Heather Mills Reportedly Throws Water On McCartney's Lawyer, Judge Calls Her Claims 'Exorbitant'


First Posted: 03-18-08 08:12 AM   |   Updated: 03-28-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Heather Mills

LONDON — Heather Mills was a less than candid court witness whose $250 million divorce claim was exorbitant, a judge said in his ruling on her divorce from Paul McCartney.

The judgment by Hugh Bennett was released Tuesday, after a court rejected Mills' attempt to block publication.

On Monday, Bennett awarded Mills a $48.6 million divorce settlement after her four-year marriage to the former Beatle. Mills had sought almost $250 million, while McCartney had offered $31.6 million, including Mills' own assets.

In his ruling, the judge said Mills' claim "is and was unreasonable, indeed exorbitant."

He also said Mills' evidence was "not just inconsistent and inaccurate but also less than candid. Overall she was a less than impressive witness."

McCartney's lawyers didn't object to publication, but Mills claimed details in the ruling could compromise the security of her 4-year-old daughter Beatrice.

"Miss Mills believes her daughter will be put in real danger. It is most disturbing," said lawyer David Rosen, who represented Mills in court. She did not attend the hearing.

Mills, 40, walked away from court with a settlement worth about $34,000 for every day of her marriage to the 65-year-old McCartney. But it was only a fifth of what she had sought and a fraction of McCartney's $800 million fortune.

Story continues below
advertisement

Mills declared that she was "very, very, very pleased."

The settlement included a lump sum of $33 million, plus the assets Mills currently holds worth $15.6 million.

Some legal experts were surprised the former model did not get more.

"In the scheme of things, it's quite surprisingly low," said Patricia Hollings, a divorce specialist with London law firm Finers Stephens Innocent. "It is only offering her about 6 percent of his assets. In terms of high-wealth cases it's very low."

McCartney left after the ruling without comment. But Mills emerged from the three-hour private hearing for an impromptu news conference on the courthouse steps _ railing against McCartney's lawyer and accusing McCartney of underestimating his wealth.

"All of you that have researched know that it was always going to be a figure between 20 and 30 million" pounds, said a visibly agitated Mills. "Paul was offering a lot less than that. ... So we're very, very, very pleased."

Mills criticized McCartney's attorney Fiona Shackleton, who represented Prince Charles in his divorce from Princess Diana.

"She has called me many, many names before even meeting me when I was in a wheelchair," said Mills, whose own legal team, in an ironic twist, was led by Princess Diana's divorce lawyer until she fired them in November.

Shackleton emerged from court Monday with a wet head, reportedly from a glass of water that Mills had dumped on her. Mills told reporters Shackleton had been "baptized in court." McCartney's representatives declined to comment.

McCartney also was ordered to pay $70,000 a year for Beatrice, and to pay for her nanny and school fees.

Mills said that was a paltry amount. "She's obviously meant to travel B class while her father travels A class," she said.

The settlement doesn't rank with the most expensive celebrity divorces. Basketball star Michael Jordan and singer-songwriter Neil Diamond both had to pay out about $150 million to settle their divorces, according to Forbes magazine.

British divorce settlements are generally lower than those in the U.S. But Mills' settlement is only about half of the biggest contested divorce settlement in British history _ the 48 million pounds (about $90 million at the time) that insurance tycoon John Charman was ordered to pay his ex-wife in 2006.

Mills and McCartney went to court last month to decide on her share of his fortune, which had been estimated at as much as $1.6 billion. However, the judge found that McCartney's total worth was about $800 million.

Now that the case is over, Mills implored the media to just let it be.

"And I really hope now that me and my daughter can have a life and not be followed every single day and that is why I've come out, to give it closure," she said.

LONDON — Heather Mills was a less than candid court witness whose $250 million divorce claim was exorbitant, a judge said in his ruling on her divorce from Paul McCartney. The judgment by Hugh ...
LONDON — Heather Mills was a less than candid court witness whose $250 million divorce claim was exorbitant, a judge said in his ruling on her divorce from Paul McCartney. The judgment by Hugh ...
Filed by Katherine Thomson  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
70
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 (3 pages total)
- helonias I'm a Fan of helonias 250 fans permalink
photo

What about the richman/woman, camel, eye of needle, kingdom of heaven thingee.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 PM on 03/18/2008
- MsLiz I'm a Fan of MsLiz 106 fans permalink
photo

Mistranslation. It was originally rope, not camel. Makes sense that way, doesn't it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 PM on 03/18/2008
- dadw5boys I'm a Fan of dadw5boys 282 fans permalink
photo

The Mills Charity will meet in the South of France in High Season then in Plam Beach, Aspen, Maimi and the Bahamas with side tripes to Spain and Italy. England will be for relaxed reflection of all that charity talk and plans for furture tours until all the money os gone

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 03/18/2008
- Trittydi I'm a Fan of Trittydi 68 fans permalink
photo

And her poor daughter will be going everywhere with her - but in "B" class. Poor, poor thing.

*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 AM on 03/19/2008
- schatsie I'm a Fan of schatsie 80 fans permalink

$35,000 per day... about the GDP per capita in Great Britain...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 PM on 03/18/2008
- MyThought I'm a Fan of MyThought 8 fans permalink

Her antics in court (pouring the water) won't go well if she tries to appeal.

What a stupid, stupid woman. Antics like this could be grounds to take the daugher away if she keeps this kind of thing up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 03/18/2008
- 43P04T34 I'm a Fan of 43P04T34 12 fans permalink

Her appeal was denied today. The judge told her he was sick of her lies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 PM on 03/18/2008
- Trittydi I'm a Fan of Trittydi 68 fans permalink
photo

Cool.

*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 AM on 03/19/2008

I can't wait to see all the checks she is going to write for charity now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 03/18/2008

Maybe I'm missing something here, but if Mills lied in court, under oath, isn't that perjury? And if she threw water at McCartney's lawyer, isn't that assault? I wish Paul would seek sole custody of Beatrice because her mother is clearly unstable, a danger to herself and others. Baker Act, anyone?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 03/18/2008
- CammyV I'm a Fan of CammyV 6 fans permalink
photo

Poor, poor Beatrice having to travel B class, while Daddy travels A class, and Ms Mills has NO class. I'm sure that $70 grand a year for the child is above and beyond what Mommy recieves, so if she wants to improve her daughters travel accomodations, she can stick her hand in her own pocket.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 03/18/2008

Good point. You would think that a woman who just received a $33 million lump sum would be able to commit one quarter of one percent to her daughter. That would be $82,500 which combined with Paul's 70K should be enough to ensure that Beatrice can travel A class.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 AM on 03/19/2008

What did Paul see in the she devil?? She's not pretty, pleashant or even funny. Maybe the bedroom, that's always a sticky wicked.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 03/18/2008
- Trittydi I'm a Fan of Trittydi 68 fans permalink
photo

I'm going to assume you meant "sticky wicket".

Who has a sticky wicket? Never mind . . . I don't want to hear about ANYONE'S sticky wicket.

*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 AM on 03/19/2008
- CammyV I'm a Fan of CammyV 6 fans permalink
photo

Perhaps his wicket was also wicked. I'm sure hers is sticky. ewww sorry. I didn't even know they played cricket.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 AM on 03/19/2008
- CammyV I'm a Fan of CammyV 6 fans permalink
photo

Is it croquet that uses wickets? What ever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 03/19/2008
- grisgris I'm a Fan of grisgris 3 fans permalink

I hope McCartney's lawyer, Shackleton, sues Mills for battery.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 03/18/2008
- michie62 I'm a Fan of michie62 5 fans permalink
photo

She got a bunch of free money and throws water on Paul's lawyer? I am afraid this is just more evidence of a mental illness in this woman and the minor child needs to be protected from her. Sir Paul should have gone for custody--sole custody and supervised visitation for this pathological psychopath.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 AM on 03/18/2008
- jojojo I'm a Fan of jojojo 10 fans permalink

I wonder if the lawyer will sue for assault.

Wouldn't that be sweet?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 03/18/2008

Poor Paulie, having gotten involved with this lunatic. Hope he'll have lots of influence over his daughter. Good thing for the lawyer that it was only water.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:23 AM on 03/18/2008
- tumblewind I'm a Fan of tumblewind 2 fans permalink

There isn't much Mills has to say that I am inclined to listen to let alone believe. She comes off as being a b.....! No wonder Paul got rid of her.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 AM on 03/18/2008

Agree - Mill's behavior throughout has been despicable.
"Baptizing" Sir Paul's lawyer in court was in keeping with her Trailer-Park demeanor.
Though, to me, it's a better look for Ms. Fiona Shackleton, Esq.
The Lady Di quaff is especially creepy knowing she was Prince Charles' divorce lawyer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 03/18/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect