LeBron James Vogue Cover Criticized For "Perpetuating Racial Stereotypes"

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - LeBron James Vogue Cover Criticized For "Perpetuating Racial Stereotypes" stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 03-25-08 08:39 AM   |   Updated: 04- 2-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

When Vogue announced its April cover starring LeBron James and Gisele Bundchen, the magazine noted with some fanfare that James was the first black man to grace its cover.

But the image is stirring up controversy, with some commentators decrying the photo as perpetuating racial stereotypes. James strikes what some see as a gorilla-like pose, baring his teeth, with one hand dribbling a ball and the other around Bundchen's tiny waist.

It's an image some have likened to "King Kong" and Fay Wray.

"It conjures up this idea of a dangerous black man," said Tamara Walker, 29, of Philadelphia.

Photographer Annie Leibovitz shot the 6-foot-9 NBA star and the 5-foot-11 Brazilian model for the cover and an inside spread. Vogue spokesman Patrick O'Connell said the magazine "sought to celebrate two superstars at the top of their game" for the magazine's annual issue devoted to size and shape.

"We think Lebron James and Gisele Bundchen look beautiful together and we are honored to have them on the cover," he said.

James told The (Cleveland) Plain Dealer he was pleased with the cover, saying he was "just showing a little emotion."

"Everything my name is on is going to be criticized in a good way or bad way," James told the paper. "Who cares what anyone says?"

Story continues below

But magazine analyst Samir Husni believes the photo was deliberately provocative, adding that it "screams King Kong." Considering Vogue's influential history, he said, covers are not something that the magazine does in a rush.

"So when you have a cover that reminds people of King Kong and brings those stereotypes to the front, black man wanting white woman, it's not innocent," he said.

O'Connell, the Vogue spokesman, declined further comment.

In a column at ESPN.com, Jemele Hill called the cover "memorable for all the wrong reasons." But she said in an interview that the image is not unusual -- white athletes are generally portrayed smiling or laughing, while black sports figures are given a "beastly sort of vibe."

For example, former NBA star Charles Barkley was depicted breaking free of neck and wrist shackles on the cover of Sports Illustrated. Dennis Rodman graced the cover of Rolling Stone with horns poking out of his forehead and his red tongue hanging out.

Images of black male athletes as aggressive and threatening "reinforce the criminalization of black men," said Damion Thomas, assistant professor in the Department of Kinesiology at University of Maryland.

But others say the image show James' game face -- nothing more. And they note that Bundchen hardly looks frightened.

"James is a huge, black beautiful masculine statue and Gisele is a feminine, sexy gorgeous doll," said Christa Thomas, 36, a black account supervisor in Los Angeles.

"I didn't see any kind of racist overtone to it," she said. "I still don't. I think there is such a hypersensitivity to race still in this country."

Husni said it is too soon to know how the magazine is selling, though the controversy could increase sales as people rush out to get a "collector's edition."

If nothing else, Walker said the cover underscores the need for a more diverse workplace.

"If more people of color worked for Vogue in positions of editorial authority, perhaps someone in the room might have been able to read the image the way so many of us are reading it now, and had the power to do something about it," she said.

Filed by Katharine Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
249
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last » (12 pages total)

I'm a black woman and I personally don't find the cover offensive. When I saw it for the first time over the weekend my only thought was that he would have looked more handsome without the growl on his face; though I'm sure Annie Leibovitz requested this emotion.

After further thought, I guess I can see how others can find the cover offensive, but it didn't strike me as animalistic at first glance. Regardless, I think the final quote makes an excellent point about the importance of incorporating diversity into the workplace so that we can glean different perspectives about these things.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 03/25/2008

That is not racist at all....

-Check out my site for ways to make money online. http://mikesmoneyclub.blogspot.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 03/25/2008

This is the biggest bunch of HOOEY I've seen in quite a while. Good grief!

Much ado about nothing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:15 PM on 03/25/2008
- Halfwit I'm a Fan of Halfwit 37 fans permalink
photo

Ridiculous.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 03/25/2008
photo

Provocative: serving or tending to provoke, excite or stimulate.

Apparently the use of the word provocative is just to "Politically incorrect" for the HuffPo Reviewers. Either that or they are illiterate and don't know the meaning.

This cover is provocative, to say the least.

However, provocative sells.

I wonder what Tom Brady thinks about this cover?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:01 PM on 03/25/2008
- candlewax I'm a Fan of candlewax 5 fans permalink

What, just because it shows a very angry black man in close proximity to a white woman? Did we not learn anything since "To Kill A Mockingbird"? Judging from the cover, obviously not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 03/25/2008
- qdog112 I'm a Fan of qdog112 71 fans permalink
photo

No two ways about this. It is King Kong and Faye Wray. Lebron's agent should dropped from the Empire State Building. This is disgusting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 03/25/2008
photo

This is provocative to say the least.

Provocative sells, however.

I wonder what Tom Brady thinks when he sees this cover?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 03/25/2008
- Nommo I'm a Fan of Nommo 93 fans permalink
photo

Gee, that fella looks like Michael Strahan...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 PM on 03/25/2008
- kitty3363 I'm a Fan of kitty3363 2 fans permalink
photo

SNORE......................

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 03/25/2008
photo

The image is Kong, clearly. But then, that's what the original 1933 movie was about, too, on the subconscious level.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 PM on 03/25/2008

KIng Kong? yeah that was exactly what I was thinking of. Lebron James is dribbling a basketball because he's a basketball player- which is the only reason why he is a celebrity. according to his quote he was showing emotion- not following any direction.

these postmodern losers really need to get it together.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 03/25/2008
- justmeinAz I'm a Fan of justmeinAz 19 fans permalink
photo

Non-issue. Feel free to become offended by anything you like, just don't expect your indignation to be a call to action for the rest of us. Acknowledging race or playing off of racial stereotypes is not racism. It's acknowledging what's there. I think the people who think he's in an ape-like pose have closet-racists inside themselves, because I could have stared at that picture all day long without thinking once about gorillas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 03/25/2008

Obviously two stereotypic characters in a very stereotyped and potentially offensive (and totally HOT) pose. Would a lot of folks want to trade places with one or the other of them? Absolutely. I suppose if we lived in a world where every Black man looked like Lebron and was as talented an athlete -- and every white woman was Giselle, and there were no other races, shapes, sizes, sexual fantasies, etc to worry about, and we all shared the same values, and being the allegorical Gorilla in the picture was actually a compliment instead of a remedy for White men's fears of physical inadequacy ... then one could consider the picture innocent. I'm most offended by the editors claims about what the picture represents -- this celebration of different sizes and shapes. It's soft porn meant to sell magazines by representing a sexual fantasy.
Sorry for the overanalysis -- the picture is totally hot! And more than a little offensive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 03/25/2008
- TroubleNYC I'm a Fan of TroubleNYC 9 fans permalink
photo

Political Correctness gone astray.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 03/25/2008

Yes, I am totally against the perpetuation of the stereotype that white women are as beautiful as Gisele Bundchen... oh I'm sorry that's not what we were talking about. I'm sorry, I thought we were bringing up the female stereotypes that Vogue along with every other fashion magazine pushes on all of our young women, regardless of race.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 PM on 03/25/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last » (12 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect