Clinton Releases New Texas, Ohio Ads

Clinton Releases New Texas, Ohio Ads

Huffington Post   |   March 3, 2008 11:03 AM


stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

Sen. Clinton has two new ads out on the eve of primaries in Texas and Ohio.

In the first, Clinton hits Obama on his inactivity while serving as chairman of the Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Europe. It also includes footage of sleeping children from Obama's previous ad (labeled "Obama TV Ad" so no one will confuse it with the Hillary ad of similar content):

Clinton's new Ohio ad "Partner" focuses on the economy:



 
 

Comments
65
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- mvastola12 See Profile I'm a Fan of mvastola12 permalink

DailyKos: Hillary's ad: debate footage doctored to make Obama blacker http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/3/4/21311/85811/447/468408

I'm appalled.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:15 AM on 03/04/2008
- Seattlelite See Profile I'm a Fan of Seattlelite permalink

She's certainly been missing in action on the Senate floor herself. Hillary didn't your mother tell you to not throw stones when you live in a glass house.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 AM on 03/04/2008
- lungfish See Profile I'm a Fan of lungfish permalink

Hillary was too busy to vote on FISA - too busy campaigning and it wasn't politically expediant for her to do so even though the people who elected her to office expected her to. Now FISA is going to sneak by anyway because of the Dems working behind the scenes for a compromise. where is her voice in this situation?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 AM on 03/04/2008
- IndependentMeans See Profile I'm a Fan of IndependentMeans permalink

Enough already. This is not what the Democratic party needs. I supported her until she became a nasty piece of work. Now I cannot stand her, I hope she gets creamed tomorrow.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 PM on 03/03/2008
- Seattlelite See Profile I'm a Fan of Seattlelite permalink

New flash!! He could hold all the meeting he wants but the fact is NOTHING is going to change in regards to Iraq or Afganstan until Bush and company leaves the White House! His time is better spent trying to get elected so he'll have the power to make changes. Holding meeting is not going to get him elected and sure ain't going to change a thing in Bush's screwed up policies, and if you don't believe that, then why hasn't the congress been able to make any changes?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 03/03/2008
- RISEUPAMERICA See Profile I'm a Fan of RISEUPAMERICA permalink

your missing the point!!

if he can't schedule a meeting as a senator what makes you think he will schedule one when he's president? DUH

This say's everything about how he is not the "change" agent he claims to be
and it tells us clearly that he is nothing more than another polictian willing to say what ever to get your
trust and votes.

not to mention it tells us his "judgement" is just as cloudy as everyone elses, including his supporters.

get your kleenex ready........your gonna need it

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:45 AM on 03/04/2008
- ESK See Profile I'm a Fan of ESK permalink

In the 109th Congress both Clinton and Obama have excellent vote attendance records, with Obama's being just a bit better. In the 110th Congress both have diminished attendance records, with hers being the better of the two. Obviously this is all due to the the time both spend on the campaign trail. By the way in both Congresses John McCain has a much worse vote attendance record than either Clinton or Obama. You can look it up. Your argument doesn't hold water. All you've done is take one point and overgeneralize it to a broader assumption. That's called exaggeration. By the way, 11 primaries and caucuses in a row, a delegate lead that will be very difficult to overcome, and party heavyweights beginning to signal that party unity and winning in November is now a big issue. It's not nice to gloat prematurely.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 AM on 03/04/2008
- Seattlelite See Profile I'm a Fan of Seattlelite permalink

News flash -- Hillary been missing in action on the Senate floor herself DUH -- FISA bill ring a bell? Sen. Reid told them to get back and vote, Obama showed up Hillary, missing.

Won't speak for his other supporters but I assure you my judgment is clear as a can be, Hillary in the most important decision she had to make she got it wrong. Poor judgment .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 AM on 03/04/2008
- Roshi98 See Profile I'm a Fan of Roshi98 permalink

Rationalize it anyway you want. Obama has been too busy to even bother proposing a convening of his very important and relevant committee. What you should be worried about is his apparent disregard for the purpose of oversight. That should be a wonderful quality which I'm sure every progressive will be four-square behind.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 PM on 03/03/2008
- PTTY See Profile I'm a Fan of PTTY permalink

Biden is the Chairman, Hillary is knocking Biden. There has been no sub-committee meetings and Hillary knows it.

Another lie by Hillary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 PM on 03/03/2008
- ESK See Profile I'm a Fan of ESK permalink

I'm so tired of overgeneralizations. Your point is a leap at best. Where did you get this information? Who told you that he has a disregard for oversight? This isn't rationalizing, it's reality. We could argue back and forth for quite a while about who attended what vote, ran what meeting or subcomittee hearing. I'm positive that Sen. Clinton has missed her share of those during the campaign. But that's beside the point. Running for President, by design, assumes that this will happen. By the way, to use a single circumstance as means of making a broader critical argument distorts that argument and becomes nothing more than an exaggeration.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 03/03/2008
- BUSHsurvivor See Profile I'm a Fan of BUSHsurvivor permalink

BO: Uhhh...it was the start of uhhh...the campaign.....uhhh, yeah, that's right, it was.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 03/03/2008
- charley0008 See Profile I'm a Fan of charley0008 permalink

Give me a break - this from Senator Clinton who could not be bothered to read the Intelligence reports before voting to give Bush the power to go to war in Iraq! Even though Senator Graham, chairman of the Intelligence Committee urged senators to read it and voted against the resolution himself!
This from Senator Clinton who then did it again, voted in 2007 on essentially the same wording in the Lieberman resolution that would authorize Bush to go to war with Iran! Then hoped it failed!!!!
The same Senator Clinton who will not meet with any of the countries causing us concern but is willing to stand back and call them names!
The same Clinton who in the White House blew away any chance of passing Health Care when the Democrats held the house because she did it in secret with the big Health Care Insurance corporations; would not include others, including Democrats who had experience but were not allowed input on her bill; who essentially took a my way or the highway approach! Presto ...no health care.
The same Clinton who will tear apart the Democratic party to further her own ambition with misleading and dishonest ads like this. Is she working for the Republicans, she sure sounds like it!
I want nothing to do with another Bush or another Clinton and I do not care how many misleading, ridiculous ads like this she runs. It only reinforces my belief that if she is the nominee our best chances to take back the White House will be gone, she will lose to Senator McCain, because they have the same voting records on Iraq and Iran but he is perceived to be more trustworthy than she is and less divisive. No more Clintons!


All of the Clinton ads relies on a belief that the American public is stupid or incapable of doing a little research on the internet - like her voting record or her absences or that the sub-committee in question deals with Europe and as such NATO but has nothing to do with Afganistan which is handled by another committee.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 03/03/2008
- resonate See Profile I'm a Fan of resonate permalink

UHG! I am not voting if she is the democratic nominee. America will just slide further into global bullying, war and division while she and her pals make a pretty penny.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 03/03/2008
- Freddy334 See Profile I'm a Fan of Freddy334 permalink

Tell us more about Obama's connections to: Rezko and Syria, an Iraqi billionaire and friend of Saddam, anti-semites and bigots Jesse Jackson and Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam. Obama's pastor is close with FarraKKKhan. This is the same Saddam who paid rewards to Hamas, Hezboolah and Alqsa Martyrs suicide bombers. Obama needs to start explianing his ties to the Middle East and Muslim financiers.

Vote for Hillary because Obama will never carry Florida and will probably lose NY, NJ, CT and PA. McCain could even carry CA.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 PM on 03/03/2008
- darlamc See Profile I'm a Fan of darlamc permalink

The audacity of hypocrisy - www.politicalamnesia.blogspot.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 03/03/2008
- MNmommy See Profile I'm a Fan of MNmommy permalink

I like both these ads a hell of a lot better than last week's 3 a.m. ad.

Wake me up when it's over.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 03/03/2008
- ESK See Profile I'm a Fan of ESK permalink

We need to make sure that we have our facts straight here. Afghanistan itself is not in Sen. Obama's subcomittee's jurisdictition --it can be addressed only either from the Foreign Relations Committee as a whole, or John Kerry's subcommittee on Near Eastern and South and Central Asian Affairs. Hearings have been held there. By the way, the last I looked it's the President who makes foreign policy, and the ineptness of the current administration speaks for itself. The damage it has done will take some time to fix. Our European partners in NATO aren't going to change their policy until a new President with a more constructive approach is in office. While it certainly would have been to Obama's political advantage to hold hearings, in that they would have helped him combat the narrow nitpicking that goes on in a campaign, it serves the country much better for him to spend his time campaigning for an office where his influence will be much greater. Let's keep our eye on the larger picture folks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:47 PM on 03/03/2008
- gba See Profile I'm a Fan of gba permalink

If the USA want Europe to employ more troops in Afghanistan, then it is an issue for the Foreign Relations Committee

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 03/03/2008
- ESK See Profile I'm a Fan of ESK permalink

That's right. And the Foreign Relations Committee is not chaired by Obama. It's chaired by Joe Biden.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 PM on 03/03/2008
- frustratedinohio See Profile I'm a Fan of frustratedinohio permalink

Quit rationalizing. He's not doing an important part of his job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 03/03/2008
- resonate See Profile I'm a Fan of resonate permalink

He hasn't held and meeting but has anyone bothered to look into what other work the people on the committee have done since like publications and policy papers on Afghanistan? Its an easy Clinton one liner but who says things have to be truthful?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 03/03/2008
- ESK See Profile I'm a Fan of ESK permalink

It wasn't a rationalization, it's reality. We could argue back and forth for quite a while about who attended what vote, ran what meeting or subcomittee hearing. I'm positive that Sen. Clinton has missed her share of those during the campaign. But that's beside the point. Running for President, by design, assumes that this will happen. By the way, to use a single circumstance as means of making a broader critical argument distorts that argument and becomes nothing more than an exaggeration.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 03/03/2008
- ibsteve2u See Profile I'm a Fan of ibsteve2u permalink

Let me see...number of National Intelligence Estimates read...oh, never mind.

If I start that, there is sure to be a Clinton ad that suggests that reading is far less important than the ability to make uninformed decisions, quickly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 03/03/2008
- darlamc See Profile I'm a Fan of darlamc permalink

Oh let's see, misleading the public...too high to count.

the audacity of hypocrisy - www.politicalamnesia.blogspot.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 03/03/2008
- 2liveNdie See Profile I'm a Fan of 2liveNdie permalink

Why didn't Hillary vote in the senate on FISA when she was clearly in D.C. just like Obama and McCain who did go cast their vote? Voted for the war against Iraq and voted for higher credit card interests rates, but HOPED it wouldn't pass. So she does HOPE after all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:45 PM on 03/03/2008
- kevenhussienseven See Profile I'm a Fan of kevenhussienseven permalink

FISA UPDATE!

The House leadership is considering splitting up the Senate abomination in order to allow congressmen to trade votes (you vote yes on A, I"ll vote no, you vote no on B, I"ll vote yes) in order to give them cover to pass the entire bill.

Please read:

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/03/todays_must_read_287.php

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/03/03/democrats/index.html

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/1/175613/1399/825/467005

A list of Blue Dog Congressmen thought to be sympathetic to the concept of Telecom immunity is at: http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/2/29/145640/493/398

Then call Pelosi, Hoyer, Conyers, some Blue Dogs and your own congressman and raise holy hell. Tell them that only the RESTORE act is acceptable.

From the article: "Under pressure to end an impasse over espionage legislation, House Democrats are considering a plan to vote on a bill next week that would give the government broad new eavesdropping authorities but strip out a provision that would protect phone companies from lawsuits."

Please act!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 03/03/2008
- ObamaSeeChange See Profile I'm a Fan of ObamaSeeChange permalink

That's true he was busy kicking your ass from coast to coast for the Democratic nomination for POTUS. You spent even less time in the Senate but you wasted your sabbatical planning your inauguration. You had only gotten as far as choosing that Tweety Bird yellow jacket to be sworn in with when the sky fell in on you. Now please get out of the way and find another political career or spend the rest of your life answering toy red phones in Chappaqua and muttering unintelligible instructions to your make believe security staff.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 PM on 03/03/2008
- JakeEasy See Profile I'm a Fan of JakeEasy permalink

And kicking ass is so important to you isn't it. Kicking Hillary's ass and kicking Edwards ass. That's what you care about, not the issues, not whether your guy has any idea of how to get things done, whether he has any sense of responsibility. Just win, right?

Every other candidate running for the Democratic nomination still fulfilled their duties to the people who elected them. Obama's preoccupation with running for office and ducking votes where he could be could be held accountable (the most missed of any candidate) are very good indicators of his searing ambition without commitment.

But he's kicking ass, so it's okay. Right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 PM on 03/03/2008
- resonate See Profile I'm a Fan of resonate permalink

Hillary has skipped votes in the senate and not fulfilled her promises to NY. To be fair you should also evaluate what she has not accomplished after having started her campaign. She is just as guilty if not more so for making blatant false promises in her run up to the NY senate seat and now just running of to the white house after having used it as a stepping stone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 03/03/2008
- frustratedinohio See Profile I'm a Fan of frustratedinohio permalink

Excellent point!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:58 PM on 03/03/2008
- rollingdivision See Profile I'm a Fan of rollingdivision permalink

Committee Chairman Obama held as many hearing on Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Europe as he did on the Afghanistan subcommittee! Zero. If he had as many brains as a box of rocks Obama would have scheduled a meeting each quarter for both of these committees. Even if they didn't make much or any progress at least they would have tried. Obama had the perfect forum to air and gain publicity for his policy positions on the Afghanistan War and Europe's restricted NATO participation which now seems to think are important (recent speeches and policy papers). When given golden opportunities to make significant accomplishments in the Senate on these very issues, Obama didn't even vote "PRESENT". Republicans don't even have to write the TV ads, just presenting the facts is all that's needed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 PM on 03/03/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in