McCain Received Defense Firm Cash After Backing Its Contract

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - McCain Received Defense Firm Cash After Backing Its Contract stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 03-11-08 01:40 PM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:46 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Ncc

Critics on Tuesday questioned whether Sen. John McCain catered to special interests when he aggressively threw his support behind a $35 billion Pentagon contract for a European plane maker.

McCain, the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, played a crucial role in blocking the deal to build air tankers from going to U.S.-based Boeing, instead paving the path for EADS to score the loot. He framed his decision as an example of political integrity; Boeing has previously been exposed of contract abuse. But a review of campaign finance donations and lobbying records suggests that money and personal lobbying may have also been in play.

On January 15, 2007, McCain appeared at Alabama Gov. Bob Riley's gubernatorial swearing in ceremony and formally called for multiple bidders in the tanker deal. The push for an open process had only one true beneficiary, however, and that was the Northrop Grumman/EADS consortium, which was poised to be Boeing's sole competitor.

A day after McCain made his proclamation, the contributions began to flow. John Green, a lobbyist for EADS donated $2,100 to the senator's presidential campaign. Ten days after that, Michelle Lammers, the "Chief of Staff" for EADS North America, gave $250 to the McCain campaign. It was her first political contribution ever. Less than a month later, the long-time head of EADS' government affairs program, Samuel Adcock, made a $2,100 donation to McCain. And eleven days later, Ralph Crosby, the head of EADS North America, donated $2,300 himself.

All told, as documented earlier by CQ PoliticalMoneyline, McCain received more than $15,000 from EADS and its subsidiary, Airbus North America. Not only was this the highest amount received by any federal candidate, but prior to 2006, not a single employee from EADS had ever contributed to McCain. Two Airbus employees did donate nearly $4,000 for his 2000 run at the White House.

"It has a bad appearance," said Phillip Finnegan, the director of corporate analysis at The Teal Group, a market analysis and consulting firm. "Clearly, companies contribute to members of congress who are sympathetic with there position. But it doesn't necessarily mean that it influences their position... McCain is a bit of a crusader. And when he has an issue like he had with Boeing, he pursues it. But [the contributions] definitely doesn't look good."

Finnegan was referring to McCain's 2003 investigation into Boeing's billing practices and lock on the tanker business. That investigation resulted in the company losing out on a $23 billion deal to lease tankers to the Air Force. On Friday, McCain defended both his current and past positions: "I never weighed in for or against anybody that competed for the contract. All I asked for was a fair process. And the facts are that I never showed any bias in any way against anybody -- except for the taxpayer."

But there are myriad signs that EADS curried up to the Arizona Senator. And it wasn't just the money. According to an Associated Press report published on Tuesday, the McCain campaign currently employs individuals who just last year were lobbying on behalf of EADS.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Two of the advisers gave up their lobbying work when they joined McCain's campaign," the AP wrote. "A third, former Texas Rep. Tom Loeffler, lobbied for the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co. while serving as McCain's national finance chairman."

One of those advisers, John Green, left Ogilvy Government Relations to become McCain's congressional Republican liaison shortly after the EADS deal was announced.

"They never lobbied him related to the issues, and the letters went out before they were contracted" by EADS, McCain campaign spokeswoman Jill Hazelbaker told the AP.

In the end, McCain may have received more than just campaign contributions in return for his support of the EADS contract. Parts for the refueling tankers are slated to be built in Mobile, Alabama. And just days after the deal was finalized, the state's governor, Bob Riley -- a long holdout in the presidential process -- finally offered his endorsement of McCain's candidacy.

"To say this is a great day for Alabama is a monumental understatement," Riley said of the contract. "This will go down in history as one of our greatest days."

Critics on Tuesday questioned whether Sen. John McCain catered to special interests when he aggressively threw his support behind a $35 billion Pentagon contract for a European plane maker. McCain, t...
Critics on Tuesday questioned whether Sen. John McCain catered to special interests when he aggressively threw his support behind a $35 billion Pentagon contract for a European plane maker. McCain, t...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
204
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
- ntmessage I'm a Fan of ntmessage 35 fans permalink

This false scandal link is a huge stretch. Dont know why I feel like sticking up for McCain on this stupid issue, but if you remember the procurement agent in the Pentagon resigned after she joined Boeing, the original winner of the contract and admitted she gave Boeing preferential treatment while in the Pentagon. Another example of the so-called revolving door. The CEO resigned as well and the contract was put up for bid again.

McCain showed leadership in protesting the corruption in order to make sure the contract would then be awarded fairly.

I think the kitchen sink is coming from the Obama supporters. Anyhow, I suggest that a better *scandal* than this one would be needed to circulate around the blogs to see if it *sticks*.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 03/11/2008
- gonavy I'm a Fan of gonavy 7 fans permalink

The author of the article is relying on the ignorance of the people here to not know about that or to not believe it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 03/11/2008
- BWonka I'm a Fan of BWonka 119 fans permalink
photo

Like McCrazy and the Keating 5?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:27 PM on 03/11/2008
- ntmessage I'm a Fan of ntmessage 35 fans permalink

I was around for the Keating 5. It was part of the S&L crisis. It may be *new* information for the Obama fanatics, but most of the country, already resolved how this issue affects their voting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 AM on 03/12/2008
- riverhouse I'm a Fan of riverhouse 47 fans permalink

This is an example of something Obama could take advantage of in the general election but Hillary could not. The GOP will have ten tons of as bad or worse financial dealings by the Clintons. She faces the Peter Paul trial, constant Hsu questioning, the ethanol deal with Bill and his billionaire friend coupled with Hillary's bill to provide $50 in incentatives for ethanol incentatives. It's profoundly disheartening to think we'd have two old special interests pols, Hillary and McCain, to choose from in November. America deserves better.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 03/11/2008
- ntmessage I'm a Fan of ntmessage 35 fans permalink

The Dems lose the corruption issue if they dont fix MI and FL. Seriously.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 03/11/2008

There is nothing to fix. They moved up their elections and disregarded the rules and were penalized.


Now its up to the state parties to fix it and comply witht the rules, not the DNC to bend over backwards because Clinton is in desperation mode.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:20 PM on 03/11/2008
photo

The MIC will have it's way, come hell or high water. They just announced that Bushco

has accepted the resignation of Admiral Fallon who was put in charge of Cent-Com.

He was in charge of the Middle East War Zone but was adamant about not going to

war with Iran. Fallon knows that bombing Iran will result in losing most of our Navy

in the gulf to the dozens of land to sea missiles we know Iran has well hidden there.


To Darth, who is over there right now, those Navy ships and men are expendable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 03/11/2008
- riverhouse I'm a Fan of riverhouse 47 fans permalink

I, too, saw the resignation announced. It does make you wonder what's going on. It can't be good.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 03/11/2008
- LaFeminazi I'm a Fan of LaFeminazi 236 fans permalink
photo

McCain is against lobbyists that he does not like and for lobbyists he likes.

Sounds just like every other rat on the hill.

Oh btw Airbus thanks you John, did you receive the check yet?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 03/11/2008
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1579 fans permalink
photo

All those lobbyists he deals with are honorable. That's why he allows them to be with him on his honorable bus.

Airbus is an honorable corporation making very honorable airplanes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 03/11/2008
- LaFeminazi I'm a Fan of LaFeminazi 236 fans permalink
photo

Very honorable and made in France...;­)

See you joined the interactive thread.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 03/11/2008
- Grannysue I'm a Fan of Grannysue 131 fans permalink
photo

So the great "American patriot" sold out so his buddies at the Airforce budget office signed our planes to be built in Europe instead of America! Wonder if that's his plan for recovering the economy, he didn't say it was our economy he would try and fix, cause he doesn't know much about economics, seems he knows how to line his pockets and coffers, just like a good many of the other politicians.
How low this man will go to be President, puts him right in line with Hillary, they would both sell their first born if it meant they could be President. And sell out American right along with them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 03/11/2008
- mrdontplay I'm a Fan of mrdontplay 3 fans permalink

again who is surprised?

These guys put him in office the least he could do is hook em up with some of our hard earned tax dollars.

Mcquid
Mcpro
Mcquo

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 03/11/2008

this WILL BE a campaign issue!

1. mccain hires eads lobbyists to run his campaign.

2. mccain screws american workers by pushing the contract to go overseas.

3. mccain accepts the "thank you" money

.
mccain is showing the country and the world that he does business just like bush/cheney.

time for the msm to stop giving this guy a pass.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 03/11/2008
- Nochnoi I'm a Fan of Nochnoi 130 fans permalink
photo

And when I first heard them talking about building the plant in Alabama, I was so happy for them.... but now, knowing how shady the whole thing is.... it leaves an icky taste in my mouth....

Well.... at least it is going to create a lot of new jobs there....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 03/11/2008
photo

I was a defense contractor out in California for a number of years, and believe me, McCain was a regular part of the Republican shakedown machine in San Diego along with Duncan Hunter and "Duke" Cunningham. It was pretty clear back then that we all had to "pay to play." McCain is as dirty as the rest of the Republicans--and I am always amazed that the press presents him as a "clean" politician. Dig deeper, folks, McCain has decades of experience­--greasing the skids for defense contractors, and any one else doing business with the government.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 03/11/2008
- gonavy I'm a Fan of gonavy 7 fans permalink

Do you really think the democrats run their shop any different?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 PM on 03/11/2008
photo

Yes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:46 PM on 03/11/2008
photo

I'm not saying that the Democrats are different--I didn't happen to operate my business in a Democrat-controlled Congressional district AND the Republicans were running Congress at the time (Hunter was vice chairman of the Defense Appropriations subcommitt­ee.) The point is that McCain is as corrupt as most--certainly no paragon of clean government. And that, my friends, is from personal experience.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:15 PM on 03/11/2008
- Faux I'm a Fan of Faux 3 fans permalink

Lemme see if I follow the logic of this story-

In 2003, Boeing was the presumptive winner of the tanker contract. At that time, McCain blocked the deal because of what was later shown to be bribery and corruption in the process. His efforts resulted in jail time for the people who tried to swindle the government out of a few billion dollars, and the CEO of Boeing retired in shame.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2002130791_mccain26m.html

Now the tanker deal came up again, and Boeing loses. So it's McCain's fault because he should have just let the corrupt 'American' contractor make the deal four years ago? This is madness beyond what is reasonable for this place.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 03/11/2008
- gonavy I'm a Fan of gonavy 7 fans permalink

"reasonable for this place" - oxymoron

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 03/11/2008
- TLV I'm a Fan of TLV 119 fans permalink

Many people involved in this venture said that they liked it because it was a cooperative effort and involved not one but three companies. The Airbus is just the body of the plane and the rest will be fitted to them here in the states.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:38 PM on 03/11/2008
- RoseMerry I'm a Fan of RoseMerry 18 fans permalink

If this is true, it is criminal and the man needs to go to prison, not the White House. Or has he all ready bought is exemption from prosecution? The Speaker of the House would be the expert on that subject.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 PM on 03/11/2008
- Cautious I'm a Fan of Cautious 15 fans permalink
photo

If this is true, it would be really a sad scene- not that I doubt it's true. In many ways John McCain is a sad old man, and it would be really tragic to watch him try to make some sputtering response to this. He should have stuck with being a war hero and retired a lot sooner than he has.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 PM on 03/11/2008
- gonavy I'm a Fan of gonavy 7 fans permalink

What's sad is that you people are buying this crap. This is just a sliver of the whole story, but this is the only information, when taken out of context, that can make McCain look bad.

I don't think you people even want to know the truth. Very sad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 03/11/2008
photo

Vote for John McSame: More wars and less jobs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 03/11/2008
- Mike169 I'm a Fan of Mike169 45 fans permalink
photo

Does that make him the whore?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 03/11/2008
photo

Yeah, but we have already established in this news cycle that good whores cost more than $2,100!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 PM on 03/11/2008
- DELICIOUS I'm a Fan of DELICIOUS 6 fans permalink

OUR TAX DOLLARS WHERE OUR CROOKED GOVERNMENT CAN ABUSE IT BUT CITIZENS DO WITHOUT.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 03/11/2008
- cittykat2 I'm a Fan of cittykat2 2 fans permalink

Birds of feather stick together. Maybe that is why the straight talker is happy that the President endorsed him. They are all crooks and stick together.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 03/11/2008
- mellene I'm a Fan of mellene 10 fans permalink

Time will prove that McCain is rotten through and through. Maybe he ought to step down before he's pushed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 03/11/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect