Nader Announces Run for President

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Nader Announces Run for President stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

HOPE YEN | February 24, 2008 04:07 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this photograph provided by "Meet the Press," Ralph Nader appears on "Meet the Press'" Sunday, Feb. 24, 2008, with moderator Tim Russert at the NBC studios in Washington. Nader said Sunday he will run for president as a third-party candidate, criticizing the top White House contenders as too close to big business and pledging to repeat a bid that will "shift the power from the few to the many." (AP Photo/Meet The Press, Alex Wong)

WASHINGTON — Ralph Nader on Sunday announced a fresh bid for the White House, criticizing the top contenders as too close to big business and dismissing the possibility that his third-party candidacy could tip the election to Republicans.

The longtime consumer advocate is still loathed by many Democrats who accuse him of costing Al Gore the 2000 election.

Nader said most people are disenchanted with the Democratic and Republican parties due to a prolonged Iraq war and a shaky economy. He also blamed tax and other corporate-friendly policies under the Bush administration that he said have left many lower- and middle-class people in debt.

"You take that framework of people feeling locked out, shut out, marginalized, disrespected," he said. "You go from Iraq, to Palestine/Israel, from Enron to Wall Street, from Katrina to the bungling of the Bush administration, to the complicity of the Democrats in not stopping him on the war, stopping him on the tax cuts."

Nader, who turns 74 later this week, announced his candidacy on NBC's "Meet the Press."

In a later interview with The Associated Press, he rejected the notion of himself as a spoiler candidate, saying the electorate will not vote for a "pro-war John McCain." He also predicted his campaign would do better than in 2004, when he won just 0.3 percent of the vote as an independent.

"This time we're ready for them," said Nader of the Democratic Party lawsuits that kept him off the ballot in some states.

Democratic candidates Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton quickly sought to portray Nader's announcement as having little impact.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Obviously, it's not helpful to whomever our Democratic nominee is. But it's a free country," said Clinton, who called Nader's announcement a "passing fancy."

Obama dismissed Nader as a perennial presidential campaigner. "He thought that there was no difference between Al Gore and George Bush and eight years later I think people realize that Ralph did not know what he was talking about," Obama added.

Republican Mike Huckabee welcomed Nader into the race.

"I think it always would probably pull votes away from the Democrats, not the Republicans," the former Arkansas governor said on CNN.

Nader said Obama's and Clinton's lukewarm response was not surprising given that both political parties typically treat third-party candidates as "second-class citizens." Nader said he will decide in the coming days whether to run as an independent, Green Party candidate or in some other third party.

Pointing a finger at Republicans, he described McCain as a candidate for "perpetual war" and said he welcomed the support of Republican conservatives "who don't like the war in Iraq, who don't like taxpayer dollars wasted, and who don't like the Patriot Act and who treasure their rights of privacy."

"If the Democrats can't landslide the Republicans this year, they ought to just wrap up," Nader added.

___

Associated Press writers Beth Fouhy in Providence, R.I., and David Espo in Lorain, Ohio, contributed to this report.

___

On the Net:

Ralph Nader presidential campaign: http://www.votenader.org

WASHINGTON — Ralph Nader on Sunday announced a fresh bid for the White House, criticizing the top contenders as too close to big business and dismissing the possibility that his third-party cand...
WASHINGTON — Ralph Nader on Sunday announced a fresh bid for the White House, criticizing the top contenders as too close to big business and dismissing the possibility that his third-party cand...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
454
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (13 pages total)
- xcrunner77 I'm a Fan of xcrunner77 14 fans permalink

Nader may be the force that unites a potentially split Democrat party. Nader got votes in 2000 because people were dissatisfied with their choices and made him almost a protest vote. This time Democrats are VERY satisfied with their candidates. Most will be insulted by Nader's jumping in long after hundreds of thousands of people have become engaged, worked hard, and poured their hearts into candidates they can finally believe in and feel good about -- whether you like Hillary or Obama.

I have to see that as an Obama supporter I'd be disappointed to see Hillary get the nomination. I even considered not voting for her because of her dirty tricks in South Carolina. But now that Nader is being an ass about it -- I would happily pull that lever for Hillary ifI had to, rather than someone like Nader, or McCain.

Thanks Ralph. All that speculation about the Dems being split at the convention now goes away. You've reminded us that we need to stick together and not let cranky old men like you or McCain screw the country up more.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 02/24/2008
- Sisyphuss I'm a Fan of Sisyphuss 13 fans permalink

Nader attracted just 0.3 percent of the vote in 2004 (about the same as the Libertarian party) and he'll be on the ballot in fewer states this year. There are always a number of third-party candidates on the ballot in every election. It's much ado about nothing

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 02/24/2008
- omeo2013 I'm a Fan of omeo2013 9 fans permalink
photo

The problem isn't so much Nader as the people who're dumb enough to vote for him and honestly believe he's not taking votes from the Democrats.

Hey, I'd like a third party, too-hell, I'd like a parliament-but no one's willing to risk handing the presidency to the other team by supporting a new candidate.

Yes, Gore botched his campaign, but you're an idiot if you don't think the people who voted for Nader would've voted for Gore if Nader hadn't been in the race.

Our only hope is that some of the people who voted for Nader before will realize that their mistake and that Obama's lead over McCain will be too big for Nader to make a difference.

Remember kids, a vote for Nader is a vote for McCain and all he stands for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 AM on 02/24/2008

Well I just might make that move. I can't see myself voting for Obama after his Rove type tactics in Ohio. At least with Nader I know what I'll get. So go Ralph!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 02/24/2008
- denver I'm a Fan of denver 5 fans permalink

I cant stand this when Ralph runs it only means trouble for democrats.According to Ralph all three of the top candidates Mcain,Obama,Clinton have one thing in common they are all rich and belong to the exclusive senate club and Barack has the best rhetoric ever seen............I think not Ralph he means what he says and people see it feel it and believe in it,

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 02/24/2008
- BluGrrl I'm a Fan of BluGrrl 5 fans permalink

Leave it to Ralph Nader to come in and f*ck up the race for President...

Ralph Nader just did John McCain and the Republicans the biggest favor in the world by jumping into this race.

Nader has never won before and he is not about to start now, the only thing he is going to do by jumping in the race is suck votes away from the Democratic nominee and help the Republicans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 02/24/2008

I think Obama is already doing that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 02/24/2008
photo

Has Nader ever had a job? For a guy without one he sure lives well on the idiots money that that support him. Send this Arab back to the rock that he lives under.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 AM on 02/24/2008
- flashlight I'm a Fan of flashlight 3 fans permalink

A vote for Nader is a vote for 100 more years in Iraq.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 02/24/2008
- PODdem I'm a Fan of PODdem 2 fans permalink

Hey what happened to Hope? What happened to Change? Nader is Change note change lite like Obama. So now we have chance for true conviction. Time to draw the line Nader in 08 YES WE CAN

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 AM on 02/24/2008

Thank you voteMcCain.com Your neocon masters will be very pleased.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 AM on 02/24/2008

correct, nader has been the change candidate all along, perhaps obama could be his running mate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 AM on 02/24/2008

Maybe you should start reading accounts of "voting irregularities" on bradblog.

It doesn't seem that the RNC will allow anyone to siphon votes from them in some cases.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 02/24/2008

that was actually a reply to sage25

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 02/24/2008
- flashlight I'm a Fan of flashlight 3 fans permalink

Yeah, why settle for only 8 years of Republican control, when we can make it an even 12?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 AM on 02/24/2008
- glorija I'm a Fan of glorija 2 fans permalink

Mr. Nader has been the paradigmatic example of what true citizenship is, but his decision to run this year demonstrates that he is unable to judge the context and the timing of what he does. He has a right to do this, but it's a wrong decision.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 AM on 02/24/2008

No big deal. He will not have an impact.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 AM on 02/24/2008
photo

a big non-factor.

less than zero.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 02/24/2008
- omeo2013 I'm a Fan of omeo2013 9 fans permalink
photo

The problem isn't so much Nader as the people who're dumb enough to vote for him and honestly believe he's not taking votes from the Democrats.

Hey, I'd like a third party, too-hell, I'd like a parliament-but no one's willing to risk handing the presidency to the other team by supporting a new candidate.

Yes, Gore botched his campaign, but you're an idiot if you don't think the people who voted for Nader would've voted for Gore if Nader hadn't been in the race.

Our only hope is that some of the people who voted for Nader before will realize that their mistake and that Obama's lead over McCain will be too big for Nader to make a difference.

Remember kids, a vote for Nader is a vote for McCain and all he stands for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 02/24/2008

Oh, no - not AGAIN! This guy is really unsafe at any speed. If Ralph Nader's shadow would match his ego, this World would be a pinch-black place. What's so f'n great in being a nuissance?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 02/24/2008
- BluGrrl I'm a Fan of BluGrrl 5 fans permalink

Hear, hear Montanamotor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 02/24/2008

Of course he has the right to run for president.

Yet it is undeniable that had he not put his name on the ballot in Florida in 2000, it would have greatly increased the chances of Gore winning. The evidence is in the vote totals.

It is also true that the past 7 years of Bush governance have been amongst the most disastrous in U.S. history, given the consequences.

Furthermore, consider the future ramifications if Nader becomes a factor again in a "Bush-2"/McCain presidency. One example is Supreme Court vacancies being filled with right-wing extremists who favor militarists and corporatists and will rule against our civil and Constitutional rights - for decades.

Nader was a great man who became ego-obsessed. He lost influence and has now decided to return to us every four years as a presidential candidate knowing he cannot win.

It is self-destructive and reeks of a "payback" mentality for his being out-of-favor with the public.

Even though he has a "right" to run for president, he has a bigger obligation to stand aside and support his country. That is the patriotic (and unselfish) thing to do.

Let us have a chance to make history and change the direction of our country and the world.

Carpe Diem!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 02/24/2008
- xcrunner77 I'm a Fan of xcrunner77 14 fans permalink

Ralph lost in 2000 and 2004. What has he done since then to recommend him? Does ANYONE know what Nader has been doing with his time?

Nader shows that he is the tooliest of tools. If you believe that he took the votes from Gore and put Bush in office, then you have to lay the Iraq War at Nader's door too.

Who will he take votes from? Not Dems. They've seen this trick before. Independents who want a change from Republicans know that putting their vote with Nader is like voting for McCain. Republicans? Ha. He's too liberal.

NO ONE will vote for Ralph.

(I think he runs to fill up his bank account. Doesn't he get to keep leftover campaign donations?)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 02/24/2008
- ceasenake I'm a Fan of ceasenake 8 fans permalink

Good for you Ralph! It's better to have more choices than Formula A or Formula B.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 AM on 02/24/2008
- xcrunner77 I'm a Fan of xcrunner77 14 fans permalink

Ralph lost in 2000 and 2004. What has he done since then to recommend him? Does ANYONE know what Nader has been doing with his time?

Nader shows that he is the tooliest of tools. If you believe that he took the votes from Gore and put Bush in office, then you have to lay the Iraq War at Nader's door too.

Who will he take votes from? Not Dems. They've seen this trick before. Independents who want a change from Republicans know that putting their vote with Nader is like voting for McCain. Republicans? Ha. He's too liberal.

NO ONE will vote for Ralph.

(I think he runs to fill up his bank account. Doesn't he get to keep leftover campaign donations?)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 AM on 02/24/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (13 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect