Bill Richardson Criticizes

Bill Richardson Criticizes "3 AM" Ad, Praises Obama's Judgement

Election Central   |  Greg Sargent   |   March 3, 2008 03:23 PM


stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Yesterday Bill Richardson gave an interview that has gotten a bunch of attention already, because in it he said that Dems should coalesce behind the candidate with the "clear lead" after tomorrow's voting....

...He was outspoken in his criticism of Clinton's new "ringing phone" ad, which suggests that Obama is not ready to become commander in chief. "I happen to disagree with that ad that says that Senator Obama is not ready," he said. "He is ready. He has great judgment, an internationalist background."


 
 

Comments
109
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Richarson, get on the "Obama-Bus" already will ya.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 03/04/2008

Dear Gov. Richardson,

Two major appointments in the Clinton Adminstration which inarguably have beget your charmed political career, and this is your response !!! Where's your sense of loyalty and decency ???

You are willing to sell out your long-time friends just to become VP ??? I do hope you will endorse Senator Obama who I hope will win the nomination but won't pick you as a his running mate. I predict that any clout and respects you've earned within the Democratic party will also be wiped out going award as you have been exposed as a political opportunist, and nothing more. Karma is a bitch, sir !!!

I used to like you but no more !!!

Jon from Cali

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 03/05/2008

Hey people, lighten up. Bill Richardson is not obligated to endorse Obama (though I wish he would). He has already done a very good thing with his refusal to endorse Hillary. The thing that we all need to recognize is that many Democrats (including lots of voters) started out with the Clintons. However, as the campaign unfolds, and we all get a chance to see the Clinton team in action (getting uglier by the second), many are deciding that loyalty to this family trumps neither loyalty to party nor country. It's just taking some a little longer than others to forsake personal loyalty (which generally is a pretty good quality) in favor of the bigger picture

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 03/04/2008

Richardson took the coward's road and deserves a cowards welcome. His 'I'm above it all' attitude is laughable. Anyone care to look into Richardson's personal betrayals? Bad as the Clintons.

He can keep his 'opinions' to himself, shove his 'endorsement' up his....sleeve?

Obama tried to run a decent and inspiring campaign. He never attacked the Clintons on any of the decades of dirty, indictments and betrays-never once. The support Hillary has received from 'supporters' and the media has demonstrated that Republican Rovian techniques work on a certain % of Americans. These Americans, Dem or Rep should be ashamed, but they are not. Win at all costs.

My hope is Obama wins or looses with integrity and decency.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 AM on 03/04/2008

Mr. Richardson I gave you way too much credit. Its clear you are just kissing butt so Obama will give you some position should he be elected. I really thought you had more guts than that. Hillary give it EVERYTHING you have to go after Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 AM on 03/04/2008

Another dirty Rovian Republican heard from.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 03/04/2008

RICHARDSON NEEDS TO ENDORSE ...NOW....
RICHARDSON FOR OBAMA'S VP 08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 AM on 03/04/2008

Richardson has has weeks to speak up, he had this w/e to speak up and gave that limp, weak scolding to both of them.

He needs to keep his mouth shut now. Live with his mistakes and watch how he and others could have helped to turn this country around.

Now he gets to watch at what happens when 'good men do nothing'. We all know what happens. He sat back and watched the Clintons wage the filthiest campaign seen since Bush went after Gore.
We have never seen a Democrat go after a Democrat in the way the Clintons have. Its been truly disheartening to watch them and to watch Democratic Americans buy into it.

Richardson needs to keep his mouth shut. He never stood up when it took some courage to do so and shut the Clintons Rove Machine down. Now he needs to live with it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 03/04/2008

I've always respected Gov. Richardson's judgment -- even supported him when he's run for prez in the past -- so, this is just more of his common sense approach to the very tricky problem of, what do you do when two, determined old fools hijack a political party and use it as their vehicle to satisfy their selfish whims?

I hope Gov. R's opinion prevails among the leadership of the Dem Party, otherwise, they can kiss their asses goodbye in November. Ain't no way voters are going to give Bill a third term!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:35 AM on 03/04/2008

How is that a tricky problem for someone with judgment and common sense? He either has good judgment or he is a selfish opportunist.

Richardson had his opportunity to do something good. He caved to Clitnon pressure and bribes. He now needs to sit back, keep his large and useless mouth shut and watch what his judgment and common sense has enabled.

Way to go Richardson.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 AM on 03/04/2008

Clinton doesn't understand winning through losing and losing by winning. Her nasty attacks are embittering the party. At this stage, even if she somehow wins the nomination, she will do so by splitting the party. It will give McCain the White House and dramatically reduce Democratic gains in Congress. It would destroy her hopes for any political future and make about 1/3 of the party despise her more than they despise Ralph Nader.

Clinton doesn't understand that a nomination is not a "win at all costs" affair. If you cannot unite the party behind you, you have won a worthless prize and set yourself for humiliation in the fall and ignominy in the future. Just ask Hubert Humphrey.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 AM on 03/04/2008

very happy to hear about Richardson's criticism of billary . .. .. the clintons are too ambitious to regain the WH to listen I suspect . . . it is time the voters today put them in their place by giving Obama 15 straight wins . .. .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 AM on 03/04/2008

Richardson is the best worst friend a person could have.. I as a Mexican American Women.
He is appalling to me. He has no loyality... and is a political despot at best! I held out hope and
mere hope he would show some back bone It is so obvious he is a cad....and only out for himself.
I am so sad...............to finally understand this about a man i held in such esteem......
YUCK!!!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 AM on 03/04/2008

Speaking of experience to deal with crisis - I'm surprised this tidbit hasn't gotten more media attention.
---
(you can hear the clip over at nationaljournal.com)

February 29, 2008
Pregnant Pause
It was, in this reporter's opinion, the most interesting moment in today's Clinton campaign phoner with reporters. Responding to the release of HRC's new TX TV ad, which asserts in no subtle terms that only she has the experience to deal with a major world crisis, and, relatedly, to keep your children safe, Slate's John Dickerson asked the obvious question:

"What foreign policy moment would you point to in Hillary's career where she's been tested by crisis?" he said.

Silence on the call. You could've knit a sweater in the time it took the usually verbose team of Mark Penn, Howard Wolfson and Lee Feinstein, Clinton's national security director, to find a cogent answer. And what they came up with was weak -- that she's been endorsed by many high ranking members of the uniformed military.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 AM on 03/04/2008

Richardson is right. All this mudslinging politics is only hurting the party. It is time to stop the mudslinging.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 AM on 03/04/2008

Unlike her supporters, or Hillary herself, Richardson is smart enough to realize she's done.

If Hillary doesn't win both Texas and Ohio by decent margins, expect the endorsements to start rollin' in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 AM on 03/04/2008

I am soooooooooo tired of this fear mongering politics. Hillary should be ashamed of using the tactics of Republicans. American people are just done with it. This kind of politics is sooooooooo over.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 AM on 03/04/2008

If Clinton is going to act like Karl Rove, then why bother calling herself a Democrat?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:32 AM on 03/04/2008

She is not a Democrat. She is a Bush/Rove Republican. Her votes, her lies, her manipulation, her dirty background, her willingness to destroy the Dem Party for the 2nd time-she is a Republican through and through.

Can't believe anyone, no matter how intellectually impoverished a person is, could but into her tactics. Its a mystery.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 AM on 03/04/2008

I have always liked Bill Richardson, but he does have a tendency to say too much at times. It's clear to me that he wants to back Obama, but doesn't have the guts yet to do it. He reminds me of Clyburn in SC who claimed to be neutral and then kept going on tv to slam the Clintons. If he supports Obama he should say so and stop trying to pretend he is neutral. That said, I he is a fairweather friend. He seemed very pro-Hillary when she was ahead in the polls and didn't seem too impressed by Obama. It will be interesting to see what he does should Sen. Clinton make a comeback. I think he's lost his VP chances with his recent comments.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 AM on 03/04/2008

Adrianna Huffington:

As someone who was swindled by the California referendum in 2002, you or one of your "15 real-humans 24/7; approved comments are published to our site very quickly, but not always instantly!" should read this PDF file. I have read it word for word and was totally surprised that you have not made this public. I am confused by your support of one of the Democratic candidates over the other without considering this article. Please explain.

http://www.thecityedition.com/Pages/Archive/Winter08/PDFfiles/2008Election.pdf

The 3 AM ad doesn't scare me as much as this does.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 PM on 03/03/2008

You get scared by TV ads????

What are you? Three? Need your Mommy when it gets dark out?

Nappy time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 03/04/2008

Who gives a damn what Karl Rove thinks? He had his "magic numbers" in 2006 that told him the GOP would hold Congress.

Vote for the guy who can unite the party and win big in the Fall, and yes, in this case, it is the guy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 AM on 03/04/2008

Anything is possible where Karl Rove is involved. Thanks for the link.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 AM on 03/04/2008

Thanks for the link. I was aware of much of this but not all of the info.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 AM on 03/04/2008

Well, if you believe that unadulterated truckload of horseshit, I guess you'll be scared by anything! C

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 PM on 03/03/2008

how's this for a 3:00 a.m. ad. hillary picks up the red phone, and immediately says' bill, is that you, where the hell are you, it's 3:00 in the morning. oh, it's not you bill, sorry mr. putin.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 PM on 03/03/2008

Putin is no longer President of Russia, but Clinton doesn't know the name of his successor. (Medvedev)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 AM on 03/04/2008

here's my spin, obama has something up his sleeve, and will have some huge announcement weds. a.m. , especially if he loses ohio and or texas. he wants to take the wind out of hillary's victories, and i'm guessing some big name endorsements. notice they haven't announced his feb. donor $$$$. i also bet it's around $54mil. if she wins either state, they'll unload with lots of news of their own come weds. a.m. to ofset her victory. folks it's over, the remaining states favor obama's demographics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 PM on 03/03/2008

I saw the enterview and that title is an overstatement, but I wish he would just shut up and mind his own business.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 03/03/2008

Gee, I thought that since both camps were sending him wine, roses, and roofies trying to seal the deal on an endorsement, that would indicate that he may be part of the business you say he should stay out of.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 AM on 03/04/2008

He is a citizen he is a governor of a state and I guess as much as it is your business or my business it is his business ..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 PM on 03/03/2008


Wait a sec -I seem to remember Richardson bragging in an early debate that he had a lot MORE National Security experience than Clinton, Obama and Edwards combined.

Now he singing Obama's National Security experience. Heh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 PM on 03/03/2008


Remember one of teh first debates, when Hillary was in the lead in polls.

Remember when Richardson defended Hillary against some attacks by the others.

Rchardson has his nose up her tush because he believed she would win and he wanted a cabinent post.

Now that Obama has the lead, Richardson has removed his nose from her tush and firmly planted in Obama's tush.

It's called pandering for political favor. Richardson wants a Cabinet Seat bad.

Just like Obama is pandering to republicans to get primary votes by talking about inclduing GOP in his cabinet.



    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:26 PM on 03/03/2008

The politics of personal distruction... You're either with us or against us. Now Richardson is Judas! How low will the Clintonistas go?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 PM on 03/03/2008


I hear some polls have Hillary ahead in Texas -- maybe Richardson will switch back again.

Fun, huh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 PM on 03/03/2008

LOL at a possible response ad for Clinton's 3:00am commercial. Have Bill answer the phone while distracted, undressed and being entertained by an intern. There is an ad for you, Barack!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 PM on 03/03/2008

judgement? google "obama and Tony Rezko", google Rev. Wright and obama- the story that obama's LONG time preacher who he knows very well said these states quoted below. (I dont think its the kind of change that we were hoping for)
More recently, his name is becoming nationally familiar as the longtime spiritual mentor of Barack Obama, who joined the church in 1988 - a move Obama says was important to shaping his identity as an African-American. In fact, Obama's book title "Audacity of Hope" was taken from one of Wright's sermons. (Plagiarism even then, huh?)

Here's some audacious comments from the good Rev. Wright on random topics:

On 9/11: "In the 21st century, white America got a wake-up call after 9/11/01...White America and the Western world came to realize that people of color had not gone away, faded into the woodwork or just 'disappeared,' as the Great White West kept on its merry way of ignoring Black concerns."

On Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan: "He brings a perspective that is helpful and honest...Minister Farrakhan will be remembered as one of the 20th and 21st century giants of the African-American religious experience."

He is NOT the kind of American President we want in office, our vote goes to Hillary who at least had the balls to reject Farrakhan's racism on MANY occasions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 PM on 03/03/2008

That is so odd ... The Anti-defamation league has not found anything Antisemitic about the Rev. Wright but in response to your random quotes the first quote has nothing wrong with it ... we have ignored people of color ... we have ignored Africa ... look what Bill Clinton did in Rwanda ... Clinton said he will never forget and I cannot forget it ... think about the genocide that could have been averted? Think about what has happened on the continent of Africa ... think about what we have done in the US to African Americans and Indigenous People ... so it is not a big deal ... and if the Anti-defamation league has no problem I would suggest you are engaging in racism ...
Furthermore the definition of racism has to do with power relations so as much as I am not a fan of Farrakhan he can be prejudiced but not racist sorry only you and I as whites can be racist ...
One other thing Allen66 ... on more than one occasion Senator Obama has repudiated Minister Farrakahn so please comment on facts stop lying and stop the hyperbole and stop the conjecture it is really despicable ...
Google-ing Obama and Tony Rezko means nothing do you understand story and blog and lie and conjecture and internet placement do not substitute for facts ... you are sadly sadly mistaken

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 PM on 03/03/2008

Allen66 -
Google - Hillary Clinton - Rape Trial - 12-year-old destroyed by rape -1975 - Washington County Arkansas.

Google - Clinton Casualties

How about the Marc Rich pardon. The Clintons accepted several thousands of dollars worth of furniture from his wife - probably a "buy off". Then here's what you'll get on this - but go and read the entire article....

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=21595
"On Jan. 20, President Clinton gave Rich a chance for a third "do-over." Clinton wiped all the criminal charges off of Rich's record with a presidential pardon on his last day in power. The Rich pardon has received special attention because Denise Rich raised and donated more than $1 million to the Democratic Party in recent years and also provided the Clintons directly with a $10,000 contribution to their legal defense fund and $7,300 worth of furniture. "

If Barack Obama wanted to turn the tables on Hillary Clinton, which as a gentleman he probably would not do, he could flood the airwaves everyday with their wrongdoing, not only before the Clinton administration, but during and after. Anyone who truly remembers the 90s cannot possibly EVER want a repeat.

As for her experience, she has NONE. How can you possibly get a nation to believe Hillary helped make decisions in the Clinton adminstration if you did NOT have any security clearance in the white house? Just which phone calls did Hillary take at 3 a.m? You know and I know there were none.

Is Hillary a democrat or has her lust for power driven her beyond reality. Is this the type of person you want as president? She cannot possibly win the delegates but she's willing to tear the party apart in order to win...much like she did to that poor 12-year-old in Washington Co., Arkansas, in 1975. Winning, no matter what the cost, has always been their motto; even if it means destroying the life of a child.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 PM on 03/03/2008