Stocks Fall Sharply on Economic Worries

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Stocks Fall Sharply on Economic Worries stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TIM PARADIS | February 29, 2008 07:39 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

NEW YORK — Stocks fell sharply Friday after a series of depressing economic and corporate reports as well as high oil prices stoked concerns about the health of the economy. The major stock indexes fell more than 2.5 percent and the Dow Jones industrials lost 315 points.

Investors were unnerved by disappointing quarterly results from American International Group Inc. and Dell Inc. And an index of regional business activity that Wall Street regards as a good indicator of a broader report due next week had its weakest showing in more than six years.

Oil prices continued to stir concern about inflation after pushing past $103 per barrel for the first time.

While stocks made sharp gains in the first three days this week even amid somewhat lackluster economic readings, the litany of concerns investors succumbed to Friday reflected the undercurrent of uncertainty that has kept Wall Street on edge for months.

"We really had to face a plethora of negative news," said Art Hogan, chief market strategist at Jefferies & Co. in Boston. "We just ran out of gas this week."

Hogan said while stocks held up admirably early in the week amid an uneven flow of economic news, they couldn't hold their gains after the latest round of weak economic signals.

The Dow fell 315.79, or 2.51 percent, to 12,266.39.

Broader stock indicators also tumbled. The Standard & Poor's 500 index lost 37.05, or 2.71 percent, to 1,330.63, and the Nasdaq composite index declined 60.09, or 2.58 percent, to 2,271.48.

Story continues below
advertisement

For the week, the Dow lost 0.93 percent, while the S&P 500 gave up 1.66 percent and the Nasdaq fell 1.38 percent. The week's losses would have been steeper had stocks not risen early in the week on hopes many of Wall Street's credit troubles were easing and after IBM Corp. announced a sizable stock repurchase plan.

Friday's losses sent stocks lower for February, the fourth straight month of declines.

Bond prices rose sharply as stocks lost ground. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note, which moves opposite its price, fell to 3.53 percent in late trading from 3.67 percent late Thursday.

The Chicago Board Options Exchange's volatility index, known as the VIX, and often referred to as the "fear index," jumped 12.8 percent.

The dollar hit another low against the euro and slid to a three-year record against the yen. The fall in the dollar has sent prices of commodities such as oil and gold soaring.

Light, sweet crude jumped to a record of $103.05 in early electronic trading before settling down 75 cents at $101.84 a barrel on New York Mercantile Exchange.

Insurer AIG announced a $5.29 billion quarterly loss largely because of steep declines in the value of a portfolio of contracts known as credit default swaps. Such contracts pledge to cover missed payments on debt. The company's losses caught analysts off guard, as many had expected the company to turn a profit.

While each of the 30 stocks that comprise the Dow industrials showed declines, those of AIG were the steepest. The stock fell $3.29, or 6.6 percent, to $46.86.

Computer maker Dell posted a 6 percent decline in its quarterly profit, falling below analysts' expectations, and warned that its business could suffer from reduced customer spending. Dell slid 97 cents, or 4.7 percent, to $19.90.

Bill Schultz, chief investment officer at McQueen, Ball & Associates in Bethlehem, Pa., said AIG's report left investors uneasy about the prospect of further sizable write-downs of bad debt.

"Every time we get to a point where we think we've finished, another report comes out and says we're not done yet," he said.

Schultz expects Wall Street will continue to proceed with "fits and starts" until investors sense that the bad debt from faltering mortgages has been accounted for and that balance sheets are on the mend.

Some relief for the ailing bond insurance industry is on the way, though the news didn't dislodge Wall Street's glum mood Friday. Billionaire investor Wilbur Ross agreed to invest up to $1 billion in Bermuda-based reinsurer Assured Guaranty Ltd. Assured Guaranty rose $2.87, or 12.6 percent, to $25.65.

In economic news, the Chicago purchasing managers index for February came in at 44.5, a weaker reading than the 48.5 that had been expected, according to Dow Jones Newswires. The report painted a dreary picture of the manufacturing sector and is seen as a precursor to the national Institute for Supply Management report expected Monday.

A government report showed that personal spending, when stripping out the effects of inflation, stood unchanged in January. The findings brought further worries that consumers are more hesitant to reach into their wallets amid the uncertainties facing the economy.

A parade of economic worries has weighed on consumer as well. The Reuters-University of Michigan final consumer sentiment reading for February came in at 70.8, better than the figure of 69 that had been expected. Still, the index was well off the level of 78.4 seen in January.

Declining issues outnumbered advancers by roughly 7 to 1 on the New York Stock Exchange, where consolidated volume came to 4.23 billion shares compared with 3.76 billion shares traded Thursday.

The Russell 2000 index of smaller companies fell 19.54, or 2.77 percent, to 686.18.

Overseas, Japan's Nikkei stock average closed down 2.32 percent. Britain's FTSE 100 lost 1.36 percent, Germany's DAX index fell 1.67 percent, and France's CAC-40 gave up 1.53 percent.

________

The Dow Jones industrial average ended the week down 114.63, or 0.93 percent, at 12,266.39. The Standard & Poor's 500 index finished down 22.48, or 1.66 percent, at 1,330.63. The Nasdaq composite index ended the week down 31.87, or 1.38 percent, at 2,271.48.

The Russell 2000 index finished the week down 9.25, or 1.33 percent, at 686.18.

The Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite Index _ a free-float weighted index that measures 5,000 U.S. based companies _ ended Friday at 13,455.96, down 207.07 points, or 1.52 percent, for the week. A year ago, the index was at 14,271.61.

___

On the Net:

New York Stock Exchange: http://www.nyse.com

Nasdaq Stock Market: http://www.nasdaq.com

(This version CORRECTS percentage Nasdaq fell for week in 9th graf.)

NEW YORK — Stocks fell sharply Friday after a series of depressing economic and corporate reports as well as high oil prices stoked concerns about the health of the economy. The major stock inde...
NEW YORK — Stocks fell sharply Friday after a series of depressing economic and corporate reports as well as high oil prices stoked concerns about the health of the economy. The major stock inde...
Filed by Michelle Kung  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
249
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

REasonable thought: A few points.
1) I don't care how much my account varies every 6 months. I don't even look at it that often. I intend to be invested in the markets around the world until the day I die. And I will profit from that. Your time frame is too short, your bias to easily aroused, your understanding not seasoned nor deep enough.
2) Our dollars are spread between our home ownership, Domestic stocks, Foreign Stocks, Domestic Bonds, Foreign bonds, Emergency cash savings., Real Estate, Gold.
3) 50% of our stock equity holdings is OVERSEAS.
4) 50% of our bond holdings is OVERSEAS.
a bit over half the worlds economy is OUTSIDE the US and in the middle of historic change and growth. Why should 75% of my "wealth" be in the US when it's a global market, a global economy, and global opportunity? The Bushs, Kerry's, Clintons, Kennedy's, and probably even Obama all invest over seas, why shouldn't I?
If progressive liberals drag the US economy down into the gutter with higher taxes, increased regulation, punishing business..­....I'll send all my money overseas.
Report back in 6 months? Do you want to know how much I made when the tech stocks collapsed because I made more in bonds than I lost in my well diversified index funds? Do you want to know how much i've made during the last 3 to 4 years? 6 months is nothing. If things are CHEAPER in 6 months than my dollars will merely be able to buy more as I continue to invest.
Americans need to grow up and learn how to build wealth instead of sitting around whining about having the government take care of them.

Are you one the shmucks who have a million and think that they're rich? If you are, you're so naive or an idiot. I live in a place where a million buys you a 3/2 with a 2000 square foot lot. I've seen a lot of retired people wiped out before the state pay the tab for they're medical care. I've seen them cry because they were not able to pass on their asset before they got sick.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 03/01/2008
photo

More than your money will go overseas, if we continue on our present course america will soon be a place that is unfit to live in where crime becomes the norm and with the amount of firearms in circulation no one will stand a chance. Kidnapping and ransoms along with armed robberies will be the order of the day. Best be making plans to follow your money overseas as well. I hear Singapore is nice and rather civilized.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 PM on 03/04/2008
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

Reasonablethought: A few points.
1) I don't care how much my account varies every 6 months. I don't even look at it that often. I intend to be invested in the markets around the world until the day I die. And I will profit from that. Your time frame is too short, your bias to easily aroused, your understanding not seasoned nor deep enough.
2) Our dollars are spread between our home ownership, Domestic stocks, Foreign Stocks, Domestic Bonds, Foreign bonds, Emergency cash savings., Real Estate, Gold.
3) 50% of our stock equity holdings is OVERSEAS.
4) 50% of our bond holdings is OVERSEAS.
a bit over half the worlds economy is OUTSIDE the US and in the middle of historic change and growth. Why should 75% of my "wealth" be in the US when it's a global market, a global economy, and global opportunity? The Bushs, Kerry's, Clintons, Kennedy's, and probably even Obama all invest over seas, why shouldn't I?
If progressive liberals drag the US economy down into the gutter with higher taxes, increased regulation, punishing business..­....I'll send all my money overseas.
Report back in 6 months? Do you want to know how much I made when the tech stocks collapsed because I made more in bonds than I lost in my well diversified index funds? Do you want to know how much i've made during the last 3 to 4 years? 6 months is nothing. If things are CHEAPER in 6 months than my dollars will merely be able to buy more as I continue to invest.
Americans need to grow up and learn how to build wealth instead of sitting around whining about having the government take care of them.

Are you one of the shmucks with a million dollars and think they're rich? I live in a place where a million buys you a 3/2 house with 2000 sq ft of lot. If you think you're safe, you're so naive (or an idiot). I've seen lots of retired "rich" people wiped out before the state helped them with their medical care tabs. I've seen people with two, three million dollar properties cry because they were not able to pass on their money to their kids. My advice, if you have kids, transfer your assets when you're about 65 and hope you don't get too sick in the next ten years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 03/01/2008
- fourex I'm a Fan of fourex 14 fans permalink
photo

Bush has never offered to pay for anything no matter who was running congress.

WP,
In trying to adopt such ambitions as his own, Bush hopes to regain the initiative after his party lost Congress in November and to counter his reputation as a president who took a budget surplus and turned it into record deficits, analysts said. Bush has never proposed a balanced budget since it went into deficit, never vetoed a spending bill when Republicans controlled Congress and offered little sustained objection to earmarks until the issue gained political traction last year.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 03/01/2008
- drkazmd65 I'm a Fan of drkazmd65 53 fans permalink
photo

"We really had to face a plethora of negative news," said Art Hogan, chief market strategist at Jefferies & Co. in Boston. "We just ran out of gas this week."

Just gotta love a strategist that uses the word "Plethora".

Damn,... I wish I had had the smarts and resources to invest in precious metals a few months back,...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:10 PM on 03/01/2008

The state of the market is the result of both the Democrats and Republicans. Clinton help to set up the bubbles in the stock market and housing. Also Clinton's repeal of Glass/Steagal allowed the banks to engage in highly speculative endeavors. Reagan help set the stage of the debt crisis by cutting taxes on the right and shifting burden unto workers and by increasing wasteful defense spending. The Bush plan was Reaganism on steroids. Hillary Clinton support of the war is directly responsible for the state of the economy and the media still presents the economy as separate and apart from military spending. Also Obama lack of support for interest rates caps are hurtful to many workers. All needs to be held accountable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 03/01/2008
- Tom95134 I'm a Fan of Tom95134 53 fans permalink
photo

The state of the market is almost directly the result of Bush's putting the costs of his Iraq adventure on credit cards. The international financial markets have finally woken up to the fact that the cost of Bush's fiascio is goin to top $4 trillion and that they are carrying the paper for a lot of it. They have finally decided that the dollor isn't worth shit anymore and have started to say "no thank you". Bush was insane to think that he could have his playtime in Iraq while still pushing his tax cuts for the wealthy through the Republican controlled Congress.

The only thing that Bush has done is prove that if you screw up government bad enough it doesn't work. The Democrats will have a long task ahead just diging our country out of the ditch that Bush and his ilk have driven us into. It will mean higher taxes for some just so that we can begin to create jobs at home and rebuild the middle class. You remember the middle class,,, those people that keep the economy running by their spending for things other than food and gasoline.

Yes, Clinton must bare some of the blame but he did leave office with a surplus which Bush immeadiately pissed away on tax cuts for his cronies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 03/01/2008
photo

It's true that Clinton left office with a surplus, but DB1000 is right about Glass-Steagall and other Clinton policies that helped get the ball of economic ruin rolling. The problem with Clinton is that he capitulated to the right, with deregulation in banking and telecommunications, and signed NAFTA which destroyed our manufacturing industry, and has now destroyed our research, development and innovation. Everything was ok under Clinton because the tech. and biotech boom occurred during the 90's, but began to fall apart mid 1999. I'm not saying Clinton is responsible for everything that we are experiencing now, but how can anyone trust a Republican administration NOT to cut taxes for the rich, NOT to start an unnecessary war, NOT to use "the war on terror" to shift massive amounts of taxpayer wealth to the administrations cronies and backers, and NOT to throw away the surplus. When you enact laws that have a positive but limited and short term effect, but tragic long term effects, and leave the door open for the Republicans to take advantage of those laws, ruining the country and the economy, then you are an enabler, even if your enabling is based on ignorance or short-sightedness.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 03/01/2008
- frappe I'm a Fan of frappe 207 fans permalink
photo

I'm sure that the Republican party in twenty years, if it still exists, will be blaming Clinton for this and for that. They are only good at pointing fingers and have a serious problem with accountability.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 PM on 03/01/2008
- blastocyst I'm a Fan of blastocyst 27 fans permalink

I do wish all of the Clintons as much longevity as they wish and hope for.
And it will be grand seeing them gleefully chased through History wrongfully accused of every miscue since the Fall of Saigon. And deflecting the figurative slings and arrows again and again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 03/01/2008
- MIKEBC I'm a Fan of MIKEBC 26 fans permalink
photo

EVERYTIME THE GOP LEAVES THE WHITE HOUSE, THEY LEAVE US WITH A RECESSION OR A DEPRESSION.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 PM on 03/01/2008
- Tom95134 I'm a Fan of Tom95134 53 fans permalink
photo

Resession? Depression? Naw, this is just a "little slowdown". Just ask Bush.

Bush's observation of just a little slowdown makes about as much sense as the Captain of the Titanic saying, "It's just a small leak."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 03/01/2008
- BOBONDE I'm a Fan of BOBONDE 4 fans permalink

HOW'S EVERYONE DOING WITH THE GOP GAS PRICES, WHEN BILL LEFT OFFICE IT WAS LESS THAN $1.50 PER GALLON,

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 PM on 03/01/2008
- blastocyst I'm a Fan of blastocyst 27 fans permalink

It's fair to say few are pleased. But by the measure of some, it's the right few.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 PM on 03/01/2008
- timothe I'm a Fan of timothe 7 fans permalink

The president has nothing to do with gas or oil prices, unless you want to consider the fact that we haven't built a refinery in 30 years because the evil oil companies don't see any profit in building refineries due to massive government regulation.

Then there's the problem of drilling in ANWR because of some caribou. With the help of Congress, the president can get legislation passed that allows us to drill there, providing more domestic oil.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 03/01/2008
- frappe I'm a Fan of frappe 207 fans permalink
photo

What about the speculation side of the market? Certainly, Bush's strategic blunder in Iraq hasn't created a stable situation in the Mideast. That has fueled a great deal of doubt and worry, resulting in a wave of price increases.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 PM on 03/01/2008
- blastocyst I'm a Fan of blastocyst 27 fans permalink

Screw Oil. Undertake a massive Manhattan Project-styled effort to effectively remove the oil-monkey from our backs for once and for all. Otherwise count on there being a franchise of many sequels for "There Will Be Blood". Everyone keeps and enjoys their own milkshakes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 PM on 03/01/2008
photo

If we created the kind of ratio mgp efficiency laws that Europe has, we wouldn't need to import any oil at all. Therefore, no exploratory drilling necessary. The answer is not to find more resources, because resources are limited and always run out. The answer is to look for alternative fuel sources that we can create, not just consume. Internal combustion engines should already be a thing of the past. They are an old and outdated mode of creating energy. The only reason they still exist, is because of the hold that the oil industry and oil corporations have over Governments worldwide.

And the President does have something to do with oil prices. Anyone with a couple of brain cells and a memory realizes that when you have instability in the Middle East, oil prices skyrocket.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 PM on 03/01/2008

Your "refinery" statement is a total lie . . . regulations has NOTHING to do with it - the refineries were closed down and consolidated to eliminate EXCESS production as any former INDEPENDENT fuel broker/dealer will tell you. Gas has to be sold and storage is not an option . . . here in Regulation-hell California several refineries were closed down even though they were operating and complying with all regulations - and with a WORLD RECORD profit year after year, capital is there to build - besides our oil friendly Administration sees to it that such "investment" is MORE than paid for with tax benefits, write-downs, exemptions on offshore shifted accounts and a buffet of taxpayer provided perks. Drilling is not the problem, it is the monopoly control of refineries and distribution from wellhead to pump . . . you do realize that IRAN and IRAQ with the GREATEST oil reserves in the world actually IMPORT gasoline due to refinery issues - don't think there is any Iranian Environmental Board Regulation telling them not to "build"?

You have a complete lack of knowledge about the oil industry, economic facts and just plain common bid-ness . . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 03/01/2008
- fourex I'm a Fan of fourex 14 fans permalink
photo

timothe, "The president has nothing to do with gas or oil prices, ..."

False, the falling dollar has a hell of a lot to do with energy prices.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 03/01/2008
- Nova16 I'm a Fan of Nova16 34 fans permalink

KingCityGuru speak with forked tongue. It wasn't liberal policies that caused our current economic disaster and independents and the 4thgrade class at the local elementary school didn't either, but the fascist policies of the dolt in the White House could be to blame. All economic indicators point to a recession which include the galactic personal and public debt, a dollar with the same value as a sheet of Charmin, credit and housing in deep crisis, unemployment, the loss of our mfg base, outsourcing, spiraling trade deficits, budget deficits, phony war sapping our treasury, energy costs thru the roof, auto industry tanking and the dolt with another year to continue his mischief. I am a liberal with stock holdings losing value daily and have no desire for a recession, but republicans do have a track record of creating them. Wise up! If ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 03/01/2008
- frappe I'm a Fan of frappe 207 fans permalink
photo

There should be a picture of George W. Bush and a GOP symbol appearing whenever there is an article or report about our declining economy. This looming recession is not some "cyclical" event. It is the direct result or manifestation of ignorance and personal greed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 PM on 03/01/2008

You Libs really do want a recession.
"Massive" ? Hardly.
Buy when everyone is selling and sell when everyone is buying a you will make money everytime.
I expect the market to rally the rest of the year and set new highs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 03/01/2008
photo

LOL

That's funny, because all those in the know, have taken most of their money out of the US and put it in foreign markets.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 03/01/2008
- blastocyst I'm a Fan of blastocyst 27 fans permalink

E-Trade will gladly allow investment in China. Those bridges we don't burn'll fall into a river somewhere eventually.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 PM on 03/01/2008

The libs want a recession? Nice straw man argument. Fact is, no one wants to lose everything they have, regardless of polical ideology.
Do you believe Bush is correct in stating that we are in a "slowdowm? Looking at the amount of national debt, coupled along with the treasury printing new money every other week ($60 bill reported to be infused next week), it appears these are not normal actions during a slowdown period. More than likely, these actions are designed to delay potential econominc calamity. No different than borrowing on a credit card with no ability to repay the principal.
This administration is pulling out all stops to avoid being in office when the perverbial shit hits the fan. Better yet, they will blame whoever is in office next January for the mess. Too bad any rational thinking person knows how we got here.
The terrorists will not have to fire another shot. They can just sit back and watch us implode from all the debt run up by this WH to continue a war where the military complex and the corps suck all the money our of our treasury.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 03/01/2008
- timothe I'm a Fan of timothe 7 fans permalink

The definition of a recession is two quarters of negative GDP. We haven't had one quarter of negative GDP yet. Calling a recession without the appropriate data is irresponsible journalism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 03/01/2008
- blastocyst I'm a Fan of blastocyst 27 fans permalink

Put the books away. Economists don't even have a name for this one yet. Thick as a granite countertop you are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 03/01/2008
- opines I'm a Fan of opines 25 fans permalink

In the Bernanke led effort to avoid a market crash, he is further devaluing the dollar and pouring gasoline on already dangerously inflating prices. The money he is shoveling out the door to financial institutions will not prevent a crash but it will bail out some Wall Street friends.

In addition, these highly toxic bailouts are aimed at delaying an inevitable crash until a new, almost certainly Democratic, Administration is in office.

For those who ask, isn't it better to delay a crash rather than let it happen, the answer in this case is 'No".

The reason is that the such attempts squander remaining assets and destroy safety nets that would better be used to soften the impact devastation and prepare the ground for recovery.

This disguuised class war will have a devastating on all but the ultra rich because of the resulting inflation. Don't be surprised if Social Security funds are raided as further 'stimulants' are required to delay the crash. Of course the rising inflation will punish fixed income and Social Security recipients.

How ludicrous that oil and food prices are excluded from Bernanke's inflation measurements.

Don't expect the Presidential candidates or Congress to get involved (until after the damage is done).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 03/01/2008
- blastocyst I'm a Fan of blastocyst 27 fans permalink

How would forgiveness of debt factor into your vision of what could possibly be allowed to happen? The mechanisms which are already in place to recover bad/imperiled debt are creaking from the strain as it is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 03/01/2008
- Boboday555 I'm a Fan of Boboday555 116 fans permalink
photo

When you look at the political trend over the past 1/2 century here in America you begin to see a pattern.
Repubs get elected and run rough shod over the economy by cutting taxes for their rich corporate owners while simultaneously increasing spending.
The Repubs do this so much it ruins the economy.
Enter the Democratic replacement.
The Dem grown then rolls up their sleeves and gets to cleaning up after the GOP hoot-nanny.
The Dems are forced to reinstate the taxes the GOP kids cut to pay off the bills the GOP raked up and the GOP shouts "Tax and Spend Democrats" and their base of GOP children take up the call.
Which puts another Republican in the White House during the next election and the cycle continues today!

I almost want to see McCain win in 2008 so the GOP can finally clean up after themselves for once in their born to privilege lives!
BUT, then I realize how many more American soldiers will die with a republican in MY White House I see that this nation simply cannot afford another War Mongering, fiscally irresponsible Republican as President!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 03/01/2008

Apres Moi le Deluge...T­he economic and global mess the next administration will inherit will be near catastroph­ic...Three trillion dollars spent on Iraq but we will get 600$ so be happy...Bu­sh/McCain Iraqi doctrine to go indefinite­ly...the worst foreign policy decision in US history...­.and all the king's horses and all the king's men...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 AM on 03/01/2008
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

The decider espouses trickle "voodoo" economics and then tries to fix things with a pinch of trickle up economics. I bet you these Friedman assholes really know that trickle down does not work and just try to transfer money from the poor working people to their rich cronies every time they get into office.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 03/01/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect