Republican presidential hopeful, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., talks to reporters in flight from Indianapolis to Washington Friday, Feb. 22, 2008. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)

WASHINGTON — A former Paxson Communications president said Saturday he never met with John McCain about the Arizona senator writing letters to the Federal Communications Commission regarding the regulatory delay of a Pittsburgh TV station sale.

Dean Goodman, who was in charge of the company's lobbying efforts in 1999, told The Associated Press he also doubts that chief executive Lowell W. "Bud" Paxson met with McCain over the issue, and said he doesn't recall such a meeting.

McCain's presidential campaign said the Arizona senator and then-chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee did not meet with Paxson or his lobbyist, Vicki Iseman, before sending the letters, which have drawn controversy in recent days. But Paxson told The Washington Post in a story published Saturday that he and "probably" Iseman met with McCain on the matter several weeks before the senator sent the letters.

Goodman, who left the company a year and a half ago, took issue with that account in a telephone interview from West Palm Beach, Fla.

"I never met with or discussed this with Senator McCain," Goodman said. "I don't recall Bud meeting with McCain. It would be extremely rare that there would be a meeting that I didn't attend, and I can tell you that I didn't have a meeting with McCain on this issue."

"Whether Bud discussed it with him or not, via some other mechanism, I can't rule it out," Goodman added. But, he said, "I don't think there was a meeting."

Efforts to reach Paxson and Iseman were not successful.

McCain, the likely Republican presidential nominee who routinely rails against the influence of lobbyists and special interests, was forced to address suggestions Thursday in news reports that he had an inappropriate relationship with Iseman and advanced the interests of her clients, including Paxson Communications. McCain has denied he did anything improper.

Among the issues raised in The New York Times and the Post were two letters McCain wrote in late 1999 to the FCC on behalf of Florida-based Paxson Communications _ which had paid Iseman as its lobbyist _ urging quick consideration of a proposal to buy a television station license in Pittsburgh. At the time, Paxson was also a contributor to McCain's 2000 presidential campaign.

McCain did not urge the FCC commissioners to approve the proposal, but he asked for speedy consideration of the deal, which was pending from two years earlier. In an unusual response, then-FCC Chairman William Kennard complained that McCain's request "comes at a sensitive time in the deliberative process" and "could have procedural and substantive impacts on the commission's deliberations and, thus, on the due process rights of the parties."

The senator wrote the letters after he received more than $20,000 in contributions from the company's executives and lobbyists. Paxson also lent McCain his company's jet at least four times during 1999 for campaign travel.

McCain's campaign said Thursday that the senator had not met with Paxson or Iseman, who worked for the firm Alcalde and Fay, on the matter and that Iseman worked only with staff on the issue. "No representative of Paxson or Alcalde and Fay personally asked Senator McCain to send a letter to the FCC regarding this proceeding," the campaign said in a statement.

Still, McCain indicated in a 2002 deposition taken in litigation over the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law _ and disclosed by Newsweek on Friday _ that he talked to Paxson about a TV station the broadcaster wanted to buy in Pittsburgh and Paxson pressed his concern about the FCC delay.

"I said I would be glad to write a letter asking them to act," McCain testified, recounting the conversation with Paxson. "But I cannot write a letter asking them to approve or deny, because then that would be an interference in their activities."

Jill Hazelbaker, a McCain campaign spokeswoman, said Saturday in a statement, "Senator McCain does not recall directly discussing the issue with Mr. Paxson or any representative of Paxson."

The campaign said his 1999 Senate schedule does not show any meetings between McCain and Paxson or any of Paxson's representatives on this issue. The campaign said the schedule shows no meetings with Paxson that year, but shows one meeting in 1998 and one in 2000, months before and after the letters were sent.

Still, Paxson told the Post that he talked with McCain in the senator's Washington office several weeks before the Arizona Republican wrote the letters. Paxson recalled to the newspaper that his lobbyist, Iseman, probably attended the meeting in McCain's office.

"I remember going there to meet with him," Paxson told the Post. He recalled that he told McCain: "You're head of the Commerce Committee. The FCC is not doing its job. I would love for you to write a letter."


 
 

Comments
30
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- NoahVail See Profile I'm a Fan of NoahVail permalink

So how much does McCain charge to intervene in Arizona? Do his constituents have to pony up $20,000, or is there an "in-state discount"?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 02/24/2008
- VivaZapata See Profile I'm a Fan of VivaZapata permalink

Republicans would be smart to push McCain to step aside instead of this silly defense around him. He will bring them down faster than you can say, "Bob Dole." I was always for Kucinich, but I never thought he had a realistic chance; however against McCain, even he'd win by a landslide, and that with the mainstream media pulling out all the UFO bullshit they can muster.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:53 AM on 02/24/2008
- Ping See Profile I'm a Fan of Ping permalink

McCain is already damaged.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 02/24/2008
- thatsitfortheotherone See Profile I'm a Fan of thatsitfortheotherone permalink

It must be painful, trolls waking up and looking at themselves in the mirror every day, and saying "I believe the Republican party has the best interests of the United States at heart."


OUCH!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 AM on 02/24/2008
- Ozarks See Profile I'm a Fan of Ozarks permalink

"Jill Hazelbaker, a McCain campaign spokeswoman, said Saturday in a statement, "Senator McCain does not recall directly discussing the issue with Mr. Paxson or any representative of Paxson."

Depositions are taken under oath. The weight of evidence in comparing Hazelbaker's above " does not recall" statement with McCain's statements in deposition under oath shows that Ms Hazelbaker is blowing smoke.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 AM on 02/24/2008
- Doofus See Profile I'm a Fan of Doofus permalink

'"I never met with or discussed this with Senator McCain," Goodman said.'

Could be, somebody's lying? Or not. That would certainly be refreshing. We can only hope it's not yet another instance of faulty memory.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 AM on 02/24/2008
- Doofus See Profile I'm a Fan of Doofus permalink

From elsewhere, 'The Washington Post reports:

Broadcaster Lowell "Bud" Paxson today contradicted statements from Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign that the senator did not meet with Paxson or his lobbyist before sending two controversial letters to the Federal Communications Commission on Paxson's behalf.

Paxson said he talked with McCain in his Washington office several weeks before the Arizona Republican wrote the letters to the FCC urging a rapid decision on Paxson's quest to acquire a Pittsburgh television station.

Paxson also recalled that his lobbyist, Vicki Iseman, attended the meeting in McCain's office and that Iseman helped arrange the meeting. "Was Vicki there? Probably," Paxson said in an interview with The Washington Post today. "The woman was a professional. She was good. She could get us meetings."'...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 AM on 02/24/2008
- GDAEman See Profile I'm a Fan of GDAEman permalink

"I said I would be glad to write a letter asking them to act," McCain testified, recounting the conversation with Paxson. "But I cannot write a letter asking them to approve or deny, because then that would be an interference in their activities."

Ah! But there was a deadline for the FCC to act, and if the deadline passed, Paxson's request would have been denied. So McCain WAS trying to pressure the FCC commissioners, which is why McCain was found to have violated ex parte rules... effectively trying to influence a judge.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 AM on 02/24/2008
- GDAEman See Profile I'm a Fan of GDAEman permalink

The DemocracyNow interview about the Paxson affair is excellent journalism:
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/2/22/behind_the_john_mccain_lobbying_scandal

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 AM on 02/24/2008
- Gary47 See Profile I'm a Fan of Gary47 permalink

That's the tried and true republican approach to any scandal. Throw enough confusing and conflicting made-up stories at it until everyone is distracted. Such manipulators.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 AM on 02/24/2008
- samuraijack See Profile I'm a Fan of samuraijack permalink

John, John, this planes going down...it's breaking up!!! Candidacy is sliding...down...the...shitter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 PM on 02/23/2008
- samuraijack See Profile I'm a Fan of samuraijack permalink

What's really pissing off McCain is that now, even if he wanted to get it on with a lobbyist, he couldn't. Freakin crates of Viagra and NADA!!! Release the hounds!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 PM on 02/23/2008
- thatsitfortheotherone See Profile I'm a Fan of thatsitfortheotherone permalink

Would be funny if this asshole wasn't a serious contender for President of the United States.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 AM on 02/24/2008
- realistxxx See Profile I'm a Fan of realistxxx permalink

My friends, Lobbyists are honorable men and women. Indeed, most of my friends are lobbyists. As a DC insider for my entire public life, my friends, I can assure you that my lobbyists are my friends. How can America be swayed by hope and inspiraion by an oursider when, my friends, I am an insider and my friends are DC lobbyists.

Do not put aside the politics as usual, my friends, for those that would betray my friends, the lobbyists!

Oh yeah, war for 100 more years... Huzzah!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 02/23/2008
- Lemeritus See Profile I'm a Fan of Lemeritus permalink

Perfect!

But, really, McCain need not rebut the negative stories about him -- they actually seem to help. All around Conservative World, the filthy apes are chanting: "One of us! One of us!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 PM on 02/24/2008
- NoahVail See Profile I'm a Fan of NoahVail permalink

This whole thing is just a ploy to suggest that McCain can still get it up. In reality, he is just as limp as Bob Dole.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 PM on 02/24/2008
- samuraijack See Profile I'm a Fan of samuraijack permalink

Hey Old Man, it's not the crime IT'S THE COVER UP- that gets you, every damn time. Don't you freakin Repugnicans ever learn?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 02/23/2008
- ProfessorDuh See Profile I'm a Fan of ProfessorDuh permalink

That's a lesson Republicans can never learn. They have too much to cover up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:57 AM on 02/24/2008
- realistxxx See Profile I'm a Fan of realistxxx permalink

Samuraijack is my hero :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 PM on 02/23/2008
- bb1234 See Profile I'm a Fan of bb1234 permalink

The bottom line is that McCain did not take any action to influence the FCC in favor of Paxson and in fact took many positions against their interest. It's a credit to his conduct that the liberal media is looking at non-issues from 9 years ago. I wasn't even a supporter of his, but this slime campaign has got me energized.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 02/23/2008
- BARRISTER See Profile I'm a Fan of BARRISTER permalink

Troll, the man is a goddamn liar and crook. Ask Keating.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:28 AM on 02/24/2008
- Ozarks See Profile I'm a Fan of Ozarks permalink

Are you energized enough to give McCain a pass on contradicting statements made under oath. How wormy can McCain get, if he tries to avoid the fact ( his fact) that he met with Paxson and said so under oath!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 AM on 02/24/2008
- realistxxx See Profile I'm a Fan of realistxxx permalink

McCain threatened FCC with a complete overhaul if they closed the loophole that favored Iseman's client.

Try again syncophant.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/23/us/politics/23lobby.html?ref=us

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 PM on 02/23/2008
- dwillisno1 See Profile I'm a Fan of dwillisno1 permalink

Yeah, your bottom line is more line than anything else. He was just urging them to act, one way or the other. Right. They already knew what he wanted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 PM on 02/23/2008
- ProfessorDuh See Profile I'm a Fan of ProfessorDuh permalink

The slime is clinging to McCain, and it's called a load of lobbyists.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 02/23/2008
- imsosure See Profile I'm a Fan of imsosure permalink

Some surprise huh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 PM on 02/23/2008
- Obamapalooza See Profile I'm a Fan of Obamapalooza permalink

liar x 2 pants aflame

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 PM on 02/23/2008
- osage See Profile I'm a Fan of osage permalink

Three differing accounts, but surely they're all telling the truth. It's called being Republicans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 PM on 02/23/2008
- brwnizofmine See Profile I'm a Fan of brwnizofmine permalink

Somebody is lying!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 PM on 02/23/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in