Marion Cotillard's 9/11 And Moon Landing Conspiracy Theories

seriously!? There is a mountain of evidence disproving what you just wrote above (nevermind the rest of the fairytale), like this is the first time a steel building has collapsed from a fire...and miracles of miracles, we had a 2nd and a third! steel tower collapse in no time flat. Yes. Quite plausible. Too bad jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel. Get thinking, you are turning into a police state and you need to start learning the truth before its too late.

loose change anyone? (google it)

I think this proves that most Americans are uneducated and naive. Too easily distracted to know what their own so-called govt is doing. Outsiders see what's happening.

Good post! You go ahead girl! What she said was not ridiculous. Read "The New Pearl Harbor" by David Ray Griffin, and "Debunking 911 Debunkers". Then read 10 steps to fascist america by Naomi Wolf.

.

Thanks, good points about misplaced priorities. People sometimes don't realize how steadily their life is passing by while they are ranting about the "world" in the form of their projections.

.

I have read many reliable scientific reports on towers meltdown implausibility. The suspicious residue of that substance that implodes buildings, the eye witnesses hearing rhythmic explosions from other floors, previous buildings of lesser structure burning fiercely yet not melting down, and the fact that norad was down for the count. I question anything from the goverment, the press, the corporations.... Any intelligent soul would do so, no? She has the right to question it as well. All through history goverments and power players have lied to the great unwashed. What would make this any different. Especially givent that the 911 commission refused to investigate certain scientifically plausible questions about the official story.

i think the conspiracy is not over the 'if', but the 'when'...

(how's the wave pool these days?)

HuffPost's Pick

I am not entirely sure Allen himself is really saying she should be embarrassed, just acknowledging that, based on the way the US media and mindset works, she was merely "facing" the potential of embarrassment.

About an hour ago, good old Anderson Cooper on CNN ran this same "story" in his nightly "What Were They Thinking" segment. He did so with a "tisk tisk" condescending "shame on her" tone. You know, the whole: "How could anybody ever think that? She must be totally crazy or entirely ungrateful to us brainwashed, gullible, confused and fearful American's to say that" act.

And I think it IS an act to a degree for some; a necessary charade one does to toe the line and keep their job. Cooper had a kind of cynical look in his eye as he spoke. Something that gives me a little hope. Perhaps he knows M.C. could be right? Perhaps he secretly respects her even more now? But he can't let that out, can he? Not when he is a cog in the system of manufactured consent that pays him handsomely to read the telepromoter propaganda and not tread in areas that throw all of our "givens" into the harsh light of truth.

Obviously, the American mass media and US citizens in general just can't find the courage to admit or face all the horrible truths and dupes involved in 9/11 and beyond. It's much easier to go with the flow than against the grain. I am one of those people to a degree, I admit it. I lead a double-life. One half is a truth seeking freedom fighter and the other half keeps it to myself and myself alone or to some anonymous blogger poster like you. I am not very happy that I can't be the freedom fighter all the time, but also realize in a way that it is not just about standing on street corners yelling or knocking on doors and confronting people with their own ignorance or denial. To be successful in the enlightenment process, one must use skillful means. That means, most of the time it comes down to a process of finding out where people are at and then meeting them at that level and very slowly transitioning them, expanding them, turning them in a more appropriate direction so that day by day, week by week, year by year you find they are more and more open, fearless, courageous, inspired, outspoken, or whatever is called for.

You know as well as I do that if I challenged every denier out there in the name of reality, truth, justice or whatever cause is worthy of being championed, I'd seriously be putting myself at a disadvantage. If I were a famous actor or super rich or from another country, I wouldn't be so concerned. But since I am not those things (yet) I'd have to say that most likely people would shun me, hate me, avoid me like the plague and worse. They already do just because I am a thinker and a creative and "spiritual" and a "liberal," etc.

My point is, and it really hurts to write this, I'm finding out that shallow kinship is sometimes better than none at all. I no longer "resent" my family and so many people for the way they are. To a degree, small talk and "getting along" starts to sound nice when compared to the other option, a life as a loner. I am already an outsider and I know damn well that the majority of men lead lives of quiet desperation. This is not to say that I don't have kindred spirits out there who give me support and consolation. It's just that at the end of the day, we are all faced with so many extremely difficult issues and I have learned to be a lot more forgiving of all of our shortcomings because I am confronted by them practically every minute of my waking life and it has got to the point that if I don't just chill-out a little and just let things slide a bit I will end of either going mad or slitting my wrists out of frustration.

It's taken me a long time to realize that most people don't even have time for the simplest things, let alone to deal with a massive blow like 9/11 Truth. I mean, it's totally scary to them. Even people in the upper middle class with a relatively high level of opportunity to develop some consciousness and awareness are just mired in an endless list of excuses why they cannot permit themselves to really think. People are scared to death of what they will find and how it will force them to take responsibility and how that will rock their little fragile worlds in the process. These people are mortified by the thought of questioning the "official" story," a story anyone with some brains or guts can see right through. Anyone who has really woken up is painfully aware of this. It's sad and it's sickening but somehow we keep soldiering on and somehow we find we have made things a little better by our efforts, however small they seem.

When you look like her and have talent, other people organize your life for you. The real sad cases are the wackos posting all the comments below, most of whom, I fear, have forgotten the difference between clothes and pajamas.

"These things do happen, that is fact. So to condemn anyone who doesn't believe the official explaination is to ignore our own very recent history"

That's the thinking of the nay-sayers. Conspiracies only happen if someone is caught doing them. If they get away with them, then of course there is no conspiracy. Its just a happy coincidence.

Its sad, but most of these true believers will be dead when all this comes out, and when it does come out it'll be history, and no one will care. The damage (or the benefit, if you're part of the Cheney let's rule the world and rape and pillage) will have already been done.

Just like Pearl Harbor and FDR knew -- who cares? We won didn't we?

Just like George Bush stealing the election -- who cares? He won didn't he?

Illegal war in Iraq? Who cares? We won didn't we....??

Don't forget how Clinton napalmed women and children in seriavo and kosovo. he started the Pre-emptive foreign policy. President Clinton says not one word to defend civil liberties of people.

I'm just curious who was holding the camera outside of the lunar lander while Neil Armstrong was coming down the ladder?

Maybe he was just crazy like the man who killed John Lennon - it's impossible to figure out their motives because they're crazy so it wouldn't make sense to us.

You haven't seen the YouTube video on the moon landing "conspiracy." Watch it, it does raise fun and interesting questions. It's a great critical thinking exercise at least. That and the expanding earth video. I love YouTube "documentaries."

The moon-landing conspiracy theories don't say we never went to the moon, just that we didn't do it on national television. We couldn't risk such an incredibly public and profound failure on national television so the TV landing was staged just so there were no accidents. They actually did go to the moon on later missions, which is how we got the moon rocks and such.