Clinton Donors Object to Pelosi Comment

UPDATE: It doesn't sound like the letter had much effect on Pelosi's attitude towards the nomination. From her press office:

Speaker Pelosi is confident that superdelegates will choose between Sens. Clinton or Obama -- our two strong candidates -- before the convention in August," Daly said. "That choice will be based on many considerations, including respecting the decisions of millions of Americans who have voted in primaries and participated in caucuses. The speaker believes it would do great harm to the Democratic Party if superdelegates are perceived to overturn the will of the voters. This has been her position throughout this primary season, regardless of who was ahead at any particular point in delegates or votes.

UPDATE: The Center for Responsive Politics has calculated the financial heft that the donors involved, and it is substantial. From the press release:

The 20 Democratic bigwigs who wrote to Nancy Pelosi re: superdelegates yesterday have contributed nearly $24 million to Democratic candidates and committees over the last 10 years, the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics has calculated. They've given Hillary Clinton's Senate and presidential campaigns about $315,000, or nearly $554,000, if you include contributions to her leadership PAC. By comparison, Barack Obama has collected $34,700 from them for his Senate and presidential campaigns, plus $17,500 to his leadership PAC. And there's no telling how much this group has helped raise for Democrats over the years.

WASHINGTON — Twenty top Democratic donors who are supporting Hillary Rodham Clinton criticized House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for saying superdelegates should support the presidential candidate with the most pledged delegates.

No matter what the outcome of the 10 remaining contests, it will be nearly impossible for Clinton to overcome Barack Obama's lead in pledged delegates because they are awarded proportionally based on the outcome.

So it will be up to the nearly 800 superdelegates _ party activists and elected officials who aren't bound by any vote _ to put one of them over the mark of 2,024 delegates needed to win the nomination. Obama has 1,406 pledged delegates to Clinton's 1,249, according to The Associated Press count.

Pelosi, who has not endorsed either candidate as chair of the Democratic National Convention, said during a March 16 appearance on ABC's "This Week" that it would be harmful to the party if superdelegates don't support the pledged delegate winner.

In their letter, Clinton's supporters said superdelegates "must look to not one criterion but to the full panoply of factors that will help them assess who will be the party's strongest nominee in the general election."

The letter also noted the donors "have been strong supporters" of the House Democrats' fundraising apparatus.

"We therefore urge you to clarify your position on superdelegates and reflect in your comments a more open view to the optional independent actions of each of the delegates at the national convention in August," they said.

Pelosi stands by her comment, said her spokesman, Brendan Daly.

Story continues below

"The speaker believes it would do great harm to the Democratic Party if superdelegates are perceived to overturn the will of the voters," he said. "This has been her position throughout this primary season, regardless of who was ahead at any particular point in delegates or votes."

Obama spokesman Bill Burton called the letter "inappropriate."

"We hope the Clinton campaign will reject the insinuation contained in it," he said. "Regardless of the outcome of the nomination fight, Senator Obama will continue to urge his supporters to assist Speaker Pelosi in her efforts to maintain and build a working majority in the House of Representatives."

In response, Clinton spokesman Phil Singer said: "Few have done more to build the Democratic Party than Bill and Hillary Clinton. The last thing they need is a lecture from the Obama campaign."

The letter was first reported by The Washington Post and the political blog Talking Points Memo.

___

On the Net:

http://www.house.gov/pelosi

Comments

[MrGill]

"Same song, second verse, could be better but it's only worse..."

We deserve something better, and Hillary is NOT it. I'd like to know more about the names on that letter and what companies they represent.

[shamgod]

Yes give us the names!

[Texas4Obama]

Just another example of Clinton arm twisting. This is America - we don't have Kings and Queens. It is time for Hillary to realize that she has lost and time for her to go home!

[circles]

Is the nomination for sale???

[GoreyFantod]

In a word, yes.

[nomobull]

we the people say not this time

[Trollstakeyourmeds]

I don't know, is it? We keep reading over and over how much more money Obama has that Senator Clinton. One would assume, from the repetition of that stat by his supporters, that the election is indeed, for sale. To the highest bidder. But it's okay, right? It's Obama trying to buy it, not Senator Clinton. The rules change depending on who uses them.

[Aleka]

Wow. Nice twisting of logic there.

Being a more able fundraiser who is better able to manage their money is not the same as having your rich chums threaten party leaders if they don't hand you the nomination.

[shamgod]

The big difference here is that Obama's donations are in small denominations from every day people, not hyper affluent insiders. Make no mistake, the Clintons are owned. Chattel. Obama has his fat cats to be sure, but at the same time he'll have to keep some loyalty to us little folk who kicked in a few hundred bucks here and there. Obama's campaign, as we know from Joe Tripi, has been from the ground up.

[ThomasHobbes87]

Hillary is old new...literally...