iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Thomas: No Questions in 2 Years

MARK SHERMAN   02/25/08 12:10 PM ET   AP

Clarence Silence

WASHINGTON — Two years and 144 cases have passed since Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas last spoke up at oral arguments. It is a period of unbroken silence that contrasts with the rest of the court's unceasing inquiries.

Hardly a case goes by, including two appeals that were argued Monday, without eight justices peppering lawyers with questions. Oral arguments offer justices the chance to resolve nagging doubts about a case, probe its weaknesses or make a point to their colleagues.

Left, right and center, the justices ask and they ask and they ask. Sometimes they debate each other, leaving the lawyer at the podium helpless to jump in. "I think you're handling these questions very well," Chief Justice John Roberts quipped to a lawyer recently in the midst of one such exchange.

Leaning back in his leather chair, often looking up at the ceiling, Thomas takes it all in, but he never joins in.

Monday was no different. Thomas said nothing.

He occasionally leans to his right to share a comment or a laugh with Justice Stephen Breyer. Less often, he talks to Justice Anthony Kennedy, to his immediate left.

Thomas, characteristically, declined to comment for this article. But in the course of his publicity tour for his autobiography, "My Grandfather's Son," the 59-year-old justice discussed his reticence on the bench on several occasions.

The questions may be helpful to the others, Thomas said, but not to him.

"One thing I've demonstrated often in 16 years is you can do this job without asking a single question," he told an adoring crowd at the Federalist Society, a conservative legal group.

The book tour showed that the topic comes up even among friendly audiences.

Indeed, Thomas' comment was provoked by this question: Why do your colleagues ask so many questions?

His response: "I did not plant that question. That's a fine question. When you figure out the answer, you let me know," he said.

The typical hourlong argument session can sometimes be difficult, even for a practiced questioner.

"I really would like to hear what those reasons are without interruption from all of my colleagues," Justice John Paul Stevens said at an argument in the fall.

The newest justice, Samuel Alito, has said he initially found it hard to get a question in sometimes amid all the former law professors on the court.

The last time Thomas asked a question in court was Feb. 22, 2006, in a death penalty case out of South Carolina. A unanimous court eventually broadened the ability of death-penalty defendants to blame someone else for the crime.

In the past, the Georgia-born Thomas has chalked up his silence to his struggle as a teenager to master standard English after having grown up speaking Geechee, a kind of dialect that thrived among former slaves on the islands off the South Carolina, Georgia and Florida coasts.

He also has said he will ask a pertinent question if his colleagues don't but sees no need to engage in the back-and-forth just to hear his own voice.

Lately, he has focused on the latter reason.

"If I think a question will help me decide a case, then I'll ask that question," he told C-SPAN's Brian Lamb in October. "Otherwise, it's not worth asking because it detracts from my job."

He talked in that same interview about descriptions of him as the silent justice.

"I can't really say that it's unfair to say that I'm silent in that context. I would like to, though, be referred to as the 'listening justice,' you know," Thomas said. "I still believe that, if somebody else is talking, somebody should be listening."

The following month, however, at an event sponsored by Hillsdale College in Michigan, Thomas was more combative when asked about oral arguments.

Suppose surgeons started discussing the merits of removing a gallbladder while in the operating room, Thomas said, as quoted by U.S. News & World Report. "You really didn't go in there to have a debate about gallbladder surgery," he said. Similarly, "we are there to decide cases, not to engage in seminar discussions."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

WASHINGTON — Two years and 144 cases have passed since Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas last spoke up at oral arguments. It is a period of unbroken silence that contrasts with the rest of t...
WASHINGTON — Two years and 144 cases have passed since Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas last spoke up at oral arguments. It is a period of unbroken silence that contrasts with the rest of t...
Filed by Will Thomas  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 81
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
05:22 PM on 02/26/2008
"One thing I've demonstrated often in 16 years is you can do this job without asking a single question," he told an adoring crowd at the Federalist Society, a conservative legal group.

"A dude in a black trench coat gives me an envelope the night before and I vote its content- its not like we're in Plato's republic or something."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
guntotinganglion
Moe, Larry, THE CHEESE!
03:15 PM on 02/26/2008
Hey, don't bother him, he's watching his Long Dong Silver classics!
01:14 PM on 02/26/2008
That and his rabid hatred of liberals, should be enough to impeach him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
booker52
avid reader
09:50 AM on 02/26/2008
I take it to mean that he either hates his job or he is clueless, I vote for both.
photo
MajorKong
If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally
09:29 AM on 02/26/2008
I guess he doesn't really need to talk, just sit there and nod approvingly to whatever Scalia says like a good little Republican.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Graywolf48
If you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu
09:25 AM on 02/26/2008
Thomas says little because every time he opens his mouth some of his brains fall out. But, he is smart enough to realize he has very little gray matter and must keep as much as he can to just function. He's the Conservative Republican pushing the Progressive Democrat's nose into affirmative action. "So, you like affirmative action, well here's a little affirmative action for you to deal with on the Supreme Court, ha ha ha!" Thomas is a Republican joke on liberal Democrats and until he dies or resigns or retires there is little if anything that can be done about the punchline. The Republicans seek out the most incompetent and obnoxious minorities and push them in your face. Thomas is one example, Alberto Gonzalez is another.
photo
MajorKong
If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally
09:13 AM on 02/26/2008
I don't know what's worse. Clarence Thomas not talking or Clarence Thomas talking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anonani
A woman of substance
02:39 AM on 02/26/2008
I suppose that Justice Thomas has his reasons for remaining silent. It is,however, so much less that the nation expects of him or any Supreme Court Justice for that matter. Perhaps he is not a scholar. Perhaps he is not an intellectual. Perhaps he knows he has a good thing and no matter what anybody says now or has said in the past, he never ever has to worry about getting another job. He will go down in our history books, infamously and otherwise. He has nothing to prove and we can't make him prove he is worthy of his seat. He is there to stay. AN
08:10 AM on 02/26/2008
This is an insane discussion, the man was never qualified to be on the court and keeping his mouth shut proves it...perhaps his electronic lynching dulled his brain waves...Anita Hill you have been proven right about this guy so many times...the fact that he would be willing to stay on the court as an Republican affirmative action appointee(aren't repugs the ones who argued AA only placed under achieving black folks in positions they didn't earn?)-in this case they were right and they put him there anyway....hmmmm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
05:31 PM on 02/26/2008
As much as Thomas complains about being humiliated by affirmative action he certainly didn't turn down the Supreme Court for which he was underqualified by a mile,so that he could get more experience and broaden his legal background.

I think the Repugs put him in to prove affirmative action doesn't work ,and you have to admit, he IS a great example.
02:00 AM on 02/26/2008
Perhaps he's finally realized how incompetent and unqualified he really is. And maybe he's caught on to the fact that he has always been little more than a token, so the reichwingers could pretend to believe in racial equality. He was never any more than a modern-day Uncle Tom, and never will be.
10:32 PM on 02/25/2008
While Mr Justice Thomas's nomination was confirmed by the US Senate & remains as a member of the US Supreme Court-his conformation hearings, the so called Borking, established, beyond doubt that he is quite stupid. Mr Justice Thomas doesn't open his mouth or express his opinions because he doesn't want to repeatedly show the depths of his stupidity & bring more attention to that sad fact which could cause a constant fresh torrent of 'new' criticism of his stupidity each time he opened his mouth on Court matters.
Clarence Thomas doesn't want to be forced out of his position on the US Supreme Court. A lawyer of his sort & talent wouldn't get paid as much or be assured of a comfortable retirement if he wasn't a US Supreme Court Justice. He has it made. He has a very well paid sinecure for life. While he is quite stupid-he can easily see that he would be a 5th rate lawyer if he didn't have a seat on the US Supreme Court. Practicing law or teaching law is a very competive occupation. Look at Chris Darden or Marcia Clark, the prosecutors who failed to convict OJ Simpson of murder & look at the man who had been elected to serve as LA County Prosecutor. You haven't heard of them for a while. Mr Darden was teaching at a 3d tier law school a while ago. Neither he nor Ms Clark are seen on talk shows or asked to give their legal opinions re: sensational cases on cable TV now. Mr Darden's book was not a best seller. If Ms Clark wrote a book, it didn't become a best seller. Clarence Thomas would face the same fate as Mr Darden & Ms Clark face if it were not for his position on the US Supreme Court. Does anybody know or care what happened to Gil Garceti after he left office in LA County?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NABNYC
08:39 PM on 02/25/2008
He's seething. He's still pissed off that his sexual harassment of female employees was exposed so everyone knows what a perv he is.

And he's also angry because he thinks other people think he's only on the Supreme Court because they wanted a black conservative, and he was the only one they could find. It was a Republican form of affirmative action. And it's absolutely true. He isn't there because he's got experience in law, or even as a trial judge, which was minimal. He's not there because he's a legal scholar. He's there because he's a token. Live with it Clarence.

But he's pissed off. He sits up there and doesn't care what people say, doesn't care about the cases. He just waits for Roberts to rule and then he says "Yeah, whatever, me too."

The only good thing about Clarence Thomas is that he'll likely resign office soon because he's so pissed off about everything (or maybe ashamed?) that he wants to go somewhere and hide. And I'd contribute to a fund for that.
BrighterStar
Let Freedom Ring
08:47 PM on 02/25/2008
Typical liberal racist. Can't get past the color of his skin. If he was a liberal you would be saying how great of a man Thomas is.
06:24 AM on 02/26/2008
As a black man no I wouldn't. A liberal without a tongue is worse than a Republican with one.

This country was founded on Liberal ideas. I wish you people on the right would simply realize there are all forms of patriotism. The one which restricts you the least is the optimum but it must always be balanced against the public good.

The public good is not served by a silent judge.

Thomas has clearly given his reasons, mostly by citing other great Jurists who said little on the bench. He juxtaposes himself against that backdrop and says "why not me?" He then laments the very system that got him there.

He's a strange cat.He hates he went in as Affirmative Action at Yale and he feels he has the stink of it all over him. That few took him seriously.

In the end it seemed to me he saw things others probably didn't see. He seems to lack a certain confidence, and simultaneous regret he is not truly equal to whites because of AA.

He never considers the other aspects which allowed the others into Yale under a different form of AA. But I have to agree there is a stigma and it is palatable.

The one thing I despise about this court is that it is far more active than any other court in history. This group is finding standing law unconstitutional all over the place or requiring new standards for how cases are read, requiring that they have standing first. On the surface this seems correct, but the technical merits of the practice has rendered many cases that would have been heard, unheard and have been heard through a chain I remind you - it ain't easy getting your case heard in the Supreme Court. It means courts see ambiguity in the law and want it re-examined and made more clear.

These guys are changing precedent law at an alarming rate. That, my friends, is activism, and that is something we need to attenuate by gong left on the judge appointments, and Democrats must immediately go nuclear should the GOP dare black a single nomination. Up or down votes for all if they get out of committee, yes?

Clarence Thomas is weird, has some personal issues, and like Scalia I do not think he is qualified to sit on the court. neither is Scalia.

While I don't like Roberts and the other Alito, they have proven to me to be capable jurists although I do not like where they come out on law.

-J
10:58 AM on 02/26/2008
Racist? Uncle Thomas is the whitest Black man in Washington.
He sits there on his fat, lazy butt with the same lack of intellectual curosity as George Bush.
He doesn't care, he's got a huge paycheck for life and knows his performance doesn't have to matter.
Ask any Black person what they think of this sell-out bastard. When they tell you he's a loser who sold his soul for a buck, are they being racist?
It's not about race, pal, it's about incompetence and political puppetry.
BrighterStar
Let Freedom Ring
08:35 PM on 02/25/2008
Thomas is the best justice on the court. If people would take the time to read his opinions that would be clear. Instead, people who don't take the time to educate themselves on the issues focus on media reports about something meaningless like questions at oral arguments.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TheHandyman
Death...the last new experience you will ever have
12:45 AM on 02/26/2008
And you really like George Bush too, don't you? You think Bush is a very smart man if only we would read what he has written(nothing) and listen to what he has said (can't complete a simple sentence) or the success of his foriegn policy(there aren't any) or his masterful touch on the economy of the country(I don't think the War(and borrowing 2 trillion dollars from China) is the cause for the poor economy, building too many houses is!

Thomas's decisions show not even a rudimentary grasp of Constitutional Law. He is the Supreme Courts equivalent of a linguist translating the bible from Old English to Middle English and he speaks neither language. Thomas is a token conservative Black and not a very good one. But you aren't smart enough to figure that out.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:27 AM on 02/26/2008
Read his opinions?

Where might I find a source for them?

Thank you.
07:00 PM on 02/25/2008
He's unqualified and out of his depth and he'll always be miserable partly because he's full of self hate, anger, and bitterness but mostly because he can't tell pubic hair jokes anymore. He's another reason to despise the Bushes AKA Murder Inc.
07:45 AM on 02/26/2008
Bush Family as Murder Inc.

Exactly!!!!!!
photo
petey64
I fix computers free for those in need
06:58 PM on 02/25/2008
WOW, there just is no pleasing the Huffpo's unless everyone acts like them and if they don't act like them then they must be some foul name......what is wrong with you people who call yourselves progressive, it's plain to see that progressive must mean prejudice, this man earned his way up and just because he is quiet and religeous you villify him......well so what he doesn't have to do a damn thing to please you prejudice people, he is going to sit on that bench for life so go sit and spin and after your lame muslim gets beat like a drum in November you'll get more supremes picked by the majority of Americans.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TheHandyman
Death...the last new experience you will ever have
12:48 AM on 02/26/2008
Ah yes, when we have no facts, we yell racism! And then we open our stupid mouth to slander a person with a religious label which is a lie. You are absolutely brilliant! And your understanding of how and who selects the Supreme Court Justices is just masterful....or not.
05:28 PM on 02/25/2008
he doesnt ask questions because he is not very bright.
BrighterStar
Let Freedom Ring
08:20 PM on 02/25/2008
Or maybe he knows the answers.
02:01 AM on 02/26/2008
Or maybe he doesn't even understand the questions. Of course, his handlers may have stopped feeding him lines, too.
BrighterStar
Let Freedom Ring
08:23 PM on 02/25/2008
or maybe he already knows the answers.