JPMorgan Raises Bear Purchase Price

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - JPMorgan Raises Bear Purchase Price stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JOE BEL BRUNO | March 24, 2008 05:34 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
The Bear Stearns headquarters, center, and the JP Morgan headquarters, right, are shown on Monday, March 24, 2008 in New York. JPMorgan Chase & Co. increased it offer Monday for Bear Stears Cos. to $10 per share. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

NEW YORK — JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s higher offer for Bear Stearns on Monday gave the investment bank control of nearly 40 percent of its ailing rival, blunting the threat that angry shareholders could scuttle the deal.

The $2.4 billion lifeline to rescue the investment house stands a strong chance of success _ assuaging investors unhappy with a $2 per share offer by upping it to $10 apiece. JPMorgan has faced an outcry among Bear Stearns shareholders about the lowball offer, and faced the possibility that rival deals would begin to surface.

Most analysts said a higher bid was unlikely, but some bondholders have reportedly been buying the stock in order to ensure their right to vote for a deal and prevent a bankruptcy that would wipe them out. Bear Stearns' shares _ which hit $160 last year and still traded near $80 earlier in the month _ nearly doubled to $11.25 on Monday.

However, for a company whose market value went from $8.3 billion to about $1 billion in a little more than a week, the revised deal was still not the outcome investors hoped for. It also didn't help out the 14,000 employees _ one-third owners in Bear Stearns _ who have seen the value of their stock holdings plummet and still face the potential of massive layoffs.

"Whether you got $2 or you got $10 was the difference between nothing and nothing," said John Buckingham, chief executive of Al Frank Asset Management, which held shares of Bear Stearns. "For an employee whose retirement was 98 percent wiped out, they had nothing to lose hoping to get more money out of bankruptcy _ and that behooved JPMorgan to raise the price."

There has been outrage since the Federal Reserve tapped JPMorgan to rescue the 85-year-old investment bank in a deal some feel was hastily arranged. The buyout was put together over a weekend, and within a few days JPMorgan Chief Executive Jamie Dimon was trying to rally Bear Stearns executives to his side.

In exchange for the higher-priced offer, Bear Stearns agreed to sell 95 million newly issued shares to JPMorgan. That gave JPMorgan a 39.5 percent stake, providing an almost certain majority in any shareholder vote.

JPMorgan, the nation's third-largest commercial bank, also renegotiated the Federal Reserve's role in the offer. The central bank originally agreed to guarantee $30 billion of Bear Stearns assets, including risky mortgage-backed securities. JPMorgan said it will now take on the first $1 billion of losses, while the Fed backs the rest.

Story continues below
advertisement

Dimon, who needs only another 10.5 percent of shareholders to approve the takeover, appears to have outflanked any other deals. The agreement, filed with regulators last week, prohibits Bear Stearns employees or directors from soliciting any alternative transactions.

"We believe the amended terms are fair to all sides and reflect the value and risks of the Bear Stearns franchise," Dimon said in a statement.

Investors agreed with his tactics, sending JPMorgan shares up 58 cents to $45.55.

Bear Stearns shareholders, meanwhile, are expected to vote on the deal within the next few months.

The Fed, along with the Treasury Department, has drawn criticism for bailing out a Wall Street investment bank that many feel have been reckless amid the credit crisis. The higher price for Bear Stearns could be uncomfortable for Fed officials and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, who played a key role in the rescue effort. The New York Fed declined to comment.

Last week, Paulson publicly defended the Fed's actions, noting that shareholders were nearly wiped out at the original $2 per share price and argued that such losses would discourage other companies from counting on government help in the future.

Treasury spokeswoman Jennifer Zuccarelli said in an e-mail that "an orderly transition of Bear Stearns is in the best interest of our financial markets. The updated arrangements between Bear Stearns, JPMorgan and the Federal Reserve are consistent with that goal."

JPMorgan's higher offer _ the initial price was $236 million _ comes at a jittery time for Washington and Wall Street alike. A total collapse of Bear Stearns would have rippled through the economy, locking up credit even tighter and torpedoing global stock markets.

The housing collapse and credit crunch spurred record-high home foreclosures and led financial companies to rack up multibillion losses from complex mortgage investments that turned sour. As credit problems spread, financial institutions became increasingly wary of lending, causing businesses and consumers to hunker down.

Bear's financial troubles began in July, when two hedge funds it managed nearly collapsed from big positions in securities tied to subprime mortgages. The investment house had to bail out the funds and take possession of many of their instruments.

The revised bid dented hopes by retail investors for another offer that would value the company more fairly. There have been reports that billionaire financier Joseph Lewis, one of Bear Stearns' biggest shareholders, and Chairman and former CEO James Cayne would team up for a rival bid.

Lewis spokesman Doug McMahon didn't return a call Monday seeking comment. A spokesman for Bear Stearns also did not return calls.

The renegotiated agreement does not eliminate the hurdles to the deal, which is still the target of shareholder lawsuits.

Marian Rosner, a senior partner at Wolf Popper LLP, whose firm was one of many that filed class action lawsuits against Bear Stearns on behalf of employees, said Monday that "selling for $2 or $10 doesn't really make a difference."

___

AP Business Writers Madlen Read and Stephen Bernard contributed to this report.

NEW YORK — JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s higher offer for Bear Stearns on Monday gave the investment bank control of nearly 40 percent of its ailing rival, blunting the threat that angry shareholders c...
NEW YORK — JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s higher offer for Bear Stearns on Monday gave the investment bank control of nearly 40 percent of its ailing rival, blunting the threat that angry shareholders c...
Filed by Michelle Kung  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
37
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 (2 pages total)

WTF?
Let me get this straight..­. If the government decides to bail out my bankrupt - run into the ground - worthless company, and I don't like the price they offer, (after the fact mind you)... I can just whine about it and they will give me FIVE TIMES AS MUCH for my still worthless company?
Hey I think we need some adult supervision here - damn quick, too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 03/24/2008
- nastyvirus I'm a Fan of nastyvirus 2 fans permalink

No, you silly goose, not YOUR company. Only companies that can ply the administration with many millions can play.

So, if your company does indeed go bankrupt, then your goose will be cooked, because no one on Wall Street will rise to help poor YOU.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 PM on 03/24/2008

Does no one see the similarities between this and the handling of the Iraq war?

The complete and utter incompetence on the part of Halliburton, JPM and Bear Stearns?

The secrecy and opaqueness?

The perfidy?

And at the end of the day, the Federal Government waiting with check book in hand, ready to indemnify all, just so long as they are big business interests?

Could any other outcome be expected with this administration?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 AM on 03/24/2008
- mcostello I'm a Fan of mcostello 9 fans permalink

It won't be long before everyone realizes that deficit spending is what has created this inflation and weak $$. Then the feds won't be so eager to bail companies out. But they won't be eager to buoy up our economy with federal jobs, business tax incentives or tax cuts either.
Hopefully Washington will wake out of it's slumber before the Asians refuse to buy another dollar.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 03/24/2008

Glad I wasn't holding on to any of that stock. The talking heads on CNBC only a weeks before the buyout were saying, "Hang on to it!" Which is another reason I don't let anyone else manage my money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 AM on 03/24/2008

Guess, I hadn't got that far yet. The media section here fingers CNBC's Jim Cramer. Check my profile. I don't thing I have ever called anyone a name here, until now, "knucklehe­ad."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 03/24/2008
photo

That is still a very good deal considering how much money the taxpayer put into it. Nice scam. Have Georges buddy at the fed throw tens of billions into a company, then some of his republican buddies at another company buy it for pennies on the dollar and meanwhile his buddies at the failed company walk away with their 100 million dollar bonuses. Why is it George can get taxpayers to build him a stadium so he can sell his team, he can get taxpayers to bail out a failure company, and conservotards still think he is on the side of the taxpayer?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 03/24/2008
- drkazmd65 I'm a Fan of drkazmd65 53 fans permalink
photo

"JPMorgan will bear the first $1 billion of any losses linked to Bear Stearns assets being financed, while the central bank will put up the remaining $29 billion."

I still want to know why I, as a taxpayer in this country, should be expected to potentially underwrite $29 billion in losses to a private company that is purchasing another private company?

Bear Stearns and JPMorgan never trickled down any of their gains to me over the last several years. Why should I help underwrite their potential losses? I mean - isn't business supposed to 'flourish' under deregulated capitalism?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 03/24/2008
- mcostello I'm a Fan of mcostello 9 fans permalink

But they could trickle down a lot of pain to you if they went bankrupt.
Barney Frank said it best; "these companies are holding America hostage, and we can pay the ransom, or see how much damage gets done.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 03/24/2008

But do we have to pay millions in severance to the people who caused it and facilitated it? Do we do anything for homeowners?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 PM on 03/24/2008
photo

One thing about Republicans:

They do like to privatize profits and socialize losses.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 AM on 03/24/2008
- Mike169 I'm a Fan of Mike169 45 fans permalink
photo

That doesn't seem to be Adam Smith's capitalism at all. But it works for the ruling class.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 AM on 03/24/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect