McCain Received Defense Firm Cash After Backing Its Contract

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - McCain Received Defense Firm Cash After Backing Its Contract stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 03-11-08 01:40 PM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 02:46 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Ncc

Critics on Tuesday questioned whether Sen. John McCain catered to special interests when he aggressively threw his support behind a $35 billion Pentagon contract for a European plane maker.

McCain, the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, played a crucial role in blocking the deal to build air tankers from going to U.S.-based Boeing, instead paving the path for EADS to score the loot. He framed his decision as an example of political integrity; Boeing has previously been exposed of contract abuse. But a review of campaign finance donations and lobbying records suggests that money and personal lobbying may have also been in play.

On January 15, 2007, McCain appeared at Alabama Gov. Bob Riley's gubernatorial swearing in ceremony and formally called for multiple bidders in the tanker deal. The push for an open process had only one true beneficiary, however, and that was the Northrop Grumman/EADS consortium, which was poised to be Boeing's sole competitor.

A day after McCain made his proclamation, the contributions began to flow. John Green, a lobbyist for EADS donated $2,100 to the senator's presidential campaign. Ten days after that, Michelle Lammers, the "Chief of Staff" for EADS North America, gave $250 to the McCain campaign. It was her first political contribution ever. Less than a month later, the long-time head of EADS' government affairs program, Samuel Adcock, made a $2,100 donation to McCain. And eleven days later, Ralph Crosby, the head of EADS North America, donated $2,300 himself.

All told, as documented earlier by CQ PoliticalMoneyline, McCain received more than $15,000 from EADS and its subsidiary, Airbus North America. Not only was this the highest amount received by any federal candidate, but prior to 2006, not a single employee from EADS had ever contributed to McCain. Two Airbus employees did donate nearly $4,000 for his 2000 run at the White House.

"It has a bad appearance," said Phillip Finnegan, the director of corporate analysis at The Teal Group, a market analysis and consulting firm. "Clearly, companies contribute to members of congress who are sympathetic with there position. But it doesn't necessarily mean that it influences their position... McCain is a bit of a crusader. And when he has an issue like he had with Boeing, he pursues it. But [the contributions] definitely doesn't look good."

Finnegan was referring to McCain's 2003 investigation into Boeing's billing practices and lock on the tanker business. That investigation resulted in the company losing out on a $23 billion deal to lease tankers to the Air Force. On Friday, McCain defended both his current and past positions: "I never weighed in for or against anybody that competed for the contract. All I asked for was a fair process. And the facts are that I never showed any bias in any way against anybody -- except for the taxpayer."

But there are myriad signs that EADS curried up to the Arizona Senator. And it wasn't just the money. According to an Associated Press report published on Tuesday, the McCain campaign currently employs individuals who just last year were lobbying on behalf of EADS.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Two of the advisers gave up their lobbying work when they joined McCain's campaign," the AP wrote. "A third, former Texas Rep. Tom Loeffler, lobbied for the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co. while serving as McCain's national finance chairman."

One of those advisers, John Green, left Ogilvy Government Relations to become McCain's congressional Republican liaison shortly after the EADS deal was announced.

"They never lobbied him related to the issues, and the letters went out before they were contracted" by EADS, McCain campaign spokeswoman Jill Hazelbaker told the AP.

In the end, McCain may have received more than just campaign contributions in return for his support of the EADS contract. Parts for the refueling tankers are slated to be built in Mobile, Alabama. And just days after the deal was finalized, the state's governor, Bob Riley -- a long holdout in the presidential process -- finally offered his endorsement of McCain's candidacy.

"To say this is a great day for Alabama is a monumental understatement," Riley said of the contract. "This will go down in history as one of our greatest days."

Critics on Tuesday questioned whether Sen. John McCain catered to special interests when he aggressively threw his support behind a $35 billion Pentagon contract for a European plane maker. McCain, t...
Critics on Tuesday questioned whether Sen. John McCain catered to special interests when he aggressively threw his support behind a $35 billion Pentagon contract for a European plane maker. McCain, t...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
204
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
- loki I'm a Fan of loki 134 fans permalink
photo

As they handed over the large donation, they kept asking McCain " Now whose your Daddy?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 03/11/2008
- ibsteve2u I'm a Fan of ibsteve2u 146 fans permalink
photo

There is no guarantee Boeing would have done the work here, ya know...Boeing has jumped on the "we can make more money offshore" bandwagon, too:

http://www.cio.com/article/29096/Boeing_Versus_Airbus_Flight_Risk_Outsourcing_Challenges_

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 PM on 03/11/2008
- Tankan I'm a Fan of Tankan 3 fans permalink

There's a name for people who sell themselves John!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 03/11/2008
- loki I'm a Fan of loki 134 fans permalink
photo

Yeah, john, do you work for Emperor club too?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 PM on 03/11/2008

How much did EADS donate to Sen. McCain's foundation in Virginia? It's time for the main stream media to really look at Sen. McCain's campaign contributions. Upon doing so they will find a senator who is not such a maverick but a flawed candidate who is not above doing anything and saying anything for political aggrandizement.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 03/11/2008
- gonavy I'm a Fan of gonavy 7 fans permalink

look them up yourself. opensecrets.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 03/11/2008
- AnnArky I'm a Fan of AnnArky 35 fans permalink
photo

Here's some universal logic: If you elect McCain you'll get more of the same.
If you like war, a failing economy, high fuel prices, constitution-tramping politicians, torture, lying to the american people, being spyed on, fear as the primary motivating factor then, by all means, vote for John McCain. He's your man, he'll make sure things get worse . . . or better depending on your state of reality.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 PM on 03/11/2008
- VOTER I'm a Fan of VOTER 186 fans permalink
photo

John McCain gives Defense Dept. Contract to Foreign Company.

Feel safer now?

Well, we can expect more of the same from this Old Man.

Add, McTraitor is his long list of monikers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 03/11/2008
photo

Being that I am from Boeing country.....F'YOU MCAIN and all lyour little MINONS TOO! See you in NOVEMBER!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:44 PM on 03/11/2008
- gonavy I'm a Fan of gonavy 7 fans permalink

Oh, I forgot, ask the folks in Alabama if they mind that Northrup Grumman got the contract instead of Boeing...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 03/11/2008
- SubparDude I'm a Fan of SubparDude 9 fans permalink

:
GoAwayNavy.

You are a condescending and insulting boor.

Like Bush, you have that magic combination of Mean and Stoopid.

:

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:47 PM on 03/11/2008
- gonavy I'm a Fan of gonavy 7 fans permalink

Let me get this straight. Boeing had been screwing the government with bloated contracts, so McCain pushed for the other contractor to get the contract. Right?

I thought the other company was Northrup Grumman? Well, who elso did they donate to? These large companies spread the money around, hedging their bets. Hillary is on the Armed Services Committee, did she get a donation?

These corporations have to submit bids for these contracts, and if I'm not mistaken , they have to accept the smallest bid. Well, given the union contracts that have increased the cost of making anything in America, don't you think that the forgein contract was less expensive?

This dog just won't hunt, try again...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 03/11/2008

Why would any patriotic American allow our defense industry to be out-sourced? Americans should build our defense systems, not foreigners. That McSame would sell his vote for so little money, really, shows how desperate he is to be yet another neo-con destroyer of the middle class. That's what upsets people about this story.

That dog does and will hunt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 03/11/2008
- gonavy I'm a Fan of gonavy 7 fans permalink

The first day the story was out, I was upset also. The next day the details were released. Only the shell of the plane is made overseas. This contract provides US jobs, and as someone else stated on this thread, there is no guarantee that Boeing would have not outsourced the job had they got the contract.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 03/11/2008
photo

It is not the smallest bid. It is also more expensive because more of our tax dollars end up overseas. Ever hear of trade deficits?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 03/11/2008
photo

Ever hear of a no-bid contract? There are plenty of them--mostly Cheney or Republican-related companies--especially in Iraq.

Don't delude yourself that low-bid contracts go to the bidder offering the lowest price. A deal like this one is very complex because the proposal details from each bidder are different. A judgment call by the DOD--"best value to the govenment"--decides. Of course, these type of judgments are, shall we say, subject to influence. It has been this way since the Continental Congress went looking for muskets.

The personal donations are the smoke, look for soft donations to the RNC for the real money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 03/11/2008
- atomic I'm a Fan of atomic 68 fans permalink
photo

WHAT IS THE DEAL WITH McCAIN'S CHEEK ON THE LEFT SIDE? IS THAT A JAW BREAKER OR WHAT IN THERE?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:37 PM on 03/11/2008
- omaro I'm a Fan of omaro 3 fans permalink

This is a result of the surgery he had for skin cancer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 03/11/2008

I thought he was always nimbling on some uncrackable NUT.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 03/11/2008
- Mike169 I'm a Fan of Mike169 50 fans permalink
photo

But for having no hair he looks like the father on "American Dad"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 PM on 03/11/2008
- SubparDude I'm a Fan of SubparDude 9 fans permalink

:

You are going to give the dear fellow a Stroke.

And all he did was sell his votes, hire their lobbyists,

and Lie.

You gotta Problem Wit Dat?

:

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 PM on 03/11/2008
- HST I'm a Fan of HST 56 fans permalink
photo

apparently gonavy doesn't have a problem with it, but then again most neocons don't have a problem with government corruption so long as their side is the one doing it.

The same goes for: torture, sexual deviancy, trampling of states' rights, disregard of the constitutiion, lying (to the public, to congress and our troops) using national defense for political propaganda purposes and voting fraud. I'm sure I left some things out, but this is all I could think of at this moment.

Republicans = failed Americans

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 03/11/2008
- iPolitics I'm a Fan of iPolitics 33 fans permalink

As with Spitzer, Mr. morality lies and speaks with forked tongue

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 PM on 03/11/2008
- Janus I'm a Fan of Janus 22 fans permalink

Hmmmmmm. Term III of the Puppet's Administration is predictable already. Possibly, Chicken Hawk Cheney is at work lining up more munitions and oil investors and more nonbidding contractors to support McBomber, After all, the Military-Industrial-Compliant Media Complex is alive and well, aided and abetted by the redneck evangelical vote centered in Dupedom South, home of the Southern Strategy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 PM on 03/11/2008
- sammy333 I'm a Fan of sammy333 4 fans permalink

He must be hiding the cash in his left cheek.

He should just become officially what he is anyway, namely, a lobbyist for the war profiteers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 03/11/2008
- Dari I'm a Fan of Dari 15 fans permalink
photo

One of the things that most Americans respect most about John McCain is that he is a Vietnam War hero who endured 5 years in the “Hanoi Hilton”. Because he underwent torture while he was there, I for one, have lost respect for Senator McCain CHANGING his position on “Water boarding” as torture.

Last year, he voted FOR banning water boarding and just last month he voted AGAINST it, aligning himself with President Bush’s position.

I believe that changing one’s positions while in a political race is considered “Flip-Flopping” on the issue.

My BIGGEST issue and loss of respect for Senator McCain is concerning his “Doubletalk” ~ politics as usual, Washington insider positioning while ‘espousing’ himself as a Lobbyist Reformer.

This morning, MSNBC just ran a clip of McCain’s speech from Atlanta, Georgia calling Washington, D. C. “the city of Satan”.

The question that comment raises does McCain see and portray himself as an ‘Angel of Vengeance’ against ‘special interests’ while consorting and working with the ‘Dark Side’?

When the NY Times article, entitled, “For McCain, Self-Confidence on Ethics Poses Its Own Risk” broke: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21mccain.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=mccain+the+long+run&st=nyt&oref=slogin

Senator McCain asked and answered reporters questions ONLY hours after the story broke and has since refused to answer questions concerning this.

As the Washington Post has published, in follow up stories, one of which was a PDF file of the deposition from McCain in 2002 http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/pdf/mccain_deposition_20080222.pdf?sid=ST2008022203188
which contradicts his statements and rebuttal of the NY Times story. In that PDF, he admits that on page 61 (10) “I am tainted, it has tainted every officeholder that ever accepts anything from any group or individual that has an interest in Washington.”

The question that remains is this:

Does John McCain believe that he is held to a different standard when it comes to allowing Lobbyists to run both his Senate office and his campaign?

Does he believe that we, the voters, will let this slide because he says they are “honest”?

And where does that ‘honesty’ presently stand?

In an AP article, this morning, http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iiW1J4iWjV71TzWJ0uAmi9yL-N0AD8VB329G0
The Headline reads: “McCain Advisors Lobbied for Airbus”.

A portion of which follows below:
WASHINGTON (AP) — Top current advisers to Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign last year lobbied for a European plane maker that beat Boeing to a $35 billion Air Force tanker contract, taking sides in a bidding fight that McCain has tried to referee for more than five years.
… McCain, the Republican presidential nominee in waiting, has been a key figure in the Pentagon's yearslong attempt to complete a deal on the tanker. McCain helped block an earlier tanker contract with Boeing and prodded the Pentagon in 2006 to develop bidding procedures that did not exclude Airbus.
EADS retained Ogilvy Government Relations and The Loeffler Group to lobby for the tanker deal last year, months after McCain sent two letters urging the Defense Department to make sure the bidding proposals guaranteed competition.
"They never lobbied him related to the issues, and the letters went out before they were contracted" by EADS, McCain campaign spokeswoman Jill Hazelbaker said Monday.
According to lobbying records filed with the Senate, Loeffler Group lobbyists on the project included Loeffler and Susan Nelson, who left the firm and is now the campaign's finance director. Ogilvy lobbyist John Green, who was assigned the EADS work, recently took a leave of absence to volunteer for McCain as the campaign's congressional liaison.
"The aesthetics are not good, especially since he is an advocate of reform and transparency," said Richard Aboulafia, an analyst with the aerospace consulting firm Teal Group. "Boeing advocates are going to use this as ammunition."

This is exactly what both the NY Times and the Washington Post reported on (see PDF link above) that WHILE Senator McCain chaired the powerful Commerce Committee, he also wrote letters to the FCC whose budget he controlled and in one instance, threatened the FCC with a shake up, if they didn’t respond to the issue by December 14th. Lobbyist, Vicki Iseman, was the lobbyist representing both Paxson and now Univision, the 2 companies that Senator McCain wrote letters on behalf of.

These ongoing Lobbyist relationships that Senator McCain has; while his public persona is that of a Lobbyist Reformer, reeks of hypocrisy and should have every voter asking themselves:

Does Senator McCain hold one standard of ethics and judgment for HIMSELF and demand a completely DIFFERENT standard for everyone else?

If elected, will John McCain govern at the EXPENSE of the people
OR
With the CONSENT of the people
AND
exactly who are the ‘people’ that John McCain REALLY represents regardless of what he tells us to the contrary?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:24 PM on 03/11/2008
- wmfor I'm a Fan of wmfor 21 fans permalink
photo

"One of the things that most Americans respect most about John McCain is that he is a Vietnam War hero who endured 5 years in the "Hanoi Hilton". Because he underwent torture while he was there"

Please get your wording right. McCain was a "detainee" in Hanoi, where he experienced "enhanced interrogation techniques." It's like a fraternity hazing, dontcha know.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 03/11/2008
- Dari I'm a Fan of Dari 15 fans permalink
photo

Good one, thanks for assisting me to realign my comments with the current Political speak.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 PM on 03/11/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect