Charles Prince, former Chairman and CEO of Citigroup, left, Richard Parsons, Chair of Personnel and Compensation Committee for Citigroup, second from left, E. Stanley O'Neal, former Chairman and CEO of Merrill Lynch, third from left, John Finnegan, Chair of Management Development and Compensation Committee for Merrill Lynch, third from right, Angelo Mozilo, founder and former CEO of Countrywide Financial Corporation, second from right, and Harley W. Snyder, Chair of the Compensation Committee of Countrywide Financial, right, raise their right hands as they are sworn in during a House Oversight and Government Reform hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, March 7, 2008, in Washington. The committee is examining the compensation and retirement packages granted to the CEOs of corporations deeply involved in the current mortgage crisis. (AP Photos/Susan Walsh)

CEOs Defend Their High Pay on Hill

JIM ABRAMS | March 7, 2008 03:37 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

WASHINGTON — Three corporate executives called in for a shaming by Democratic lawmakers Friday defended raking in hundreds of millions of dollars despite contributing to the subprime mortgage crisis that has their companies reeling from losses and the nation on the edge of recession.

"There's a complete disconnect with reality," said Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

But the CEOs testifying before the committee, Angelo Mozilo of Countrywide Financial Corp.; Stanley O'Neal, formerly of Merrill Lynch & Co; and Charles Prince, formerly of Citigroup Inc.; defended their pay as appropriate.

"As our company did well, I did well," said Mozilo, founder of Countrywide, the nation's largest mortgage lender and a key player in the subprime problem. "But when our company did not do well, as in 2007, my direct compensation and the value of my holdings declined materially, which is as it should be."

Republicans on the committee generally agreed. "This is a hearing in search of bad guys," said Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif. "All of you complied with the transparency rules and the best practices rules."

The hearing was the second held by Waxman on the issue of executive pay, which Forbes magazine said averaged $15.2 million for the CEOs in the largest 500 U.S. companies in 2006, an increase of 38 percent in one year.

He questioned how all three CEOs could profit handsomely at a time when their companies were losing billions of dollars and stock values were plunging.

"You're in the middle of an enormous debacle," Waxman said. "It seems like everyone is hurting except for you."

"It's only in the wacky world of CEOs where you get severance for failing," said Nell Minow, editor of The Corporate Library and one of the economic experts testifying.

Committee figures showed that Countrywide suffered a $1.2 billion loss in the third quarter of 2007 and then lost another $422 million in the fourth quarter. By the end of the year, the company's stock had fallen 80 percent from its five-year peak in February. During the same period, Mozilo received a $1.9 million salary, $20 million in stock awards contingent upon performance and sold $121 million in stock.

Some of those stock sales occurred at the same time the company was borrowing $1.5 billion to repurchase its shares.

Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., questioned Mozilo's insistence _ documented in a November 2006 e-mail _ that he be reimbursed for taxes owed when his wife traveled on Countrywide's corporate jet.

Mozilo related how he had started Countrywide in 1969, sitting in the kitchen of his small New York apartment. He said his direct compensation and the value of his stock holdings declined substantially last year and he had not received, and will not receive, a bonus for 2007 and 2008.

Mozilo also said he would give up some $37 million in severance pay if Bank of America proceeds with plans to acquire Countrywide.

O'Neal received a retirement package of $161 million when he was pushed out as Merrill Lynch CEO last October. But the committee said that if the company had terminated O'Neal for cause rather than letting him retire, he would not have been entitled to $131 million of that in unvested stock and options. During 2007, the firm reported $18 billion in writedowns related to subprime and other risky mortgages.

O'Neal countered that he had received no bonus in 2007 and no severance pay.

He was defended by John Finnegan, chairman of Merrill Lynch's compensation committee. "All of the $161 million related to prior-period performance and all were amounts to which Mr. O'Neal was entitled as a retirement-eligible employee."

The lawmakers also asked why Citigroup, which saw its stock fall 48 percent at the end of 2007 compared with a year earlier, would award Prince a cash bonus worth $10.4 million after he stepped down as CEO last November. He also received $28 million in unvested stock and options and $1.5 million in annual perquisites upon his departure.

"I'm proud of my accomplishments," Prince said, speaking of his contributions over almost three decades to Citigroup's growth and the company's efforts to assist homeowners facing foreclosure.

Rep. Tom Davis of Virginia, top Republican on the committee, noted that Mozilo's total compensation package in 2007 was about $22 million, half that of 2006, while Prince also saw his compensation halved in 2007 to about $12 million. Linking executive pay to the subprime crisis "only seems to muddle the issue further," he said.

Several of the executives did acknowledge public resentment over the fact that large company CEOs now receive about 600 times what the average worker earns, compared to about 40 times in 1980.

The question, said Richard Parsons, chairman of Citigroup's personnel and compensation committee, is "how do we remain competitive without contributing to something that could be tearing at the fabric of society."

___

On the Net:

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee: http://oversight.house.gov/


 
 

Comments
39
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- sculptor See Profile I'm a Fan of sculptor

What I want to know is why didn't they question them about the fraud committed by giving mortgages to people they knew that couldn't afford them and then repackaging and reselling these mortgages to others after getting them rubber stamped as A-OK by obviously biased rating companies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 PM on 03/08/2008
- NewArtz See Profile I'm a Fan of NewArtz

Our government has enabled corporate takeover by giving in to their money power. Each human being in office must deal with the bribe they know awaits them if they play the corporate game the billionaires lay out for them to play. Talk about lack of accountability. We are a country run controled by very rich individuals enabled by their constituents who give their loyalty to the rich man's royalty. As a country we are ripe for tyrants who rape us for their own pleasure and leave us to our shame, as we blame ourselves for our failure to succeed.

The middle class was built by an understanding that if there were not a strong one, then the whole stack of cards will tumble down no matter how wealthy the elite become. Yes, the elite will jet off to Dubai, and even republican voters will cringe in pain from the sting of their violated trust, but it will be too late. We have been fed a fantasy of consumerism and still are. We're encouraged to use the coming rebate money to go out and consume. However, once we fill up the gas tank, we won't have any left to spend at the mall.

These men have made their riches, congress has given them absolution and the rest of us must pay the piper as paupers. And some wonder why we need to change things. Well, without change in government, the only change you'll have left will barely fill your pocket.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 03/08/2008
- Lemeritus See Profile I'm a Fan of Lemeritus

DEMOCRAT: "I have no problem with paying for success. But it looks like when you're a CEO you get paid for failure." Waxman - CA

REPUBLICAN: "This is a hearing in search of bad guys. Are there bad guys in front of me? I"m not seeing it." Issa - VA

DEMOCRAT: "I worry about this whole culture where the little guy gets squeezed and next thing you know, he has a debt, not a house ... and the parachutes just drift on up the golf course." Cummings - MD

REPUBLICAN: "Punishing individual corporate executives with public floggings like this may be a politically satisfying ritual -- like an island tribe sacrificing a virgin to a grumbling volcano. But in the end, it won't answer the questions ... about corporate responsibility and economic stability." Davis - VA

DEMOCRAT: "You run the largest mortgage originator in the country. If you don't have some personal responsibility, I don't know who does." Cummings - MD

REPUBLICAN: "Mr. Chairman, I look forward to finding if something is wrong here. So far you haven't found it." Issa - VA

DEMOCRAT: "Most Americans live in a world where economic security is precarious and there are real economic consequences for failure. But our nation"s top executives seem to live by a different set of rules... It seems like everyone is hurting except for you." Waxman - CA

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 03/08/2008
- fcsakes See Profile I'm a Fan of fcsakes

Republicans and CEO's make comfortable bedfellows, don't you think? Raping the middle class is not only NOT illegal, it is encouraged, supported, made possible and bragged about by those with whom they shake hands behind our backs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 AM on 03/08/2008
- Novista See Profile I'm a Fan of Novista

Investigations and stern letters are great. And the outcome? Not so great. In fact, no result.

Waxman: what about Sibel Edmonds? Or don't you recall? Again.

And as far as the naive yapping about shareholders, the typical corporate charter has an eight-point agenda: the first seven are to protect the corporation. The last one is about shareholders. Yeah.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 AM on 03/08/2008
- PacificGatePost See Profile I'm a Fan of PacificGatePost


There is a strange sense of discomfort that comes over you as you watch members of Congress get the "deer-in-the-headlights" perplexing looks glazing over their countenances as they listen to their "Captains of Industry" blow smoke through their pillowed craniums. Isn't this the way of the free market capitalist system we all know and love?

No it isn't.

This is outright theft. It's simple to execute the take down when you've stacked the board of directors with cronies who have everything to gain by making sure you dip in the well. The cronies know you will applaud from the warm seats on their boards when its their turn. This is more than just abusive.

NO ONE is accountable. Why? Because EVERYBODY's doing it who's in a position to do so. The head hunting firms have, for years, supported sky rocketing senior executive pay, well beyond reason and common sense and into theft. No need to review how and why here.

....So Congress sits, seemingly emasculated, either willingly or from sheer impotence.

Law's? Rules?

http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/02/corporate-ethics.html

Can we blog these guys into listening to some common sense?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:42 PM on 03/07/2008
- johnnyjust See Profile I'm a Fan of johnnyjust

Whenever someone makes money Democrats come out of the woodwork with their hands out. They don't give a crap about the shareholders....they just want their share.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:03 PM on 03/07/2008
- knowhelpnow See Profile I'm a Fan of knowhelpnow

I would have to guess you were one of these CEO's but no they wouldn't bother to comment about the excess they have. I think you are a wanna be, you think that it is fine that they get rewarded for their incompetence, that their only concern since they will get a wind fall either way is to get as much as possible before it implodes. How do they get these jobs anyway it is because they know someone or their father or someone has to repay someone the rags to riches story is way over blown. Just like our government they put people in high position not because they know anything about the job, it's who they know and who they owe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 03/08/2008
- Brownpower See Profile I'm a Fan of Brownpower

Deja Vu....it was only a few years ago that it was Enron being grilled!!!! I had to shut the TV off, it sickend me to see our so called representatives pandering to these greed driven monsters. I would had hoped that they used The leader of the pack "Dick Grasso" as a pinata! since he was the best regulation money could buy...!!!

If I had stole all that money, I would be in Jail serving life....It' no wonder our country is in the abyss.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:17 PM on 03/07/2008
- MadAppraiser See Profile I'm a Fan of MadAppraiser

What is the societal benefit of elite education that provides access to professional career opportunity mean when the operational objective is the implementation of upscale corporate decadence? This business platform has become the cornerstone of the American free market paradigm. The revered, disgraceful trickle down economic science fiction further supplements this free market paragon!

I do not need a high tech instrumentation camera with Angenieux zoom lens, degrees, or professional designations and licenses to comprehend future corporate financial debacles! These unchecked, vicious corporate takers will destroy America"s political, financial, and societal institutions from within America.

America spends billions of dollars, and expends military personnel/hardware on the other side of the world for corporate gain marketed to citizens as patrotism. The great irony of America"s Middle East war campaign against terror is that quite possibly it originates from Wall Street!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 03/07/2008
- ErnestineBass See Profile I'm a Fan of ErnestineBass

A good reporter knows to "follow the money", MadAppraiser, and if you follow the money we've poured into Iraq, then back out again, it leads straight back to Wall Street.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:29 PM on 03/07/2008
- PacificGatePost See Profile I'm a Fan of PacificGatePost

Use the power of the internet to nudge these integrity deficient CEO's into the corner of, well, .......at least embarrassment.

http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 03/07/2008
- PacificGatePost See Profile I'm a Fan of PacificGatePost

This is a sad commentary on the state of corporate America.

Stealing because you can, and know you can blame your board of directors who are doing the same thing, is still STEALING. You can call it ABUSE or rationalize it any other way, but it's still stealing. Call it what it is.

No one in Congress, or in the media for that matter, seems to be able to make the call. ...>>

http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/02/corporate-ethics.html

Can we "BLOG" these people into doing the right thing - showing reason and restraint?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:13 PM on 03/07/2008
- wiseapple See Profile I'm a Fan of wiseapple

The funny thing is that these people actually think their companies flourished because of something they did during their tenure. These companies swelled with capital because of the Bush tax cuts. People who didn't need the money suddenly found excess cash and ... what better than to dump it into the stocks that were paying the highest returns- the financial sector. These companies have record years of prosperity, and the thugs at the top think they did something to deserve it.

Geez, during the hearing some twerp from North Carolina seemed to want to place some blame on a hedge fund manager because he hedged against the risky lending of the sub-prime market and made billions. If I'd have had money, I'd have been in on that action- it was obvious that ARM's were for suckers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 03/07/2008
- PacificGatePost See Profile I'm a Fan of PacificGatePost

Are any abusers going to give the money back when these losses really slam their shareholders and employee?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 03/07/2008
- Lemeritus See Profile I'm a Fan of Lemeritus

Are you crazy! They stole that money fair and square!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 AM on 03/08/2008
- johnnydajogger See Profile I'm a Fan of johnnydajogger

Agreed that the salaries and compensation packages are outrageous but where does the Congress have any authority to investigate this? Isnt this a matter for the shareholders?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 PM on 03/07/2008
- ErnestineBass See Profile I'm a Fan of ErnestineBass

Torches? ...Check!
Pitchforks?...Check!
Whetstone for sharpening guillotine blade?...Check!

Enraged rabble?...(not quite, but America's getting there).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 PM on 03/07/2008
- RobertaInCT See Profile I'm a Fan of RobertaInCT

We have been headed that way for a long time. I will most likely hit after the new president take office.
It has been a long time coming and nothing will stop it............

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 03/07/2008
- BC33 See Profile I'm a Fan of BC33

I am ready, Ernestine. Just say the word and I will be there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 03/07/2008
- supergranny See Profile I'm a Fan of supergranny

The corporate mafia is alive and well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 PM on 03/07/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Stock Quote

Enter a ticker symbol below:

Data provided by AOL



 

 Site  Web ask.com