Nader Announces Run for President

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Nader Announces Run for President stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

HOPE YEN | February 24, 2008 04:07 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this photograph provided by "Meet the Press," Ralph Nader appears on "Meet the Press'" Sunday, Feb. 24, 2008, with moderator Tim Russert at the NBC studios in Washington. Nader said Sunday he will run for president as a third-party candidate, criticizing the top White House contenders as too close to big business and pledging to repeat a bid that will "shift the power from the few to the many." (AP Photo/Meet The Press, Alex Wong)

WASHINGTON — Ralph Nader on Sunday announced a fresh bid for the White House, criticizing the top contenders as too close to big business and dismissing the possibility that his third-party candidacy could tip the election to Republicans.

The longtime consumer advocate is still loathed by many Democrats who accuse him of costing Al Gore the 2000 election.

Nader said most people are disenchanted with the Democratic and Republican parties due to a prolonged Iraq war and a shaky economy. He also blamed tax and other corporate-friendly policies under the Bush administration that he said have left many lower- and middle-class people in debt.

"You take that framework of people feeling locked out, shut out, marginalized, disrespected," he said. "You go from Iraq, to Palestine/Israel, from Enron to Wall Street, from Katrina to the bungling of the Bush administration, to the complicity of the Democrats in not stopping him on the war, stopping him on the tax cuts."

Nader, who turns 74 later this week, announced his candidacy on NBC's "Meet the Press."

In a later interview with The Associated Press, he rejected the notion of himself as a spoiler candidate, saying the electorate will not vote for a "pro-war John McCain." He also predicted his campaign would do better than in 2004, when he won just 0.3 percent of the vote as an independent.

"This time we're ready for them," said Nader of the Democratic Party lawsuits that kept him off the ballot in some states.

Democratic candidates Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton quickly sought to portray Nader's announcement as having little impact.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Obviously, it's not helpful to whomever our Democratic nominee is. But it's a free country," said Clinton, who called Nader's announcement a "passing fancy."

Obama dismissed Nader as a perennial presidential campaigner. "He thought that there was no difference between Al Gore and George Bush and eight years later I think people realize that Ralph did not know what he was talking about," Obama added.

Republican Mike Huckabee welcomed Nader into the race.

"I think it always would probably pull votes away from the Democrats, not the Republicans," the former Arkansas governor said on CNN.

Nader said Obama's and Clinton's lukewarm response was not surprising given that both political parties typically treat third-party candidates as "second-class citizens." Nader said he will decide in the coming days whether to run as an independent, Green Party candidate or in some other third party.

Pointing a finger at Republicans, he described McCain as a candidate for "perpetual war" and said he welcomed the support of Republican conservatives "who don't like the war in Iraq, who don't like taxpayer dollars wasted, and who don't like the Patriot Act and who treasure their rights of privacy."

"If the Democrats can't landslide the Republicans this year, they ought to just wrap up," Nader added.

___

Associated Press writers Beth Fouhy in Providence, R.I., and David Espo in Lorain, Ohio, contributed to this report.

___

On the Net:

Ralph Nader presidential campaign: http://www.votenader.org

WASHINGTON — Ralph Nader on Sunday announced a fresh bid for the White House, criticizing the top contenders as too close to big business and dismissing the possibility that his third-party cand...
WASHINGTON — Ralph Nader on Sunday announced a fresh bid for the White House, criticizing the top contenders as too close to big business and dismissing the possibility that his third-party cand...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
454
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (13 pages total)
- OkieMon I'm a Fan of OkieMon 34 fans permalink

think nader's real goal is to see if he can take the muslim vote away from obama...it's an ego thing with this guy...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 AM on 02/24/2008
- cadbury I'm a Fan of cadbury 4 fans permalink

Nader running again! After doing so much good last time! Good one!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 AM on 02/24/2008
- Rubyfoo I'm a Fan of Rubyfoo 5 fans permalink

We have Nader to thank for getting George Bush elected, now he's going to try and get John McCain elected. Gee, do ya think they might be paying him for this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 AM on 02/24/2008
- Earl I'm a Fan of Earl 90 fans permalink
photo

Why did Al Gore the environmentalist lose the Green Party vote?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 02/24/2008

ummm... because he's a democrat, not a green.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 02/24/2008
- calfacon I'm a Fan of calfacon 12 fans permalink

I'd love to see a list of his donors, including members of any PACs or 527s

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 AM on 02/24/2008

A vote for Ralph Nader is a vote for the Republican Party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 AM on 02/24/2008
photo

How so? Your assumption is that a vote for Nader is a stolen vote from the Democrats. BUT... if the Democratic platform is so weak that people vote for someone who doesn't have a chance, what does that say for their platform?

That's the real story behind this story. The Democratic party is toeing the line so hard that true progressives feel sick when they vote for these corporate cronies and instead decide to vote in such a way that allows them to sleep at night. I.e., for candidates who speak to what they believe in.

Isn't that what democracy is about? I realize that strategy plays into it, but how strategic can you get with one vote? Isn't it MY vote? Or is it rightfully the Democratic party's?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 02/24/2008
- Marco I'm a Fan of Marco 3 fans permalink

I loved my Political Science classes, too.

But now I must live and work in this world. Even the most sincere idealist must make the 'lesser of two evils' choice at important and stomach-turning times in his or her life. For me, this would be one of them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 AM on 02/24/2008
- AnninCA I'm a Fan of AnninCA 54 fans permalink

That's "old thinking" isn't it? Partisanship id dead.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 AM on 02/24/2008

Is this guy Harold Stassen's illegitimate spawn.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 AM on 02/24/2008

I keep seeing the same posts over and over on supposedly different pages in the comment section. What's up? No new ideas?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 AM on 02/24/2008
- marko77 I'm a Fan of marko77 32 fans permalink

Nader is running for President because it's his only chance for air time.

Nader doesn't care if he draws votes away from the Democrats. He's got to hear himself speak. I wouldn't mind if he hadn't gotten W and the Neo-cons elected, but he did. This cannot be denied.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 02/24/2008

i'm really tired of this old excuse.

i'm a nader supporter, and i would not vote for a republican or a democrat.

the two parties need to get over themselves.. you're not entitled to any votes.

Nader 08.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 02/24/2008
- Marco I'm a Fan of Marco 3 fans permalink

I'm really tired of the "not entitled to my vote" issue of entitlement.

I see it mostly used by indignant, naive folks who claim to want reform but are mostly just contrarians who make the world even more screwed-up by not knowing how to work with large groups of people - and then point at how screwed -up the world is as justification for their "radicalism" (sic). Sick.

(Not to say all Nader voters/supporters fall into this realm, but I see a consistent trend.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 AM on 02/24/2008
- calfacon I'm a Fan of calfacon 12 fans permalink

"you're not entitled to any votes." Excuse me?!?
Not sure if this is incredibly Elitist or wishful voter suppression.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 02/24/2008
- marko77 I'm a Fan of marko77 32 fans permalink

Nader is running for President because it's his only chance for air time.

Nader doesn't care if he draws votes away from the Democrats. He's got to hear himself speak. I wouldn't mind if he hadn't gotten W and the Neo-cons elected, but he did. This cannot be denied.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 02/24/2008

"Nader doesn't care if he draws votes away from the Democrats"

Maybe that's because he isn't a Democrat? For some reason people keep expecting him to play by a set of rules that he has obviously rejected.

He's a good man, and just doing what he believes in. Nobody can deny him that. The problem is that with our two party system. We have the decent, the bad, and the other. We voters are forced to vote for the decent candidate just so the bad one doesn't get elected.

As Bill Maher said, people stand up and applaud Nader when he speaks, but boo him when he runs. Hopefully his candidacy will bring to the forefront a few issues that would otherwise be ignored.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 02/24/2008
- malrubius I'm a Fan of malrubius 3 fans permalink

Single-payer health care, not forcing people to buy health care from bloated, corrupt healthcare profiteers, but real "universal health care" in which doctors make healthcare decisions. He's got my vote. Dems could have tried to stand up for people, but as always, the two mainstream conservative parties side with their corporate sponsors. Maybe the Dems will learn to take liberals under their umbrella some day, but it ain't happening with Hellary Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 AM on 02/24/2008

This is the campaign Kucinich was running. He did it the right way, unfortunately, he got no media coverage (including from HuffPo -- the "liberal" blogs are as much of the problem as anything else). Kucinich was trying to steer the conversation. Perhaps that is what Nader is trying to do. But, he's got to be mindful of what he creates.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 02/24/2008
- iluvsam I'm a Fan of iluvsam 17 fans permalink

Nader is one sick guy. Back in the day, he did some good for this country, now I think he is just a sadist who wants to see the rest of us suffer. Al Gore "lost" Florida by 500+ votes. Nader got 96,000 or so votes in Florida. Therefore, I at least partially blame him and those who voted for him for 9/11, and for the U.S going to war with Iraq. He pisses me off to no end. He's lucky that hell doesn't exist.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 AM on 02/24/2008
- Earl I'm a Fan of Earl 90 fans permalink
photo

It's ironic that you would blame the Green Party for causing your environmentalist hero to lose the election. I guess Gore just wasn't green enough. Imagine that. Why don't you try blaming the Socialist Workers Party instead? They got more than 500 votes in Florida. Or, what about this -- how about blaming Al Gore himself for being such a pussy he rolled over for Rove & Cheney and admitted defeat before the votes were even counted?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 AM on 02/24/2008
- batgirlevi I'm a Fan of batgirlevi 9 fans permalink

Nader knows he has no chance. He comes out of the woodwork during every election and interjects himself and pontificates like he has no clue that he's been washed up for years.

Why would anyone vote for him?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 AM on 02/24/2008
photo

Because they think he would be a better president than the other candidates? Or is that too obvious?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 02/24/2008
- mikekev58 I'm a Fan of mikekev58 8 fans permalink

Elections are about choices, and Ralph Nader always offers an alternative to what the two parties are offering. For some of us, it's not just about who will win. It's also about who best represents our interests, and about who we can in good conscience really give our vote to with enthusiasm. A third party candidate can also have the power to push the major candidates toward discussing issues that they have put on the back burner.
If people fear Nader will take Obama's or Hillary's voters, then those candidates should make sure they are addressing the issues that concern Nader's constituency.
Obama's supporters, in particularly, have seemed pretty confident that their man will blow McCain out of the water. If so, Nader will not present a problem.
Some blame Nader for costing Gore the 2000 election. I voted for Gore, but when I saw Tennessee going to Bush, I knew he was in trouble. He didn't cost Gore the election in 2000. In the end it was Gore's campaign that allowed the lightweight from Texas to be competitive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 AM on 02/24/2008
- TAC I'm a Fan of TAC 23 fans permalink
photo

"For some of us, it's not just about who will win.

That's why we have (at least) eight years of Bush...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 02/24/2008
- TAC I'm a Fan of TAC 23 fans permalink
photo

"Why would anyone vote for him?"

To help McCain steal the presidency...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 AM on 02/24/2008
- dogwalker I'm a Fan of dogwalker 4 fans permalink

If I don't hear more from Obama about a real time line for Health Care reform then maybe voting for Nader is a good idea for me.

When I realized that Edwards and (now) Hillary weren't going to make the cut, I thought I would vote for Obama as a vote against republicans. This is a possible alternative for me and others who feel that Obama does not represent our interests.

Walker

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 AM on 02/24/2008

dogwalker - how on earth do you think it is responsible to throw a vote to nader's ego? he's building the new american majority - like it or not, he's bringing people together - and that's how we get healthcare changes. remember when car insurance wasn't mandatory? then remember how the prices skyrocketed? that's what hillary's plan would eventually do - i don't want to be forced to buy healthcare or penalized for not having it. i have a naturopath that takes care of all my health needs and don't need insurance. don't be a spoiled little kid and think nader is going to help any of us in any way. really think about what obama is saying about health insurance. hillary is just wrong on this. look at massachusett's problems.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 02/24/2008
- marko77 I'm a Fan of marko77 32 fans permalink

Nader is running for President because it's his only chance for air time.

Nader doesn't care if he draws votes away from the Democrats. He's got to hear himself speak. I wouldn't mind if he hadn't gotten W and the Neo-cons elected, but he did. This cannot be denied.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 02/24/2008
- degjack I'm a Fan of degjack 8 fans permalink


Ralph Nader has some honest, sound, intelligent positions.

Maybe somebody should listen to what he has to say.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 02/24/2008
- rini I'm a Fan of rini 34 fans permalink
photo

Yes,

but he can't win and he may have cost it for Gore in 2000.

We can't let the GOP win again in 2008. It is not outside the realm of possibility.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 02/24/2008
- TAC I'm a Fan of TAC 23 fans permalink
photo

"Ralph Nader has some honest, sound, intelligent positions."

Running as GOPer enabler is not one of them...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 AM on 02/24/2008

Old man, great trouble, no good. Ralph Nader is older than John McCain, what does he expect from his candidacy? He knows the electoral college, and surely he knows he would not get a single electoral vote. Ross Perot in 1992 received 19% of the popular vote and how many electoral votes did he receive? None. So what
kind of delusional game is he playing here? He has become a legend in his own mind.

Ralph Nader use to talk about civic responsibility but now he just complains about other candidates not matching up to his criteria of issues. Of course he has every right to become a perennial candidate, but it is good to remember that Harold Stassen at least, was once a governor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 02/24/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (13 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect