LOL Norman was a bagman thief.. everyone in the chinatown community knew this. If Eddie Chan didn't vouch for him .. he would have been finished many years ago. His job was to continue funneling funds to All politicians including the DNC. The bigger the Politician the more cash was doled out. Obama was a new commer to the scene... of course he was tasked to dole out the cash,,, btw the Republicans also got funds. But Norman gave over $1million Dollars to Hillary Clinton's Senate and Presidential campaign. You think that Triad party bosses are philantropists? I assure you they are not.

Ok, I'll play Political Poker with you. I raise you Carlos Vignali, Almon Braswell, Mark Rich (pardoned & wife gave Hillary campaign funds and Bill library money), Mehmet Celebi, Oscar Wyatt, Ron Burkle, Frank Giustra, Sheik Mohammed bin Rashid (Dubai), Peter Paul (fraud lawsuit AND alleged campaign finance fraud), Keith Raniere (NXIVM), International Profit Associates.

Some of those are Billary transgressions but many are Hillary's. Give up? I've got lots more where that came from.

Trump card: Hillary Clinton endorsed John McCain 3 times in the past week for president.

Um, well, the name Norman Hsu actually first came up in the 1996 Presidential election. You remember that year, don't you? There were actually some hearings in Congress concerning that. So tell us again how "Obama's campaign brought that out."

Maybe she was just 'associating' with Hsu so she could 'bring equality to the Chinese women". You know, along with "bringing peace to Northern Ireland"?

I agree with you. Hillary claims being married to him makes her qualified to lead by osmosis, that she soaked up his experience from him. So she doesn't get to pick and choose what qualities she absorbed. She's actually had her own hands in her own cookie jars over the years.

If there was a remote off-chance that she's not corrupt, I would think that someone that claims she can deal with the entire world's big problems that she could keep her own house clean.

By Hillary's definition of experience - Yes.

lobbyists love Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, the No. 1 recipient of lobbyist cash, receiving $823,000 in 2007 from the lobbying industry, which gave about $2.7 million overall.

Lawyers and law firms have contributed more than any other industry, giving $46.6 million. Democrats got 77 percent of that, with Clinton the top recipient.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/02/military-donors.html


Defense Industry Embraces Democrats, Hillary By Far The Favorite

The defense industry this year abandoned its decade-long commitment to the Republican Party, funneling the lion share of its contributions to Democratic presidential candidates, especially to Hillary Clinton who far out-paced all her competitors.

An examination of contributions of $500 or more, using the Huffington Post's Fundrace website, shows that employees of the top five arms makers - Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop-Grumman, Raytheon and General Dynamics -- gave Democratic presidential candidates $103,900, with only $86,800 going to Republicans.

Senator Clinton took in $52,600, more than half of the total going to all Democrats, and a figure equaling 60 percent of the sum going to the entire GOP field. Her closest competitor for defense industry money is former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney (R.), who raised $32,000.

Insofar as defense workers making political donations reflect the interests of their employers, the contributions clearly suggest that the arms industry has reach the conclusion that Democratic prospects for 2008 are very good indeed. Since their profits are so heavily dependent on government contracts, companies in this field want to be sure they do not have hostile relations with the White House.

The strong support for Clinton indicates that a majority of defense industry executives currently believe Clinton is a favorite to win the Democratic nomination and, in November, 2008, the general election.


Mama Warbucks

But it was enough to leave them with a sense of optimism. One manager, who kept marveling that "someone so powerful would come to visit us," said how fortunate the local defense industry is. "Having Hillary on that committee will bring business back to these facilities."

It's a sentiment echoed over and over by local defense experts, most of whom have nothing but praise for the senator. "I haven't heard anyone say anything negative," says U.S. Congressman Peter King, a Long Island Republican. "They are pleased with her, and they tell me that every chance they get."

Adds George Hockbrueckner, a D.C. lobbyist for New York defense companies: "She gets the job done, and people love her for it."

And why wouldn't they? Defense and military folks give Clinton high marks for listening to their concerns, promoting their products, leveraging her ties to the Pentagon "in effect, for classic constituent services.

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0518,lombardi,63597,5.html

lobbyists love Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, the No. 1 recipient of lobbyist cash, receiving $823,000 in 2007 from the lobbying industry, which gave about $2.7 million overall.

Lawyers and law firms have contributed more than any other industry, giving $46.6 million. Democrats got 77 percent of that, with Clinton the top recipient.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/02/military-donors.html

Defense Industry Embraces Democrats, Hillary By Far The Favorite

The defense industry this year abandoned its decade-long commitment to the Republican Party, funneling the lion share of its contributions to Democratic presidential candidates, especially to Hillary Clinton who far out-paced all her competitors.

An examination of contributions of $500 or more, using the Huffington Post's Fundrace website, shows that employees of the top five arms makers - Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop-Grumman, Raytheon and General Dynamics -- gave Democratic presidential candidates $103,900, with only $86,800 going to Republicans.

Senator Clinton took in $52,600, more than half of the total going to all Democrats, and a figure equaling 60 percent of the sum going to the entire GOP field. Her closest competitor for defense industry money is former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney (R.), who raised $32,000.

Insofar as defense workers making political donations reflect the interests of their employers, the contributions clearly suggest that the arms industry has reach the conclusion that Democratic prospects for 2008 are very good indeed. Since their profits are so heavily dependent on government contracts, companies in this field want to be sure they do not have hostile relations with the White House.

The strong support for Clinton indicates that a majority of defense industry executives currently believe Clinton is a favorite to win the Democratic nomination and, in November, 2008, the general election.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/10/17/defense-industry-embraces_n_68927.html

This is why from "I didn't inhale" that I loathe the Clintons. Not once, NEVER, have they ever owned a single imperfection. Obama openly has volunteered information about things from his past of which he's not proud. Even admitted on the property in Chicago with Rezko that it was a boneheaded move. Do you think a Clinton would have owned these things without trying to hide behind a smokescreen or ask for the definition of prepositions and conjunctions when lies weren't enough? No. Heck, we all know Bush to not be a good man but when confronted with his past he's acknowledged them all. Great character is defined by accepting your accountability. Imagine, even G-Dub has more character than does a Clinton.

You know why I say this? Because this stuff is all over the internet, so it's no secret to the Republican swiftboaters. If she plans on being the nominee, she should go ahead and get this crap out of the way because it is out there. Tell us what is going on with this, Hillary. If you don't and it turns out to be something, then you are just sabotaging the Democratic Party with your silence. Don't fool yourself. The Republicans are already planning to bring this up so you'd better have an answer.

I checked a legal site -- there is no such case filed anywhere.

About the CON MAN Peter F. Paul (his middle initial must stand for FRAUD) who is SUING Bill Clinton, supposedly. I checked a legal site -- there is no such active case filed anywhere in CA.

So I go to "Con Watch" and find this about Peter Paul, QUOTE:

Under the Carter administration, he was convicted for cocaine possession and an attempt to bilk Cuban dictator Fidel Castro of $8 million.

He ascribes that to politics, arguing he was embraced by Ronald Reagan's kitchen cabinet, which "realized the problems I had were more related to being gung ho about removing Castro."

Paul's current felony -- his role in a $25 million stock scam involving Stan Lee Media, which Paul co-founded with the comic-book legend. ..."Paul pleaded guilty to one count of violating Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on the trading of his stock. He insists his actions did not defraud shareholders, and that, in fact, he lost money in the transaction." Paul faces a maximum of 10 years in prison and a maximum fine of $5 million for the charge to which he pleaded guilty.

Paul's LIES: Paul claims that "the Clinton Justice Department had him jailed while he was in Brazil and then extradicted [sic] to the United States."

In fact, as the U.S. attorney's office points out, the original indictment against Paul was not issued until June 2001, and he was arrested in Brazil in August 2001 -- months after the Clinton administration left office and, thus, no longer ran the Justice Department.

http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/stories/2005/wndpaul.html

And Peter Paul is bio'd on Wiki:

Paul alleged that Clinton was deceitful in this,[33] and retained public interest law firm, and frequent Clinton opponent, Judicial Watch to represent him in a series of civil and criminal lawsuits against the Clintons, the Clinton campaign, and ultimately the Federal Election Commission (which he charged was negligent in failing to convict Mrs. Clinton).[34][35][36][37] T

These charges were delayed, as courts held that Paul could not bring charges against the Clintons as he fought extradition from Brazil,[38] but proceeded once he was returned to the States.[39]

Paul's claims have not found traction. An audit by the Federal Elections Commission found that neither Senator Clinton nor her Senate campaign had accepted any illegal funds in connection with the Hollywood fundraiser[40], though the campaign was asked to pay $35,000 in fines for having underreported the cost of the party.[41]

Paul's suit against the FEC was thrown out; his attempt to bring ethics charges against Clinton were rejected,[42] and his fraud charges against Senator Clinton were tossed out in April 2006.[43]

Paul continued to press civil charges against Senator Clinton and former President Clinton for "looting"[44] his business, but the courts refused to allow him to sue Senator Clinton, with the appellate court specifying that her behavior had been "perfectly legal," and allowing her to recoup her legal fees from Paul.[40]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_F._Paul#_note-30