Prince Harry Fighting In Afghanistan For Last Three Months, Reports Say

Prince Harry Fighting In Afghanistan For Last Three Months, Reports Say

Huffington Post   |   February 28, 2008 03:05 PM


digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

UPDATE: US Magazine Says Prince Harry Returning From Afghanistan:

Prince Harry is on a plane out of Afghanistan, a source told Usmagazine.com.

The 23-year-old royal has been serving there with British troops since December, it was reported today.

"We will not comment on the whereabouts of Prince Harry," a Ministry of Defense spokesperson told Us.

UPDATE: MSNBC released video of Prince Harry firing a machine gun. The clip also includes Prince Harry's comments on first learning he was going to Afghanistan.

British news outlets The Guardian, The Daily Mail and the BBC are now running stories revealing that Prince Harry has been fighting in Afghanistan for the last 10 weeks.

The Guardian:

Prince Harry has been secretly serving in Afghanistan with British troops since last December, it emerged today.

The news of his operational posting leaked out following the breakdown of a news blackout agreement with the media when the story was posted on the US-based Drudge Report website.

The Daily Telegraph:

Harry has personally fired a machine gun at the Taliban Prince Harry has personally fired a machine gun at the Taliban during a front line clash in Afghanistan.

Manning a powerful .50 calibre machine gun for the first time, Harry helped Gurkha troops repel an insurgent attack on the southernmost British position in Helmand.



BBC
: Prince Harry serving in Helmand Province

Prince Harry has been fighting the Taleban on the front line in Afghanistan, the Ministry of Defence has confirmed.

Harry, 23, who is third in line to the throne, has spent the last 10 weeks serving in Helmand Province.




The Drudge Report first lead with the news that Prince Harry has been fighting in Afghanistan for three months. Drudge used Australian magazine New Idea and German Magazine BILD as sources.

Below is the article from New Idea that was published on January 7. According to Wikipedia, New Idea magazine was ranked 3rd in Australia in 2006, ahead of Reader's Digest. The magazine apparently published the full report in it's paper copy.

Prince Harry has joined his regiment on a covert mission to Afghanistan and his unit has already seen front line action.

Not seen in public since the middle of December, New Idea can exclusively reveal that despite opposition from senior members of the British government and the royal family itself, Harry now joins his uncle Prince Andrew as a royal who has been to war.

'At first there was a lot of resistance' said a friend 'but Harry threatened to resign his commission and serve as a private if he was kept from the battlefield - and that proved to be the final straw'.

Full details on this breaking story in this week's New Idea

Photos of Prince Harry in Afghanistan:


 
Comments
300
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
photo


This was all photo-ops and damn it if the people bit the bait!

As a former member of the military, I can tell you this "secret deployment" wouldn't have been secret for long. What happened was obvious; he was finally deployed because you cannot send British kids to war while the Royals enjoy the high life and dress like Nazis (like Harry himself did at a party some time ago), not fair is it? Then the military themselves secretly leak the story and the pull him out because of the "concern for the safety of the prince". What's even funnier is that he was patrolling and most of these pictures want to make him look like a regular infantry soldier.

There is a legitimate concern in the age of recorded executions and Islamist sensationalism to protect a someone like Harry but A) He doesn't have to pull infantry duty to serve (geez, even Elvis went to war) and B) He doesn't necessarily stand out from other British soldiers. McCain's son is serving in Iraq and he is of a high profile, since his father is running for president on the platform of that war. This was a stunt by the military in Britain to allay justified criticism that their royals are indeed considered a better breed of people than those they lord over : "Well, he tried to serve but the media outed him!".

What a crock!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 PM on 03/01/2008
photo

I hope this doesn't reslt in the Taliban finding Harry and his mates, they'd make quite a prize.
I'm sure journalists the world over would voice deep regrets as they run that story.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 02/29/2008
photo

It's was a stunt, people! Don't drink the Kool-aid!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 PM on 03/01/2008
photo

Not only has Drudge endangered Prince Harry's life, but the men he served with. It would seem to me that terrorist strike symbolic targets, and so they would intend to bring harm to the soldiers he stood with for a multimedia event. No one benefits when Drudge decided to endanger Harry's life. The monumental cost of bringing Harry out isn't only expensive, it's taking valuable time away from the work the soldiers are trying to do.

It is repulsive to know that Drudge would be so stupid, so completely immoral to defy the news blackout and put lives in danger for a so-called scoop on his piece-of-garbage blog. He is a bottom feeder, and I hope the UK and the royal family do their best to ruin his career more so than he has done on his own. He has no foresight, no sense of responsibility and no integrity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 AM on 02/29/2008

He's a Prince of what? He has no political authority and he chose to serve his country, I'm sure there are a lot of Princess's serving in the military but they won't be able to get off the front line because of the " don't ask don't tell " policy!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 AM on 02/29/2008

Let's recap: You bring up three different ideas, only one of them serves to make a point, and that was a stupid non sequitir to bash gay people.

Great job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:16 PM on 02/29/2008
photo

In other developments, Keith Richards fell out of a date palm somewhere in Anbar Province.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 AM on 02/29/2008

Wars are fought by the common people and not by the elite class. On the battle field, you will never see the rulers but the unknown people. If the war is victorious, the gold medals and honours go to the elite class for their bravery while in the case of a defeat, the poor cry over their sons corpses.
Although Prince Harry went to Afghanistan and didn't stay in his Palace is an honour however, to say that he was on the front line and fought against the Taliban is undermining everyone's intelligence.
The pictures are an evidence of great snapshots by the Royal Family's Photographer. Prince Harry can you please raise you gun and point it , click click. We shouldn't forget that the Taliban control the 2/3's of the country, and Prince Harry on his tour in the streets has a photographer taking pictures click click. Furthermore, the second last picture shows him wearing a camouflage uniform (black,green,brown) that the English aren't wearing in Afghanistan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 AM on 02/29/2008

What price Drudge gets fucked by the Royal's PR juggernaut? It couldn't happen to a bigger asshole, and it can't happen soon enough.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 AM on 02/29/2008
photo

Shame on the Drudge report for leaking this info. This young man wanted to serve and they have ruin this for him. Now he has to be pulled out to save his life and those around him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:37 AM on 02/29/2008
- SNS I'm a Fan of SNS permalink

Meanwhile, right wingers will continue to mock Brits and Euros in general as they perceive them as pacifists, cowards, intellectuals, etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:25 AM on 02/29/2008

Don't know where you get your propaganda but nothing could be further from the truth. England has been with us from the beginning of the war on terrorism. The President of France is proamerican. Freedom loving europeans and americans have the same goals. Admittedly, european communists have their noses out of joint, but hey, you would be upset too if someone tore down that nice wall that kept everybody in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:43 AM on 02/29/2008

When you say England I think you mean Britain. They are not the same thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 AM on 02/29/2008

Matt Drudge and Perez Hilton would make a cute couple. They're both worthless wastes of oxygen. They are parasites overcompensating for the fact that no one ever liked them in junior high.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:23 AM on 02/29/2008
- davy I'm a Fan of davy permalink

We're proud of you Harry. Did you bump into any U.S. politicians kids while you were over there?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:11 AM on 02/29/2008


Go Harry!

Romney Boys, Bush Twins - take note!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 AM on 02/29/2008

If Harry is now targeted and killed, the mag ought to be held partially responsible. No wonder most of these "literary" journalist are alcoholics--they can't live with themselves sober.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 AM on 02/29/2008

thank you procrustes . . . and the exposure caused by these scumbags has ended his tour of duty . . . Harry is a brave young man .. .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 AM on 02/29/2008

It matters not that Harry is a Royal.

What matters is that he is a serving officer and a high profile target if identified to those who wish to kill and maim British troops who are in a war zone for no other reason but to help and assist American allies. .

What matters is that this Mr. Drudge has by his foolish and irresponsible behaviour, placed a serving British officer and his mates in greater danger than they need be for no other reason than to gain brownie points and profit for his disreputable newspaper Drudge Report.

What matters is that all British serving officers and men will now wonder loudly if there is any worth in supporting our so called friends and allies in this horrific war if our American allies casually expose our officers and men to the enemy"s fire, not for the benefit of ending this war, but solely for the kudos of a so called world exclusive. .

What matters is that many British serving officers and men will be now asking if they want to respond to American requests for help in a battle zone, if they want to place their lives at risk for an ally who quite wantonly and casually places the lives of British Officers in jeopardy, disregarding their health, safety and welfare, whilst calling themselves our Friend.

What matters now is that British Officers and their men will be questioning whether the Americans are in fact our friends at all and if we British really need such irresponsible, selfish and unreliable friends and allies who place serving troops lives at greater risk than is needed to get the job done.

Careless talk costs lives and your Mr. Drudge has a very loose tongue that has helped those who wish to kill not only British troops, but also your own American service personnel whilst in a battle zone.

The result is that we Brits will take yet another step back from trusting our so-called American allies and friends.

Cromwell

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 AM on 02/29/2008
photo

I agree with you absolutely, but how can you reconcile this with your execution of Charles I?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 AM on 02/29/2008

LOL !!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 AM on 02/29/2008

I have a hell of a lot of respect for Prince Harry serving. Unlike some of the college RepubliCONS interviewed in this video at least he had the balls to serve.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFGit_tZDqs

Personally, I would love to see the draft reinstituted just so some of these little chickenshit chickenhawks could be sent to Iraq or Iran. I know they all seem to have medical problems, the most prevelent being the yellow streak down their back, but send them anyway in support positions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:32 AM on 02/29/2008

How right you are win2kpro.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:06 AM on 02/29/2008
photo

Me, too. Doesn't matter whether you're a Royal or an East-Ender--bullets and IED's don't care.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 02/29/2008

win2kpro; You evidently are not old enough to remember the draft during Nam. ALL of the elite were given deferments or their daddy's, G.W. Bush's, bought them a place in the guard so that they would not have to go. The only ones who get drafted are the poor. I sure hope that you are rich or you just might get to die for Bush. 1776

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 PM on 02/29/2008

I would agree on one condition: That Congressmen's sons and the rich get the lowest draft numbers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 PM on 02/29/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect