Obama, Clinton And McCain's Passports Breached: Two State Dept Officials Fired, Investigation Underway

ANNE FLAHERTY and DESMOND BUTLER | March 21, 2008 07:53 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice tells reporters that she has apologized to Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., for an incident in which State Department contractors unnecessarily reviewed his passport file, Friday, March 21, 2008, at the State Department in Washington, during a meeting with Brazil's Defense Minister Nelson Jobim. Rice said she would be "disturbed" if her passport file was viewed in such an unauthorized manner. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

WASHINGTON — At least four State Department workers pried into the supposedly secure passport files of presidential contenders Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain, abashed officials admitted Friday in a revelation that had Condoleezza Rice promising a full investigation and telephoning the candidates to apologize personally.

The snooping incidents raised questions as to whether there was political motivation and why two contractors involved were fired before investigators had a chance to interview them. The State Department's inspector general was probing, with the Justice Department monitoring the effort, but Obama said that was not enough. He urged congressional involvement "so it's not simply an internal matter."

The unauthorized digging into electronic government files on politicians recalled a 1992 case in which a Republican political appointee at the State Department was demoted for searching Bill Clinton's passport records when Clinton was running against President George H.W. Bush.

McCain, the Republican nominee-in-waiting, said there should be an investigation of the new snooping as well as an apology.

Democrat Obama said that better include Congress, not just Bush administration investigators.

"When you have not just one but a series of attempts to tap into people's personal records, that's a problem not just for me but for how our government functions," Obama told reporters in Portland, Ore., where he was campaigning. "I expect a full and thorough investigation. It should be done in conjunction with those congressional committees that have oversight function so it's not simply an internal matter."

Rice was apologetic in public as well as in her private phone calls to the candidates.

"None of us wants to have a circumstance in which any American's passport file is looked at in an unauthorized way," the secretary of state said after speaking with Obama.

Story continues below
advertisement

"I told him that I was sorry, and I told him that I, myself, would be very disturbed if I learned that somebody had looked into my passport file," she added. "And therefore, I will stay on top of it and get to the bottom of it."

In all, at least four workers were involved in the snooping.

The State Department confirmed Thursday night that Obama's files had been compromised on three occasions _ Jan. 9, Feb. 21 and as recently as last week, on March 14. By the time senior officials were made aware, two contract employees had been fired and a third disciplined, agency officials said.

The firings could make it more difficult for the State Department to force them to answer questions. Unless they agree to comply, they would have to be served with a grand jury subpoena compelling them to testify before a grand jury.

The companies that provided the contractors were The Analysis Corp. and Stanley Inc. Stanley, based in Arlington, Va., this week won a five-year, $570-million government contract extension to support passport services.

According to agency officials, a Stanley employee improperly accessed Obama's records on Jan. 9 and was fired within days. The second contractor, employed by The Analysis Corp., pried into similar records on Feb. 21 but was not terminated. The third incident involved another Stanley employee, who was swiftly fired.

In a statement, Stanley said it regretted the "rare occurrence" of unauthorized access of any individual's private information. When it fired the two subcontractors involved in accessing the Obama files, terminating them the day the incident was discovered, Stanley was not aware of others performing unauthorized searches of McCain or Clinton's files, the company said.

The Analysis Corp., or TAC, issued a statement late Friday saying it had been notified earlier in the day that one of its contractors had acted improperly.

The company said it had decided to honor the department's request to delay firing its consultant in order to give investigators time to conduct its investigation.

"This individual's actions were taken without the knowledge or direction of anyone at TAC and are wholly inconsistent with our professional and ethical standards," wrote the company, based in McLean, Va.

State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said Friday that a separate search conducted after the Obama revelation showed that workers also had snooped on McCain and Clinton.

The worker who had been reprimanded in the Obama incident had also reviewed McCain's records earlier this year, McCormack said. While the employee has not been fired, that person no longer has access to passport files, he said.

"I can assure you that person's going to be at the top of the list of the inspector general when they talk to people, and we are currently reviewing our (disciplinary) options with respect to that person," McCormack said.

In Clinton's case, someone accessed her file last summer as part of a training session involving another State Department worker. McCormack said the violation was immediately recognized and the person was admonished. That person was not involved in the later incidents, meaning four people were involved in all.

The department's internal computer system "flags" certain records, including those of high-profile people, to tip off supervisors when someone tries to view the records without an appropriate reason.

McCormack said an early review of the incidents points to workers' "imprudent curiosity" more than something more sinister.

But "we are not dismissive of any other possibility, and that's the reason why we have an investigation under way," he said.

Former independent counsel Joseph diGenova, who investigated the 1992 scandal, said the firings of the two contract employees will make the investigation more difficult because the inspector general can't compel them to talk.

"My guess is if he tries to talk to them now, in all likelihood they will take the Fifth," diGenova said, referring to the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination.

Likewise, Patrick Kennedy, the top management official at the State Department, briefed the candidates' staffs on Capitol Hill, then said to reporters, "The State Department has very, very rigorous rules about controls and access for privacy material. We review them regularly, and we have a large organization with a lot of people in it. Mistakes and errors happen from time to time. ... We caught these and we've got to work and correct that process."

Attorney General Michael Mukasey said the case has not yet been referred to the Justice Department for investigation, and indicated prosecutors were likely to wait until the State Department's inspector general concludes that inquiry. But Mukasey did not rule out the possibility of the Justice Department taking an independent look.

McCain, who was in Paris on Friday, said any breach of passport privacy deserves action.

"The United States of America values everyone's privacy, and corrective action should be taken," he said.

It was not clear whether the employees saw anything other than the basic personal data such as name, citizenship, age, Social Security number and place of birth, which is required when someone fills out a passport application.

The file also includes date and place of birth and address at time of application. Agency officials said the files generally would not list countries the person has traveled to.

"It is worth noting that that earlier situation (in 1992) also was characterized as isolated and nonpolitical when the news initially emerged," said Howard Berman, D-Calif., chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

"This time, as then, Congress will pay close attention to the depth of executive branch involvement in the rifling of presidential candidates' passport files," he added.

The Washington Times first reported the incident involving Obama.

___

Associated Press reporter Dan Caterinicchia contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — At least four State Department workers pried into the supposedly secure passport files of presidential contenders Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain, abashed offic...
WASHINGTON — At least four State Department workers pried into the supposedly secure passport files of presidential contenders Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain, abashed offic...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
2868
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next › Last » (49 pages total)
photo

If I was gonna have someone sneak a peak at my competitors passports, I'd also have them sneak a peak at my own... just to have an alibi of sorts.

Just saying...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 03/21/2008

Not so subtle message to all Dems gleened from this story:

Stay in line, keep your mouths shut, remain emasculated

or you might be next in the Eliot Spitzer hit parade.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 PM on 03/21/2008

Would you deny Halliburton the right to perform due diligence on their prospective employee and/or prosecutor? I know I would.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 03/21/2008
- Irons I'm a Fan of Irons 2 fans permalink

I bet some Congressional Dem will fire off a strongly-worded letter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 PM on 03/21/2008

Waxman already has.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:43 PM on 03/21/2008
- robbor I'm a Fan of robbor 7 fans permalink
photo

OMG...coul­d it be???....P­assportgat­e?? idiot thieves are discovered and caught during break in, through interrogation the small crack widens to reveal the nefarious hand of !!!.......­..........­.. stay tuned

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 03/21/2008

If these sensitive passport records had a flag to alert supervisors and administrators when the records were accessed, why didn't they just set security levels for the users? Database administration is pretty easy--if you don't want the regular or contract workers to view a candidate's passport file, you flag the files as sensitive, create a security profile for the user, and if the user has insufficient clearance, the system denies you access to the file.

I also take exception to how MSNBC is reporting this--"the file was breached." No, it wasn't. If a hacker got through the firewall and accessed the files, that would be a breach. The people who viewed the files were contractors or employees, who had full access. The employees shouldn't be fired--they should be warned--but some heads should roll in State's IT department.

Network Security isn't rocket science, but then again, this is the Government, and I guess it's difficult to find good programmers for the antiquated technology still in use. (Hell, the IRS is probably the largest employer of COBOL programmer­s.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 PM on 03/21/2008
- Meok I'm a Fan of Meok permalink

If these contractors ONLY looked at the files of the last 3 candidates, and ignored Giuliani, Edwards, Romney, Thompson, Huckabee, Richardson, then they are real psychics and they should go to Las Vegas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 PM on 03/21/2008
photo

Excellent point. Meok. This is bullshit, specifically ROVE bullshit designed to defuse a new Watergate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 03/21/2008
- EinChicago I'm a Fan of EinChicago 33 fans permalink

Actually, that is a great point. At least on the GOP side. On teh dem side, it was a no-brainer from last July that there were omnly really two candidastes, so that's not a biggie no other dem except perhaps Edwards was ever anything more than a joke candidate. But if the breach of McCain's stretches back more than few months, then that is really telling that it was a GOP insider with some insight into how things were going to play out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 PM on 03/21/2008
- njdon I'm a Fan of njdon 2 fans permalink

having worked for the feds for many (really many) years i can tell you (anecdotally) that personal records are breached all the time. papers can be added or removed or read or copied. by people with real or imagined authority or just plain meanness.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 PM on 03/21/2008
- barriosbabe I'm a Fan of barriosbabe 240 fans permalink
photo

You know, I feel these things are terrible breaches ..... as a (former) government attorney, but as you say, this stuff went on ALL the time. So sad. I'm tired of MSM reducing everything to a sensational "bite."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 03/21/2008
photo

That's a sad, but valid point njdon.

Wasn't last year when someone from the Veteran's administration took a disk home illeagally, and then got burgerlized?

I remember I got a letter, but am fuzzy on the exact details.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 03/21/2008
- Kyuzo I'm a Fan of Kyuzo 37 fans permalink

Can someone explain to me why these "breaches" are so controversial as they pertain to the campaigns? I understand and agree that it's a terrible violation of their privacy, but is the travel schedule of such promininent public figures really so "private"?

I'm not being sarcastic, I just don't understand how one's passport record could be used against them politically.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 PM on 03/21/2008
- Svenson I'm a Fan of Svenson 3 fans permalink

Well, at first it was only Obama's passport details that was read ... so to all the Obamdiots .. they wanted to accuse the clintons or the mccains of foul play to take rev wright off the front pages.

Sadly and disappointingly especially to Keith Olberman and CHris Mathews, and huff n puff, it affected everyone..­.

So they ahve to play along as i it is a big story .. cannot just drop it because clinton and mccain are also affect .. that would look too obvious.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 PM on 03/21/2008

Obamdiots.­...very clever.

Secondly, evidently the State Department thought it was important to notify the media and Obama's campaign about this before they were aware that the same breach occured with the other candidates. Why is this? It's mysterious to me.

Thirdly, there is an aggressive campaign to take down Obama and this movement from all sides right now. It is not too far fetched to see in the actions of this highly-politicized State department some sort of conspiratorial process with which to sabotage the Democratic process to choose our nominee.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 03/21/2008

I can hear them crying now. Yesterday I posted that probably Sen. Clinton's passport info had been breached also, but they were not having any of it. I guess they were too busy thanking God that Obama had some cover for the Rev. Wright story. And, Obama stuck his foot in his mouth once again yesterday when he referred to his grandmother as a "typical white person/woman" and he is backtracking today....d­oing what he does best lately.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:38 PM on 03/21/2008
- slow2 I'm a Fan of slow2 10 fans permalink

Kyuzo,

It has been noted that passports also contain SS # and other info that could allow further access into financial and similar records...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 03/21/2008
- AnninCA I'm a Fan of AnninCA 54 fans permalink

It isn't a real story. They could check dates of travel, I guess.

Obama supporters just get all hysterical over stuff. Paranoia runs rampant in his gang. Obama puffs up over most everything.


The State department caught it, caught the guys, and the last I really heard, it was more of a "curiosity" deal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 PM on 03/21/2008

For high profile persons, their resords are, understandably, restricted veiwing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:29 PM on 03/21/2008
- ErikW65 I'm a Fan of ErikW65 11 fans permalink

I don't think "how one's passport record could be used against them politically" is the reason the Obama Campaign is objecting. It's an issue of governmental procedures and possible lawbreaking as well. The system did not work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 PM on 03/21/2008
- Beelzebul I'm a Fan of Beelzebul 55 fans permalink

9-11 changed everything. Remember 9-11. Always.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 PM on 03/21/2008
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1589 fans permalink
photo

Rudy?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 PM on 03/21/2008
photo

Charlie Black, McCain's head campaign advisor is a lobbyist for Blackwater. Mark Penn works for the lobbying firm that handles Blackwater. Mark Penn is Hillary's chief strategist.

Ego?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 PM on 03/21/2008
- NU81 I'm a Fan of NU81 2 fans permalink

This morning the State Dept. spokesperson at times seemed to smirk or definitely make light of this grave matter, even though his "words" at times tried to assure us (somewhat) otherwise. He emphasized repeatedly that a "trainee" accessed at least one of the files...do­es this make it okay because they were a trainee?

I worked at a large corporation where security was a serious issue as well (albeit less serious than the State Dept.). It was repeatedly emphasized that our activity on the system was logged, so if we accessed any file other than one we should be working on it would be immediately reported! Also, when we trained on new programs, a "John Q. Sample" file was set up so that we wouldn't need to access real files (the State Dept. said trainees were urged to use files of family members, etc.) Why wasn't a sample file set up?

Important questions were also not asked of the spokesman this morning; did the official training these contract workers make it repeatedly clear that logging onto other files was a very serious breach? Not only do I feel my privacy as an "ordinary" U.S. citizen has been compromised by hearing of this, but it's been further aggravated by the fact I feel the State Dept. official seemed to take this too lightly. He even came to the press conference not knowing whether other presidential nominees' files had been breached! I'm not a spokesperson, but I would have come to the press conference prepared with that simple answer.

I don't know what other more important business Sec. Condoleeza Rice had going on this morning, but in my opinion she should have held this press conference--this matter is of grave importance to all Americans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 PM on 03/21/2008
- magen I'm a Fan of magen 14 fans permalink

Hmmmm....

I saw Little Georgie pounding his fist and having a temper tantrum the other day about his wiretapping.

Now State Department passport files are breached.

Somebody's fishing.

Rove?????? Smells like you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 03/21/2008
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG 111 fans permalink
photo

^ I was just going to say that, next we'll learn their phones were tapped.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 PM on 03/21/2008

Of course Rove is behind this.

Now is a good time to remind you about something.

Has anyone else noticed that ROVE spelled backwards is EVIL.
Sure the O and the R have to be substituted for but that's because he's too damn clever to use his real name which is ... KARL LIVE.
And have you noticed both his and Bush's first and last names have 4 letters?
And the years of the stolen elections, 2000 and 2004 , are both divisible by 4? Coincidence? I think not.
Sure, all presidential years are divisible by 4 but, really, do 1996 and 1992 look anything like 2000 and 2004? Hardly. They're so bendy and loopy they can be discounted.
And what of GEORGE BUSH's name? Same thing. You drop the 2nd GE because it's just a repeat of the 1st GE and you have GEOR BUSH.
4 letters each.
And how many strokes does it take to form the letter "W" ?
And don't get me started on the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse connection.
It's all out there and and and ...

AHWOOOOOOO

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 03/21/2008

Just sending the routine coded messages that politicians and a few of us who are informed truly understand. All non-neo-cons must stay in lockstep.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 03/21/2008

Of course Rove is behind this.

Now is a good time to remind you about something.

Has anyone else noticed that ROVE spelled backwards is EVIL.

Sure the O and the R have to be substituted for but that's because he's too damn clever to use his real name which is ... KARL LIVE.

And have you noticed both his and Bush's first and last names have 4 letters?

And the years of the stolen elections, 2000 and 2004 , are both divisible by 4? Coincidence? I think not.

Sure, all presidential years are divisible by 4 but, really, do 1996 and 1992 look anything like 2000 and 2004? Hardly. They're so bendy and loopy they can be discounted.

And what of GEORGE BUSH's name? Same thing. You drop the 2nd GE because it's just a repeat of the 1st GE and you have GEOR BUSH.

4 letters each.

And how many strokes does it take to form the letter "W" ?

And don't get me started on the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse connection.

It's all out there and and and ...

AHWOOOOOOO

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 03/21/2008
- StrayTalk I'm a Fan of StrayTalk 8 fans permalink
photo

Last time I looked, Condi Rice isn't supporting Clinton or Obama. Look again and you'll see that the State Dept has continually lied to us about the facts since Bush Inc. got in. This isn't a Hillary vs Obama issue. Remember Karl Rove?
Maybe what they tell us about this matter is true. But don't bet on it. I'm picking Oregon to make the Final Four before I would believe these storytellers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 03/21/2008
- slow2 I'm a Fan of slow2 10 fans permalink

Maybe fmr Amb Wilson would have an opinion?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 PM on 03/21/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next › Last » (49 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect