TVNewser has a great catch from Sunday's Fox & Friends: anchor Ainsley Earhardt explaining then Fox News ideology when it comes to the pantsuits vs. skirts divide: "Here at Fox, we like to be feminine. So we don't wear the pants."
Watch:
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
When will BillO wear a kilt?
Sure they don't wear pants. But the real question is do they wear underpants?
lolllll...
Translation:
"Here at Fox, they like us to be feminine. So they don't let us wear pants."
But they aren't man enough to work on a real news station.
They are Mary Tyler Less.
Robin Meade at CNN ain't bad either... wasn't she a former "Miss Ohio"?
As for the women at Faux News, I highly doubt that they are hired for their journalistic skills, no one else at Faux is...
Hey Provice! As a fan of Fox News, I have checked into the backgrounds of most of the Ladies at Fox They have very impressive credentials and are much more inteligent then most people who subscribe to Huffington Post and this forum, including myself! Do you actually think, because a woman is beautiful or attractive, she is stupid? They are well educated (some are lawyers), and
have worked very hard to get there. Yes, they look great wearing those short skirts and their legs
are very inviting, indeed! That is how they get viewers interested. Attractive ladies wearing short skirts and bright colored blouses, attract both male and female viewers, alike! Then they prove themselves on their amount of knowledge on different news stories. From what I hear, Fox pays
much better than the other cable news channels. So great money will attract the smarter ladies!
Great looking Foxes belong on Fox News Channel. They are all smart enough to know that! I guess, the rest of you, aren't! And the news is more fair and balanced on FNC than any other news channel, on cable or free network TV!
Sorry those pumps and that skirt are not making those chicken legs attractive to me.
Point five on that list of fourteen characteristics of fascism that's been circulating on the internet for the past few years:
"5. Rampant Sexism - The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institutio
Well, it's great that these dames know their place, but if they really wanted to be lady-like, shouldn't they be at home, in the kitchen, popping Valium and dutifully mixing martinis for when their hard-working hubbies get home after a busy day at work?
Figures...
Yessir, by golly. When you go down to the corner to hang out tonight be sure to spend time with hairy chested Rs like Bush, our cheerleader and your leader. Or maybe those outed gays from your congress. Come on, get real.
Shut up and the fetch the martini
... Ah charlot, you made me choke on MY martini reading your spot-on assessment of the 'Faux females' - normally I'd say you owe me a drink, but I prefer to mix my own nowadays (I'm finicky, what can I say?), so I'll give you a round of applause instead..! *clapping* ;) ...
I can't stop thinking of her c***, mission accomplished Fox.
You jokes should check the bios of these women before you bark. Their credentials kick your ass, and certainly those of any of the "writers" at PuffPost.
The mistake you made was thinking that no woman with intelligence could also be beautiful. Only applies to liberal women.
You're right, what a bio. A degree from the University of South Carolina and 8 years as a noon news anchor on local TV. Next thing you know she'll be curing cancer.
Now let's see yours.....
And women wearing slacks are not feminine, or attractive? Hmm. Thanks for telling me.
"And women wearing slacks are not feminine, or attractive? Hmm. Thanks for telling me."
Skirts are definately more feminine than pants. That's pretty obvious.
As far as attractiveness goes, I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone who thought a woman was more attractive in pants instead of a skirt. Women's legs can be very attractive.
If they're so smart how come there hawking propaganda for a living.
Evidently, johnnyjust doesn't wear pants either.
Good to know that I have to check my ethics and integrity at the desk to be considered worthy like the propaganda spouting bimbo's at Fox.
At FOX the womwn anchors don't wann wer pants. One of them has already been featured ina men's magazine, so YA ! they definitly don't wer pants. Viva la differance
No wonder they do so many stories on Brittany Spears.
They're so "feminine" at FOXie that they don't wear panties either.
They're always "ready" to f*ck with the "news".
For once I agree with Faux Noise - women should not wear pants (or panties for that matter). A female needs to be feminine; case closed.
A female needs to be feminine?
who gets to define feminine?
and the "panties for that matter" just makes you look like a drooling pervert with nothing to say... think you're on the wrong site? go find jenna jameson's site since that's what seems to define feminine for you.
Last time I looked, feminine or masculine was determined by the type of reproductive organs one has.
last time you looked.... it must have been the stone age. ignorance is bliss, isn't it? fyi: masculinity and femininity have NOTHING to do with sex. furthermore, sex and gender are two very different subject matters. do yourself a favor, inform yourself.
Loading comments…
Huffington Post via TVNewser
First Posted: 03- 3-08 07:55 PM | Updated: 08- 6-08 06:27 PM