Britney Spears Gets Hospital Workers Fired

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Britney Spears Gets Hospital Workers Fired stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

March 15, 2008 07:20 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Singer Britney Spears poses on the press line at the Scandinavian Style Mansion party in Los Angeles in this Dec. 1, 2007 file photo. (AP Photo/Dan Steinberg, file)

LOS ANGELES — UCLA Medical Center will fire some employees and discipline others for snooping at the confidential medical records of Britney Spears, who was hospitalized in its psychiatric ward, a hospital official told The Associated Press.

Jeri Simpson, the hospital's director of human resources who was involved in the investigations of the confidentiality breach, confirmed the action but could not say how many employees were affected. The hospital did not say when the snooping took place or which of Spears records were looked at.

The Los Angeles Times reported on its Web site Friday that the breaches occurred during Spears most recent hospital stay. While the disciplined employees were unable to access her psychiatric records, they did look at non-psychiatric records from her previous visits to the medical center, the Times reported.

The newspaper said more than 13 employees, none of whom are doctors, would be fired. Twelve others, including several doctors, will be disciplined otherwise for looking at her computerized records, it reported.

There is no evidence that any employee leaked or sold the information about Spears, who is a tabloid favorite, according to the Times. Still, such snooping is a violation of state and federal medical privacy laws and the state Department of Public Health had opened an investigation of the hospital, the newspaper reported.

This is not the first time the hospital has had to reprimand employees for looking at Spears' records. Several workers were fired after they were caught snooping after Spears gave birth to her first son, Sean Preston, in September 2005.

"It's not only surprising, it's very frustrating and it's very disappointing," Simpson told the newspaper, adding that she felt "horrible" that it happened again.

Spears was admitted to the hospital twice in January under a state law allowing patients to be held against their will for up to 72 hours for evaluation if they are deemed a danger to themselves or others. On her second trip to the medical center, Spears stayed for nearly a week.

Leading up to the hospitalizations, Spears had been behaving bizarrely. She shaved her head, was seen in public without underwear, ran over a celebrity photographer's foot and attacked a vehicle with an umbrella.

After her Feb. 6 release, a judge placed Spears and her estate under a temporary conservatorship. Conservatorships are granted for people deemed unable to take care of themselves or their affairs.

Spears has since had very limited contact with her toddler sons who are under the sole physical and legal custody of her ex-husband Kevin Federline.

LOS ANGELES — UCLA Medical Center will fire some employees and discipline others for snooping at the confidential medical records of Britney Spears, who was hospitalized in its psychiatric ward,...
LOS ANGELES — UCLA Medical Center will fire some employees and discipline others for snooping at the confidential medical records of Britney Spears, who was hospitalized in its psychiatric ward,...
Filed by Katherine Thomson  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
71
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

I wonder if these records are more interesting than those of the audio nature that the general public has been subjected to for the last ten years.

Just a thought.

db

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 03/16/2008
- angel66 I'm a Fan of angel66 2 fans permalink

The HuffPo really wants to compete with the Enquirer?

What a bad headline. And factually wrong.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 03/16/2008
photo

I am not defending Britney here, but didn't the "workers" get themselves fired? I mean really now. Is nothing sacred anymore?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 03/16/2008

WHY WHY WHY would hospital workers do that ... when they can read her medical history in the checkout lane at the grocery store?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 AM on 03/16/2008
photo

They sold them you idiot, headlines for the National Enquirer. Its about time they leave her alone. Didn't you hear that her manager solder her out, had her on medications, taking over her financial books. Have you noticied that when the story came out in her way, they hushed it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 03/17/2008
- pinkyboo I'm a Fan of pinkyboo 21 fans permalink

LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 03/17/2008

What is this the National Enquirer? Who wrote the headline? Fire them!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 AM on 03/16/2008

I agree with you. When I first read the headline of course I thought of something illicit or vengeful that Britney had done. Not that these workers violated a state and federal law, HIPPA. Shame on you HuffPO. This is why the media has become so villified. I didn't think that a news blog would stoop to the same shenanigans of tabloid sleaze and network news.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 03/16/2008
photo

Invasion of Spears Privacy Gets Hospital Workers Fired

Wow, I barely have a 12th grade education and I managed to write a headline that was both accurate and invites readers to learn more.

Disappointed in you Huff Po.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 AM on 03/16/2008
- lenzorizzo I'm a Fan of lenzorizzo 6 fans permalink

I'm just glad that the writer used the word "affect" instead of "impact." Literacy is not quite dead yet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 AM on 03/16/2008
photo

They got themselves fired by violating Federal HIPAA laws. That is a stupid headline.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 PM on 03/15/2008

Amen, brother. The headline is a disgrace. Completely inaccurate and demeaning to Ms. Spears. The workers got themselves fired by violating laws which are very well known in the medical community. She had nothing to do with it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:38 AM on 03/16/2008

Exactly!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 PM on 03/17/2008

Who in the world writes the headlines for articles here? THAT person should also be fired!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 PM on 03/15/2008
- RoseMerry I'm a Fan of RoseMerry 18 fans permalink

I agreed! These people needed to be fired. Privacy is a right and everyone is entitled. It was not Ms. Spears fault they were so stupid and immoral.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 PM on 03/15/2008
- sklfcats I'm a Fan of sklfcats 4 fans permalink

Britney, dry up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 PM on 03/15/2008
- tbone99 I'm a Fan of tbone99 93 fans permalink

Maintaining confidentiality is part of the job description of health care workers. A worker has no business ging into anyone's records but the pts they are treating.T­hey deserved to be fired if they can't comprehend the most fundamental rules. Britney Spears deserves to have her privacy respected as does any other person.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 PM on 03/15/2008
- Earl I'm a Fan of Earl 93 fans permalink
photo

Where is the personal responsibility? Didn't they get themselves fired?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 PM on 03/15/2008
- peachfuzz I'm a Fan of peachfuzz 12 fans permalink
photo

YES, they did.

Terrible headline.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 PM on 03/16/2008
- beekeeper I'm a Fan of beekeeper 24 fans permalink
photo

I can tell you that Britney had nothing to do with BUT THE law, it is against the law to snoop at anybodies chart or records unless you have a reason to be there. HIPPA laws... not only that, it just is not really ethical. They should have been fired. The hospital could be heavily fined for those employees.­....

Why would huffpo make up this BS headline?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 PM on 03/15/2008
photo

even if she had lifted a finger to get them removed she'd have been perfectly right to do it and would have been protecting others.

it's not just that the headline writers here are off factually, deeper they seem to lack any real democratic or liberal values that reflect a respect for the individual or compassion.

carry on........­...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 PM on 03/15/2008
- unitron I'm a Fan of unitron 19 fans permalink

Good for her. Nobody deserves having their private medical records "voyeured".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 PM on 03/15/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect