Blackstone Co-Founder Peterson On Wealth, McCain, And Fiscal Responsibility

Blackstone Co-Founder Peterson On Wealth, McCain, And Fiscal Responsibility

Portfolio   |  Lloyd Grove   |   March 25, 2008 01:25 PM


digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Peter G. Peterson is a man of parts: leveraged-buyout billionaire, policy wonk, social lion, and--most recently--the patron of an ambitious new foundation (named, like the Washington think tank he chairs, after himself) that aims to alert Americans to the dangers of mushrooming deficits, exploding entitlements, and gluttonous oil addiction.

At 81--rich, privileged, and well-connected beyond his dreams--Pete Peterson is an unlikely Paul Revere. He's the Nebraska-born son of striving Greek immigrants, who studied hard, excelled in business (rising through the ranks of the McCann Erickson advertising agency and then running Bell & Howell), and impressed the likes of philanthropist John D. Rockefeller III and former Treasury secretary Douglas Dillon with his public-spirited bent. They sponsored his induction into the American Establishment, and Peterson ended up serving as Richard Nixon's international economics expert, and then Commerce secretary, before running Lehman Brothers for more than a decade. In 1985, Peterson was nearly 60--and ripe for a rewarding retirement--when he and a young financial whiz named Stephen Schwarzman decided to start a small private equity firm, the Blackstone Group, whose name was an amalgam of theirs (schwarz meaning black in German and petros meaning stone in Greek). Now the senior chairman of the hugely successful firm, Peterson received $1.8 billion as a result of Blackstone's initial public offering and plans to pump as much as a billion dollars of his own money into his new foundation. Three weeks ago, he sat down with Portfolio.com for an exclusive interview.


 
Comments
6
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- Rule Of Law I'm a Fan of Rule Of Law 161 fans permalink

Another Oracle says, beware, beware the exploding entitlements!

They are laying the ground work for the repeal of SS pretty darn good now, aren't they?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 PM on 03/25/2008
- Rule Of Law I'm a Fan of Rule Of Law 161 fans permalink

AND, as was just pointed out on another blog--SS and Medicare are Not entitlement programs!

The Neo-Con Republicans, their Democratic enablers, and both their bosses--The Corporate Elites--are very busy right now lumping all those programs together in the public mind in order to destroy every one of them. Another great example of how they play with words to manipulate the unwary.

Their biggest target has always been SS, but this new tactic of calling a program that we all Pay Into with our taxes, an entitlement, is just plain WRONG! We buy it every year with our labor! Then they steal it and cover the debt with IOU's. So tell me who is really on welfare here?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 03/26/2008
- argeec I'm a Fan of argeec 7 fans permalink

Peterson thinks that a welfare state such as Sweden or Denmark is untenable.
He would prefer the US go back to the way it was before the New Deal.
I guess it's possible to make billions and still be wrong on major issues.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 03/25/2008
- WIpatriot I'm a Fan of WIpatriot 36 fans permalink
photo

Money don't make you right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 PM on 03/25/2008
- Rule Of Law I'm a Fan of Rule Of Law 161 fans permalink

But having money means never having to say you're sorry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 PM on 03/25/2008

Please provide a source for those comments. I read through the entire interview and saw no mention of the New Deal or a Scandinavian country. As stated at http://www.concordcoalition.org/board/bios/peterson.html , Peterson is the founding President of The Concord Coalition, a "bi-partisan citizen's group he organized in 1992 together with former Senators Warren Rudman and the late Paul Tsongas (who was succeeded by Senator Robert Kerrey)". In that role, I have never heard him suggest the elimination of Social Security or Medicare. On page 200 of his book "Running on Empty", he suggests indexing new Social Security benefits to prices instead of wages, something that was done in Britain. In combination with that, he goes on to suggest mandating additional savings in personal retirement accounts and fortifying Social Security's safety net. On page 280 of this earlier book "Facing Up", he suggested expanding the means-testing in Social Security as did the Concord Coalition. However, that idea never gained any political traction. In any event, we would be much better off if all Republicans were as reasonable and as civic-minded as Peterson. At the very least, we should not be misrepresenting his views.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 AM on 03/26/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect