Pro-Clinton 527 Prepares For Pennsylvania Ad War

Pro-Clinton 527 Prepares For Pennsylvania Ad War

Politico   |  Kenneth P. Vogel   |   March 5, 2008 04:38 PM


stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

A new pro-Hillary Clinton group spent $830,000 airing ads Texas and Ohio in the run-up to her victory in the March 4 primaries. And the group has at least $300,000 in the bank to launch an expected air war on her behalf in Pennsylvania.

American Leadership Project raised a total of $1.2 million - $1 million of which came from AFSCME, which has endorsed Clinton - since Feb. 21, according to a report it filed Wednesday with the Federal Election Commission.


 
 

Comments
6
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- identityalways See Profile I'm a Fan of identityalways permalink

It's not "likeability" for me - it's "lie-ability." Hillary distorts the truth. Some call that "spinning;" I call it "lying."
And the whole experience and competence issue. What a scam. She didn't have the security clearance to answer the White House phone at 3:00 am. Where's the experience?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 03/06/2008
- TheShadow See Profile I'm a Fan of TheShadow permalink

My apolgies for the double post .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 PM on 03/05/2008
- TheShadow See Profile I'm a Fan of TheShadow permalink

I can't see having another president who does not value, or respect the voting rank and file electorate, and always plays the "poor me" card whether it be for votes of more money to run a campaign. In addition, I cannot stomach another "Swiftboating" style of campaign from anyone, and I think that the past few days have shown just who resembles the ghosts of Karl Rove, and the Republican wealthy dirty tricks people. If lying, bending the rules as they see fit while others must comply is the only way one achieves the most powerful office in the nation, then I think the rational people in this nation and around the world can figure out just who has the qualifications for the office of President of the United States. We need respect in the world, and not sleazy "business as usual" as we have endured the past seven years.

A person is judged by the company they keep (and that goes for your political team that surrounds you 24/7).

Sorry Clinton supporters: Character does count, and that's why I am voting for Barack Hussein Obama in my upcoming state"s Democratic primary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 PM on 03/05/2008
- TheShadow See Profile I'm a Fan of TheShadow permalink

I can't see having another president who does not value, or respect the voting rank and file electorate. In addition, I cannot stomach another "Swiftboating" style of campaign from anyone, and I think that the past few days have shown jsut who resemble the ghosts of Karl Rove, and the Republican wealthy sirty tricks people.

You are judged by the company you keep.

That's why I am voting for Barack Hussein Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 PM on 03/05/2008
- bessie1 See Profile I'm a Fan of bessie1 permalink

And I like Hillary better, so I'm voting for her. Of course, the fact that she is more competent is the "primary" factor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:41 PM on 03/05/2008
- tililek See Profile I'm a Fan of tililek permalink

People keep talking about the 'likeability' factor in voting for a President. Surely we had too much of that with those who voted for Bush. Maybe we should find capability and competence to be worth more?

I've never expected to have tea with a president, so why should I care about what they'd be like as a guest - better someone who has knowledge, can get the job done because they know the people involved in voting in Congress, and with a competent cabinet regardless of their chuminess factor. So, I'm voting for Hilary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 03/05/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

 

 Site  Web ask.com