Wall Street No Longer Gaga For Google

Wall Street No Longer Gaga For Google

Los Angeles Times   |  Jessica Guynn   |   March 5, 2008 08:23 AM


digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Remember when Wall Street was gaga over Google?

Despite its quirky approach to business, Google Inc. became a favorite among investors as the company best positioned to cash in on the digital media revolution. The Internet search giant's shares first hit the market at $85 in August 2004 and had risen nearly ninefold by late last year, turning Google into one of America's most valuable companies.

But since reaching a record $741.79 in November, Google's stock price has plunged 40%. The company, which only a few months ago could do no wrong, saw its stock slip $12.42, or nearly 3%, Tuesday to $444.60, its lowest point in nearly a year. The dive, which has wiped out more than $93 billion in shareholder wealth, reflects concerns that a slowdown in consumer spending could temper Google's stunning growth.

Keep Reading

-- OR --

Read about whatever happened to Google at $900.


-- OR --

Read more about how Google lost top exec Sheryl Sandberg to upstart Facebook.



 
Comments
10
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

PricewaterhouseCooper placed global ad spend at $385 billion last year, and estimates that by 2010 it will exceed half-a-trillion. So, not just a notion, but rather a firm reality regarding ad growth.

Google makes most of their money by way of Adwords, which is paid search. By all accounts paid search is expected to see continued growth in 2008. In 2007 growth was 28%. According to J.P. Morgan Chase, paid search will increase to 32% in 2008, making it a $15.5 billion business.

Also, something caught my eye a few weeks ago; Elias Plishner at Universal McCann reported the internet accounts for less than 10% of all U.S ad spend, but more than 20% of the time Americans spend consuming media. TV spend and viewing was equal at about 40%. However, newspaper and magazine ad spend outpaced consumption time. This seems to place Google in the position to chip away at the future half-a-trillion pot of ad dollars. Advertisers want eyeballs, and if they are online, the dollars will follow.

Yet, Google understands a truly successful media effort requires TV, online, radio, etc. So they continue to make inroads in "offline" media. I"m sure the payoff on these efforts are years down the road, but it truly signals this is not some myopic relic of the dot bust era as referenced in prior posts.

I have no idea what the stock is worth, but they provide a product to the advertising industry that will be everlasting. Finally, their potential with small business has not even been scratched, with only 50% of all small business owning a PC...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:02 PM on 03/06/2008
- jubo I'm a Fan of jubo permalink
photo

No Shit. They're privy to the new communications law they (HRC in, BO out) just signed.

Disgusting. Watch what you search. Seriously.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 03/05/2008

Hey! Were these guys alive in 2000-01? What part of "We are going to do you prison style" Market Manipulation don't they understand? Did they really think that they were immune from the same forces that destroyed hundreds of other hi-teks or forced them into the arms of Old Money suitors waiting to buy them on the cheap? What rubes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 PM on 03/05/2008

If life gives you bad stocks, make wallpaper.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 03/05/2008
photo

Google stock is just another fantasy bubble.

I mean seriously haven't people learned from the doggyfood.com era?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 AM on 03/05/2008

Google represents a slightly more-sophisticated variation of the same old "Dot-Bomb Bust" that we saw in the mid-to-late 1990's. It was, and is, basically a stock-play. Doing their IPO in the way that they did enabled the profits to be earned much more quickly.

But Google is much too big, and although it has many service-oriented offerings it is not really bringing in revenues from any of them. It's bringing in the dollars from advertising, and my computer without any particular effort filters out all of those ads, just as it does for the advertising-content of The Huffington Post.

We're going to see some fairly precipitous falls throughout the stock-market as the consequences of inflation and "fraud on the market" take hold, but I believe that companies like Google which basically sell nothing will take it on the chin much harder than, say, Apple or Netflix which actually provide something of material value.

We don't really need "a search-engine to rule them all." And when you cut away all the fluff and noise, that's all that Google really is or really ever was. That's their one ... and only ... core ... business.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 AM on 03/05/2008

Sundial, given your almost complete lack of understanding of google's business model why do you bother to post? FOUR BILLION DOLLARS. Read that again because I don't think you get it. FOUR BILLION DOLLARS. Yep, thats Google's EARNINGS the last 4 quarters. Hey, I don't care if Google made banana cream pies, that's ALOT OF MONEY! Money is flowing from advertising in broadcast media to advertising in interactive media. That is the future. Google has (up until now) demonstrated that they are BY FAR the best at capitalizing on this trend. Do you believe that people are going to stop using the internet and start staring at their TVs more? Google's P/E is now 33. You are right that Google is all about advertising but advertising is HUGE and will only get bigger. All the other services (and there are now uncountable many) may or may not be monetizable. It doesn't matter. Google is a FOUR BILLION DOLLAR company that is headed to becoming an EIGHT BILLION DOLLAR company. Where do you think that puts their P/E? Where do you think that puts their stock price? Oh, hey, it's high, I'll give you that, but if I could go back and buy Berkshire Hathaway at $40,000 a share I WOULD (and so would you)! GOOG at $450 is a gift.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 AM on 03/05/2008

Uh huh, I hear you. Four billion dollars and a P/E of 33. Enjoy your stock with my blessings. Really. It sounds much "too good to be true" to me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 AM on 03/05/2008

Good luck with that "advertising is HUGE and will only get bigger" notion.

The American consumer is tapped out.

Maybe the Chinese, Indians or the Russians will develop a middle class of their own to pick up the slack.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 03/05/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect

 
Right Now on HuffPost
ALASKA GOP SENATOR RIPS PALIN: YOU ABANDONED US

Alaska's Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski issued a...

Sarah Palin Turns Pro

I wish Hunter S. Thompson had lived to see this. As...