Obama's New Strategy: Blame The Media!

Huffington Post   |  Rachel Sklar   |   March 6, 2008 09:22 AM


stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Oblame the media! In the wake of Tuesday's game-changing defeats in Texas and Ohio (and hey, Rhode Island), Barack Obama is clearly steamed that the media turned on him. Yesterday in a media avail on his plane, he accused the media of being complicit in Hillary Clinton's "kitchen sink" strategy and allowing themselves to be "persuaded that you had been too hard on her and too soft on me." This, Obama seemed to feel, was clearly an injustice and had resulted in the press' abdication of their duty: "Hopefully now people feel like everything's evened out and we can start actually covering the campaign properly." Oh, snap! Step up, media, you really dropped the ball this time. (See video below.)

This improper coverage he's referring to presumably includes Tuesday's press conference, which was variously described as "combative" and "contentious" during which he was "grilled"
in "the toughest news conference of his campaign." According to the Washington Post's Dana Milbank, Obama's initial smile upon greeting reporters was "quickly replaced by the surprised look of a man bitten by his own dog." But according to accounts of that press conference, the questions seemed legitimately driven by the news cycle, given the recent (and evolving) story of the report of an Obama staffer's backroom meeting with the Canadian embassy in Chicago to reassure them over NAFTA (which has since been dubbed "NAFTA-Gate" in some quarters, which can't thrill the Obama camp), and the kickoff of the Tony Rezko trial this past Monday. Also, according to Chicago Sun-Times columnist Lynn Sweet, the toughness was helped along by the presence of some Chicago-area media who have covered Obama for longer and as such were not as "shy" about asking for specifics (she mentioned Sun-Times political columnist Carol Marin, who is cited in numerous reports on the press conference, along with Sweet, as being particularly inquisitive). The grilling sounds like it was more like a quick pan-searing, too — Obama cut off questioning with exasperation, saying (in the most-quoted line of the press conference), "Come on guys. I answered like eight questions. We're running late." Then he left. He didn't come back to talk to the press on his plane later, either.

Like, eight questions! Press, get your act together. You've got a campaign to cover .

Obama, the candidate almost always described as "cool," seems to be betraying more than a touch of annoyance lately. Now that the heat is being turned up, and another long slog looms ahead before Pennsylvania, it will be interesting to see not only how the press behaves with respect to both candidates, but also how Obama responds under the harsh new glare — and whether he submits himself to it willingly or continues his pattern of keeping the press carefully at arm's length.

In the meantime, chief campaign strategist David Axelrod clearly knows that the best defense is a good offense, brazenly turning the media-favoritism meme around and throwing it back: "The point we want to raise is that the vetting of Hillary Clinton has yet to start and that the hard questions haven't been asked of Sen. Clinton. And as I said yesterday, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. We think that there ought to be the same standard held to both candidates."

The same standard held to both candidates? Wow - dare to dream. In the next few weeks, we may just see it happen.



Blame The Media [Hotline - NJ]
Ask Tough Questions? Yes, They Can! [WaPo]
Obama talks a lot, but answers little [Chicago Sun-Times]

Related:
"Obama press conferences "relatively rare and often brief affairs" [The Caucus]
Obama stiffs, stifles national press [Politico]

Dream headline for this article: "Obama Oblames Media for Obacklash."


 
 

Comments
743
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (10 pages total)

All Barack needs to do is remain presidential and let Sybil I mean Hillary self-destruct as she is almost certain to do. I predict a world witnessed, smoke from the ears, head implosion, tailor made for must see TV consumption. Sadly the woman is ill, as in one day she's honored to be on the stage with him and the next he is unworthy to carry her water. C-R-A-Z-Y! Barack should deal with issues and not enter The Twilight Zone where she has the advantage. That's the bad part. The good part is if he stays ahead she might let him be her VP.

Sklar is not to be taken seriously.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 03/10/2008

Rachel Sklar.
Is another bais so call reporter. I saw her on television. I thought she was very fair in her comments. It seems I was wrong.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:22 PM on 03/10/2008

What a sleazy post. The so-called NAFTA-gate has already been refuted. In fact, it's turning out it's Hillary's team that have been "making private reassurances" to Canadian officials. The Clintons really can't go low enough, can they?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 03/10/2008

What a terrible article. Where was this article when hilary was whining about the media's coverage of her? Just an awful, awful article. Why does hilary get to pick and choose when to play victim? Wasnt hilary the one crying and whining about alleged media unfairness. I think she's on her 10th strategy anyway and eventually her fearmongering and gutter politics will be exemplified and we'll rid her as a candidate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 PM on 03/10/2008

hillary has been pounded on by the press for 15 years thats what i cant stand about obama people they are children, plain and simple and cant deal or even see reality

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:04 PM on 03/10/2008

Whew! Delusion, thy name is Rachel (and Hillary and Bill and Wolfson and Penn and Williams...) What a biased and desperate piece this was. From now on, MSNBC should require that she formally declare that she is 'in the tank' for Clinton(s) whenever she is called up to present her take on the campaigns.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 03/10/2008

who is olbermann in the tank for, oh please

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:04 PM on 03/10/2008

Sklar, you are so ridiculous I can't finish reading the tripe you wrote.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 03/10/2008

This post has the same pathetic tone of the Clintons' campaign for a third term in the White House. Just a couple of points as example: The "NAFTA scandal" is not Obama's scandal, but Hillary's because it was her team that winked at the Canadians. Second point, since when did Hillary "win" Texas? Obama is coming out of the Lone Star state with more delegates than Hillary did, according to the caucus tallies (which are where the true Democrats, as opposed to Limbaugh's Republican cross-over voters, stood up for Obama over Hillary).

Don't scold Obama for getting flustered, if that is in fact what happened, after one press conference. On his worst day he has more poise and self-control than Hillary has ever exhibited on her best day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 03/10/2008

Why is it all Repubs voting for Obama are visionaries and those voting for Clinton are nefarious.
It may be possible there are a lot of elderly women who skewed Republican in the past but are voting for Clinton.
But nooooo, it is all part of a, oh no, my god....VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY

does nobody get it.
if everyone who wants to keep the Repubs out of the white house actually vote Dem and don't complain, because their nominee wasn't nominated and stay home.
The DEMS will win.
So guess what, we can support the party or half of us can go take our ball and go home. And help lead the country further down the hole.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 03/10/2008

tax returns and library donor list please.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 PM on 03/10/2008

Paper trail on Rezco dealings
oh and how about the earmark records for the years in the US Senate when you hadn't decided to run for the presidency.
I think they call this show me yours and I'll show you mine.

How about they both release the fact that they are lying about getting the troops out in 6 months.
Both of them Clinton and Obama.

Hope that doesn't cause the basic downfall of the party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 03/10/2008

Rachel Sklar's new pro-Hillary strategy: blame Obama for even trying to defend himself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 03/10/2008

Irony? Since Rachel wrote this, about a half dozen Clinton questions and scandals have arisen and gotten heavy circulation. I guess we know why Hillary chose this strategy as a last resort.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 03/10/2008

What an absurdly biased article. Hillary and Bill Clinton have literally shut down the media coverage
of Hillary and now Bills stump speeches are becoming off limits. The media is falling all over themselves to praise Hillary on her empty attacks and politics of personal destruction as tough, good strategy. something that she has to do. It is turning my stomach. This kitchen sink tactic will drive people away as the media knows it will. It has happened before. This election is too important to be handled like the Paris, OJ and Brittany coverage. Egging on the "fight" is not serving the public well. Ratings, yes.

Rachel's appearances on MSNBC have been embarrassing. She can't even look the hosts or the camera in the eye as she spews out the Clinton talking points. She can't even believe what she's saying.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:58 PM on 03/10/2008

Rachel is a Hillary shill. I have seen her to the political shows and she's all smiles and sweetness until she opens her mouth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 03/10/2008

I already know you're a Clinton supporter, but if I didn't, do you know what would give it away? And this is usually the sign of good journalism - LOTS of exclamation points.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:06 PM on 03/10/2008

And do you know what gives away someone who knows the difference between traditional journalism and a blog? Oh snap!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 PM on 03/10/2008

Rachel- are you and Tina Fey dating?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 PM on 03/10/2008

The "media" is a business--profit is the primary objective. Getting the most viewers, readers and internet hits translates into bottom-line dollars. I am not aware of any newspeople who do their jobs for free. The battle for media consumers to "pay attention" will always be with us.
With profit in mind I believe the media will always do whatever it can to fuel debate, contention, rumors and any remotely questionable behavior of politicians, celebrities and the growing number of infamous people to gain market share.
The Obama and Clinton campaigns understand and use the news cycle to their best advantage. So do celebrities. Why else do we continue to hear about Brittney Spears and Paris Hilton? Is it because of their talent or their press agents? I think we know the answer to that one!
Unfair? Of course, but not for any other reason than getting the news that gets attention--not the news that is worthy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 03/10/2008

The "media" business is, as you say, for profit; but use of the public air waves also requires the media to provide a public service. Covering the primary race as if it is a boxing match isn't exactly serving the public's interest. That would require the media to sort out the facts from the fiction.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 PM on 03/10/2008

The New York Times doesn't believe that it was harder on Hillary than Obama http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/opinion/09pubed.html?ex=1362715200&en=63ca93735ff6f1df&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss but Hillary sure made the MSM believe they were and thus they bent over backwards to be nice to her. Case in point - Hillary wins Texas. Nonsense, Obama will end up with the majority of delegates from Texas. That's winning to me.

Somehow Hillary will figure out how to cheat and will win this thing. And hundreds and thousands of us will go back in the holes we came out of for another 20 years as the rest of you watch reruns of Monica and Bill and Hillary and the vast right wing conspiracy.


    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 03/10/2008

My favorite line from CNN: "Clinton was afraid of a blowout in Wyoming but she held on there."

61-38 isn't a blowout? Oooookay.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 03/10/2008

The Clinton camp, along with all their kool-aid drinkers, and the complicit media_who can't get enough of perfectly tailored squabling_are only prolonging an inevitable result. Worse than that is they don't care if the Democratsare ruined in the process.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 AM on 03/10/2008

Rachel Sklar, please STFU. No one has whined, cried, complained, and thrown temper tantrums more than Hillary. She is the Janus-faced Monster, half victim and half bully. Your post is so delusional, it deserves no response.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 AM on 03/10/2008

And yet...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 03/10/2008

Rachel, just put on a gigantic Hillary button next time you go on the MSNBC news shows during the day and quit pretending that you are impartial. It's insulting!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 PM on 03/09/2008

Where's Arianna's button?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 03/10/2008

That's the truth.

It's sad really the effort it takes for one to continue to delude themselves in order to continue to be a Billary apologist.

I think the issue is that the media attacked him at the BEHEST of Clinton. And in case you don't have a television, Hellery did not win Texas!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 03/10/2008

You lost me at "game changing". A loss by Clinton in either one would have been game-changing.


Other than that, the story remains the same - Clinton wins in her fortress states and loses everywhere else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 PM on 03/09/2008

The media is toxic. You haven't been able to dig up enough crap on someone like Obama so you spin and spin any little chance of a story until it is blown out of proportion.

Years ago I gave up all commercial media: tv, ny times, wsj and other magazine publications. Most "journalists" have actively contributed to the hatred and division in this country while dropping the ball on stories that are relevant and require attention.

.i.e, the troops (multiple stories), dead and displaced Iraquis, (corrupt) contractors in iraq, US torture policies, guantanamo, homeland security and wiretapping on US citizens, rendition...does ANY of this ring a bell?

Honeslty the lines between "Entertainment tonite" type of shows and msnbc news are so blurred that
it is impossible to take any of you seriously.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 03/09/2008

Rachel, I work in media and I NOW BELIEVE the media is the problem. -- -- The 24-hour news cycle of repetitive sensationalism, talk radio's vitriol, the 2nd and 3rd source innuendo reported as fact (read Neil Postman's "Amusing Ourselves To Death") has CONVINCED me that the media is partly responsible and culpable for this WAR in Iraq (as well as this administration's occupation of the White House for the past eight years). -- --

Abraham Lincoln could not have been elected if today's media had been this prevalence in the 1860's.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 03/09/2008

You think he blew his cool????? After what she pulled out of her pants before the the last big one???

I think he's shown again and again calm and cool against her machine's Rovian tactics. Why he hasn't and the media haven't challenged her 35-year experience history, and he hasn't responded with his experience in the 6 years he was in the Illinois Senate which, on close inspection, was pretty extensive and showed grit....that he even got elected shows grit. He's about the same age as Bill was when he entered the WH and has more legislative experience than Hillary has, He's nearly 15 years Hillary's junior, but has more true experience up until now than she did at his age. She's tough all right, but I'll opt for strong before tough.

I truly blew my cool after seeing her week-long pre-primary low-ball toss. I find myself actually frightened to think of her anywhere near the WH.....again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:45 PM on 03/09/2008

It's becoming clear that this might have been a different campaign if there had been more Chigago-area reporters covering it....... whose immune systems have had time to build up antibodies to Sen. Obama's amazing hypnotic powers......and might ask him some pertinent questions other than the usual.......

"Our readers would like to know.....How does it FEELto be so wonderful? .......And what is your favorite color sir?"

.............................................................tm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 PM on 03/09/2008

What questions do you suggest? Anything sensible or do you just mean to cast aspersions whenever possible?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 PM on 03/09/2008

Rachel, I woke up with a headache this morning and then I thought about Obama and wow , it is gone !!
Yes , he can, and Hillary must be the Monster, who gave me the headache in the first place !!!

Love most of your posts, want to see you more on MSNBC.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 AM on 03/09/2008

So I guess that means Obama is Ken Starr, as Hillary's communication's director Howard Wolfson said.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 PM on 03/09/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (10 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in