LeBron James Vogue Cover Criticized For "Perpetuating Racial Stereotypes"

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - LeBron James Vogue Cover Criticized For "Perpetuating Racial Stereotypes" stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 03-25-08 08:39 AM   |   Updated: 04- 2-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

When Vogue announced its April cover starring LeBron James and Gisele Bundchen, the magazine noted with some fanfare that James was the first black man to grace its cover.

But the image is stirring up controversy, with some commentators decrying the photo as perpetuating racial stereotypes. James strikes what some see as a gorilla-like pose, baring his teeth, with one hand dribbling a ball and the other around Bundchen's tiny waist.

It's an image some have likened to "King Kong" and Fay Wray.

"It conjures up this idea of a dangerous black man," said Tamara Walker, 29, of Philadelphia.

Photographer Annie Leibovitz shot the 6-foot-9 NBA star and the 5-foot-11 Brazilian model for the cover and an inside spread. Vogue spokesman Patrick O'Connell said the magazine "sought to celebrate two superstars at the top of their game" for the magazine's annual issue devoted to size and shape.

"We think Lebron James and Gisele Bundchen look beautiful together and we are honored to have them on the cover," he said.

James told The (Cleveland) Plain Dealer he was pleased with the cover, saying he was "just showing a little emotion."

"Everything my name is on is going to be criticized in a good way or bad way," James told the paper. "Who cares what anyone says?"

Story continues below
advertisement

But magazine analyst Samir Husni believes the photo was deliberately provocative, adding that it "screams King Kong." Considering Vogue's influential history, he said, covers are not something that the magazine does in a rush.

"So when you have a cover that reminds people of King Kong and brings those stereotypes to the front, black man wanting white woman, it's not innocent," he said.

O'Connell, the Vogue spokesman, declined further comment.

In a column at ESPN.com, Jemele Hill called the cover "memorable for all the wrong reasons." But she said in an interview that the image is not unusual -- white athletes are generally portrayed smiling or laughing, while black sports figures are given a "beastly sort of vibe."

For example, former NBA star Charles Barkley was depicted breaking free of neck and wrist shackles on the cover of Sports Illustrated. Dennis Rodman graced the cover of Rolling Stone with horns poking out of his forehead and his red tongue hanging out.

Images of black male athletes as aggressive and threatening "reinforce the criminalization of black men," said Damion Thomas, assistant professor in the Department of Kinesiology at University of Maryland.

But others say the image show James' game face -- nothing more. And they note that Bundchen hardly looks frightened.

"James is a huge, black beautiful masculine statue and Gisele is a feminine, sexy gorgeous doll," said Christa Thomas, 36, a black account supervisor in Los Angeles.

"I didn't see any kind of racist overtone to it," she said. "I still don't. I think there is such a hypersensitivity to race still in this country."

Husni said it is too soon to know how the magazine is selling, though the controversy could increase sales as people rush out to get a "collector's edition."

If nothing else, Walker said the cover underscores the need for a more diverse workplace.

"If more people of color worked for Vogue in positions of editorial authority, perhaps someone in the room might have been able to read the image the way so many of us are reading it now, and had the power to do something about it," she said.

Filed by Katharine Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
249
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (12 pages total)
- veracity I'm a Fan of veracity 67 fans permalink

Great story, HuffPost! This is certainly where the "major media" fears to tread -and you certainly can't discuss this sort of issue in tradictional major media.

The cover photo (of LeBron) accurately captures his career profession: His job is to take that ball past very big, very determined, very athletic, very powerful defenders who are trying to stop him. That is his profession, and like Michael Jordan, he is good at it. I'm not the biggest MJ fan (I feel his decision to not support Harvey Gantt in NC senate races 1990 and '96, against good-ol-boy entrenched racist Jesse Helms, was a betrayal of the civil rights movement), but I can't even imagine MJ doing that snarl the way LeBron does.
On the other hand, maybe LeBron's pose is the more honest: That IS what we want in our athletes, the snarling, animal ability to run over (and overpower) their opponents.
We just sugar-coat that snarling animal competition, with notions of civilized fair play and dignity....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 AM on 03/29/2008

If you put both photos next to each other like I did on my site then yes it does look like King Kong and Jane. No Disrespect Lebron
http://www.blacknews4us.com/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 PM on 03/28/2008
- plooger I'm a Fan of plooger 14 fans permalink

check out this WWI propaganda poster, if you want to see the "inspiration" for the Vogue cover...

http://www.digitaldesk.org/projects/secondary/propaganda/destroy_brute.html

And here's the 2 images side-by-side, for comparison...

http://home.comcast.net/~krkaufman/du/lebron_as_brute2.jpg

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 AM on 03/27/2008

This cover has nothing to do with the legacy of race in these United States, and the (white) decision makers at Vogue did not consider the controversy (and sales) that would ensue as a result of this pose.

To think that the long, bloody and hysterical legacy of interracial relations between the sexes in this country is at all at play here is totally beyond reason.

I don't see race... I don't see poverty... I don't see homelessness... I don't see a needless, futile war costing the lives of hundreds of thousands, many of them women and children...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 03/26/2008

Wow, Stanco. You "don't see" a lot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 PM on 03/26/2008
- moda31 I'm a Fan of moda31 10 fans permalink

when i first saw the cover i thought it was bit of an odd cover, though i couldn't figure out exactly what it was. i wondered why the hell lebron looked so angry and stupid, surely out of the hundreds they took they could have chosen a better one. after taking a second look there is definitely a similarity to the king kong image, down to the green dress. i can understand why people might be upset about it given the fact that this is the first time a black man has been on the cover of vogue, and they chose that image?!? honestly it wouldn't surprise me if some idiot editor thought ooh lets channel the king kong scene, wouldn't that be fun. what would be most disturbing to me would be if lebron picked up on it and went along with it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 03/26/2008
- rudiy I'm a Fan of rudiy 2 fans permalink

I find it amazing people see this as racist. It is interesting recognizing the writers who did not see Rev. Wrights comments as racist. I guess you can trun anything to your bias.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 AM on 03/26/2008
- XCITIZEN I'm a Fan of XCITIZEN 57 fans permalink
photo

...continued --- Clearly, this is a transgression against Political Correctness. Maybe the transgression serves a purpose not limited to, and different from being 'wrong' or 'offensive'. Maybe the significance of this image as an archetypal representation is greater that the significance of it as a post-modern spin on an old stereotype. LeBron and Gisele don't seem to be too upset about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 AM on 03/26/2008
- XCITIZEN I'm a Fan of XCITIZEN 57 fans permalink
photo

...continued. -- Clearly, this is a transgression against Political Correctness. Maybe the transgression serves a purpose not limited to, and different from being 'wrong' or 'offensive'. Maybe the significance of this image as an archetypal representation is greater that the significance of it as a post-modern spin on an old stereotype. LeBron and Gisele don't seem to be too upset about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 AM on 03/26/2008
- XCITIZEN I'm a Fan of XCITIZEN 57 fans permalink
photo

I saw this image on the magazine rack the other day, and I thought, weird. Definitely playing on stereotypes, but at the same time, both people in the image look very dynamic and attractive. For some reason, and I can't imagine why, the 'King King' analogy completely went over my head. Now that I look again, it really is 'King Kong and Fay Wray." Very provocative and disturbing. LeBron James is definitely being presented as an animal.

So here is the question, in my mind - is it inherently racist to portray a man as an animal, if that man is black? Men have been called animals since time began. This is a classic metaphor, Beauty and The Beast. In fact, the 'male animal' is literally an archetype. I find the image of James to be really sexy. So for me, there is an appreciation of the image's archetypal quality. But unfortunately, the stereotypical qualities of the image are impossible to ignore or overlook.

So -- now that this image has been analyzed through a politically correct lens, and as we all know, anybody who is politically incorrect should be thrown into a lake of fire for all eternity - who is to blame for the 'wrongness' of this image? Annie Liebowicz? LeBron James and Gisele? The editors of Vogue?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 AM on 03/26/2008
- Orikinla I'm a Fan of Orikinla 4 fans permalink

Yeah, they looked like beauty and the beast or "King Kong" and Fay Wray, but I ignored the similarities when I reported it.

The contrasts glare at you.

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 AM on 03/26/2008

The only people who would find this racist are probably racists themselves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 AM on 03/26/2008
- OverIt I'm a Fan of OverIt 72 fans permalink

Exactly! While I can buy that the picture does in fact play with a stereotype --- black pro athlete/white woman --- I don't see anything "racist" about the image.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 AM on 03/26/2008
- noamjunior I'm a Fan of noamjunior 81 fans permalink

If Lebron didn't hunch over like that in the photo- the two wouldn't be in the same shot because of their size difference, so criticizing Lebron's pose seems off-base. Lebron's intense photo shows the awesome aura of one of the world's greatest athletes. The problem isn't this photo, it is a media that only allow black heroes to be rap stars and athletes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:51 AM on 03/26/2008
- snruB I'm a Fan of snruB 5 fans permalink
photo

First thing I thought when seeing that cover was "They're trying to make him look like a gorilla or something" (well, actually it was "Oh, what I would do to her if I was Lebron"). That's brutal

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 PM on 03/25/2008
- shengirl I'm a Fan of shengirl 10 fans permalink

Why is this racial stereotypes? If the athlete was white, would it be racial stereotypes? So a black athlete can't engage in the same posed shenanigans as a white one could? Now THAT'S racist.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 PM on 03/25/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (12 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect