Author Margaret P. Jones Admits She Faked Gang Memoir

March 4, 2008 06:50 AM EST | AP


digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

NEW YORK — A memoir by a white woman who claimed she was raised in poverty by a black foster mother and sold drugs for a gang in a tough Los Angeles neighborhood has turned out to be pure fiction, a newspaper report says.

In "Love and Consequences," published last week by Penguin Group USA imprint Riverhead Books, author Margaret B. Jones writes about growing up as a half-white, half-Native American girl in South-Central Los Angeles in the foster home of Big Mom. One of her foster brothers, she writes, was gunned down by Crips gang members outside their home.

Jones also writes of carrying illegal guns and selling drugs for the Bloods gang.

Jones's story came apart after her older sister, Cyndi Hoffman, saw an article in The New York Times about the author and contacted Riverhead, the Times says. Hoffman questioned the publisher's fact-checking and said the fabrication should and could have been prevented, the Times reported on its Web site Monday.

The publisher has recalled all copies of the book and has canceled Jones's book tour, which was to begin on Monday.

Margaret B. Jones is a pseudonym for Margaret Seltzer, who is white and grew up in a well-off area of San Fernando Valley in California with her biological family, the Times says. She attended a private Episcopal day school and never lived with a foster family or sold drugs for a gang.

Jones, who lives in Eugene, Ore., also lied about having graduated from the University of Oregon.

Jones, 33, admitted to the Times that her memoir was fully fabricated. Many of the experiences recounted in the book, she told the newspaper, were based on the experiences of friends she had met while doing anti-gang outreach in Los Angeles.

"For whatever reason, I was really torn, and I thought it was my opportunity to put a voice to people who people don't listen to," she told the paper.

An editor at Riverhead, in an interview with the Times, described the discovery as "upsetting" and as a "huge personal and professional betrayal." The editor, Sarah McGrath, said she had numerous conversations with the writer about telling the truth.

"I've been talking to her on the phone and getting e-mails from her for three years, and her story never has changed," McGrath told the Times. "All the details have been the same. There never have been any cracks."

Jones didn't immediately return a telephone message left by The Associated Press at her home on Monday.

The "Love and Consequences" scandal follows last week's discovery that the Holocaust memoir "Misha: A Memoire of the Holocaust Years," by Misha Defonseca, was a fake. Two years ago, James Frey, the author of an Oprah Book Club selected memoir, "A Million Little Pieces," admitted he had made up or exaggerated details about his drug addiction and recovery.


 
Comments
11
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

The real problem here is in the word "reputable," a word everyone involved keeps using. A reputable writer recommended Seltzer to a reputable agent, who sold her book to a reputable publisher, who didn't check the facts because she had a reputable agent, etc.
This implies that there are disreputable people in the publishing world who would do things like this, but there aren't. All these frauds occur in reputable houses, whose editors trust their friends (who must be reputable) rather than act professionally.
"Reputable" is a great excuse to be lazy. Agents can trust their reputable authors and friends, and exclude those who don't come through them. Ditto with publishers. This saves a great deal of work. But it's neither responsible nor professional, it's just a way of doing business that seems risk-free, but clearly is not.
Whenever you turn off your criticial faculties, believing in things like reputability, you are taking a huge risk.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 AM on 03/05/2008

Hey Riverhead! Gimme a call. I am an ACTUAL writer who doesn't lie to publishers. Jeez. Are all publishing houses this stupid? It's fun to watch them stumble, because it would never happen if they were not so enamored of "clawed my way up" memoirs that read like they're written by adolescents. So: Bwa-ha-ha-ha!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 03/04/2008
photo

Its pathetic because she had to make her self "ethnic" and borrow real people of color's suffering to make money. Claiming to be "Indian" so she can pretend white privilege doesn't really apply to her and they "feel the pain" minorities face.

Meanwhile, there are blacks and latinos that really live this and can't get a publisher. She should do community service in a ghetto so she can be authentic and stop playing on the sympathies of "poor white girl gone bad".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 03/04/2008

I think this is another reason so many people have a problem with Diablo Cody, besides the fake "trying to hard to be hipster" name. She is a college educated middle class white woman who decided to be a stripper so she could write about it. Of course she always knew she could leave that life as opposed to the real women stuck in that awful world. I've met some strippers, don't ask it's a long story, and although I wasn't suprised that many had a drug problem, I was shocked at how many said she were molested as children. They have horrible problems that Diablo Cody has never had to deal with.

And it's the same with children living in the inner city - it's really offensive when a white person tries to exploit their suffering to make a name for herself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 03/04/2008
photo

Maggie could turn this story from a lie to an expose of the laziness of the publishing business - the publishers were shocked-shocked that the story was not a true one.

A 30 minute search could have revealed that the story was not real.

Don't blame the author - blame the lazy publishers. Way to go Maggie, make them look like the fools they are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 AM on 03/04/2008

Nice sister she's got. Apparently there were some problems with Ms. Jone's family relationships. If my sister did this, I'd call her up and read her the riot act...and advise her to get a lawyer and fess up to her publisher.

Can't help thinking of Stephen Glass/New Republic scandal. This kind of deception can go on for a long time, and bring down a lot of legitimate people with it. I'd use the word "shameful" except I don't think that has much meaning nowadays. Virtue is for sale in every profession.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 AM on 03/04/2008

I don't get why this woman did this? ego? if she had stated it was based on actual events while doing anti-gang research, I think it would have still sold very well.

Check out the book, "random family".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 AM on 03/04/2008

You really have to laugh don't you? It beats crying.

'Writing' should be a celebrated artform, but it has turned into a commercial commodity. And someone (author or agent or publisher?) decided this story would sell more copies if it was labeled 'autobiography' instead of 'fiction'. Was the story not good enough to be sold as a fictional work? Does this mean the bar is lowered for 'autobiographies'?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 AM on 03/04/2008

I read the review - and as an ex-prosecutor, the tone and all else -- even when laundered through MK --smacked of the first thing that came to mind - Frey. I don't care if it sounds like Monday morning QB'ing - I've become so numb to all of the faux - after myriad stories of the same con - that I started to write a letter to the NYTBR, then stopped tapping my keyboard. This is the level of cynicism that our whole culture has fostered. Knowing that in order to make this allegation I'd need something other than my gut - and knowing that it'd come to light eventually. My gut is rarely wrong - same for most careful readers (law enforcement or not) - except apparently book editors and reviewers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 AM on 03/04/2008

Margaret should go on a book tour with James Frey!

http://www.newslampoon.com/author_lies.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:55 AM on 03/04/2008

Oooooh, please.

It strains credulity to think "Ms. Jones' " editor at Riverhead Books didn't figure this out after meeting with her a time or two.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 PM on 03/03/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect

 
Right Now on HuffPost
MAYHEM IN HONDURAS

TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras — Ousted President Manuel...

Biden: "We Misread How Bad The Economy Was"

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration "misread" the depth...