The Clinton Myth: Nomination All But Unachievable

Hillary is red, white, and blue. Obama can be painted as green (for inexperience), and yellow (for being whimpy and whining), and black (for making us think about race when we don't want to).

Does that mean you don't want to know about Peter Paul vs Clinton three days after the PA primary...a 17 million dollar fraud case...hmmm...I guess you don't. lol

Clinton had a free ride for more than a year in the MSM. In fact during her entire Senate career she has had virtually no media criticism, even though her votes in the Senate were consistently neocon enabling and far to the right of the Democratic base.

She has run a despicable campaign against Senator Obama and the media is only now starting to question her credibility, her blatant lies, resume padding and her attempt to destroy Senator Obama's chances to win against McCain in the general election when she knows very well that she cannot win the nomination. It was clear after the Wisconsin primary that Senator Clinton would not finish ahead in the popular vote, pledged delegates or contests won. She should have bowed out then. If she continues her divisive campaign, she will be shown to be nothing more than a Republican helping McCain.

It's sounds as if you have been sipping on the Obama koolaid because you are buying into their latest talking point about the PARTY being hurt by her continued presence in the race. There are still millions of voters and supporters who have yet to vote. They have spent money and time in their quest to get Hillary nominated. It is so un-Democratic to disenfranchise them in addition to the voters locked out in FL and MI. If Hillary were to be forced out now due to a phony paradigm being perpetuated by Obama backers; the consequential damage would far outweigh the benefits to the Party. Let the process play out.

The nicest thing I've heard from a Clinton supporter. Thank you!

he is not responsible for them.their state leaders chose to ignore the rules. would you expect hillary to do thjis if the shoe w3as on the other foot i think not so w3hat does that say about you

Obama has a better chance of winning the general election than Hillary. Hillary can't take any state that Kerry failed to take, and the polls show she might lose a few blue states, which means her candidacy would guarantee a McCain win. Obama, on the other hand, won't lose any state that Kerry won, plus he will likely pick up a few red states that Hillary would certainly lose.

For example, there's Colorado, a state that Obama won in the primary election with a whopping 35 point spread over Hillary's bid. This state is a red state, having voted Republican in 4 of the last 5 general elections. In this state, Obama is favored to win over McCain by 46% to 39% according to Rassmussen, while Hillary is projected to lose there 35% to 49%.

Then there's Oregon, a traditionally blue state, that Obama would likelty take 49% to 40% according to the latest Rasmussen, while Hillary would likely lose there to McCain 42% to 45%. Likewise, Iowa, a traditionally blue state that switched to Bush in the last election would likely welcome Obama by a slender margin 43% to 40% in his favor, compared to Hillary likely losing by a vote of 37% to 47% in favor of McCain.

It is ironic that Bill Clinton is painting such high hopes for Hillary on the state of Indiana, as it is traditionally red and most likely to stay that way in the fall election. Equally ironic, Michigan, another traditionally blue state, shows a clear win for Obama, while Hillary ties with McCain. And Florida is likely to vote for McCain in the fall election, no matter who the nominee turns out to be.

Check out presidentialelectionpolls.com for yourself. Do the math. Hillary can't win the general election, but Obama will.

Well her campaign sure as heck turned quite a few of her own Dem party people against her. I don't even want to get into her negatives for the General... Then you have the Indies, newbies & crossovers to try to get in her corner...

Joint ticket? No damn chance. Her name shows up on any Dem Ticket & I'll leave that spot BLANK but will vote for my Dem Senate seat that is in play in my state.

She & Dollar Bill endorsed a Republican instead of one of their own Dem party members in a Dem primary for position of commander in chief... Tells you a lot about those people right there...

Because PA is basically a McCain state and Hillary and McCain are two peas in a pod.

I think you forgot a couple:

Clinton: "I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base."

Clinton: "I've long been a critic of the shortcomings of NAFTA."

Clinton: "I've crossed the Commander in Chief threshold"

Clinton: "I helped to bring peace to Northern Ireland."

Clinton: "I negotiated open borders to let fleeing refugees into safety from Kosovo."

Clinton: "I will win the Democratic Nomination"

delusional much

So you're saying Obama's winning because of racial guilt or something? I haven't heard a SINGLE person say they voted for him for such a reason. At best you're presuming to know what everyone is thinking despite a complete lack of objective evidence.

Actually she was leading in the overall delegate count after Super Tuesday and she won 20 more delegates that day as well. That's reality.

Actually, Obama got more TX delegates than Hillary did.

Kev- I somehow can't put the words "rea;ity" and Clinton in the same sentence !!! She cares only for her own selfish wants and needs...and not a wit for the good of the country, much less the Democratic Party. Why won't the DNC and Gore, or whoever, get together and convince this shrew she is damaging the Party ??? Oh, well...we are screwed as long as she stays in this race !!!

Are YOU using "Hussein" in your middle name, or is it really someone else ???

Just curious !!!

Please explain to me why her tax returns are of such interest to you? How about Obama's pre-2006 tax returns? How was he able to afford a $2 million dollar house in 2004 after being broke in 2000? How about we actually discuss issues?