Paulson: No

Paulson: No "Bailouts" For Reckless Lenders

Wall Street Journal   |  MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS, GREG IP   |   February 28, 2008 08:30 AM


digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

The Bush administration is hardening its opposition to the chorus of Democrats, bankers, economists and consumer advocates calling for a big-money government rescue program for struggling homeowners.

In an interview yesterday, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson branded many of the aid proposals circulating in Washington as "bailouts" for reckless lenders, investors and speculators, rather than measures that would provide meaningful relief to deserving, but cash-strapped, mortgage borrowers.

Mr. Paulson's comments came amid signs that the nation's housing market is getting worse, not better. Indeed, at a House hearing yesterday, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke kept the door open to further interest-rate cuts to boost the economy, even as he warned that inflation pressures have intensified in recent weeks.

President Bush and other administration officials have voiced skepticism before about a major government effort to ease the burden of the nation's housing slump. But Mr. Paulson's comments are the most explicit to date in laying out the administration's opposition to the recent spate of rescue plans.

Keep Reading

- OR -

Read Wall Street 24/7's analysis


 
Comments
18
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

JoeB. Mrcontinental, my defender and apologist, is correct about my less than lucid remarks. In an organization when the members who are the most productive and supportive of the organization's mission statement, are punished for their fidelity, the organization declines. Coupled with this punishment for producing and saving, the crooks who used their influence to swindle investors by making unwarranted loans and selling the paper as an asset are being rewarded with bail out. This leadership performance directs an organization to irrelevance and destruction .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 02/29/2008

Allowing Banks and Wall Street Leveraged loan sharks to stuff their debt into Fannie and Freddie is beyond a bailout ....... it's an enormous financial burden directly levied onto we the tax payers. No one asked our permission that I know of. And the Congress people we pay to look out for our best interests help broker this swindle. Taxation with out representation remains the best stimulus for revolution that I know of.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:11 PM on 02/28/2008
photo

WELL YOU FORGOT REAGAN AND ALL THAT DEREGUALTION !

DON'T YOU LOVE REGAN NOW?

NO FOOD INSPECTORS , NO BANKING CONTROLS, NO STOCK MARKET CONTROLS.

NO OVERSIGHT ON MILITARY SPENDING, NO OVERSIGHT ON GOVERNMENT WASTE.

DON'T YOU SEE THE WEALTHY CASHING OUT OF THE U.S.A.?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:38 PM on 02/28/2008

So the last 168 billion "rebate" was NOT a bailout? We weren't spending taxpayer money then? When was that, two weeks ago?

I need to update that old lawyer joke: How do you know someone in the Bush Administration is lying? You can see their lips moving.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 02/28/2008

Paulson denies a bailout for the consumer. But for the reckless, swindler banks that loaned the money, his leadership is feverishly lowering the Fed funds rate and flooding the system with our degenerated currency. We save the guilty and destroy the wealth of the responsible citizens.
Lowering the discount rate is having the effect of higher interest rates; the investor sees the American economic system as an increasingly high risk environment.
Such is the decision-making of an incompetent, corrupt administration. Previlege and powerful interests prevail over the common interests. And the organization declines precipitiously and perilously.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 AM on 02/28/2008
photo

Well you are wrong on that "responsible citizen" phrase. Responsible people won"t take out loans they can"t afford for bigger houses than they need.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 02/28/2008
photo

Maybe you should read his comment again. He wasn't talking about those people, he was talking about the ones who have planned and saved and done all of the right things but are still being INFLATED out of existence. The others are included in the guilty portion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 02/28/2008

Forgot the poor Americans and lets continue a Stupid War. That is costing us Billions in Dollars and Thousands of Wonderful American live. Get rid of this goofy Admin. We need Change and help to put the Country back in the right direction.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 AM on 02/28/2008

Forgot the poor Americans and lets continue a Stupid War. That is costing us Billions in Dollars and Thousands of Wonderful American live. Get rid of this goofy Admin. We need Change and help to put the Country back in the right direction.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 02/28/2008

I don't want to see a bail out. Rather I would support setting a maximum interest rate limit on all property loans at say 4% above prime as the best solution. This would dramatically reduce the rates for most borrowers, but at the same time not bail out the speculators. In addition it would eliminate the excessive profit the lenders were hoping to make and force them to be more careful in their future lending practices. As for disenfranchising those the would not qualify for such a loan I say those are just the people who could not afford the loans in the first place, so it is right that they don"t have access to them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 02/28/2008

Why 4% and not 1% or 20% above prime? The point is the market should determine the interest rate - based on a multitude of factors, not the least of which is the credit risk of the borrower. To fix the interest rate would ultimately mean a lot less entities lending money. Who does that help? Not a soul.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 03/08/2008

As any financier knows well, borrowing trillions of dollars (from that magical mystery "somewhere") to bail out anyone at all in this case simply will not work. If there is no debt there is no lending and vice versa.

But there sure-as-hell can be bank reform, and we had better hurry. Here's what I'd do:

(1) Stop the fraud in the processing of transactions. Banks must process their daily activity in the manner most favorable to the customer, not the manner most favorable to themselves. (A major bank made $14 BILLION in a very recent year from "fees and penalties.")

(2) Impose usury laws. Force interest rates paid by consumers to be vastly lowered and impose strict limits on how and when those rates can be raised. "Of course the loan-shark's lobbyists are 'rich,' ya doofus! Throw 'em ALL out!"

(3) Reform the credit-reporting industry. Everyone gets a free copy and has complete rights to dispute and clean it. In the future, any change to your rating may only occur after you have been informed and have been given the right to respond. You have a formal right to appeal.

(4) Re-appraise housing and forgive an appropriate portion of the debt. The house may not be re-sold for more than 10% profit over that new amount for the next 10 years. Simultaneously re-price both the collateral and the loan-balance. You're not destroying value: you're squeezing out the empty air.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 AM on 02/28/2008
photo

By 'reckless,' he means 'small-time.'

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 AM on 02/28/2008
photo

Don't ya just love good cop/bad cop. And the rubes just eat it up. They are going to screw us no matter what.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 AM on 02/28/2008
photo

Yuppers, MrC.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 AM on 02/28/2008

What reckless lenders really need is serious jail time.

Interesting how "tough on crime" only applies to the lower classes. When that attitude changes then maybe we will see things start to improve

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 AM on 02/28/2008
photo

Good! No bailout for risky lenders or unqualified borrowers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 AM on 02/28/2008

Ditto to ForRichardorPoorer's message!! Basically any bailout rubberstamps the bubble the loose credit created. People who saw the bubble and didn't jump on that bandwagon will get the short end of the stick if the government jumps in with a bailout, which will only serve to keep excessive prices in place. In the end, political pandering to the unintelligent, uniformed, irresponsible people who jumped on what they saw as a gravy train, only reinforces that behavior, and punishes the responsible. ** I have never voted for a Republican presidential candidate, but it looks like that will change this year.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 AM on 03/08/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect