Samantha Power: From Obama Asset To Campaign Casualty

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Samantha Power: From Obama Asset To Campaign Casualty stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 03- 7-08 02:16 PM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:46 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Power

In early 2005, Samantha Power was working on a follow up to her Pulitzer Prize winning book ""A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide," when she got a call from the office of Sen. Barack Obama.

She had never heard of the freshman Democrat who had taken office just months earlier. So Power researched him, downloading the famous address Obama gave to the Democratic convention the summer prior. The two met shortly after -- it was only supposed to last an hour but they ended up talking for four.

"Why don't I quit my job at Harvard and come and intern in your office and answer the phones or do whatever you want?' It was literally that spontaneous," she recalled saying. To which, the senator responded: "Great."

And so it was that Obama scored what was hailed as a staffing coup only months into his time in Washington. Power, who was working at the time for Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government, was widely considered to be one of the most forward-thinking, gifted foreign policy minds of her generation. In 2004, she was named by Time Magazine as one of the 100 top thinkers of the year.

That Obama could bring her on board -- he was, Power said, the first government official to have ever called her -- was emblematic of the different style of politics that the Illinois senator was promising to represent. Far from a down-the-line liberal on international affairs, Power was known for her innovative (if not self-reflectively painful) analysis. On the Rwanda genocide, she concluded that U.S. officials had worked to ignore the problem, not failed to address it. On the Israeli-Palestinian crisis, she once advocated (though later recanted) spending billions of dollars and sending a military force to help create a Palestinian state next to Israel.

The relationship ended on Friday after Power resigned from Obama's presidential campaign. Her comments, made to the Scottsman, that Sen. Hillary Clinton was a "monster" devoted to political opportunism, were responsible for her departure.

"With deep regret, I am resigning from my role as an advisor the Obama campaign effective today," Power wrote. "Last Monday, I made inexcusable remarks that are at marked variance from my oft-stated admiration for Senator Clinton and from the spirit, tenor, and purpose of the Obama campaign. And I extend my deepest apologies to Senator Clinton, Senator Obama, and the remarkable team I have worked with over these long 14 months."

Power's fall from campaign grace was as abrupt as it was newsworthy. Only an hour before her resignation was made public, surrogates to Clinton convened a conference call demanding her firing. An hour later, Terry McAuliffe, a chief Clinton aide, sent out an email using Power's remarks to help solicit campaign donations.

Story continues below
advertisement

And yet, while there is an acknowledgment that Power likely had to resign because of what she said, there is also a deep regret that the Democratic Party, for the time being, is losing one of its brightest thinkers. Indeed, even as she worked for Obama's senate office, Power found the time to write another book: "Chasing the Flame: Sergio Vieira de Mello and the Fight to Save the World." Her friend and political rival, Richard Holbrooke, proclaimed Obama "very fortunate to have her."

"Samantha is one of the most creative and dynamic thinkers on the political horizon," said John Prendergast, co-chair of The ENOUGH Project, an initiative to end genocide and crimes against humanity. "She is driven by deep compassion and conviction, something our foreign policy establishment badly needs at this moment in history. Removing her voice from deliberations over monumental security challenges is unfortunate, and hopefully only temporary."

There have been similar instances in which presidential campaign aides have taken the ax for their actions or remarks. In 1988, John Sasso, who was serving as Michael Dukakis' chief of staff, resigned from the campaign after it was revealed that he had leaked documents showing that Sen. Joseph Biden, a presidential candidate at the time, had plagiarized portions of his speech. That same election another Dukakis aide, Donna Brazile, was fired after she urged reporters to investigate then-Vice President George Bush's alleged marital infidelity. This election cycle, former Sen. John Edwards was released two bloggers after they were criticized for anti-religious postings.

But Power's resignation, political observers say, may have been the product of a prolonged and increasingly heated campaign season -- one that has been based, in large part, on denouncing negative campaigning -- as mush as her own words.

Indeed, when Billy Shaeheen, a surrogate to Clinton hinted at Obama's past drug use, he too was let go by the campaign.

"The whole Democratic race has ratcheted up in intensity. It is just incredibly meaningful right now," said Stu Rothenberg, editor of The Rothenberg Political Report. "And so there is a tendency for people to kind of snap or say things that are more caustic and negative than they would. There is also a fatigue factor; this has been a long race. Staff has as much invested, maybe more, than the candidate, it sometimes seems... This is not breaking the law to call your opponent a monster. That's just politics."


Read more coverage and reaction to Samantha Power's resignation

In early 2005, Samantha Power was working on a follow up to her Pulitzer Prize winning book ""A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide," when she got a call from the office of Sen. Barack ...
In early 2005, Samantha Power was working on a follow up to her Pulitzer Prize winning book ""A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide," when she got a call from the office of Sen. Barack ...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
326
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (12 pages total)
- JoDeeVa I'm a Fan of JoDeeVa 18 fans permalink
photo

This is an unfortunate incident, born out of Ms. Power's passion for Obama and frustration with the recent losses. No novice to journalistic protocol, she surely understood the power her words wield, given the potential for benefit or harm to his campaign. I'm not convinced that, in itself, the "monster" was a liability to Obama's campaign (or Clinton's)­..however, with her past comments re: his campaign and Iraq..mayb­e? The fall-out and outcry by pundits and the Clinton camp was to be expected in this media circus of election campaigns, where injudicious comments/ actions are so much fodder for those who fan the flames of sensationalism. I hate this kind of petty political semantics that has a journalist in Scotland foaming at the mouth over her big coup, ethical or not. Bravo for her..such a stellar act of tabloid yellow journalism and great service to the campaign of Barack Obama, the U.S. and the world! Accolades to the Clinton campaign for taking the high road..bein­g a supporter, it disappoints me that they used Ms. Power's lapse in composure to their advantage and I have voiced the same to them. THEIR lack of dignity and understanding was a lost opportunity for them to ameliorate the negativity ramping up on both sides in the heat of the campaign.

The person who truly took the high road on this is Samantha Power, who understood the perception of liability she may have become to Barack Obama. As I said in another post, if there is anything I understand about her, it is that she is a sincere and compassionate person. Her words come from a place of passion, both about Obama and her life's work. That passion is the epitome of what the world needs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:39 AM on 03/08/2008
- Amomma I'm a Fan of Amomma 3 fans permalink
photo

JoDeeVa, It would be great to take the high road here so the issues can really be looked at. I grow tired of the mud slinging in what, for me, is the first time I've become riveted by a presidential race. I think your Blog is trying to be helpful but only placing the fault back on the Clinton campaign. Give it a rest, Samantha Powers said herself she is a rookie in all this. Hopefully she will be called back when everyone calms down.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 AM on 03/09/2008
- Didi47 I'm a Fan of Didi47 15 fans permalink

Another "Unfortunate incident" coming from the Obama camp? How many more 'unfortunate incidents" are we in store for? I'm still waiting for some vetting on the multiple previous 'unfortunate incidents'­... Let's examine those for a CHANGE?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 03/10/2008

Samantha is not only one of the most gifted thinkers in the realm of international relations, she's a class act. IMHO, she's being crucified for simply telling the truth.

I would have called Hillary a "manipulative, egomaniacal opportunis­t"...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:06 AM on 03/08/2008
- Loeb I'm a Fan of Loeb permalink

I heard BBC interview with Samantha Powers this morning (3/8/08). She opposed
negotiating with HAMAS "because they don't recognize Israel". It was as though
her views was scripted out of the US/Israeli position. She did not mention
that the US/Israel do noti recognize a sovereign Palestine with the rights
to select itsgovernment, to follow their judiciary, to decide who can
live there, how taxes (to Palestine) are to be paid, who can and cannot
construct anything at all, how water is to be distributed, what work rules
can be set. Palestine should also have the right to defend itself both
on the ground and by air to protect its citizens. Other nations do.
The US/srael wants Palestine to renounce violence but
the US/Israel is not renouncing violence at all. The US/Israel wants
Palestine to follow international rules but the US/Israel are not
at all bounded by such rules.Boun­daries should be those at pre-1967
boundaries. No one may cross without permission of the sovereign
state. No roads can be built. No territories annexed at the will
of the US/Israel. Samanthawers has not acknowledged the
tortures, massacres by the US/Isreal and the funding of
"settlers" who should be permitted to do any construction
they like within the State of Israel, not in an adjoining sovereign
state.

In sum, Samantha Powers is only analyzing from one side
alone. That is hardly worlthy of admiration. It is,however,
politically "safe". It is more important for Samantha Powers
not to lose the "Jewish vote" than to examine all the intricacies
of complex issues or to face the human rights of the
Palestinian people. That, I suppose, would be uncomfortable.
Ms. Powers did not seem willing to discuss it beyond
echoing what Barack Obama believes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:41 AM on 03/08/2008
- VivaZapata I'm a Fan of VivaZapata 63 fans permalink
photo

Damn, Ernestine,

don't spare her feelings, tell her how you really feel.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:23 AM on 03/08/2008

Seconded!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 AM on 03/08/2008
- dawlishgal I'm a Fan of dawlishgal 218 fans permalink
photo

She is certainly a bully. Where is the demand from the Obama campaign that HIllary fire the creep who circulated the photo of Obama in the African costume in the hopes of inflaming both racial and religious prejudices? Where is the demand for the firing of the creepy little highly paid campaign guru who compared Obama to Kenneth Starr? The answer is simple....­Obama does NOT go around demanding that people be fired.

HC's bullying is just another manifestation of her arrogance and her sense of entitlement to the presidency. All Obama did was have the affrontery to run against her and to be more articulate and charismatic, and she sends her loathsome supporters (and formerly decent people like Paul Krugman) out to slime Obama's supporters as being "haters" and "cultists.­" I have to say that I never hated her before, especially when I totally supported both Clintons through thick and thin, but I am coming to the place where I could legitimately be labeled a "hater." Why now, after my previous support for them? Two reasons: I pay attention and I have standards for decent behavior.

John McCain called Chelsea "ugly" and said that Janet Reno is her father (I guess he was calling Hillary a lesbian and Janet Reno an UGLY lesbian), and Hlllary still claims that they are pals. It is only the little people that she tries to get fired.

One more thing....O­bama could send his supporters out to spread the ugly rumor that has already been repeated spread by supermarket tabloids. The Republicans are certain to use this against her--they already are. Obama has tried to keep an element of decency in this campaign. Hillary is so self-involved and touchy that she sees even legitimate criticism as some form of vicious attack. And her supporters keep saying that playing dirty is the only way a woman can beat a man.

Haven't the Clintons done enough to wreck the Democratic party by behaving so badly that--because of previous bad behavior-- they couldn't even convincingly support the two men who ought to have followed them into the White House?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 AM on 03/08/2008
- Didi47 I'm a Fan of Didi47 15 fans permalink

dawlishgal:

Careful now, people are starting to catch on to how Obama operates. Handle every goof and Obama scandal with an attack on Hillary. It's getting old and weak very very fast.

How come everyone is being steered away from vetting Obama? Waiting for McCain to do it are you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 PM on 03/10/2008
- afgail I'm a Fan of afgail 58 fans permalink

Reading from the 1994 Republican play book should get you fired from your job if you work for a Democrat. It is one thing to point out perceived deficiencies in an opponent and another to demonize them. Which is what Powers did. And so did you. In fact a good part of the Obama supporters on Huff Po demonize Hillary day in and day out. The wide gulf between Obama's rhetoric and the orchestrated campaign talking points of his supporters here on Huff Po makes Obama a lying hypocrite which the Canadian memo already proved.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 03/08/2008

After watching Ms. Powers interview, I am sad. Senator Clinton, your campaign, husband and you are vicious, indecent and a disgrace to this great nation. I feel so naive, to have supported you and your husband during the impeachment proceedings. I now understand the meaning of the “politics of personnel destruction”. I understand how travel gate was not a rightwing propaganda creation. I see calculated effort by you and your husband to destroy and attack the women who claim ( I am now convinced they are telling the truths) were harassed by your husband. Your Clinton machine puts Karl Rove and republican machine to shame. I can see why the media shivers when attacked by you. Why the democratic establishment is silent, in face of your politics of personnel ambition at the cost of taking down the party. Super delegates sit in silence and pray to God that the people will have the sense to save them the pain of voting for you in spite of their best judgment. Everyone is scared to be attacked, put down and publically humiliated. Rush Limbaugh and all the right wing media likes you, for you are their sister and Bill their brother, and they are their brother’s keeper. You are all made from the same mold.
I have supported Senator Obama but intended to vote for you if you were the nominee. I no longer can do that. The country would be better served, if Senator McCain becomes the next president. He is a descent man and this country deserves a descent president for a change.
Ms Powers, your interview shows us what a decent person is like, and I wish there was justice in this world. That a decent human being like you has become a victim of the politics of personnel destruction is a sad day indeed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 AM on 03/08/2008

A vote for john mccain is a vote for the total destruction of this country. We are already "in negotiations" for a "long-term commitment" in Iraq. bushit means to exact revenge for the this country's moral decisions to hold his corrupt, evil family to account and the stripping of his grandfather's assets after prescott bush was convicted of selling materials and information to Hitler during WWII. mccain began by being the"straight-talk express" and then admitted himself that the repukes had come to Washington to change Washington (D.C.) and Washington had changed them. How true, if it is possible to become even dirtier than they already were. Get your head out of your butt, and vote for a DEMOCRAT! It's the only hope the U.S. has and it may be already too late.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 AM on 03/08/2008
- afgail I'm a Fan of afgail 58 fans permalink

When all else fails talk about Bills sex life. Just like the Republicans. Anything but deal with the fact that Obama's campaign rehortic is a fraud.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 PM on 03/08/2008

Is this a joke? Do you seriously think that Samantha Powers is some kind of victim? It's her own fault, you don't just go around calling people monsters in politics. Jesus, even the feces throwing GOPers know this!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:35 PM on 03/08/2008
- Didi47 I'm a Fan of Didi47 15 fans permalink

Zuesthunderbolt:

Oh please, you intended to vote for Hillary you say.... well according to your past posts you never intended any such thing. Another Obama lie. Not to worry we're really used to Obama lies - and cut and paste posts , not to mention the need to plagiarize other people's phrases - cause you can't think of your own.

Just like your mentor I see.... copy copy copy and claim it as your own.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 PM on 03/10/2008
- robjh1 I'm a Fan of robjh1 17 fans permalink
photo

What was this lady thinking? Here is a person well educated and well read and what does she do? She goes out and make a STUPID comment that one would expect to come from a supporter not an adviser! This is what happens when the campaign decides to go negative. But she just might have the last laugh, for while she has been banished from Barack Obama's campaign witin a years time she will probably end up as a commentator on some liberal network.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 AM on 03/08/2008
- Cay I'm a Fan of Cay 8 fans permalink

It's sad that one public gaffe can deprive the American people of a great thinker.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 03/08/2008

I'm not sure the term doesn't fit her. To some extent at least. It is distressing to hear the bellyaching about an honest comment, when only 48 hours ago Obama was accused of telling a Canadian figure that he was saying one thing for the public consumption but had no serious intentions of following through. Then to find that it was a CLINTON operative who had gone to the Canadian side and made the remark with the inuendo that it was coming from the Obama people. No, Hillary Clinton will not stop at ANYTHING to put herself in the Oval Office. Her smugness with the remark that "the voters in Ohio have said it should be ME" is indicative of that. We all know far too much about the "voters in Ohio", we know they will stand there and do nothing while good people are defamed, will stand there bobbing their heads llike Albert the Dunking Bird while votes are electronically switched, and will shift like the wind without thinking about whatever new bit of dirt gets brought up and thrown in their faces. They don't seem to have the intelligence to see through a blatant attempt to cast aspersions by examining the whole picture. It didn't take too long to discover the story about Obama's chat with the Canadians was made up of whole cloth, but it didn't keep them from rushing to judgement and deciding they wanted a republican in a Democratic skirt to get their vote. Shame on Ohio. You let a good man be killed (figuratively) when you all swallowed the guff of the 'swiftboaters' and look what you got? george dumbass bushit. None of you had the guts to demand all votes be counted in Florida when you let the supreme court 'select' a jackass instead of a man to be president. Ohio decide who is going to be president? Ohio needs to go back to its cage. Ohioans are the jerks who got us into this mess with the 2004 debacle.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 03/07/2008
- Didi47 I'm a Fan of Didi47 15 fans permalink

littleblackcat:

You're making a fool of yourself with that ridiculous claim. Anyone who can comprehend what they read and hear from the horses mouth - (the Canadians) know that Obama got caught AGAIN in a big fat lie.

Your foul language again verifies that those highly educated Obama supporters are another great big fat lie.

And your cut and paste and plagiarizing of Hillary supporters writings are yet another example... of how very weak his platform REALLY is. Not an original word or thought to be found anywhere. Not even the much touted 'Change & Hope'. What is different.­.. is there's absolutely nothing behind those words... About as empty as it gets. All attack.... nothing else. Empty lies. That's it.

That's what happens when a candidate hides from being vetted like his opponent has been.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:47 PM on 03/10/2008

Bill Clinton's response to the Monster comment, "Welcome to my world".


Ha!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 PM on 03/07/2008

Hillary Clinton is a monster, and she will stop at nothing to destroy anything or anyone in her path to the White House. This is certainly not the ideal Presidential role model for any aspiring female. She is disingenuous, assuming roles to create bonds with members of her audience. She gives the public what she thinks will get them on her side. At times she plays the pity me victim, then she morphs into other charades. She can be strong, noble, silently suffering, loyal wife, hard working, well-informed, motherly, charitable, etc. She promotes herself with carefully chosen words and phrases. When she says, "I think women identify with me" she tries to reactivate the pity women had for her when her predatory mate, Bill, humiliated her. From this perspective, I can see why Hillary is supported, and her actions defended, by her loyal fans. However, I can also see through the “faux feminine aura”, the cutesy "I'm your girl". Her White House records, and some others, remain a secret, and I don’t expect them to be released, ever. She hired a voice/drama coach, paid for with campaign funds. None of this is “take me as I am” stuff with her. She frequently changes campaign tactics and had no qualms in snitching the "Change" theme from Obama. She dangles the hook for her universal health care plan, even though she knows will never be mandated. Dishonest, deceitful, sure, but as long as people bite she’ll keep it on the hook. "Monster" is much too kind a word for this cantankerous creature. I am truly sorry that Samantha Power felt obligated to resign. I hope that she will soon be encouraged to be part of Obama's team once more. It is also notable that the Clintons encourage and provoke many nasty "untruths" about Barack Obama and they escape any backlash from their dirty tactics. Hillary is a self-centered politician who believes that the only rules she observes and cites are those in her favor. I do not want this Clinton and her equally corrupt husband back in the White House.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 03/07/2008

No matter what you may think of Hillary or the Clintons, they have the support of half of the Dems. and you will need them to get your boy elected in the fall if he makes the nomination. So the sooner folks like yourself start toning down the vitriol, the better. I would think seriously about that. Indeed many of us who support Hillary are already planning to vote for McCain or Nader if Obama's nominated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 AM on 03/08/2008
- strifeknot I'm a Fan of strifeknot 14 fans permalink

You got that backwards. There are far more people who oppose Clinton and who would rather vote for Nader, McCain, or no one at all than cast a vote for her.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:03 AM on 03/08/2008
- Loeb I'm a Fan of Loeb permalink

Namecalling is not unknown in American politics. Sometimes it gets out of
hand.

This is not such a case.

Both Hillary and Barack Obama are in a tough battle.

I think Hillary is a tough candidate. Her ads have been distasteful to
say the least.

However, I do not agree that Barack Obama is "the second coming",
that his new people (young etc.) are the answer to world propblems.
It is more like a "show".

Should Obama win the Presidency, he would face a US Senate, and
a US Congress.

In addition a candidate like Obama who at one point votes against
the authorization for the war in Iraq and at another
votes for the funding of it with an increase of soldiers and
marines and with possible military incursions into even more
nations, leaves a voter with a less than "messianic" result.

Hillary Clinton has also changed sides on many issues and
is hawkish on foreign policy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 AM on 03/08/2008
- afgail I'm a Fan of afgail 58 fans permalink

Demonize Hillary, demonize Hillary , demonize Hillary! That's all the Obama - nation does on this blog. Get it? Didn't think so. How about Barack HUSSEIN Obama? Now you get it. Right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 03/08/2008
- Didi47 I'm a Fan of Didi47 15 fans permalink

imagram3785:

I see you got the same cut and paste anti Hillary copy all your posting buddies did.

The secret you accuse Hillary of my friend, rests firmly with Obama.... who answers questions with attacks on Hillary. How long do you think the public is going to accept this - media pundits or not.

Been looking around the net lately? People are getting sick and tired of not having their Obama questions answered. Insults and defamatory attacks against Hillary...­. and her supporters are getting very old...

So come on now... you can do it. Obama can do it, no? Answer the questions? Come on - or doesn't he have the same gumption to stand the heat in the kitchen Hillary has?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 PM on 03/10/2008

By the way, Obama won in Texas.

I'm just sayin'.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 PM on 03/07/2008
- afgail I'm a Fan of afgail 58 fans permalink

Only a Chicago politician who loses the popular vote and comes away with more delegates is the same as wining. In my book that is known as stealing an election.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 03/08/2008

Samantha was no real assest. She was working for free! So, if Barak wasn't paying for the help, then she wasn't much of an asset!

Which brings up another subject, don't give your shit away unless it's exactly that!! Shame on Barak using slave labor on the campaign!! Volunteer my ass! If she wrote a Pulitzer Prize winning book, she at least could have gotten $7.00 an hour or higher at McDonalds. Which proves that all those years in school, writing, not holding a real job,nor producing products and services; she had to work for free. But then again she was an author with a Pulitzer book; so maybe she's just plain wealthy for the sales of here efforts. Oh when are the professional liberal college students going to learn the basics of capitalism?

Want to make a real difference in poverty, re-store self esteem, give persons a real sense of achievement? Well then START A BUSINESS and hire someone. Meet a payroll! Provide benefits for your workers. Help America gain back the momentum of industry and trade. Produce something!
And for all who think I'm way off course, Do it first! Then come back and critize me! And folks it an't easy to meet a payroll. But once your have, your whole life perspective changes from dread to optimism!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 03/07/2008

And what's in your cup besides coffee?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 PM on 03/07/2008

MrCoffeeCup,

I'm a business owner - technology. Have hired 20 people in 3 years. Hillary is terrible for my employees and I. Mandated Healthcare == higher costs for me and the premium insurance we provide our employees. Obama focuses on costs -- that's what I care about -- I know you do to because you can look at your quickbooks and tell me exactly how much your Healthcare costs have increased in the past 3 years.

Crazy thing is that its the small business in this country that provide most of the employment (most people know that), but my bet is that its the small businesses that will employ a lot of the people that have been dis enfranchised by UNFAIR trade (trade is a good thing, turning the other cheek and a blind eye is not)

I'm optimistic, but I *ain't* no fool. The last 50 years has been a failure of the Status Quo. Hillary represents said Status Quo. That's indisputable.

Humor me ...

nsanity= doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result.

Consider BUSH-CLINT­ON-CLINTON­-BUSH-BUSH

Now the simplistic and prima facie argument embedded in the sequence BUSH-CLINTON above is that "change is good." That, we need to make a change simply for the sake of change. In my opinion, one can make a decent argument for this.

More substantively, however, the last 50 years of American History (and America's influence on International history), is not exactly an endorsement for the status quo, which - aside from her gender - Clinton represents. Clearly, some of the "major problems that await us on day one" are a result of previous lack of leadership.

I would appreciate it if you and others covering the "change movement" and its uncommon dynamics (this time around), would chronicle what exactly our Presidents in the last 50 years have accomplished with regards to:

1) Enabling the average American family to continue to be able to live and prospser on one income; sending children to college, living in safe and secure environs

2) Expanding the effective size of the middle class - a group historically regarded in World and American history as the backbone of a national economy

3) Working towards and effective resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict - a preponderant source of most anti-American tension in the world (by the way, 1967 marked the beginning of the 7-day war, and the genesis of Jewish-Arab/Islamic conflict in the modern era. I'll do the math for you, that was 41 years ago. B-C-C-B-B will have been complicit for nearly 48% of the lack of real movement on the issue

4) Working to ensure that Government serves its role in regulation; particularly providing safeguards for our environment. The EPA was founded in 1970; again, I'll do that math, that was 38 years ago. B-C-C-B-B will have been complicit for 52% of the environmental pillaging that is affecting our food supply and our health (btw, Mr. Nader is regardes as a seminal figure in the founding of the EPA due to his agitation and focus on issues)

5) Working to ensure that Goverment serves its role in regulation and (trade);

A) The moral high-ground; Clinton and McCain can discuss Obama talking to dictators and unsavory types. What exactly were Bush, Clinton, and McCain doing when they shilled for the Chinese in order to allow open/free -- and wait for it, the real travesty --- UNFAIR -- trade? Oh, I get it, there were no human rights violation by the Chinese. China attempted and has nearly succeed in destroying a people and their culture (Tibet).

The WTO agreements that facilitated trading with China began in 1986 and continued through 1994. I don't think I have to do the math on this one, but just in case, that's 22 years. 20 years divided by 22 years = 90%. Yes Ohio, that's right, WTO, NAFTA, etc are directly attributable to Ms. Clinton; and yes, you've been duped again into voting *against* your economic interests. And yes, B-C-C-B-B are complicit for 90% of the issues around trade and China's rise as a nation (as well as the fact that they currently are the bank behind the National Credit Card the Us Govt is effectively using)

B) Safety; I'll shorten this one. We know about lead-based toys and sub-standard drugs. Guess what, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, was championed and founded by -- yes, you guessed it - Ralph Nader in 1971. Math = 54% complicity. The CPSC continues to get hammered by lobbyists in the pockets of the shills in Washington. B-C-C-B-B, again, are complicit.

There are many more one can cite. It would be interesting to consider why someone might want to vote *Against* the Status Quo.

Ironically, from a Presidential Status Quo perspective, B-C-C-B-B even an M (McCain) (if not an O - Obama or N - Nader) in that chain is appealing.

MrCoffeeCup - get off your high horse, consider history and the intractable problems we face. "Day one" my arse ... Clinton's part of the historical problem ..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:38 AM on 03/08/2008

If that wasn't satire, MrCoffeeCup, maybe you give some thought to decaf.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 AM on 03/08/2008

She told the truth. They do not like it when the veil is lifted and their delusion exposed!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 03/07/2008

Obama should reinstate her and pick a fight with Hillary. She said something stupid. She is not a political pro, she specializes is genocide and human rights. She is a brilliant mind and there is a HUGE difference between Bill Shaheen who suggested Obama could have sold coke, who was Clinton's New Hampshire Chair, speaking at a press conference, who's wife runs the state and a 37 year old unpaid foreign policy advisor who was speaking to The Scotsman! But whatever, it' done. Hillary could have won this if she took the high road and instead everyone will just hate her more!
myspace.com/republicans4obama

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:03 PM on 03/07/2008
- Kalima I'm a Fan of Kalima 74 fans permalink
photo

I can't believe that this comment about withdrawel from Iraq could be so misconstrued. If anyone thinks
that withdrawing 160,000 troops and equipment can be done safely in just a few months, please think
again. Notice the emphasis would be on the safety of the troops,so of course there would have to be
in - depth discussions with the people on the ground in Iraq. To make such a song and dance about
the obvious seems delusional­.Was Sen. Clinton asked about a time table for withdrawal and what did
she promise?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 PM on 03/07/2008

Obama better toughen up or he's going to lose.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 PM on 03/07/2008
- amanda85 I'm a Fan of amanda85 108 fans permalink

Sorry Sam, telling the truth in a corporatist nation often gets you fired...
I'm so sorry you're not mainstream America...­your country needs more people like you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 03/07/2008
- verlaine I'm a Fan of verlaine 4 fans permalink

Hillary is a slimy, sleazy, lying, thuggish, guttersniping trashmonger. Calling her a monster is a gross understatement

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 PM on 03/07/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (12 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect