 years."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 PM on 02/20/2008
- Colmore I'm a Fan of Colmore 46 fans permalink

So, what does Sadr want, more money? In other words, bribary was used to make the surge look successful? Does this administration ever get anything right, or are lies all they know?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 PM on 02/20/2008
- aristippe I'm a Fan of aristippe 13 fans permalink

arms.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 02/20/2008
photo

McCain better hope and pray that he doesn't end it because it will reveal that the surge never worked and will never work. They better find that missing money and use it to bribe Al-Sadr for more time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 02/20/2008
- mommadona I'm a Fan of mommadona 194 fans permalink
photo

GEE - IT'S THE MID-EASTERN VERSION OF 'A WEST-SIDE STORY'.....

http://youtube.com/watch?v=exGJsv6ZNlo

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 02/20/2008
- Moshe I'm a Fan of Moshe 217 fans permalink
photo

The decrease in violence in Iraq is an enormously welcomed change.

It is, however, a temporary change that was purchased at a very high price.

The decrease in violence is not, as the neo-cons suggest, evidence that the "surge" worked.

The decrease in violence is because the U.S. is currently trading weapons and cash for temporary cooperation.

That doesn't sound that bad, until you realize that in reality, the U.S. has spent the last year arming all sides in a coming civil war in Iraq, and that U.S. troops are likely to find themselves right in the middle of that all out civil war when it breaks, with Iraqis and their real allies shooting at us with the weapons we gave them for "cooperation."

At this point, the only plan by the Bush/Cheney Administration is to maintain the status quo until they leave office, so they can then blame the whole mess on the next president.

A neat solution for them.

A traitorous, costly, bloody plan that will leave our troops and the American People holding this vile bag at the expense of our future safety and economic well being.

We will be paying for the Bush/Cheney fiasco in Iraq the rest of our lives. 3,963 Americans have already paid with their lives.

And thanks to Nancy "impeachment is off the table" Pelosi and the current DEM leadership spear-catching team, Bush and Cheney, and their hyper-wealthy international corporate sponsors, will walk away in January '09 enormously richer at the expense of the rest of the World.

"Mission Accomplished"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 02/20/2008

I agree with your viewpoint.

I also think it's possible that Al Sadr is simply doing this because he wants another billion in cash. Probably in small unmarked bills, or in gold. And he hasn't got it yet.

I think we bought this truce. Our tax dollars at work. This is why the R's want to take the money out of government, because they are afraid that if people like them are in power it will be wasted. They are right. Vote in someone else. Please.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 PM on 02/20/2008
- joebhed I'm a Fan of joebhed 49 fans permalink
photo

The actual surge has helped a little to reduce US and Iraqi casualties.
However, the al-Sadr cease fire coupled with the broader Awakening Council efforts aimed at Al Qaeda were the two major factors in what has passed for the surge's "success" in the mainstream media.
For two years I have been advocating for a negotiated exit from Iraq.
The war in Iraq is ostensibly a war against international terrorism, most notably Al Qaeda.
The AQ resorted to mass killings as a means to destabilize and put fear into all Iraqis, hoping for ever greater opportunities to kill Americans in the meanwhile.
We must agree to leave Iraq in a timely manner, and in doing so, pledge to assist the efforts of the Sunni and Shia insurgents to defeat Al Qaeda.
Today, the Sunni and Shia insurgents are our enemies only in response to our occupation.
It is these insurgents that have been responsible for most of the killing of American soldiers.
The reason is very simple.
We invaded their country for no good reason, imposed an illegal political structure, and we continue to occupy their lands now some five years later. Think about that.
Both the Sunni and Shia insurgents are Iraqi nationalists and both want to see some degree of independence from Iran.
Naturally, the Sunni want little to no Iranian influence.
However, it is not possible to dissuade the insurgency from what they see as a legitimate national struggle to end the US occupation.
We must end our furthering of the war in Iraq.
The sooner we see the logic and vigor of their position, the better off we will all be.
It is not the job of America to police the failed state of Iraqi politics.
If Iraq had no oil we would be long gone.
And, if our country was invaded, occupied and run by a puppet government, we would all be insurgents too.
The surge is doomed to failure because, by definition, it extends the occupation of a sovereign country by a foreign military force.
This is the definition of failure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:02 PM on 02/20/2008
- Moshe I'm a Fan of Moshe 217 fans permalink
photo

Hi Joe. I would only add this: Al Qaeda is simply a brand name now worn with pride by those that most hate the U.S.

You can't "defeat" a brand-name anymore than you can a concept like "terrorism."

The Al Qaida brand-name sells because it is the U.S. that made Al Qaeda famous and the top brand, largely through the mind-numbingly incompent foreign policy of the Bush/Cheney Administration.

Through U.S. invasions, occupations, and torture, Bush/Cheney handed Al Qaeda the stick they are now beating us with. U.S. foreign policy is their best recruiting tool.

But in fairness. It wasn't just George W. Bin Laden was pis-ed because U.S. troops were on Saudi land from George H.'s war in Iraq.

Bottom line: We need to get the U.S. military out of the internationally occupation business. The costs far outweigh the benefits.

We need our best and most patriotic young people here at home, to help rebuild and protect this Nation, here at home, not Iraq, or anyplace else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 02/20/2008
- wadenelson1 I'm a Fan of wadenelson1 249 fans permalink
photo

Word.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:14 PM on 02/20/2008
- raptor I'm a Fan of raptor 7 fans permalink

After the invasion, Marine General Mattis ("no better friend, no worse enemy") was on The Online Newshour on September 26, 2003.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec03/marine_9-26.html

He said that he had sent 15,000 of his Marines home in May of 2003 as superflous, and that Moqtada al Sadr was too young to command any respect or following.
"MAJ. GEN. JAMES MATTIS: Sadr is impotent. Sadr has no following. He gets more of a following in the international press than he gets inside Najaf. He is in an area where you are not considered to be a grown man until you're 40. He tries to tell people he is 29. In fact he is about 23 years old. He is just a guy with a very marginal following, and right now the people of Najaf don't even turn out for his sermons more than a couple hundred of them. He is simply not a big influence in the town."

My, how times change.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 PM on 02/20/2008

Wasn't it radical US cleric Pat Robertson who believes there's no Muslim like a dead Muslim?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 PM on 02/20/2008

No.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 02/20/2008
photo

Oh hell, There goes the surge success.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 02/20/2008
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 153 fans permalink

The problem is nationalism. At heart Al Sadr is an Iraqi Nationalist.
And the time when you could occupy a foreign nation has long since past. The Iraqi's aren't going to put up with an occupation. No one would.

If it is not Al Sadr it will be some other leader. But the USA is destined to be removed from Iraq.
That is what world history since 1945 (1918) tells us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 02/20/2008
photo

The only way to defeat nationalism is to kill of enough locals
and import your own people. So, who wants to move to Iraq?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 02/20/2008
- 23000Days I'm a Fan of 23000Days 121 fans permalink
photo

One of the real problems the Romans had was their soldiers being assimilated into the recently conquered culture. This invaribly led to the preservation of nationalism for the conquered, even under Roman rule.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 02/20/2008
- desmirl I'm a Fan of desmirl 9 fans permalink

So, the truth finally begins to seep out from beneath the carpet of lies. Al-Sadr pulled the plug on violence for six months, our soldiers and Marines got a little breathing spell, and Bush tries to take credit for his brilliant "SURGE" strategy. Now, Al-Sadr threatens to unleash his dogs once more, and all hell is about to break loose. Welcome to Iraq...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 PM on 02/20/2008
- Ammobob I'm a Fan of Ammobob 36 fans permalink

Do you actually think Al Sadr determines the success of U.S. forces in IRAQ? One must look at the glass as half full, this rumored turn of events may present alot more targets, icluding Al Sadr himself. A DEATH WISH?? Could be.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 PM on 02/20/2008
- aristippe I'm a Fan of aristippe 13 fans permalink

The U.S. cut a deal. The "surge" has very little to do with the abatement in violence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 PM on 02/20/2008

Shhh...you'll upset Bob's delusions. They're really all he has left.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 02/20/2008
- laocoon I'm a Fan of laocoon 30 fans permalink

Your absolutely right Ammo Iraq has nothing to with Iraq. None of the Iraqis have anything to do with what is happening there. Whether any of them chose to fight or not has nothing to do with whether any of them fight or not. US Casualties are all self inflicted. Iraqis have nothing to do with any thing except they are potential targets. It doesnt matter what their attitudes, decisions or conduct is and never did. Just targets.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 02/20/2008
- DRaymond I'm a Fan of DRaymond 69 fans permalink
photo

What this article points out is how little of the claims that 'the surge is working' actually have anything to do with the surge itself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 PM on 02/20/2008

Exactly. The Mahdi army declared a cease-fire six months ago, and casualties and violence began to decrease...imagine that. And John McCain's taking credit for it LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 PM on 02/20/2008
photo

Good, when the up-surge unfold he can have the credit for that as well.......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 PM on 02/20/2008
- Ammobob I'm a Fan of Ammobob 36 fans permalink

And what caused AL Sadr to run to IRAN? Make nice in the Parliament for the last 6 months?? It sure wasn't IRAQI Security Forces. Your in denial, breath deep, release thru the mouth.....WOOOOOOOSAAAAAAAA.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 02/20/2008
- laocoon I'm a Fan of laocoon 30 fans permalink

And what is causing the change now then oh Ammo the genius. Did the surge end without our knowing it. it seems to no longer be compelling his assent. I know you have carefully considered all of the possible reasons before shooting off your mouth and reached the inescapable conclusion that it had to be America force and violence and nothing else. So why would he change now? Can he tell our wad is spent?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 02/20/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect