iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Tax Returns: Low On Story Lines And Charity Donations

Obama Taxes

First Posted: 04/02/08 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 01:30 PM ET

Sen. Barack Obama released seven years of prior tax return documents on Tuesday. And a review of the records reveals several newsworthy, albeit minor, disclosures.

Up until recent years when their income increased sharply from book revenues and a Senate salary, Obama's family donated a relatively minor amount of its earnings to charity. From 2000 through 2004, the senator and his wife never gave more than $3,500 a year in charitable donations -- about 1 percent of their annual earnings. In 2005, however, that total jumped to $77,315 (4.7 percent of annual earnings), and to $60,307 in 2006 (6.1 percent).

The money went to several organizations. More than $27,000 total was given to Obama's church, Trinity United Church of Christ, whose former pastor Jeremiah Wright has dominated recent news coverage. Other charity gifts included: Muntu Dance Theater, a Chicago-based company that performs contemporary and classic African dance, which received a $5,000 donation; The Rochelle Lee Fund, a literacy organization, which received a $20,000 donation; the Illinois Reading Council, which received a $25,000 donation, and CARE, the poverty fighting organization, which received a total of $31,000 in donations.

Obama also classified a $13,107 contribution to the Congressional Black Caucus as a charity gift.

Taken as a whole, these disbursements made up a small portion of Obama's annual income. According to TaxProf Blog, the Illinois senator gave "well short of the biblical 10% tithe for all seven years."

"As new parents who were paying off their large student loans, giving $10,000 to charity [from 2000 to 2004] was as generous as they could be at the time," said Obama spokesman Bill Burton.

The release of Obama's tax returns represents another step in the campaign's effort to push the issue of transparency in the nomination battle against Sen. Hillary Clinton. The New York Democrat has not released her tax return information from the years following her departure from the White House (she has released returns corresponding to the 20 years prior). Her campaign promised to make her tax information public at least three days prior to the Pennsylvania primary on April 20.

While political observers are eager to see how former president Bill Clinton's profited off his post-White House fame, the Obama disclosures underscore the story of a relatively obscure and unknown state senator rising rapidly to national prominence.

Indeed, perhaps the only other of interesting news to be gleamed from a review of the Obama tax returns is that Michelle Obama made $12,000 more than previously known from the organization Treehouse Foods.

Why is that significant? Treehouse, an Illinois food-processing company on which Michelle Obama served as a board member, is one of the biggest suppliers of pickles and peppers to WalMart, the retail giant that is often loathed in progressive circles.

According to Obama's 2007 tax returns, Michelle earned $51,200 from the company and 7,500 Treehouse stock options. This is relatively minor stuff considering the degree of separation from WalMart itself (Sen. Hillary Clinton, for one, served on WalMart's board while she was first lady of Arkansas), but already Obama's critics have used it against him.

"The Obamas would have us believe that, when it comes to money and ethics and compassion, he is a different kind of politician," Chicago political consultant Joe Novak said in a May 2007 article in the London Telegraph. "[But] defending Treehouse while attacking Wal-Mart is a blatant example of personal hypocrisy."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Sen. Barack Obama released seven years of prior tax return documents on Tuesday. And a review of the records reveals several newsworthy, albeit m...
Sen. Barack Obama released seven years of prior tax return documents on Tuesday. And a review of the records reveals several newsworthy, albeit m...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 209
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
cybersense
10:35 AM on 03/26/2008
This exactly why putting your tax records up for everyone who knows much about nothing, is a problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
naugiedoggie
Zombie Woof.
10:28 AM on 03/26/2008
How lame. My wife and I give a higher percentage of our income to charity, on substantially less income. And that is just tax-deductible, which requires documentation. We donate out-of-pocket to numerous charity events, bazaars, fund-raising events of all kinds.

Every year, 10% of our tax refund goes to charity. Whenever we get a "windfall," such as from the sale of stock, 10% goes to charity.

Yet, here are the Obamas: they financed their $1.6 million mansion, but they "couldn't afford" to donate more than 6% of their income to charity. What part of "hypocrite" don't you understand?

Thanks.

mp
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skibum49
06:37 AM on 03/29/2008
Naugie Writes:

"How lame. My wife and I give a higher percentage of our income to charity, on substantially less income. And that is just tax-deductible, which requires documentation. We donate out-of-pocket to numerous charity events, bazaars, fund-raising events of all kinds"

How great of you Naugie! I'm sure there will be a special place in heaven for you both.

As for your second sentence what exactly makes you so presumptuous to assume that you and your wife are the only people who donate to organizations without claiming it on your tax return and why do you automatically come to the conclusion that Senator Obama doesn't do the same thing?
09:59 AM on 03/26/2008
I don't care about Wallmart or Treehouse. Frankly, every person posting here probably has similar stocks in their own portfolio if they are part of a 401K plan at all.

But I am very fed up with the Obama tactics. He wanted the dayplanner. She gave it to him. How does this help voters? Not one whit. It's just scandal-mongering. Ditto for her tax returns. I've watched every single year as politicians gets smeared over stupid stuff on their tax returns that, in reality, do not amount to a hill of beans.

ThiHe owes America an answer to why he dismissed Hillary during the debate over Rezko. He lied right to the camera, saying that his only involvement was 4 or 5 hours of legal work. What a farce! Then like George Washington, "AMerica, I cannot tell a lie. I really did have more to do with Rezko. BUT I trusted him." What a completely unbelievable fairy tale THAT is.

Then again, he pulled it with his earmarks. He slams her for not naming former years. Meanwhile, HIS earmark goes to his wife's company. She doubles her salary as soon as his "donation" comes through. What a crock of baloney to imply Hillary is dishonest.

Obama has virtually no room to crow here. It's gotten to the point that if he's slinging mud at her, you can nearly count on it that the REAL story is that he's blatantly doing something that is just shy of illegal.
09:57 AM on 03/26/2008
Obama's tax returns reveal just why Michelle complains to women voters in Ohio about how hard it has been for them to scrape by with the "public service" jobs

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=M2ZhODdkMGFhYmEwMDEwM2UwMWMwMzU1ZWZjYTY0OWQ=
09:16 AM on 03/26/2008
Hello...Obama told us back in 2005 that he and his wife had just paid off their large student loans from graduate school, so why is it a mystery that his charitable donations went up after the loans were paid off?

Sheesh...this is such a non-story, it's pathetic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saxton
08:57 AM on 03/26/2008
At least Obama puts it out there, warts and all, compared to Hillary who keeps telling everyone - "oh, it's coming we just have to craft all our documents to hide vital information." But does the press put any pressure on her, does SNL write any skits highlighting these facts - NOOOOO. I'm sick of the press and the media making a mockery of providing "objective reporting."
08:30 AM on 03/26/2008
They couldn't find anything nefarious in Obama's tax returns so they decide to pick on his charitable contributions. How juvenile is that?
08:11 AM on 03/26/2008
Give me a break. So Obama only declared 70,000 of donations on his tax return. He may have given more or he may have given just this. 5% of ones income is a lot. Especially when you have to pay down your student loans and raise two kids. I hope this scrutiny comes up in Hillary's tax return. I bet she gave less than 1% of her income to charity.
08:47 AM on 03/26/2008
Obama and the Clintons are not in the same league as far as wealth goes.

Multi millionaire Clintons have many more deductions and tax breaks.
06:52 AM on 03/26/2008
Nothing at all wrong with those returns........in fact...I think they are likely more generous than most in the same income bracket.......and even those in higher income brackets. Considering their income was relatively modest for most of that time....they truly gave a lot.

Love the Obama's! Now Hillary where are your returns......McCain? What are you hiding? I also don't expect to see any blacked out returns..........disclose the whole truth!
03:41 AM on 03/26/2008
Is the Congressional Black Caucus considered a charity?
03:12 AM on 03/26/2008
I wonder how much they gave in political donations that aren't charitable deductions. I give 4-5 times as much to political donations as I do to tax deductible donations.
02:26 AM on 03/26/2008
I thought I smelled a whiff of it recently, but it wasn't until this post by Sam Stein that I realized I had to accept the undeniable truth: HuffPo is becoming the Fox News for progressives and liberals.

When attentive focus is more on exaggerating details, sensationalizing trivial information, or aggressively attempting to craft a headline story from a complete non-story, writers guilty of such have no more credibility, nor does the publisher.

To Mr. Stein and everyone else at HuffPo, stop trying to be Fox. They'll win that game, and we'll all lose in the end.
01:32 AM on 03/26/2008
Not much of a 'Tithe' at less than 1%...the Church of Christ requests 10%, I think...one might think those years of church attendance went for naught...or for what seemed on the southside of Daleytown like an appropriate appearance at the time. Funny how the 'appearances' game can come back to bite you where you sit, isn't it?
03:04 PM on 03/27/2008
Isn't it funny how you are all quick to point out that since Obama attended the church with a pastor with questionable views he must share thesame view and then turn around to condemn him because he didn't do as the pastor preached and give 10% of his income to charity? Wow you are all so transparent it is disturbing. Damn if he does, damn if he doesn't!
09:15 PM on 03/28/2008
And of course, there will always be the debate of gross or net in terms of tithing 10%. Personally, I can only afford to tithe based on what I bring home. Perhaps they are doing the same...
12:56 AM on 03/26/2008
Time for everyone else to open up. Of course when they do it'll be all over for them.
12:50 AM on 03/26/2008
Don't any of the hillary supporters wonder what's taking so long to release records that are years old?
It's funny that most of her records were cleaned, just like bush's military records.

Can't wait to see the tax returns and her earmarks!!!
09:59 AM on 03/26/2008
I'm still waiting to see Obama's tax returns for his years in the ILL state senate. He is the one that claims those years in elective office as giving him more experience than Hillary. So, let's see those tax returns