Steven Granger of Labranche & Co. LLC directs trading on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Monday, March 17, 2008. Wall Street clawed back from sharp losses as investors snapped up bargain stocks following JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s government-backed buyout of the stricken investment bank Bear Stearns Cos. (AP Photo/Henny Ray Abrams)

Stocks Widely Mixed on Bear Stearns News

MADLEN READ | March 17, 2008 06:12 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

NEW YORK — Wall Street ended a temperamental session widely mixed Monday after investors grappled with JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s government-backed buyout of the stricken investment bank Bear Stearns Cos.

The Dow Jones industrials recovered from an initial drop of nearly 200 points to finish up about 21 points. The broader Standard & Poor's 500 and Nasdaq composite indexes ended lower as investors bailed out of investment banks and small-cap stocks and fled instead to large companies apt to be reliable during a weak economy.

"You move to the defensive names in times of market uncertainty _ safer, consumer names," said Ryan Detrick, senior technical strategist at Schaeffer's Investment Research.

The buyout of Bear Stearns was certainly more appealing than the alternative: letting the investment bank collapse and causing huge losses for anyone linked to it. And some unprecedented moves by the Federal Reserve gave investors a bit of solace on what many predicted would be a day of precipitous losses in the stock market.

Besides supporting the buyout, the Fed lowered the rate it charges to loan directly to banks by a quarter-point on Sunday night _ two days before its scheduled meeting Tuesday. The central bank also set up a lending option for firms, including many non-bank financial services firms, to secure short-term loans for a broad range of collateral.

The Fed appears to be pledging to do everything in its power to keep the credit crisis from decimating the financial industry and the economy. Policy makers at the central bank are expected to reduce the target fed funds rate _ the rate banks charge each other for overnight loans _ by at least a half-point on Tuesday, and perhaps even a full point.

But the market remained extremely volatile. The sale of Bear Stearns _ at a minuscule $2.21 a share as of Monday's close, or a total of $260.5 million _ stirred fear among investors worldwide about other banks' exposure to the troubled credit markets.

"The market has absolutely no idea what's going on," said Dan Alpert, managing director of Westwood Capital. "Some people have accused them of whistling past the graveyard _ I don't think they even know where the graveyard is."

He added that short-covering _ the unwinding of bets that stocks will fall _ ahead of Tuesday's Fed meeting contributed to the market's atypical movements.

The Dow rose 21.16, or 0.18 percent, to 11,972.25, after falling nearly 200 and rising more than 100. The blue chip index was supported partially by JPMorgan, by far the biggest gainer among the 30 component stocks. JPMorgan rose $3.77, or 10.3 percent, to $40.31.

The Dow got a lift as investors aimed for large-cap stocks such as AT&T Inc., up 76 cents at $35.79, Verizon, up 79 cents at $34.61, and pharmaceutical maker Johnson & Johnson, up $1.39 at $64.04.

The Standard & Poor's 500 index fell 11.54, or 0.90 percent, to 1,276.60. The Nasdaq composite index, heavily populated by small and high-tech companies, fell 35.48, or 1.60 percent, to 2,177.01. The Russell 2000 index of smaller companies fell 12.42, or 1.87 percent, to 650.48.

Declining issues outnumbered advancers by about 5 to 1 on the New York Stock Exchange. Consolidated volume came to 5.69 billion shares, up from 5.18 billion Friday.

Bond prices rose. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note, which moves opposite its price, fell to 3.30 percent from 3.44 percent late Friday.

The simple fact that Bear Stearns was valued at around $2 a share heightened investors' worries about how much of a blow the credit markets are dealing the financial industry. "How widespread is it? Nobody knows," Detrick said.

The pain for stockholders in Bear Stearns, which succumbed to losing bets on souring mortgages for borrowers with poor credit, will be sizable. JPMorgan is buying Bear, including its midtown Manhattan headquarters, for about 1 percent of the investment bank's worth little more than two weeks ago. Bear Stearns' buyout arrives after a short-term bailout Friday organized by the Fed and involving JPMorgan.

Bear Stearns shares fell 86 percent to $4.10 _ still above the buyout price, implying that some shareholders believe the deal terms might change.

Some investors worry Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. might be next to fall. Lehman _ the investment bank considered most similar to Bear Stearns _ and other major investment banks are slated this week to report quarterly results.

DBS Group Holdings Ltd., Southeast Asia's largest bank, reportedly instructed traders in an e-mail early Monday not to do business with the bank. According to Dow Jones Newswires, DBS Group later told traders to disregard the earlier e-mail. Lehman denied there were any problems with DBS.

Lehman fell $7.51, or 19 percent, to $31.75.

While investors focused on the financial sector, fresh economic news offered little solace. The Fed said output at the country's factories, mines and utilities fell by 0.5 percent in February, the biggest decline last October. Many analysts had been expecting a slight increase of one-tenth of one percent.

The Commerce Department also said Monday the current account deficit, the broadest measure of foreign trade, fell slightly in 2007 as stronger growth in U.S. exports offset a spiking foreign oil bill.

The dollar sank to a record low against the euro and hit a 12 1/2 year low against the Japanese yen, while gold prices rose to another record high. Crude oil plunged from record levels by $4.53 to settle at $105.68 per barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

Overseas, Japan's Nikkei stock average fell 3.71 percent, while Hong Kong's Hang Seng index fell 5.18 percent. Britain's FTSE 100 fell 3.86 percent, Germany's DAX index dropped 4.18 percent, and France's CAC-40 lost 3.51 percent.

___

On the Net:

New York Stock Exchange: http://www.nyse.com

Nasdaq Stock Market: http://www.nasdaq.com


 
 

Comments
357
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
- opines See Profile I'm a Fan of opines

Most animals, including humans, are programmed not to bite the hand that feeds them. Because most Americans have been seeing their 'worth' go up for several decades, they have accepted shoddy financial practices and corruption as the grease necessary for the economy to roll.

The insanity of trickle-down and lower taxes for the ultra-rich during wartime has been accepted with a nod and a wink. Growing numbers of Americans living below the poverty line affected black Americans to a far greater extent than whites and those protesting could be dismissed or mocked as 'bleeding-heart' whiners.

Main Street Americans watching their paper worth evaporate now will begin the blame game.

Some will blame Wall Street; others the government, the Iraq war, even the hallowed business schools that churned out MBA recipients adept at leveraging schemes, enhancing short-term profitability but deficient in business ethics.

The causes are too widespread to pinpoint blame. I fear we will tear ourselves to shreds.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 PM on 03/17/2008
- KRANKY See Profile I'm a Fan of KRANKY

The headline for this post was smething to the effect, "Nobody Knows Whats Going ON in Markets".

Au contraire, the markets are telling how messed up things are, how dysfunctional the "free market" really is.
The lesson is, left to libertarian anarchy, criminals and bullies will game the system.
Any time and in any situation, when reponsble people fail and the is no accountability; croks and gangsters take over.
This is the culmination of the Repuke coup in 2000, and the quivering Dems to frightened to stand p to 'em.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 PM on 03/17/2008
- oneeyedodin See Profile I'm a Fan of oneeyedodin

"The market has absolutely no idea what's going on".

Cheez...sounds like Bush and most of his administration regarding Ayerack.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 PM on 03/17/2008
- GarsLuber See Profile I'm a Fan of GarsLuber

or Bush and x.

x being a variable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:14 PM on 03/17/2008
- SupremeIdiot See Profile I'm a Fan of SupremeIdiot

JohnKemp See Profile I'm a Fan of JohnKemp
You know, you libs are nothing short of remarkable.

On the one hand, you want to tell us that the 2006 Congressional elections were some sort of an "earthquake."

On the other hand, you then want to tell us that your majority was handcuffed.

Which is it?

Electing Dems never fails to produce an enomomic downturn; our current scenario will not "break the mold."

_____________________________________________________________________________


This is the root of the problem right here. Do you see what this right-wing poster said? This is the guy who has nothing and votes for Georgie Porgie because he's "someone I can have a beer with" and not the smartest guy in the room. This is the guy who knows nothing and gets all his information from Fox news and Rush Limbaugh.

Thgis huy actually believes that Democrats are to blame for this economic downturn and has stated "Electing Dems never fails to produce an enomomic downturn;" I'm pretty sure he means an economic down turn adn he completel ignores the facts.

Facts like there have been 4 recessions since 1980. ALL of them during the three Republican administrations. The recessions have been getting to be a 5-6 year thing with the exception of the Clinton administration which managed to balance the budget

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 PM on 03/17/2008
- Bobby See Profile I'm a Fan of Bobby

You are talking about JohnBirch. He thinks the South should have won the Civil War. Enough said.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 PM on 03/17/2008
- SupremeIdiot See Profile I'm a Fan of SupremeIdiot

Sorry, hit the post button by mistake,

5-6 years between recessions instead of the 10-20 years historically? Why?

The reason for the increase in recessions?
Trickle down economics that includes deregulation and underfunding those regulatory agencies that could do something.
Cutting taxes, especially for the rich.
Allowing lobbyists to run Washington.
The lack of ethics and rules to go with them.

In general, kowtowing to corporate interests.

We have swallowed whole the notion that the words "union","liberal","taxes", "government" are bad words. Basically we've swallowed the neocon line for the last 28 years. Not everyone but all those like John Kemp have trouble thinking or remebering for themselves.

Time to have a change.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 PM on 03/17/2008
- thinkb4uleap See Profile I'm a Fan of thinkb4uleap

The few comments I have read here give indication that few understand the depth of the financial and political morass we find ourselves in (myself included). Calls for the return of the Clintons to the White House, pointing the finger at failed leadership, and other such simplistic analysis is very revealing to me. We need to look no further than the "man in the mirror". We as a people are responsible for the crisis that has befallen us. As one commentator stated: "we get the government we deserve, not the government we want".

Harsh as these comments are, I believe they are true. We continue to allow the form of political corruption that facilitates the raiding of our treasury and redistribution of wealth to occur unchecked. How? Apathy, Indifference, Fear, Distraction, Ignorance, Folly... We have been played like a Stradivarius and are none the wiser for the most part.

We continue to repeat the mistakes of civilizations past because we fail to learn the lessons of their demise. We lack the foresight and moral fortitude to stand up to greed and injustice and like "sins" but have sought instead to get our piece of the pie by any means necessary. We prefer soothing patriotic rhetoric instead of calls to action that challenge us to live up to our highest ideals. How do we react to those with the courage and vision to take such a stand? Brave souls like: John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr... Do we take their message and vision to heart? Do we challenge each other to live out the ideals they championed? Do we hold accountable those who perpetuate the assassination of hopes and dreams?

I believe the answer to those questions determine whom we choose to serve and have rule over us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:38 PM on 03/17/2008
- NoPCZone See Profile I'm a Fan of NoPCZone

1- I didn't vote for Clinton or either Bush, authors of the deregulation and lax oversight that helped create this mess.
2- I have not voted to support Congressional candidates that played wink-wink with Wall Street.
3- I didn't borrow money that I didn't need at interest rates I could not afford. Otherwise I lived within my means.
4- I didn't flip houses or buy one with a voodoo mortgage or take a home equity loan against the bubble value of my current home.
5- I'm not driving a gas guzzling monster SUV and have instead held onto a perfectly good older 4-cylinder compact that gives good gas mileage.
6- I have saved and bought stocks not upon casino mentality speculation, but rather upon rock solid hard value and proven, transparent business fundamentals.
7- Shortly after Bush stole the 2000 election I moved most of my investments to Euro denominated international investments to protect me against a devaluing dollar.
8- I have replaced the HVAC and appliances in my home with the most efficient models that I could find and have also long ago switched to compact fluorescent bulbs for most lighting needs.

So it's supposed to be OUR problem. Not on my doorstep.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 PM on 03/17/2008
- LouPop See Profile I'm a Fan of LouPop

NoPCZone, the fact is that not everyone is as intelligent, or has the educational background, as you. The entire financial system is a house of cards and is immoral. It was bound to fall eventually; I think the final collapse will be the result of capitalist growth economics" cost to the environment. However, the people who made stupid purchases (backed by a shallow, materialistic philosophy that capitalists have worked decades to develop) are going to cause problems for EVERYONE. If you live in the US crime will go up, which will put you in greater danger. Poverty, drug use, homelessness will all go up, along with the negative externalities associated with it. Public investment in education and healthcare, crumbling as is, will decrease. We"re going to need a better "investment" climate in the future, which will require less government spending (probably not on the military though, for illogical reasons).

To me, two things are key: 1. Is the financial & monetary system the best and most logical systems we can come up with or are they outdated and inherently unfair, with better alternatives (however painful the transition is) available? 2. What is to be learned about a society based on mindless consumption, where the things we own determines who we are? Is the lesson a superficial one, about more personably responsible finances, or do we take more fundamental lessons from this about the ideological underpinnings of capitalism? Honestly, I think the answer to the latter question is up for grabs. It will really depend on how far the economy falls. If we turn into Argentina in 2001 we could see a situation here not seen previously, probably the closest would be the 1930"s in this country. If it"s severe but as large as "01 Argentina I think the charade will continue¦in the long run to everyone"s (and the environment"s) detriment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 PM on 03/17/2008
- Subj2Chng See Profile I'm a Fan of Subj2Chng

Aye Carumba, the socio-economic collapse is upon us. Take what remaining money you have and buy guns, lots of guns!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 PM on 03/17/2008
- ute See Profile I'm a Fan of ute

don't forget ammo, lots of ammo...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 03/17/2008
- Rumplestiltskin See Profile I'm a Fan of Rumplestiltskin

And Twinkies. They last forever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 PM on 03/17/2008
- Abroad See Profile I'm a Fan of Abroad

I just love the link title: "The market has no idea ...".

Of course it doesn't! Ideas as well as humor are the privilege of human beings for crying out loud!

Adam Smith already knew markets behaved irrationally and we know to what extent they can get out of hand since 1929.

I just hope European and Asian markets are sufficiently decoupled from the US market in our days to avoid a worldwide recession.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 PM on 03/17/2008
- Nochnoi See Profile I'm a Fan of Nochnoi

Market up..... market down.... either way.... The economy is getting worse!!

All I know is I when to the gas station today.... I paid $ 3. 89 per gallon of gas.... which once upon a time, when Bush took office, would have bought me three gallons of gasoline..... Then I went to market, and nearly fainted at how much food has gone up.... bought pretty much nothing for a whole lot of money..... Checked my mail, got my electric bill, which was as much for my tiny 2 bdr condo as it was when I had a whole two story house....

I was going to go out for dinner.... but now I am staying in and having a nice bowl of Ramen Noodles... as I am broke again!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 PM on 03/17/2008
- UncleKnuckleFunk See Profile I'm a Fan of UncleKnuckleFunk

I may go stray cat huntin soon...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:08 PM on 03/17/2008
- shanghaislim See Profile I'm a Fan of shanghaislim

/ Kung Pao Kittens!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 03/20/2008
- UncleKnuckleFunk See Profile I'm a Fan of UncleKnuckleFunk

am tititt TO, aman.23

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:12 PM on 03/17/2008
- phroso See Profile I'm a Fan of phroso

Newsflash--Florida refuses to do a do-over. Get ready to seat the Florida delegates as are, or face war.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:57 PM on 03/17/2008
- MidwestMomma See Profile I'm a Fan of MidwestMomma

What's one more war! The rules were broken with full knowledge of the consciences. In Florida the election move up was made by the Republican in state office. So! I say Florida should take their punishment and use their anger to replace all those state republicans who screwed them.

Why have rules if you are going to ignore them when they fit your purpose?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:02 PM on 03/17/2008
- wittgene See Profile I'm a Fan of wittgene

Bear Sterns=Good=Iraq! LOL

The "chickens are coming home to ROOST"! LOL, LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:57 PM on 03/17/2008
- VivaZapata See Profile I'm a Fan of VivaZapata

bernanke assured wall street that no matter how recklessly they behave, the federal reserve will be there with its printing press to bail them out. too bad people who have worked hard and saved all their lives to retire with dignity will not have the same kind of safety net. printing money is just a tax on those who have no way to increase their earnings: it is the bush tax increase on working people which coincides and is the by-product of the tax cuts to the rich. RON PAUL!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 03/17/2008
- nazirmo See Profile I'm a Fan of nazirmo

I repeat again that we need the two Clintons in the White House to get the economy in better shape.
Under Bill Cllinton there were surplus and balanced budgets. There is no doubt that those good times will surely return if the Clintons were to reoccupy the White House.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 PM on 03/17/2008
- UnknownSoldier See Profile I'm a Fan of UnknownSoldier

First Bill Clinton as Co-President is disrespectful to Hillary and women. Two Bill Clinton as Co-President would violate the spirt of the 22nd Amendment (Pesky Constitution Thing). Third more people moved into Poverty under the Clinton Administration, more people worked without proper health coverage, and more people were put in prison. Clinton had the Tech Bubble, Bush has the Real Estate Bubble......... follow the bouncing dollar........ the money that left Tech, went to Real Estate........ causing false valuations.........

Hillary is setting herself and women up to become scapegoats for the Dems Losses in November.......... Hillary is the New Nader, and she will set the women's movement back just as Nader has set the Green Party movement back.

Women beware of the false prophet amongst you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 PM on 03/17/2008
- Nochnoi See Profile I'm a Fan of Nochnoi

Right.... because we are all going to hop in a time machine and go back to the 90's......

Please remember that it is Hillary running for President.... NOT Bill & Hillary......... and just because things were good in the 90's doesn't mean it will automatically be the same...

Time to go forward, with fresh ideas.... leave the past where it belongs.... in the past!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 03/17/2008
- LouPop See Profile I'm a Fan of LouPop

nazirmo, the economy was not nearly as good under Clinton as people make it seem. Take out the then booming housing market, which created most of the wealth, and you have a poorly economy. Depressed wages, an economy increasingly reliant on war, profits going through the roof (which economists as far back as Adam Smith said would go highest to the countries going quickest to ruin), etc. It was a better investment climate, meaning social services and inflation was down (thanks to welfare reform and depressed wages), so it was better on certain levels, but this was bound to happen and will get much worse. It isn't his fault, it's the economic system that he accelerated that's to blame. NAFTA has destroyed the country, decimated the industrial base and depressed wages. His Telecommunications bill went a long way in setting up a media system that went on to tell us, regardless to the structural weakness of the economy, how wonderful "free trade" was and is. Looking at who is on Clinton's economic team it isn't likely that the economy would be better for the average person. Macro economic numbers, like under Clinton, might improve but that will do a lot of what it did under the first Clinton: mask the structural weakness of the economic system. Radical changes are needed and there are no radicals in situations that could bring those changes about.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 03/17/2008
- oneeyedodin See Profile I'm a Fan of oneeyedodin

The economy may not be any better with a Clinton in office but he didn't murder as many people as Bush has.
Estimates as high as 600,000 Ayerackis!
Even with only a tenth of that number the war criminal Bush beats the war criminal Slick Willie.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:00 PM on 03/17/2008
- GarsLuber See Profile I'm a Fan of GarsLuber

Yeah.... if you substract all the good that was done under Clinton, all you have left is bad.

I understand that arithmetic.

If you take all the good that was done under Bush boy...er, um.... nevermind.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:53 PM on 03/17/2008
- in4success See Profile I'm a Fan of in4success

there you go with all your messy facts again!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 PM on 03/17/2008
- ProfessorDuh See Profile I'm a Fan of ProfessorDuh

Is that all there is? Is that all there is? If that's all there is, my friends, then let's keep dancing...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 03/17/2008