Bill\'s Ex-Counsel: Hillary Is

Bill's Ex-Counsel: Hillary Is "Misleading The American Public"

Huffington Post   |   March 14, 2008 12:30 PM


digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Greg Craig, former counsel to Bill Clinton and now Obama supporter, sat down for an interview with National Journal. His comments reflected more strongly a memo he had penned last week, suggesting that Hillary's claims of experience were overblown. An excerpt from the interview:

Q: But was that experience, do you think, that is -- having a lot of influence with advisers, giving private advice to her husband -- was that experience that has helped prepare her to be commander in chief?


Craig: Oh, I don't doubt that. The point that I am making is that her claims of the nature of that experience are overstated. The fact is she did not sit in on national security meetings. She did not have a security clearance. She did not attend meetings in the situation room. She conducted no negotiations. She did not manage any part of the national security bureaucracy. She did not have her own national security staff. That's the fact. Now the experience that she did have -- watching and sometimes sitting in the room where discussions were going on and also meeting heads of state and foreign ministers -- that is good experience, and it's invaluable to understanding how the world works when it comes to international organizations as well as international negotiations.

Read the whole interview here.

The Clinton camp responded quickly, noting a contradiction between this statement and other statements. Only last week Craig claimed:

When your entire campaign is based upon a claim of experience, it is important that you have evidence to support that claim. Hillary Clinton's argument that she has passed "the Commander- in-Chief test" is simply not supported by her record.

The comments by Craig come at a time when the Clinton camp is facing increasing scrutiny over the former First Lady's record.

The Boston Globe reported this morning that Sen. Clinton had less to do with the passage of the SCHIP program in the early 90s, and cites Republican Orrin Hatch who, with Sen. Ted Kennedy, helped spear the legislation:

"The White House wasn't for it. We really roughed them up" in trying to get it approved over the Clinton administration's objections, Hatch said in an interview. "She may have done some advocacy [privately] over at the White House, but I'm not aware of it."


"I do like her," Hatch said of Hillary Clinton. "We all care about children. But does she deserve credit for SCHIP? No - Teddy does, but she doesn't."


 
Comments
699
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (18 pages total)
- Mollye I'm a Fan of Mollye 9 fans permalink

Lawyers should not be allowed to make any comments about their former clients or families. Can his license to practice be suspended? I wouldn't hire the man.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 PM on 03/14/2008
- yannaview I'm a Fan of yannaview 8 fans permalink

Greg Craig..former Bill Clinton counsel...Has a big headline..stating that Hillary is lying to the American Public.
Now Mr. Craig is working with the barack Obama 's campaign...he said among other things .explaining his statement........

"......Now the experience that she did have -- watching and sometimes sitting in the room where discussions were going on and also meeting heads of state and foreign ministers -- that is good experience, and it's invaluable to understanding how the world works when it comes to international organizations as well as international negotiatio­ns........­..

Thank you Craig..that's all we need to know........Mr. Obama tried to deny she has this threshold of experience, he could only wish he had a whiff off. Experience for President.­......Solu­tions for President..equals ....Hillary for President

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 PM on 03/14/2008
- Tyrione I'm a Fan of Tyrione 36 fans permalink
photo

How come Ariana hasn't been trotted out on MSNBC lately?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:39 PM on 03/14/2008
- eliandbo I'm a Fan of eliandbo 2 fans permalink

If she advised Bill to go with those trade deals that put millions of hard working middle class workers out of good paying factory jobs, we don't need any more of her experience.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 PM on 03/14/2008
- blastocyst I'm a Fan of blastocyst 27 fans permalink

Lack of oxygen thanks to Olbermann's immense ego.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:08 PM on 03/14/2008
- eliandbo I'm a Fan of eliandbo 2 fans permalink

If she advised Bill to go with those trade deals that put millions of hard working middle class workers out of good paying factory jobs, then we don't need any more of her experience.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:10 PM on 03/14/2008

Her harness has been misplaced!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 PM on 03/14/2008
- janvoght I'm a Fan of janvoght 8 fans permalink
photo

my understanding is that she has a book opening soon...maybe she'll be seen for that promotion. she always adds to the clairity of what ever the issue is at hand.

obama'08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:39 PM on 03/14/2008

http://dear-barack.blogspot.com/2008/03/obamas-mom-propaganda.html

Obama uses white mother, Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro, to make himself more palatable to white Pennsylvania voters

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 03/14/2008

This is disgusting stuff. We have huge headlines claiming Hillary is misleading the public and when you read the actual article it becomes clear that it's total BS ... all about nothing. Yet, Obama headlines rave about his "church and faith." Barf! I do NOT want to hear about faith in a candidate. That should be the Republican's stronghold ... you know, the "I don't believe in evolution" crowd. I want to know that a candidate will LEAVE HIS FAITH AT THE DOOR when he's president and enter the office with FACTS, KNOWLEDGE, COMPASSION, and LOGIC. The more Obama screams about his religion, the less I feel he's what we need as a leader.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:24 PM on 03/14/2008
- ched I'm a Fan of ched 9 fans permalink
photo

Honestly, to have your own lawyer go to work for the other guy doesn't speak very well about team Clinton. One could write it off as an exception if there weren't so many other Clintonistas either working for Obama, or telling sad tales of dysfunction after leaving their employ.
Staffers having to rack up huge legal bills because the boss got a blow job then lied about it probably doesn't do much to inspire loyalty, either.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 03/14/2008
photo

I normally wouldn't post same comment twice. Felt this one was important, though.

Polarization

Fifteen years ago this week I was a wanna-be hippie college kid of 22 on the tail end of my Senior year. Bill Clinton had recently been elected to the White House, Soundgarden and NIN released two groundbreaking discs packed full of aggression, and I was preparing for yet another spring tour with the Dead (God, I miss college). I had no worries, and life was college cliché, but good.

As I mocked studious preparing for a Semantics test trying to impress some nubile co-eds, my dad was being shot in the back three times by a cowardly assassin who was hiding in a bush waiting for pop to arrive at work.

March 10, 1993 was the day polarization tapped me on the shoulder, slapped me in the face, and kicked me in the nuts causing my feet to walk on sky and my head to reel on the ground. Upside down.

Losing a parent is horrible. Losing one to a terrorist is doubly so. Losing one to a domestic, home-grown terrorist is exponentially so. Being told by religious leaders that the exponentially tragic loss of a parent was ordained by god, sanctioned by many, and simply justified exponentiated the exponential.

I tried to be together, spoke for my remaining family, and dedicated two years of my life fighting for abortion rights. I joined in the polarization, became polarization’s best friend, and I think I might have slept with polarization.

While I worked to help pass legislation making it safer for doctors who perform abortions and women who need them, I had to work closely with Pro-choice groups (NAF, NARAL, Feminist Majority, NCAP, et al) and work antagonistically against terrorist Anit-Life fascists. When it was all over, and after 10 plus years of reflection. I had a couple of epiphanies:

1) Pro-choice organizations jockeyed to their detriment over who was MORE pro-choice, who was MORE pro-provider, who earned more MONEY, and who should get MORE exposure;

2) Anit-Life groups did not give a shit about anything noted in #1 and were simply focused on their tragic goal.

Why the history? Why does my brief recount above matter? What the fuck, right?

Presently, Obama and HRC are the Pro-Choice organizations. They are, for the most part, on the right side of the issues. I think there are redeemable qualities about each person though I ardently support Obama over HRC (see prior posts for some reasons). As of this moment, they are tragically re-enacting every frustratingly banal gyration I witnessed the Pro-choice groups engage in 15 years ago. Meanwhile, Mccain is taking the cake-walk express all the way to the White House.

Obama and Clinton are in the hands of Mr. Polarization, and they are becoming so successful in wedge politics (HRC more than Obama) that most HRC supports now will not accept him and most Obama supporters will not accept her. While the Republicans’ tunnel vision leads them to victory, our co-dependent relationship with Polarization makes it increasingly impossible that a Dem will win in November.

We need, urgently and ardently, to reject Polarization and drop him like the coyote ugly one night stand he/she is. It is time to get behind a candidate and start taking down Mccain.

Superdelegates of the Edwards, Gore, Richardson, Pelosi, and Biden ilk must lay aside any potential reward they might get from either candidate and endorse the right candidate now, today. People of PA, please lay aside gender and racial identities (I know it will be hard) and hand a victory to the best candidate now. Let us end this Beckettian tragicomedy now before our pride becomes our tragic flaw and we end up with four more years of Bush that our country will not survive.

I’m trying not to be polarizing myself with this final thought, but I’m sure many people will read it thusly. Based on all the facts we surround ourselves with at this point in the primaries, Obama is the right choice. I’ll not recount all the reasons why I feel this way because I think they are obvious. Supers, please show some spine and endorse Obama now. PA residents, please do not buy into the propaganda from the other side and vote for Obama now. Let us come together behind the one who can truly lead us forward, and let us be polarization free on the morning after.




    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 PM on 03/14/2008
- lucylou I'm a Fan of lucylou 4 fans permalink
photo

Ahhhh...I was in Italy during the G8 and every other official visit here: Hillary's schedule? The Sistine Chapel, the Uffizi Galleries in Florence, tea with the other first wives...Yeah right. And my mother could run General Motors by osmosis.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:17 PM on 03/14/2008
- StillAmused I'm a Fan of StillAmused 256 fans permalink



Sounds about right... Gregg is gathering twigs, string and feathers to make a new nest for himself in an Obama administration, and the obsequious Bush apologist, war-enabler and sappy songwriter, Hatch... well, what more reliable source for an anti-Clinton HuffPo headline than a lockstep Republican?

Anyone else in the waiting room...?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 03/14/2008
- ched I'm a Fan of ched 9 fans permalink
photo

"The Clinton camp responded quickly, noting a contradiction between this statement and other statements. Only last week Craig claimed:

When your entire campaign is based upon a claim of experience, it is important that you have evidence to support that claim. Hillary Clinton's argument that she has passed "the Commander- in-Chief test" is simply not supported by her record."

How does the statement conflict at all with the interview? They are of a piece.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:14 PM on 03/14/2008
- kiga I'm a Fan of kiga permalink

sounds like Senator Obama is getting desperate by have Mr. sellout, Cregg to dig into his memory of years ago. It is clear that with mostly primaries ahead of us (with only one caucus ahead, which means that Obama people can't steal as they did in TX and other states), his campaign is getting desperate in bringing Senator Clinton down. We all know Senator Obama has no chance in Nov, since he already has given enough fuel to Republican 527 groups to destroy the his candidacy; lack of experience, his dealing with Tony Rezko (documented on the web), Michelle Obama being "proud of this country for the fist time in her adult life" and much more. The truth is that Senator Obama is not electable at this point and time, perhaps if he stays in the Senate and starts voting on issues, instead of "present," he might of a leg to stand on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 03/14/2008

Another Obama supporter slamming Senator Clinton? How odd! LOL
He must be telling the truth. Or maybe he just wants his 15 minutes.
Or a cabinet slot! Me Me Me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 03/14/2008

As I have written about in my books, I first joined Trinity United Church of Christ nearly twenty years ago. I knew Rev. Wright as someone who served this nation with honor as a United States Marine, as a respected biblical scholar, and as someone who taught or lectured at seminaries across the country, from Union Theological Seminary to the University of Chicago. He also led a diverse congregation that was and still is a pillar of the South Side and the entire city of Chicago. It's a congregation that does not merely preach social justice but acts it out each day, through ministries ranging from housing the homeless to reaching out to those with HIV/AIDS.

Most importantly, Rev. Wright preached the gospel of Jesus, a gospel on which I base my life. In other words, he has never been my political advisor; he's been my pastor. And the sermons I heard him preach always related to our obligation to love God and one another, to work on behalf of the poor, and to seek justice at every turn.

OK . So let it get right. 20 years you have known the preacher and had enough times to go listen to him speak when you went to the church. And you are claiming that you never got to listen to those bad comments from your preacher. How can one take your word on this ? It simply does not make any sense to me. You say that he has not been your political advisor but a pastor. If you are so good at leadership and knowing right from wrong then how come you failed to get the feel of your pastor ( his profile and teachings ) long ago ? You blame Hillary for authorizing the Iraq war - you attribute it to her lack of leadership skills. On the other hand here you have been going to a church for 20 years and you are saying that you never listened to your preachers wrong sermons. Give me a break. It must be a fairy tale.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 03/14/2008

I really think it is time that every Tom, Dick and Harry who ever had any association with these candidates to stop crawling out of the woodwork and cashing in on their 15 minutes of fame.

If we really want to know about them, let's hear from their dry cleaners, car washers, dog walkers, local coffee shop baristas, family doctors, cleaning ladies or recent waiters .... Are they polite? Do they tip well? Do they pay their bills on time? Do they even know their names? Are they respectful? Are they loyal? Do they complain a lot? Or compliment for good service?

The above questions are about 1 million times more relevant than any disgruntled ex-associate who may have any number of reasons to lash out at somone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 03/14/2008
- Svenson I'm a Fan of Svenson 3 fans permalink

About Obama's explantion:


Yes Obama, if you believe in IRev. Wright as your spiritual leader for 20 years, you must have good reasons to do so. Who are we to question your presidential and good judgement.

Whatever reasons you have, you do not have to explain to us because we trust you whole heartedly without question.

Yes we need you and your Rev Wright to make our country right and great again.

God Willing, we shall have our day.

And when you are president, God willing, you shall pay restitution and compensation to all decendents of the slaves and make thigns right.

In Shah Allah

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 03/14/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (18 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect