Nader 08.

"The fact is she did not sit in on national security meetings. She did not have a security clearance. She did not attend meetings in the situation room. She conducted no negotiations. She did not manage any part of the national security bureaucracy. She did not have her own national security staff. "

The last I checked, Obama wasn't there either, but he's claiming HE'S ready. This goes both ways; Clinton can't say he's not qualified, yet want him for VP, and HE can't claim she has no experience and not ready, because NEITHER DOES HE.

The one thing that bothers me about Obama is that while Hillary was traveling around the world, he was off praying in that ridiculous cult of a church he goes to wasting his time praying to an imaginary friend. THAT should scare the hell out of everyone. Where are the great old atheist politicians such as Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln when you need them? We need a new period of Enlightenment. When are we going to get to the point when believing in a sky-god means you're CRAZY and not leadership material? UGH. Pathetic.

How can McCain even pretend that he is qualified to lead the country ? Has he ever been married to a president ? All the way with Billary. Buy one, get one free !!!!!!!!!

Okay, I'll say it. There are many democrats that have nostalgia for the Clinton years, mainly because they were economically good. But integrity? Never a claim or a strong point of the Clintons. "Who cares if he got a BJ?" was the defense. I agree, but lying to the American public directly, and under oath, I do care about.

You can take a walk down the 8 years of Clinton Presidency, to recall the lies, distortions, scandals, lives cut short, snatching credit from others, and more at this CNN website. The people who toiled and made things happen in the Mid-East, Ireland, Eastern Europe, all forgotten. We never hear Senator Clinton acknowledge anyone else as having mattered in those accomplishment that she achieved single handedly. She couldn't even write her own book (Living History), so much experience. Really? Do we want another 4 years of that stuff?

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/clinton/timelines/timelines.html

Just browse a page or two - promise it'll give you the jitters, as you recall one bad judgment after another.

Its odd that Mr. Craig feels that it is necessary for him to tell us that Hillary has been misleading us. Anybody with a normal set of eyes and ears and half a working brain already knows that. It all begins with "my 35 years of experience." The only value his article has is that it gives confirmation of what we already know from a Clinton insider. For that, much appreciation.

Don't let this election become nerve wrecking redundant. Hillary is blocking the first real candidate's place in life. This makes Nelson Mandela look lightweight. She knows if Obama does make it; her chances are null and void. IF McBush makes it; then you have really broken down the american people to the point they will take anyone, even Nader. . Now if someone has a better prediction., deals are made daily. Where are the Clintons tax returns and contributions? No the media is still stuck on "words and race." Obama's teachers, Obama ministers, Obama's nurses. Bill Bradley warned us. Remember this when it is too late. Do you think he may want to put her away? Well look at Spitzer. Do you think that they can go back to normal now (whatever normal is)? Something is seriously wrong from the beginning. I know. It happened within my family.

Of course Hillary is "misleading" the American people. What I want to know is what exactly is this "Commander-In-Cheif" test? Is this something she taught in her law classes? Where exactly is this test? I have to admit she certainly hasn't passed the "Management-In-Cheif" test; just look at her campaign strategy. Now she must resort to the Republican play book to try to win votes. If Bill was worried about his "legacy" he really shouldn't because it has been destroyed more since Hillary has determined she should be coronated than Monica ever could have dreamed.

Hillary is "misleading the American Public"

Well....DUH

Duh ... of course she's been misleading .... look closely at the ladies life and record.

To the informed, Is this really news?

Neocon you happy about our 12 billion of our tax dollars a month being spent in Iraq?...guess who's getting rich?.

sure, we'll believe an Obama supporter criticising Senator Clinton--only huff post continue their cheap shots!!!

Greg Craig has been personal friends of the Clintons since their Yale Law School days and he was the lawyer who defended Clinton during his White House many trials. So you know he must have very serious reservations about the possibility of Hillary becoming president to write such a response to Hillary's "experience" claims. He throughly refutes her outlandish claims, as have other participants in these occasions she claims to have directly influenced. Craig knows the Clintons, he lived through the first Clinton presidency, and he clearly does not want to inflict another one on the nation. We should heed him.

mislead is a generous description

Many of us who have found Hillary's campaign to be misleading or full of blantant lies, rascism and hatred, have left her and are now supporting Obama. She has no one but herself, Bill and her 'supporters (Ferraro et al) for her fall from the #1 spot.