Did anyone really believe that the records wouldn't be heavily redacted?

For all you casting stones - have you looked through the record pdfs? Lot's of personal info on other folks redacted.

Good for her to redact her private travel records. This fishing expedition into Hillary's private life is absolutely ridiculous. Instead of bashing Hillary for redacting her private records, why not ask for McCain's records in his public role as Senator? Or Obama's? Including for his time in the State Senate?

Well How about that, so much for transparency more same old same old......

I wouldn't worry; I'm sure the Republicans will be more than capable of filling in those embarrassing blanks should Hillary steal the nomination. I would guess within 12 hours of the closing of the democratic convention.

I could care less about anything coming out about the Lewinsky scandal. I think Hillary has a right to not expose her personal feelings about that mess. I do care that she herself has made her record as first lady one of her central issues of "experience" in her own campaign. She raised the issue of experience and took it national in her campaign. She needs to release those records for all of us to see - her trying to hide and redact those records and having to be sued to make them public says plenty to me. Those records are not going to prove her claims of 'experience". Those are the records I want to see and she should be proudly giving us those records if they are indeed true.

That's the issue and it's not a non-issue. Our next President will deal with the Bush/Cheney mess- I want to know if that person can handle the job - Hillary's lack of concern that the American people are given all the facts in order to make that judgement is suspicious at the very least.

I think the fact that Hillary had to be sued to release any records tells us all something very important.
The official records would portray a diffent scenario than the one she is trying to sell us right now.

I really don't care about her personal feelings in the Lewinsky episode. I'm willing to say that is personal. I do care about her so called "experience" issues and dealings that she has herself made an issue in this campaign. To release a bunch of redacted records does not give me that warm and fuzzy feeling about her "experience" record. It seems the NAFTA meetings alone portray a different story than the one she is telling us all now.

If Hillary is so secretive about her first lady records that she has made the central issue of her campaign of experience then I'm afraid she loses on that record. Are we the American people supposed to just take her word for it when she is not willing to give us the historical record? One then has to ask why she is not willing to expose the truth of those records.

Is hillary hiding something - or is the redacted 5000 pages meant to give the impression that she actually did something that we, the proletariat, are not allowed to know about?

I find it fascinating that a woman who had no security clearance, did not attend the PBD, NEVER read an NIE has anything at all that should be redacted.

hillary is hiding a lot of somethings.

WHAT'S NEXT?
HER HEAVILY REDACTED TAX RETURNS?

What a non story.

Is this information critical to national security? Where are all the "missing" e-mails from THIS WH? Why dig up this old stuff, there is enough to investigate in this administration. Did anyone die, or lose a limb during this time? It cost the taxpayers what $78 mill. Small change compared to the Iraq fiasco.

On the streets of the South Side, where the Black Panther movement, Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, and the Rev. Jesse Jackson flowered, Obama was mocked as a dispossessed newcomer who failed to grasp the historical urgency of the black struggle. "The white man in blackface," a political rival once called him.

Though Obama would later convince many black skeptics of his commitment to justice and equality, he made clear he would not be bound by their antagonism toward the white power structure.

"Historically, African-Americans have turned inward and toward black nationalism whenever they have a sense, as we do now, that the mainstream has rebuffed us and that white Americans couldn't care less about the profound problems African-Americans are facing," he told an interviewer in 1995, before his political career had begun. "But cursing out white folks is not going to get the job done. Anti-Semitic and anti-Asian statements are not going to lift us up. . . . We've got communities to build."