Badly in need of a NOSE JOB....

"They begged us to do the four women, but those covers just don't sell," one editor swiped.

Yeah, right. This is Sex and the City for Christ's Sake. We fans would have bought ANYTHING with these ladies on it. SJP should not have done the photo shoot alone. She should have taken the stance of 'all or none'. So what the magazine would not have been the highest seller of 2008. The show is about FOUR women not one. I now see how the show was scratched years ago. Sometimes one with the most power has to take the stand - SJP, that would be you.

Isn't this show really about 4 Gay men? Thats why Sarah Jessica Parker plays the lead role, because she looks like a Trannie. / transsexual.

I don't think SJP is ugly at all...I think she's got an interesting face with a lot of character, and that makes her more attractive. It's obvious that people have been brain-washed by the media to think that only one type of face is considered pretty, and that anything with character is deemed physically unworthy.
Having said all that, I'd also like to add that I never cared much for 'Sex and the City', as I found it completely shallow and over-blown.

I don't know about horses but the jackasses have sure come out here.

Sure is obvious who hates their life.

a lot of retouching and airbrushing needed! why bother to put someone who needs all of this on the cover. that's why french vogue is a MUCH better publication and carine roitfeld a better editor.

She's totally overexposed. Find the other women much more interesting, but will still avoid the movie.

"They begged us to do the four women, but those covers just don't sell." one editor swiped.

Whaaaaat?

I seem to recall that the last "Charlie's Angels" lineup to grace Entertainment Weekly's cover sold pretty well.

Sarah Jessica Parker has a horse's ass for a face. She is incredibly ugly. Looks like she has had a nose job to try to improve her looks. I am floored that anyone thinks she is remotely good looking.