Britney Spears Gets Hospital Workers Fired

LOS ANGELES — UCLA Medical Center will fire some employees and discipline others for snooping at the confidential medical records of Britney Spears, who was hospitalized in its psychiatric ward, a hospital official told The Associated Press.

Jeri Simpson, the hospital's director of human resources who was involved in the investigations of the confidentiality breach, confirmed the action but could not say how many employees were affected. The hospital did not say when the snooping took place or which of Spears records were looked at.

The Los Angeles Times reported on its Web site Friday that the breaches occurred during Spears most recent hospital stay. While the disciplined employees were unable to access her psychiatric records, they did look at non-psychiatric records from her previous visits to the medical center, the Times reported.

The newspaper said more than 13 employees, none of whom are doctors, would be fired. Twelve others, including several doctors, will be disciplined otherwise for looking at her computerized records, it reported.

There is no evidence that any employee leaked or sold the information about Spears, who is a tabloid favorite, according to the Times. Still, such snooping is a violation of state and federal medical privacy laws and the state Department of Public Health had opened an investigation of the hospital, the newspaper reported.

This is not the first time the hospital has had to reprimand employees for looking at Spears' records. Several workers were fired after they were caught snooping after Spears gave birth to her first son, Sean Preston, in September 2005.

"It's not only surprising, it's very frustrating and it's very disappointing," Simpson told the newspaper, adding that she felt "horrible" that it happened again.

Spears was admitted to the hospital twice in January under a state law allowing patients to be held against their will for up to 72 hours for evaluation if they are deemed a danger to themselves or others. On her second trip to the medical center, Spears stayed for nearly a week.

Leading up to the hospitalizations, Spears had been behaving bizarrely. She shaved her head, was seen in public without underwear, ran over a celebrity photographer's foot and attacked a vehicle with an umbrella.

After her Feb. 6 release, a judge placed Spears and her estate under a temporary conservatorship. Conservatorships are granted for people deemed unable to take care of themselves or their affairs.

Spears has since had very limited contact with her toddler sons who are under the sole physical and legal custody of her ex-husband Kevin Federline.

Comments

[GoBamaGo]

Britney is so loca but fun

[MzTexas]

Uh, they got themselves fired . . . what STUPID people. Spears had nothing to do with their firing. They violated HIPAA.

[movin2montana]

Thanks for stating that. I thought the headline was misleading and irresponsible. When a high profile person is staying in a hospital, the hospital should monitor who accesses the records to ensure it is only those involved in the direct care. The workers did violate HIPAA and the response by the hospital is appropriate.

[Sciguy]

How can one violate HIPAA? Have you ever signed one of the HIPAA forms? Under HIPAA, nobody can have access to your medical records... except for everybody and his dog, provided that they claim that it's related to "terrorism" or that they have need to know due to "national security." It doesn't have to really BE related to terrorism or national security - they just have to CLAIM it is.

If you're relying on HIPAA to keep your medical records confidential, you might as well just publish them online.

[theistus]

yah, misleading headline at best, outright falsehood, and possible defamation at worst.

[grisgris]

The headline was deceptive. (Big surprise.) Spears had NOTHING to do with getting the employees fired. They knew better. They knew the privacy laws forbid what they did. They deserve to be fired.

[pfurey]

I have the same thought, just exactly how is brit responsible for these worker choose unethical behavior??

[aznurse]

Anyone working in the medical field should be aware of HIPPA codes and what violations are.
It seems they would have to be especially careful with "celebraties" . They were aware that they could be fired for even looking at a pts info that wasn't under there direct care.

[riyadhnurse]

The staff involved at UCLA violated medical ethics standards,and HIPPA codes. Just because you work at a hospital,does not give medical employees license to prowl medical records at will. Usually a employee working on a special medical unit like Pediatrics,would be violating medical ethics by browsing record's of patients in the ICU. Shameful,but it happens. These people got themselves fired,and could face disciplinary measures by the State Board's who issued their license's. If medical personel are not directly involved in that pt's care,they are not allowed acess.The Department managers & supervisors should always guard against such activities.

[aznurse]

I meant HIPAA