McCain Received Defense Firm Cash After Backing Its Contract

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - McCain Received Defense Firm Cash After Backing Its Contract stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 03-11-08 01:40 PM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:46 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Ncc

Critics on Tuesday questioned whether Sen. John McCain catered to special interests when he aggressively threw his support behind a $35 billion Pentagon contract for a European plane maker.

McCain, the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, played a crucial role in blocking the deal to build air tankers from going to U.S.-based Boeing, instead paving the path for EADS to score the loot. He framed his decision as an example of political integrity; Boeing has previously been exposed of contract abuse. But a review of campaign finance donations and lobbying records suggests that money and personal lobbying may have also been in play.

On January 15, 2007, McCain appeared at Alabama Gov. Bob Riley's gubernatorial swearing in ceremony and formally called for multiple bidders in the tanker deal. The push for an open process had only one true beneficiary, however, and that was the Northrop Grumman/EADS consortium, which was poised to be Boeing's sole competitor.

A day after McCain made his proclamation, the contributions began to flow. John Green, a lobbyist for EADS donated $2,100 to the senator's presidential campaign. Ten days after that, Michelle Lammers, the "Chief of Staff" for EADS North America, gave $250 to the McCain campaign. It was her first political contribution ever. Less than a month later, the long-time head of EADS' government affairs program, Samuel Adcock, made a $2,100 donation to McCain. And eleven days later, Ralph Crosby, the head of EADS North America, donated $2,300 himself.

All told, as documented earlier by CQ PoliticalMoneyline, McCain received more than $15,000 from EADS and its subsidiary, Airbus North America. Not only was this the highest amount received by any federal candidate, but prior to 2006, not a single employee from EADS had ever contributed to McCain. Two Airbus employees did donate nearly $4,000 for his 2000 run at the White House.

"It has a bad appearance," said Phillip Finnegan, the director of corporate analysis at The Teal Group, a market analysis and consulting firm. "Clearly, companies contribute to members of congress who are sympathetic with there position. But it doesn't necessarily mean that it influences their position... McCain is a bit of a crusader. And when he has an issue like he had with Boeing, he pursues it. But [the contributions] definitely doesn't look good."

Finnegan was referring to McCain's 2003 investigation into Boeing's billing practices and lock on the tanker business. That investigation resulted in the company losing out on a $23 billion deal to lease tankers to the Air Force. On Friday, McCain defended both his current and past positions: "I never weighed in for or against anybody that competed for the contract. All I asked for was a fair process. And the facts are that I never showed any bias in any way against anybody -- except for the taxpayer."

But there are myriad signs that EADS curried up to the Arizona Senator. And it wasn't just the money. According to an Associated Press report published on Tuesday, the McCain campaign currently employs individuals who just last year were lobbying on behalf of EADS.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Two of the advisers gave up their lobbying work when they joined McCain's campaign," the AP wrote. "A third, former Texas Rep. Tom Loeffler, lobbied for the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co. while serving as McCain's national finance chairman."

One of those advisers, John Green, left Ogilvy Government Relations to become McCain's congressional Republican liaison shortly after the EADS deal was announced.

"They never lobbied him related to the issues, and the letters went out before they were contracted" by EADS, McCain campaign spokeswoman Jill Hazelbaker told the AP.

In the end, McCain may have received more than just campaign contributions in return for his support of the EADS contract. Parts for the refueling tankers are slated to be built in Mobile, Alabama. And just days after the deal was finalized, the state's governor, Bob Riley -- a long holdout in the presidential process -- finally offered his endorsement of McCain's candidacy.

"To say this is a great day for Alabama is a monumental understatement," Riley said of the contract. "This will go down in history as one of our greatest days."

Critics on Tuesday questioned whether Sen. John McCain catered to special interests when he aggressively threw his support behind a $35 billion Pentagon contract for a European plane maker. McCain, t...
Critics on Tuesday questioned whether Sen. John McCain catered to special interests when he aggressively threw his support behind a $35 billion Pentagon contract for a European plane maker. McCain, t...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
204
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)

$15,000 .......ehhh. How much has Clinton and Obama contributed to the superdelegates? The whole system is corrupt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 03/11/2008
- captnEarl I'm a Fan of captnEarl 5 fans permalink

stupid remark

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 03/11/2008

Well, Obama has contributed quite a bit more than Hillary.
http://politicalamnesia.blogspot.com/2008/02/obamas-hope-fund-piggy-bank-for.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 03/11/2008
- ndolomar I'm a Fan of ndolomar 11 fans permalink

your tax dollars at play.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 PM on 03/11/2008

Unfortunately, the EADS Airbus bid was unquestionably superior to the Boeing proposal. The air force crunched the numbers of the two proposals and determined that, while 49 of the AirBus tankers would be available by 2013, only 19 of the Boeing version would be ready. Airbus offered the KC-30, based on the Airbus 330-300, which normally sells for $160 million each. The KC-30 carries 20 percent more fuel than the other candidate, the KC-767, plus more cargo pallets (26 versus 19) and passengers. Thus the KC-30 can stay in the air longer, while transferring more fuel. Boeing is contending the military didn't properly specify the acceptability of a larger plane. Which is true could give Boeing a chance to redeem themselves. Let's hope so. But there is no evidence McCain did anything other than work to set up a bidding process to replace the original no bid contract that was in the process of going through the congress, negotiated by the Bush administration. If any one has evidence of a quid pro quo please post.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 03/11/2008
- gonavy I'm a Fan of gonavy 7 fans permalink

Thank you for the facts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 03/11/2008

Problem is Boeing bid the 767 when they should have bid the 777. The question is why. Hopefully, the military did something tangible which led Boeing not to bid the larger plane and they get another try on this. I have read there was some sort of direction from the Air Force which would lead Boeing to conclude matching the size of the 707 was an important criteria.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 PM on 03/11/2008
- MsLiz I'm a Fan of MsLiz 105 fans permalink
photo

Alabama's Senator Sessions was happily proclaiming this deal as a source of jobs in Mobile, Alabama, too. The authors ought to check out his campaign funds, since he is up for re-election (he is a shoo-in).

The money cited is not enough to be a bribe. I mean, it would be enough for me to live on for six months, but to a presidential candidate, it is ten $1,500 a plate dinners.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 03/11/2008
- Rescisco I'm a Fan of Rescisco 67 fans permalink

With due respect to all views on this specific matter, ALL politicians are bought and paid for in the end. The illusion that they are anything other than "kept people" is the stuff of which campaign slogans and false hopes are made. There are no heroic deeds to be performed by those who trade in power and influence. There is only self interest and the surrender of principle to the highest bidder or the strongest force. Even the well meaning "mavrick" or "reformer" is tamed and ultimately corrupted by the system and the neccessities it imposes on the combatant who strives to attain "victory."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 03/11/2008
- researcher I'm a Fan of researcher 105 fans permalink

mc war from az gives it to another state and the people in az will line up to vote for this man. the folks in az are not the smartest people on earth. been a red state for years. maybe being a red state does say something about the intelligence of the people in a state. do cousins marry cousins in az like the south.

hey speaking of az they have one thing going for them. if you are into having many wives and kids and having the state taxpayers pay for your kids move to northern az and make it happen. no gov will touch that city for fear of losing the morman vote.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 03/11/2008
- Xander I'm a Fan of Xander 4 fans permalink

If this was millions of dollars in lobbyist money I'd say yeah OK let's make this a story.

But 15 grand? He makes more than that giving a photo op. Non-story.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 03/11/2008
- Ammobob I'm a Fan of Ammobob 36 fans permalink

All hype and gripe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 03/11/2008
- Infostream I'm a Fan of Infostream 11 fans permalink
photo

McCain can pretend to be the campaign finance reform anti-earmark guy, because since he is always for increasing the cash flow from American taxpayers into the deep pockets of the military industrial complex, they will always be there with the big $ for him, and the numbers quoted above are pocket change compared to the better hidden conduits. So McCain won't sign any earmarks which in total are about $100 billion a year (and not all of that is unnecessary pork), meanwhile he'll always support the $500 billion+++ a year to the military, often giving more than the pentagon has even asked for. And worst of all, he's ready on day 1 to stage another infomercial for the weapons profiteers, in the form of more deceitful shock and awe extravaganzas = unnecessary preemptive wars.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 PM on 03/11/2008
- ballewb I'm a Fan of ballewb 2 fans permalink

I think it will take, and does merit, more questioning to get to the bottom of this and other lobbying related questions about Senator McCain. Whatever the truth, publicly financed elections are the only cure for these kind of problems. But, even that has its problems.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:10 PM on 03/11/2008
- researcher I'm a Fan of researcher 105 fans permalink

come on 15000 is nothing this is not a story. he had no control over these donatations. give mc war a chance to share the wealth of our industrial military complex to of all people the socialists.

even europe now gets to milk the american taxpayer. god bless them for that. even the socialists have the sense to milk the dumbed down american taxpayer and create jobs for their socialist workers with 5 weeks vacation and to help pay for their universal health care. while americans still talk about how everything american is the best in the world. naive or dumb take your pick. maybe both.

the problem is not mc war but a dumbed down care less about politics society and a nation that refuses to take jefferson seriously. 30 years overdue on jefferson's advice.

this gov no longer works for the people read the declaration of independence on what should be done.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 03/11/2008
- gonavy I'm a Fan of gonavy 7 fans permalink

Excuse the error, the site is OPENSECRETS.ORG

Defense Industry

Clinton $217559.00

McCain $189084.00

Obama about 130000.00

Clinton and McCain are on the Armed Services Committee.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 03/11/2008
- VSamuels I'm a Fan of VSamuels 63 fans permalink

So is Obama!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 03/11/2008
- KQuark I'm a Fan of KQuark 266 fans permalink
photo

Another scandalous move by McCrazy. His white house will obviously be filled with the same scandals as the Bush white house.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 PM on 03/11/2008
- SUNRAI I'm a Fan of SUNRAI 2 fans permalink
photo

My friends, I love this straight talk express minus a few important details.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:57 PM on 03/11/2008
- gonavy I'm a Fan of gonavy 7 fans permalink

You mean the details left out of this article, right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 03/11/2008
- NickOhio I'm a Fan of NickOhio 2 fans permalink

McCain is living in another world.

He has received money from govt. contractors after backing their deals??? Oh my. Not McCain. Not the savior of the neo-cons. Not the man who hugged their savior in public with the cameras running? Not the man who endured a long time in Hanoi, then returned home only to learn his wife was nearly killed in a car accident and then (allegedly) some time later, met and fell in love with a wealthy socialite who is now his wife?

Oh my.

Is there any hope for this man?

He needs to return to Arizona and give great "barbys" on the grill. I wonder if the MSM will avoid this story of his payola, er, donation to charity?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 PM on 03/11/2008
photo

OH NO!!

OUR Johnny McPow?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 03/11/2008

TONY REZKO! Change Washington.....Yes we can.....Chicago style politics....Not red states and blue states but the United States.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 03/11/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect