Didn't support NAFTA?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFuA0z4kKD4

She sat on the board of Wal-Mart and they gave Bill 500,000.00 for his library, NAFTA is pushed and passed and low and behold now she says NAFTA needs to be REDONE. Whose board of directors and which one of Billary's foundations or whatever will benefit from the large money donations? It's simple folks, follow the money, it always leads back to the crooks!

I'm certainly not going to vote for Clinton, however, I can say this in her defense regarding NAFTA. NAFTA was a republican initiative. It was ratified by her husband because Repubs had enough votes for an over ride. So Clinton put a nice face on it an went forward. I'm really not sure if the President was for it or not

To the good, but not so astute, people of Ohio.

You have been duped!

You voted for Bush 4 years ago and you believed clinton on NAFTA

Does the word DUH mean anything to you?

It's too bad that there isn't a political reward for the most inflated resume.

hillary has lied so often that she has started to believe her own BS.

"all politicians lie, but the Clintons do it with such ease that it's troubling". From the clintons friend and frequent donor, Geffen

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGRJjX9T7As




pwned........................

When Hillary Clinton says "I'm vetted" she sort of has a point; news like this just bounces right off of her. Nobody believed anything she says before this, and no one will believe anything she says after this. They vote for her regardless.

And Obama is any more truthful? Speaking out of both sides of mouth in Ohio with a wink to Canada.

So, Hillary was pro-NAFTA. Once again, she will do anything or say anything to win the nomination.

I have a hell of a lot more faith in David Gergens recollections. His integrity has never been questioned.

I would be more interested in the WH meetings that Cheney had, when he allowed the energy companies to set the policies. He had a map of Iraq, before 9/11, all carved up to show which oil companies would get the share of that region. Hillary was First Lady, Cheney was V.P. He did more damage than all the first ladies combined. Still, he refuses to release his records. Hilary released her records from what- 10 years ago? Why not demand all the WH records from THIS administration.?

So let's see. First, Hillary says that wasn't in favor of NAFTA even when she was First Lady, but now we find out she was. Later, on the campaign trail, she accuses the Obama campaign of telling Canada to disregard his tough talk on NAFTA when in fact it's her campaign that gives Canada those assurances about her. The folks in Ohio are absolute idiots for thinking this woman is interested in saving their jobs. Instead of having revotes in Michigan and Florida, how bout a revote in Ohio.

From the current issue of Newsweek, a note about the lack of a mention in the released Hillary Clinton papers about a meet and greet with campaign donor Johnny Chung, who got into at least as much legal trouble as Rezko:

"The schedule is considerably less revealing when it comes to more awkward episodes of the Clinton presidency. Consider the afternoon of March 9, 1995, when Johnny Chung, a businessman and soon-to-be-notorious Democratic Party fund-raiser, made a fateful trip to the White House carrying a campaign check for $50,000. For many critics, Chung later became a symbol of the campaign-finance abuses of the Clinton presidency, a mysterious Chinese businessman who managed to be cleared into the White House on 49 occasions. (He also later pleaded guilty to campaign-finance violations and testified that a sizeable chunk of his illegal campaign cash came from a Chinese military-intelligence operative.) Hillary Clinton made a special trip to the Map Room that day so she could have her picture taken with Chung. "We handshake, and then she [Hillary Clinton] said, 'Welcome to the White House, my good friend'," Chung later testified, describing the encounter with Hillary Clinton. Right after that, Chung hand-delivered his $50,000 to Maggie Williams, who was the First Lady's chief of staff at the time and now manages her presidential campaign.

But Hillary Clinton's newly released calendar for that day shows no reference to Johnny Chung at all. There is listed, just as Chung testified, an "official photo" session in the Map Room. But the name of the person Hillary Clinton was having her picture taken with has been deleted on the grounds that it would be "an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy," according to the Archives' released record. This may seem odd, given that Chung had spoken openly, many times, about his photo op with Hillary. It may seem even odder given that just a few minutes later the First Lady had another photo session"but this time, the documents identify the person whose picture was taken. It was Eileen Collins, the astronaut. "

full article: http://www.newsweek.com/id/124271

Bill and Hillary Clinton, for all intents and purposes, are making a mockery of the spirit of the 22nd Amendment of the Constitution of the United States limiting an individual to two terms.

It almost seems like Bill is pulling a Putin, trying to install a presidential puppet, thus giving himself a new post where he can exercise presidential power.

Where do we draw the line? If Hillary can promote NAFTA for Bill, what will Bill promote for Hillary? If the two weren't so politically married I wouldn't be concerned, but this question needs to be debated. Look out for the vast right wing conspiracy.

HuffPost's Pick

Come on now. Give Hillary a break.

She thought the pro-NAFTA meeting was simply a request for more inspectors. While she doesn't admit her participation was "wrong" she "regrets trusting the president at the time."

Hillary "thought it was a vote to put inspectors back in NAFTA discussions" She has insisted that she and others were "told by the White House personally" that this was the purpose of the meeting, and cited President Clinton's assurances to defend her position.

Anyone who disagrees with this is part of the vast media conspiracy.