McCain Received Defense Firm Cash After Backing Its Contract

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - McCain Received Defense Firm Cash After Backing Its Contract stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 03-11-08 01:40 PM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:46 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Ncc

Critics on Tuesday questioned whether Sen. John McCain catered to special interests when he aggressively threw his support behind a $35 billion Pentagon contract for a European plane maker.

McCain, the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, played a crucial role in blocking the deal to build air tankers from going to U.S.-based Boeing, instead paving the path for EADS to score the loot. He framed his decision as an example of political integrity; Boeing has previously been exposed of contract abuse. But a review of campaign finance donations and lobbying records suggests that money and personal lobbying may have also been in play.

On January 15, 2007, McCain appeared at Alabama Gov. Bob Riley's gubernatorial swearing in ceremony and formally called for multiple bidders in the tanker deal. The push for an open process had only one true beneficiary, however, and that was the Northrop Grumman/EADS consortium, which was poised to be Boeing's sole competitor.

A day after McCain made his proclamation, the contributions began to flow. John Green, a lobbyist for EADS donated $2,100 to the senator's presidential campaign. Ten days after that, Michelle Lammers, the "Chief of Staff" for EADS North America, gave $250 to the McCain campaign. It was her first political contribution ever. Less than a month later, the long-time head of EADS' government affairs program, Samuel Adcock, made a $2,100 donation to McCain. And eleven days later, Ralph Crosby, the head of EADS North America, donated $2,300 himself.

All told, as documented earlier by CQ PoliticalMoneyline, McCain received more than $15,000 from EADS and its subsidiary, Airbus North America. Not only was this the highest amount received by any federal candidate, but prior to 2006, not a single employee from EADS had ever contributed to McCain. Two Airbus employees did donate nearly $4,000 for his 2000 run at the White House.

"It has a bad appearance," said Phillip Finnegan, the director of corporate analysis at The Teal Group, a market analysis and consulting firm. "Clearly, companies contribute to members of congress who are sympathetic with there position. But it doesn't necessarily mean that it influences their position... McCain is a bit of a crusader. And when he has an issue like he had with Boeing, he pursues it. But [the contributions] definitely doesn't look good."

Finnegan was referring to McCain's 2003 investigation into Boeing's billing practices and lock on the tanker business. That investigation resulted in the company losing out on a $23 billion deal to lease tankers to the Air Force. On Friday, McCain defended both his current and past positions: "I never weighed in for or against anybody that competed for the contract. All I asked for was a fair process. And the facts are that I never showed any bias in any way against anybody -- except for the taxpayer."

But there are myriad signs that EADS curried up to the Arizona Senator. And it wasn't just the money. According to an Associated Press report published on Tuesday, the McCain campaign currently employs individuals who just last year were lobbying on behalf of EADS.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Two of the advisers gave up their lobbying work when they joined McCain's campaign," the AP wrote. "A third, former Texas Rep. Tom Loeffler, lobbied for the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co. while serving as McCain's national finance chairman."

One of those advisers, John Green, left Ogilvy Government Relations to become McCain's congressional Republican liaison shortly after the EADS deal was announced.

"They never lobbied him related to the issues, and the letters went out before they were contracted" by EADS, McCain campaign spokeswoman Jill Hazelbaker told the AP.

In the end, McCain may have received more than just campaign contributions in return for his support of the EADS contract. Parts for the refueling tankers are slated to be built in Mobile, Alabama. And just days after the deal was finalized, the state's governor, Bob Riley -- a long holdout in the presidential process -- finally offered his endorsement of McCain's candidacy.

"To say this is a great day for Alabama is a monumental understatement," Riley said of the contract. "This will go down in history as one of our greatest days."

Critics on Tuesday questioned whether Sen. John McCain catered to special interests when he aggressively threw his support behind a $35 billion Pentagon contract for a European plane maker. McCain, t...
Critics on Tuesday questioned whether Sen. John McCain catered to special interests when he aggressively threw his support behind a $35 billion Pentagon contract for a European plane maker. McCain, t...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
204
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)

What happened to that blonde lobbyist he was bopping just a week or two ago. Is she vacationing in the Meadowlands?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:53 PM on 03/11/2008
- zigzag1 I'm a Fan of zigzag1 8 fans permalink

Vicki Iseman....­Secretary to high paid lobbyist in 2 years, typical career path. And where is the press that should be camped at her doorstep? Where is she now? Don't care about the sex aspect. I want to know what favors McCrazy did for her employers clients, the Telecommunications giants. MCCrazy simply says "no comment" and the press apologizes for bothering him. Such bull shit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 PM on 03/11/2008
- cittykat2 I'm a Fan of cittykat2 2 fans permalink

Yea, the press is busy attending McCain's picnics that they have no intention of reporting fairly. McCain is a jerk just like our president. The media are jerks as well. Wait and see, when Obama gets the nod, in the media's eyes, McCain will be the best thing since apple pie.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 AM on 03/12/2008
- shaggles I'm a Fan of shaggles 4 fans permalink

If McCain says the story's not true that's good enough for our hard working press corps. He's a straight talker after all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 03/12/2008
- hmmmmmer I'm a Fan of hmmmmmer 29 fans permalink

McSame, recieving money from a defense contractor, what a revelation. The fact he helped take a contract like that out of the country is criminal, not in the sense of going to jail, just in the sense of taking American jobs overseas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 PM on 03/11/2008
- shaggles I'm a Fan of shaggles 4 fans permalink

We'll see how much play this gets in the MSM. My guess is not much. Obama and Hillary need to lay off each other and start hammering McCain on crap like this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:40 PM on 03/11/2008

I actuually watched some of that 'hearing' - CSPAN
Funny the Potato toss.
Panel- "Yes we wrote shitty Regulations but it is your fault you actually followed them !"Granted the Criteria was Changed dramatically and to obviously accomodate Airbus, over Boeing, but these idiots sitting on the Panel could not deny that the standards They set forth were rot with Flaws that worked against DOMESTIC manufactures- BRILLIANT again!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 PM on 03/11/2008
- mouselion I'm a Fan of mouselion 123 fans permalink
photo

CNN headline:

McCain Caught In Defense Contractor­/Senatoria­l Prostitution Ring

(OK, I'm dreaming). . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 PM on 03/11/2008

When he was younger, certainly. He was the go-to party guy in the Congress.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 PM on 03/11/2008
- AuntSally I'm a Fan of AuntSally 27 fans permalink
photo

"I'm shocked, shocked I say, to discover that there's gambling going on here..."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:32 PM on 03/11/2008
photo

I don't see how ANY POLITICIAN can give away US jobs like this? Our aerospace industry is hurting and has been downsizing since Clinton. Now we have an opportunity to get a new contract and he sends it overseas. HE PUTS OUR NATIONAL SECURITY IN THE HANDS OF FOREIGNERS!!!! Yet he should be our commander in chief?!?!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 03/11/2008
- hank48188 I'm a Fan of hank48188 8 fans permalink

Obama voted for the 2005 Dick Cheney Energy Bill after getting $269,900 from the generous employees of the Exelon Corp., a nuclear company and he also watered down a bill concerning leaking radioactivity that never passed. Don't think for a second kids that Obama has clean hands, and look at that Obama - Rezko House deal too, corruption.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:24 PM on 03/11/2008

Nice try to redirect..­. this thread is about Johnny "Keating 5" McCain. Get with the program troll.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:54 PM on 03/11/2008
photo

Well, you've convinced ME! I'm going out RIGHT now to re-register as a moron.
Just wondering.­.. What DO you gain by posting this horseshit?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:09 PM on 03/11/2008
- Ramirez I'm a Fan of Ramirez 275 fans permalink
photo

So what's your point? Obama was hoping for the best and he voted for change.

Stick to the topic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 PM on 03/11/2008
- BWonka I'm a Fan of BWonka 118 fans permalink
photo

Try staying on topic - then you won't look like such an ass.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 PM on 03/11/2008
- BWonka I'm a Fan of BWonka 118 fans permalink
photo

McCrazy's a Rethuglican - of COURSE he's corrupt. But his party will be far more ibnterested in Spitzer and the prostitute - after all, the Rethugs are protecting our family values. right? Like Vitter and Craig?

Bomb bomb bomb... and then hope you don't get caught taking money, or (GASP) having sex!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 03/11/2008
- DELICIOUS I'm a Fan of DELICIOUS 6 fans permalink

JUST ANOTHER CORRUPT POLITICIAN IN A GOP SUIT.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 03/11/2008
- JulieSA I'm a Fan of JulieSA 165 fans permalink
photo

"The push for an open process had only one true beneficiary, however, and that was the Northrop Grumman/EADS consortium, which was poised to be Boeing's sole competitor­."

So apparently you think that it's better to have no competition on these contracts, a la Halliburton? Usually HuffPoers flip out when a huge corporation gets a contract without competition, and with some justification. And we're supposed to believe that McCain did this for $15,000? Clinton and Obama wouldn't even bend over to pick up $15,000 off the ground, as Hsu, Giustra, Gupta, Rezko, and Burkle can tell you.

Did Boeing pay you to write this story?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 03/11/2008
- springsm I'm a Fan of springsm 54 fans permalink

No there does need to be competition in the aerospace industry. Unfortunately most American companies have gone belly up. I resent paying Europe to make Military planes for our military with my tax dollar. The argument that Boeing outsourses parts doesn't wash either...i­t is not the same thing. They outsourced major parts of the 787 to other countries to be assembled in their Seattle plant and look at what has happened. They need to rebuild every part that has come in I think. That and compeition aside, the rules changed in the middle of the creek and Boeing was not informed. I have thought for several years that McCain was up to something he should not have been up too. I think he was very interested in denying Boeing this plane no matter what. It may come to be proven. I think McCain will use his hero status forever...­but he is not a hero. He is as slimey as some of his collegues. And "Myfriends" probably is ending up with alot more than $15,000. So take a deep breath. And no Boeing does not pay me either but they do build the best airplanes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 03/11/2008

I agree that there should be competitive bidding, qualified vetting and arduous auditing of any contract awarded by the Feds. And even though I'm in Boeing's backyard, I have no problem with EADS winning this contract (since they claim that some 40% of the work will be done in the US, as opposed to over 60% American labor participation under a Boeing contract). But, I don't believe for one second that McBraindead is only scoring $15K for his support - that's simply the reported campaign contribution. This fat cat has NO credibility and only suggestible partisans can look beyond his well-documented history and suggest he would serve the country well as President.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 03/11/2008
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 144 fans permalink

This looks like the beginning of payback from Boeing and Company.

Yuck,yuck,­yuck,yuck. I actually like McCain. Just not for President.

Of course McCain was right about the original deal being a ripoff. But now he has made one very serious enemy.

Corporate money has no party loyalty.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:03 PM on 03/11/2008
- bmermaid I'm a Fan of bmermaid 18 fans permalink
photo

Now THIS is a scandal!
Some politician paying for a prostitute- not a scandal.
Another politian giving or getting a blow job- not a scandal.
Taking bribes- scandal.
Going to war over a lie- scandal.
Making a ton of money over a blood for oil trade- scandal.
We will never have elected officials that work for the public's good until the media and the voters get it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 03/11/2008

Bravo!
What happens in the bedroom is not the business of the public.
What happens in the board room actually has an effect on us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 03/11/2008

here here ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:30 PM on 03/11/2008

*hear hear ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 PM on 03/11/2008
photo

If Congress had any balls at all it would simply refuse to fund the EADS deal and tell the Pentagon to make due with their KC 135 tanker jets. Forty billion dollars worth of Pentagon contract shouldn't go to any consortium where the majority of ownership is non-American. To Hell with globalization. There has never been one substantial military contract from a western government that has ever been given to an American military contractor let alone one worth $40 billion. This should have been a Boeing contract period since no other American manufacturer has the capability of providing the necessary aircraft and that include Northrup/Grumman.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 03/11/2008

Is it me or do the numbers in this story shock you too?

This was a $350 BILLION contract, and the author is raising objections for McCain receiving a paltry $15K in campaign donations? Is that all it takes to get a contract that size? This sounds ridiculous to me. That woman CEO in the article: she could only afford $250? Whew, such a non-story.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 03/11/2008
- Dari I'm a Fan of Dari 15 fans permalink
photo

The POINT of article is the HYPOCRISY of the candidate to call himself a REFORMER of Special Interests at the SAME time his Senate Office & his Campaign are RUN by Lobbyists and it seems like he is MANIPULATING contracts THROUGH his official capacity as a Senator.

In this way, this story means McCain is NO different than Gov. Spitzer (Substitute INFLUENCING for Prostitutes) . Publically portending to be "squeaky clean" AND his Lobbyists are "honest" but then, the INFLUENCING is taking place.

He's been around for +20 years, LOOK for the REAL Payoff in the RNC War Chest, not any paper trail in his campaign. He went thru that back in 2002 after his 2000 run.

For links see my comments on LAST page here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 03/11/2008
photo

Thank you, but you're wasting perfectly good fact and reason on a hog.

Listen... crunching pearls...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:12 PM on 03/11/2008
photo

So John McCain is a cheat date, it's not the amount that counts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 PM on 03/11/2008
photo

rules are that an indv. can only give $2300 anyway. we have no idea how much they've given to an "foundation" or bundled in some other way, or given to a PAC that endorces mccain etc etc etc

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 PM on 03/11/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect