The lying "rat" speaks!

Tell us something we don't know, Dave.

Reading Axelrod's statements reminds me of the pot and the kettle and a certain color that might be misunderstood as racist...

We are talking about an election. There can only be one candidate and since none of the two wants to settle for VP, they have to fight it out. You may get good marks on gentlemanship, if you fight clean, but that will not win the nomination. I expect them to fight for that prize. The Republicans will not be gentle, so you better be a good fighter to win this election.

Axelrod claiming that "You get the feeling they are literally trying to do anything to win this nomination." this suggests that Obama would not do anything to win. Do you really believe that? Don't you think that Obama would fight for the Florida delegates, if he won that state? Don't you think that Obama would argue that the big states matter, if he had won them, but was behind in the delegate count?

As an Obama supporter, Boringat, your statement is not acceptable. It is sexist, and the Obama campaign is about trying to get past the divisions of the past. Gender is as much a part of that as is race or disability, sexuality.

It's important to think hard before you write something like that. If you want to point out similarities between Thatcher and Clinton be my guest but stick to the issues, not ad hominen attacks.

That's why they call her Slippery Hillary.

Hillary Clinton is appalling. I have never heard of a Democratic primary candidate who said that the Republican is more qualified that her Democratic opponent. It is absolutely revolting.

No one wants to vote for Monica Lewinsky's husband. No one wants to hear Hillary make her repetitious, dishonest denials of voting for the war in Iraq. People will NOT vote for her, because they do not like her.

Obama has Dems fired up as never before. Democratic primary turnout is _double_ that of Republicans, even in so-called "Red States" such as Texas and Virginia. Having a contested primary makes people perceive that their participation counts, and therefore they participate. This is how Democrats win.

I hate to harp on this, but what in world happened to Obama's request that the race stop the dirty tactics? None of this stuff is about the issues, it's PERSONAL, and Obama took it there!!!!

Mark Penn is such a jackass and a liar. Yeah, Mark, you and the Clintons sure have run a positive campaign alright. Isn't it convenient that these old Wright clips were released just in time to distract everyone from Geraldine Ferraro's numerous recent racist tirades?

Axelrod is absolutely right. Since the devastating loss in Iowa, the knee jerk reaction on the part of the Clintons, was to "go negtative" Wow, aint; that just so commendable? Hillary said it was the fun part, and Bill was proud to announce to the world that ""she" was going to go negative". She won,NH through tears and through pity and by lies. She won, NH by a small amount and thought...., heh, going negative works! :Let's do m,ore smears and lies just like Bush! Let;s do more obfuscating and secrecy and double talk and stretching of the truth like Bush! Let's play dirty because there is no fun in playing honest or in decency, or in any loyalty to the party she has practically destroyed, in this Clinton team

She has stopped her cackling but not her lies or the fun part. Funny that she cackled when she thought she had the thing sewed up tight. lOL What an act, eh

The people have the right to see her tax return. The people she expects to vote for her have the obligation to know about her records when first lady, especially since she has touted her "experience" and stretched the truth about her participation in foreign affairs. Let's see that record Hillary and maybe we can decide whether or not you have all that experience, or whether or not you were there just watching, as Laura Bush does. The fun part on her and Bill's part is to tell those voters screw you and we are having fun doing it.

Why is she keeping all of this secret? If she has nothing to hide, why then is she hiding it?

David Axelrod is interested in building a name for himself, isn't he? The tactic is, throw the accusation on the other team and hope it sticks. If they try to call you out on your tactics, it can then be categorized as "sour grapes". I know people are sitting there watching this and honestly not seeing the dirty politics that Obama's camp is using, but the most distressing of the facts is that our economy is imploding in front of our eyes, this war is scheduled now to continue for another 100 years, healthcare is a myth for a huge percentage of the people of this once powerful and financially wealthy country, and David Axelrod is pretending to run a clean, transparent campaign for Obama.

Could the Obama camp please talk to the real issues of this country, tell us what you are going to change, and how you're going to do it. We can ferret out the ethics of both camps without these screaming headlines, but only you can tell us why you are truly the right person to fix all that needs focused attention in this country.

Obama, what is in store for us? Are you beholding to anyone who is more interested in their personal agenda than the fate of this country? You talk to us about you; we can ask our questions of the Clinton camp without you taking yourself off message.

Why does Barack have to answer these questions? But Hillary gets a walk. Because why? The clintonista's just keep plowing fear, uncertainty, and doubt hoping to find something like they might have in a closet. Where's all her funding coming from? Who are these funders to tell my party what to do?

I am perturbed. Clinton equals old established Democratic Machine. They set up the rules down here in Texas. Now Hill wants to sue her party, her rules, and her friends for fraud. Wow! Sounds a bit like manipulation.

I'm so very disappointed that the media are slow and somewhat reluctant to react to the Clintons disdain for transparency. We all suspect a. that their tax returns will open Pandora's box b. we also know that the next release of their campaign accounts (April?) is likely to contain quite a few surprises too.

Hillary has proved she's just as nasty as Bush, who needs more of that!

Obama is against a redo in Michigan. He's willing to disenfranchise those voters. . Obama will do anything to get elected.

It should be asked whether there would be any calls for a Florida or Michigan "do-over" if the race weren't so close. I find the arguments for do-overs disingenuous in the extreme.