cnn, Howard Kurtz, Howard Kurtz Reliable Sources, Howie Kurtz, Reliable Sources, Washington Post
cnn, Howard Kurtz, Howard Kurtz Reliable Sources, Howie Kurtz, Reliable Sources, Washington Post

Kaiser: Howard Kurtz's Washington Post/CNN Dual Roles "The Most Blatant And Longest-Lasting Conflict Of Interest" In Journalism

Radar   |  Charles Kaiser   |   February 20, 2008 02:30 PM


digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Howard Kurtz is the self-styled prince of American media reporters, a writing, blogging, book-writing machine who has covered the press for the Washington Post since 1990, and pontificated about it for CNN--as host of Reliable Sources--since 1998.

Last week was typical for Kurtz: nine articles in the Post, including a big profile of Chris Matthews, three blogs, and one online discussion, all capped off with his Sunday show on CNN. This never-ending blizzard of activity has sometimes obscured the basic fact about Kurtz's career: His dual roles as salaried press critic for the Post and salaried host on CNN put Howie at the heart of the most blatant and longest-lasting conflict of interests I know of in big-time, mainstream journalism.


 
Comments
13
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

"You're going to have to cover someone who pays you," Downie explained. "Howie has demonstrated in the way that he covers this newspaper that he has no conflict covering an employer.
-----
By that rationale, why not let every major media company pay Kurtz? He is far too pure to be influenced by his own sizable payoffs ... er, paychecks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:57 AM on 02/24/2008
photo

And Kurtz is a lousy right-wing water carrier in both roles. He should be fired twice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 AM on 02/24/2008
photo

Kurtz came to the rescue of the Morning, Joe show very

early on.

Duh! Huh?

Viewers wrote to MSNBC asking why we had to listen

to Joe's boring chatter and Mica's laughter for 10 minutes

before the day's news was reported. This continued for

several weeks. The show is on MSNBC so we really

were not surprised, just disappointed, by the lack of order in their program.

However the great surprise came

when HOWARD STEPPED FORWARD TO COMPLIMENT

THE SHOW AS TERRIFIC. HE WAS A GUEST ON

MORNING, JOE TWO DAYS LATER. applause...........

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 AM on 02/23/2008

Kurtz is to media critic as Fox is to fair and balanced.

Really, it should be an SAT question.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 02/22/2008
photo

Good one!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 AM on 02/23/2008

Great photo. Looks like the two finalists in a Jamie Farr lookalike contest.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 02/21/2008

it's nice to see kurtz's smug, self congratulatory farce exposed. he admires chris matthews so much because they're cut from the same mold.

obnoxious and corrupt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 PM on 02/20/2008

Kurtz is okay w/ me actually.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 PM on 02/20/2008

An op-ed about an opinion editor specialized in op-eds ...

Beautiful example of self absorbed media.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 02/20/2008

WOW. Great profile. Well researched, well written. As a very occasional viewer of Kurtz, I had no idea. I appreciated the subject of his CNN show - media - and I thought he was a bit of a lightweight, but otherwise enjoyed his show enough. Who needs him?
Send him to Fox News.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:31 PM on 02/20/2008
photo

I'll just make it short and sweet : either you are with Kurtz or you are not. One might debate it, but Kurtz criticizes himself. Enough said.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 02/20/2008
photo

You've got it wrong. Either you ARE Kurtz or you are not. If you ARE, then there's no conflict.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 02/20/2008

Yes, but how about those editorial choices he makes every week, what about the pieces he doesn't write, the observations he doesn't make, the sources he doesn't bother to tap or quote? For years, Kurtz has been the poster boy at every decent J-school in the nation for blatant hyprocrisy and conflict of interest in the media. He and his cronies at the Post should get a grip, look in the mirror and stop the venal rationalizations for their truly horrendous judgment that significantly betrays traditional journalistic values.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 AM on 02/21/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect