Earth Liberation Front Believed Responsible For Arson At Multimillion-Dollar Seattle Homes

ELIZABETH M. GILLESPIE | March 3, 2008 11:04 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Firefighters pour water onto burning houses at the scene where four multimillion dollar homes burned Monday, March 3, 2008, in Woodinville, Wash., a suburb of Seattle. A sign with the initials of a radical environmental group was found at the scene, an official said. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)

WOODINVILLE, Wash. — Three seven-figure dream homes went up in flames early Monday in a Seattle suburb, apparently set by eco-terrorists who left a sign mocking the builders' claims that the 4,000-plus-square-foot houses were environmentally friendly.

The sign _ a sheet marked with spray paint _ bore the initials ELF, for Earth Liberation Front, a loose collection of radical environmentalists that has claimed responsibility for dozens of attacks since the 1990s.

The sheriff's office estimated that Monday's pre-dawn fires did $7 million in damage to the "Street of Dreams," a row of unoccupied, furnished luxury model homes where tens of thousands of visitors last summer eyed the latest in high-end housing, interior design and landscaping. Three homes were destroyed and two had minor fire or smoke damage.

Crews removed incendiary devices found in the homes, Snohomish County District 7 Fire Chief Rick Eastman said. Later, however, Kelvin Crenshaw, special agent in charge of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms in Seattle, said there was no evidence such devices had been used.

The FBI was investigating the fires as a potential domestic terrorism act, said FBI spokesman Rich Kolko in Washington, D.C.

No injuries were reported in the fires, which began before dawn in the wooded subdivision and were still smoldering by midmorning.

The sign left behind said in red scraggly letters, "Built Green? Nope black!" and "McMansions in RCDs r not green," a reference to rural cluster developments.

One alleged ELF activist is on trial in Tacoma in the 2001 firebombing of the University of Washington's Center for Urban Horticulture. In another case out of Portland, Ore., environmental activist and former fugitive Tre Arrow pleaded not guilty Monday to ecoterrorism charges and was ordered held as a flight risk and public danger.

Story continues below

Investigators were not immediately aware of any evidence linking the fires to either criminal case, Seattle FBI agent Fred Gutt said.

The homes that burned were between 4,200 and 4,750 square feet, are on sale at prices up to nearly $2 million.

Builders involved with the project said the homes used "green" techniques such as water-pervious sidewalks, super-insulated walls and windows and products made with recycled materials, such carpet pads.

"We all built our houses to higher standards to try to demonstrate best practices in the industry," said Grey Lundberg, whose company CMI Homes built one of the homes that was destroyed.

Many cities have events similar to the Seattle Street of Dreams, which has been held since the 1980s. Advertising for last summer's show focused on the environmentally friendly aspects of the homes, which were smaller than some of the houses featured in years past.

"We are stunned by this event, and we thank God that each of the homes were unoccupied and that there were no apparent injuries," Seattle Street of Dreams Inc. President John Heller said in a news release.

The homes are in a development near the headwaters of Bear Creek, which is home to endangered chinook salmon. Opponents of the development had questioned whether the luxury homes could pollute the creek and an aquifer that is a drinking water source, and whether enough was done to protect nearby wetlands.

The FBI has said the ELF and a sister group, the Animal Liberation Front, have committed hundreds of criminal acts.

ELF is known for trying to cause economic damage to companies or organizations it considers to be harming the environment. The group has no organized structure or leadership; typically, autonomous cells of activists take "direct actions" such as arsons and claim responsibility on behalf of ELF.

In 2005, federal authorities charged more than a dozen people involved in an ELF cell known as "the Family" and centered near Olympia, Wash., and Eugene, Ore. The group was responsible for at least 17 fires around the West from 1996 to 2001 _ most notoriously, the 1998 destruction of a lodge at the Vail ski resort in Colorado, a fire that caused $12 million in damage.

A federal jury in Tacoma was deliberating in the case of another accused ELF activist. Briana Waters could face at least 35 years if convicted of helping to firebomb the UW horticulture building in 2001.

Waters' lawyer, Robert Bloom, asked the judge to declare a mistrial Monday morning, citing the possibility that the fires _ and their ensuing publicity _ could influence the jury.

"It is inconceivable that anybody who is supporting Briana's case could have been responsible for this," Bloom said.

The judge rejected Bloom's request.

Waters, a 32-year-old violin teacher from Oakland, Calif., is accused of serving as a lookout while her friends planted the firebomb, which caused $7 million in damage. The horticulture center was targeted because the ELF activists mistakenly believed researchers there were genetically engineering trees, investigators said.

Tre Arrow is accused of helping to destroy concrete-mixing trucks at Ross Island Sand and Gravel Co. in Portland in April 2001 and of firebombing logging trucks at Schoppert Logging Co. in Eagle Creek near Mount Hood in June 2001.

ELF has timed attacks with criminal cases in the past. A few days before Jeff Luers was to be tried in 2001 on charges he torched three SUVs at a Eugene, Ore., car dealership, ELF activists hit the same dealership again. Luers was convicted.

___

Associated Press writer Lara Jakes Jordan in Washington, D.C., and Gene Johnson in Seattle contributed to this report.

WOODINVILLE, Wash. — Three seven-figure dream homes went up in flames early Monday in a Seattle suburb, apparently set by eco-terrorists who left a sign mocking the builders' claims that the 4,0...
WOODINVILLE, Wash. — Three seven-figure dream homes went up in flames early Monday in a Seattle suburb, apparently set by eco-terrorists who left a sign mocking the builders' claims that the 4,0...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
329
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
photo

Thanks for sending all that toxic smoke from recycled building products into the atmosphere, and the toxic run off from fighting the blaze into the groundwater ELF.

Better tone down inhaling the hemp dudes, it is impairing your rational thinking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 PM on 03/03/2008

you dont know it was ELF. they havent claimed responsibility. stifle yourself dingbat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 03/03/2008
- ekwhite I'm a Fan of ekwhite 2 fans permalink

It is revealing that the FBI is investigating this as an act of domestic terrorism. The classic definition of terrorism is violent acts against non-combatants, not acts against property. This is arson, a serious crime, and should be treated as such. Terrorism charges should be saved for cases where people are harmed or put in danger.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 PM on 03/03/2008

The American Heritage dictionary defines Terrorism as:

n. The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.

If, as one can reasonably suspect (which an investigation should determine), they did this unlawful act, to intimidated or coerce, then that would seem to fit the "classic definition" of terrorism.

I don’t think either the classic definition (or the law for that matter) leaves room for specifically factoring in the ideological viewpoint (which you did not do – I point it out as some might initially think it ok as they believed in the cause of those who did commit this act) of those who do the acts. Would it not be terrorism if they had burned down a school (at night while unoccupied) that was under court order to desegregate? Or an unoccupied Gay and Lesbian Center?

The key in the definition (and the law, I suspect) is intention, not the act itself – something that has a fairly high standard of proof, but which it is not unreasonable to suspect, I believe, based on the statements left at the scene as reported.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:32 PM on 03/03/2008
- Navy26Yrs I'm a Fan of Navy26Yrs 6 fans permalink
photo

Check the corps that financed these un-buyable dream homes. Are they near going out of business?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 03/03/2008

My posting was in response to the assertion of EKWHITE that terrorism is not implicated by acts against property alone. That is incorrect, from a definitional, a legal and a motivational (impact on people or society) stand point.

I agree there may be numerous plausible alternative explanations. That's what an investigation should uncover. And the admonition to follow the money, is indeed a good one, and I personally believe that often leads one to the "truth" in many cases.

The only question now is if it does turn out to be the developers, will the media correct the story. And even if that is the case and the correction is made, the likelihood that the initial "Eco-Terrorists" meme will continue to resonate or even be falsely quoted seems high.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 PM on 03/03/2008

As a former Woodinville resident myself, the "Street of Dreams" had it coming. Yes, it was probably more environmentally damaging than leaving the houses there, yes, it will create bad spin for environmentalists, yes, this type of action doesn't exactly solve any problems, but I bet it felt damn good to burn that overindulgent pile of crap to the ground.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 03/03/2008
- sassafra I'm a Fan of sassafra 20 fans permalink
photo

more than likely insurance fraud is my guess brought about by the sinking real estate market when they discovered they couldn't sell those bloated homes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 03/03/2008
- contented I'm a Fan of contented 5 fans permalink

i think you're right sass.........it was that builder/developer group "Escaping Losses Fast" that pinned it on the enviros.............

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:27 PM on 03/03/2008
photo

I'm curious...how exactly is a 6,000 SF single family house earth family....or green? The McMansions here in the Seattle Area are grotesque...while I don't condone ELF or their practice, I do question American over indulgence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 03/03/2008
- Navy26Yrs I'm a Fan of Navy26Yrs 6 fans permalink
photo

They PAINTED them green, and put green smiley faces on the mailboxes. There ya go. Instant green, earth friendly homes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:02 PM on 03/03/2008
- snruB I'm a Fan of snruB 5 fans permalink
photo

LOL How counterproductive

Now, in addition to the destruction caused by these cases of arson, the people who owned this property will utilize more resources to rebuild

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 03/03/2008
- MizLiz I'm a Fan of MizLiz 61 fans permalink
photo

This sounds like nothing more or less than class warfare.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 03/03/2008
- CitizenRob I'm a Fan of CitizenRob 13 fans permalink

What rights are we as citizens left with when our natural environments are being destroyed just so some developer can maximize his profit at the expense of EVERYBODIES' quality of life?

If this was in fact something ELF did, I'm neutral on the subject. At least nobody lived in these units yet. The only people hurt are the greedy developers and their insurers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:12 PM on 03/03/2008
- atlantajoe I'm a Fan of atlantajoe 8 fans permalink

And other insurds whose rates will increase.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 PM on 03/03/2008

That's ok. I hear Bush is planning to help them rebuild with federal money. We just CAN'T have homeless billionaires wandering our streets now can we?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:03 PM on 03/03/2008

We better investigate to see if builder had recently purchased insurance against terrorist attacks like Silverman did on his World Trade Towers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 03/03/2008
- atlantajoe I'm a Fan of atlantajoe 8 fans permalink

hopeless, do you really think Billionaires were going to live in those tiny little houses all packed together like that?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 PM on 03/03/2008
- NABNYC I'm a Fan of NABNYC 99 fans permalink

I expect the FBI to get involved, the Republicans, God help us probably the Democrats too, screaming about the "terrorist" environmentalists in this country. Too bad the government only seems to care about terrorism when it helps the politicians and their friends to steal more money from taxpayers.

Terrorism? Three houses burned down? Sorry, I can't get too excited. First, I don't think any environmentalist group would leave their calling card: come get me, I did it. In today's market, it's much more likely the fires were started by the developer who wants a way out of the project, or maybe a buyer who signed the contract to buy last year but prices have now fallen and they want out of the deal.

But even if it was set by someone else, so what? It's three houses -- unoccupied -- property loss. The real terrorism in this country takes place inside people's homes, and usually comes at the end of Daddy's fist. If the FBI want to stop terrorism, go to any local police department and get a list from them of every family with suspected child abuse, unexplained bruises, childhood depression, domestic violence calls. More Americans will be terrorized by their partners inside their own homes than will ever face danger from middle eastern attacks. Despite Hillary's stupid commercial.

Why is it our entire government is devoted only to protecting property, and nobody cares about the citizens of this country? If we want the government to stop the importation and sale of poisoned food, then we want a "nanny" state. If we want decent jobs, then we are suggested old-style "protectionist" policies which are bad and wrong.

It's our government, our taxes, why shouldn't we demand that it be used for the people instead of just looted by the insiders and the wealthy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 03/03/2008
- July I'm a Fan of July permalink

So how is Bush's spying protecting us from terrorists?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 03/03/2008
- JamesR. I'm a Fan of JamesR. 213 fans permalink
photo

huh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 03/03/2008
- July I'm a Fan of July permalink

You've forgotten already?

Okay, the Bush administration has been and still is (illegally) listening to Americans' phone calls, reading our emails, violating our privacy, etc. all under the guise of protecting us from terrorists. Yet, they missed this one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:57 PM on 03/03/2008
photo

I have a four thousand square foot farm house constructed over one hundred years ago.

Why aren't they burning it down? Although it has been made as energy efficient as possible, given the limitations of dealing with old construction, I doubt it is as energy efficient as a new house.

The Elf is welcome to make an example of me. I'll just use the insurance money to construct a new more energy efficient house, with the same square footage.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 03/03/2008
photo

Haha--since when does an insurance co. actually pay out? Not these days--their lobbyists have put too many Republicans in office to rig the laws.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 PM on 03/03/2008
- ibsteve2u I'm a Fan of ibsteve2u 150 fans permalink
photo

Juvenile, if you ask me. "Everbody Loves Fires" would be a more appropriate name for what is basically a group of pyromaniacs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 03/03/2008
- ibsteve2u I'm a Fan of ibsteve2u 150 fans permalink
photo

I have to take myself out back and kick myself, repeatedly...I let my instinctive reaction to "lost homes" override a far more appropriate: "Hmmm...what is a good way to get rid of a bunch of liabilities you can't sell....".

My bad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 03/03/2008
- MamaBird62 I'm a Fan of MamaBird62 92 fans permalink

Wouldn't the prudent thing be to just wait for the investigation? I live in Snohomish county not far from where these homes burned, and I have no reason to suspect local law enforcement can't get to the truth. If someone other than ELF is responsible it won't be the first time they've been scapegoated. In Maryland in 2004 a group of homes were burned and eco-terrorists were first blamed, until an investigation showed the arsonists were a group of racists who didn't want blacks moving in.
Let's just wait for the truth. Thank goodness no one was hurt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 03/03/2008
- wagonjak I'm a Fan of wagonjak 7 fans permalink

I agree MamaBird...there was also a number of homes burned around Phoenix that were blamed on "eco-terrorists" that turned out to be a minor member of the construction business who was using ELF for cover...but if and when it turns out not to be "eco-terrorists" we probably won't hear about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 PM on 03/03/2008
photo

I am certainly not an advocate for terrorism in any form, and if ELF is responsible, they should be made to pay. But what in the world do we need with more mega-homes, sitting empty while banks foreclose on other equally outrageous massive homes, with square footages and footprints that should have been outlawed years ago? Why can't we see "green homes" in the under 2000sf category? Why must they all be huge and ostentatious? Cities, counties and developers need to curb this conspicuous consumption of land and materials for the pseudo-wealthy . . . as we all lose when they go into foreclosure and sit vacant!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 03/03/2008

I would add: why are they building "green" homes in previously undeveloped areas, instead of building them to replace "un-green", "energy-ineficient" houses.

It is not green at all if they are expanding the urban sprawl!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:40 PM on 03/03/2008
- CitizenRob I'm a Fan of CitizenRob 13 fans permalink

Probably because poor people who can't afford new homes live on those "un-green" "energy-ineficient" houses you suggest they replace.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:25 PM on 03/03/2008

Sometimes it takes a fire to get your message across. Although I don't necessarily condon burning a house down, I get it, look this is a front page story on every news site obviously what they wanted to happen happened. Just as ALF burns down animal testing labs, ELF burns down houses that are not built in an environmentally friendly way. I would never burn a house down but we need groups like this to facilitate discussion on important issues. Large homes are so tacky and people that cut down forests to erect large developments of ugliness deserve to see their profits effected. Karma is a bitch!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 03/03/2008
- jrb35 I'm a Fan of jrb35 14 fans permalink

Have you ever taken anti-biotics? Have you been inoculated for disease? Have you or anyone you love ever had life saving surgery (e.g. open heart)? Do you know any diabetics who's very lives are dependent on daily insulin injections? Well, you can thank animal testing for all of those wonderful things and groups like the ALF whom you seem to praise would rather that such medical break throughs never came to be.

Yep. Hypocrisy is a bitch!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 03/03/2008
photo

20 billion animals are destroyed every year in unnecessary "research" in the USA on things like injecting soap into rabbits' eyes.

People like you can't seem to grasp that there is a difference between useless and senseless animal exploitation and legitimate avenues of research that might require animal testing prior to a human trial.

Why else have most of the top medical schools like Harvard and Yale given up on animal experimentation? Because the results are often meaningless. Animals that are tested do not have the same physiology as humans, and most results do nothing.

Hypocrisy and your mom are bitches, aren't they?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 03/03/2008
photo

So by that reasoning the Nazi experiments on Twins are justified in your book.

Logic's a bitch. Too some people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:10 PM on 03/03/2008

Actually the animal tests you seem to love are archaic and out dated and there are more modern tests available using human cells. Further, even if animal testing were the ONLY way to test these products the conditions in which they keep these animals is deplorable and the abuse administered on puppies, rabbits, cats and chimps is inhumane and disgusting. I invite you to watch the documentary "Behind the Mask" about ALF. I'm sure you will enjoy the footage of the beagle getting beaten to death by one of the lab techs. And just so you know I recently completed a course in animal law so I do praise ALF for what they do since I read cases which made me want to cry. There is no need for coporations to do what they do to these animals, but what can we really expect from a war mongoring society such as the US. Aside from this, I do not suscribe to western medicine, I have fought my autoimmune disease using eastern techniques such as acupuncture, yoga, candida cleansing and a vegan diet. So no I don't need those medical break throughs that you praise. Also, I refuse to support companies that test on animals and I buy my toothpaste, shampoo etc. from small vegan friendly companies. I am not a hyprocrite in fact I live my life treating all beings with respect and compassion and I invite you to do the same. ALF is fighting a fight that I 100% support regardless of whether or not it breaks the law.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:35 PM on 03/03/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect