Rep. Jim McDermott, right, D-Wash., and Rep. David Bonior, D-Mich., left, are shown during a Capitol Hill news conference in this 2002 file photo. Saddam Hussein's intelligence agency secretly financed a trip to Iraq for three U.S. lawmakers during the run-up to the U.S.-led invasion, federal prosecutors said Wednesday. (AP Photo/Ken Lambert, FILE)

Feds: Saddam Paid For Lawmakers' Iraq Trip

MATT APUZZO | March 26, 2008 11:13 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »


WASHINGTON — Saddam Hussein's intelligence agency secretly financed a trip to Iraq for three U.S. lawmakers during the run-up to the U.S.-led invasion, federal prosecutors said Wednesday.

The three anti-war Democrats made the trip in October 2002, while the Bush administration was trying to persuade Congress to authorize military action against Iraq. While traveling, they called for a diplomatic solution.

Prosecutors say that trip was arranged by Muthanna Al-Hanooti, a Michigan charity official, who was charged Wednesday with setting up the junket at the behest of Saddam's regime. Iraqi intelligence officials allegedly paid for the trip through an intermediary and rewarded Al-Hanooti with 2 million barrels of Iraqi oil.

The lawmakers are not named in the indictment but the dates correspond to a trip by Democratic Reps. Jim McDermott of Washington, David Bonior of Michigan and Mike Thompson of California. None was charged and Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd said investigators "have no information whatsoever" any of them knew the trip was underwritten by Saddam.

"Obviously, we didn't know it at the time," McDermott spokesman Michael DeCesare said Wednesday. "The trip was to see the plight of the Iraqi children. That's the only reason we went."

Both McDermott and Thompson are popular among liberal voters in their reliably Democratic districts for their anti-war views. Bonior is no longer in Congress.

Thompson released a statement Wednesday saying the trip was approved by the State Department.

"Obviously, had there been any question at all regarding the sponsor of the trip or the funding, I would not have participated," he said.

During the trip, the lawmakers expressed skepticism about the Bush administration's claims that Saddam was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction. Though such weapons ultimately were never found, the lawmakers drew criticism for their trip at the time.

Oklahoma Sen. Don Nickles, then the second-ranking Senate Republican, said the Democrats "sound somewhat like spokespersons for the Iraqi government." Seattle-area conservatives dubbed McDermott "Baghdad Jim" for the Iraq trip.

Al-Hanooti was arrested Tuesday night while returning to the U.S. from the Middle East, where he was looking for a job, his attorney, James Thomas, said. Al-Hanooti pleaded not guilty Wednesday to charges of conspiracy to act as an unregistered agent of a foreign government, illegally purchasing Iraqi oil and lying to authorities. He was being held on $100,000 bail.

Between 1999 and 2006, he worked on and off as a public relations coordinator for Life for Relief and Development, a charity formed after the first Gulf War to fund humanitarian work in Iraq. FBI and Joint Terrorism Task Force agents raided the charity's headquarters in 2006 but charged nobody and allowed the agency to continue operating.

McDermott identified that charity as the group financing the Iraq trip. In House disclosure forms, he put the cost at $5,510. Thompson also understood the charity to be financing the trip, spokeswoman Anne Warden said.

Prosecutors said Al-Hanooti was responsible for monitoring Congress for the Iraqi Intelligence Service. From 1999 to 2002, he allegedly provided Saddam's government with a list of U.S. lawmakers he believed favored lifting economic sanctions against Iraq.

Thomas said Al-Hanooti would "vigorously defend" himself against the charges but he could not discuss the specifics of the case since he had seen none of the evidence.



Comments
117
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

I wish all political junkets were paid for by host countries.
As far as Hussein springing for this trip, I think the photos of him shaking hands with a fawning Rumsfeld say a lot more.
This story is news only because three wise Democrats saved us taxpayers thousands in travel money.
Good for them!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 AM on 03/27/2008

Another Democrat junket paid for by lobbyists. This time it's Saddam & Sons.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 AM on 03/27/2008

What's your point? That the Republicans are too honorable to accept lobbyist money? That you still believe in fairy tales?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:26 AM on 03/27/2008

If the Feds say it, I DO NOT believe it.

I have lost ALL CONFIDENCE in any and all of them..................damn losers, PERIOD.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 AM on 03/27/2008

Bush/Cheney are the only ones who get blamed for the war on this site, but there were plenty of people in Congress that were willing accomplices.

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 107th Congress - 2nd Session

Vote Date: October 11, 2002, 12:50 AM
Measure Title: A joint resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.
Vote Counts: YEAs 77
Vote Summary By Senator Name By Vote Position By Home State

Yea:

Allard (R-CO)Allen (R-VA)Baucus (D-MT)Bayh (D-IN)Bennett (R-UT)Biden (D-DE)Bond (R-MO)
Breaux (D-LA)Brownback (R-KS)Bunning (R-KY)Burns (R-MT)Campbell (R-CO)Cantwell (D-WA)
Carnahan (D-MO)Carper (D-DE)Cleland (D-GA)Clinton (D-NY)Cochran (R-MS)Collins (R-ME)
Craig (R-ID)Crapo (R-ID)Daschle (D-SD)DeWine (R-OH)Dodd (D-CT)Domenici (R-NM)
Dorgan (D-ND)Edwards (D-NC)Ensign (R-NV)Enzi (R-WY)Feinstein (D-CA)Fitzgerald (R-IL)
Frist (R-TN)Gramm (R-TX)Grassley (R-IA)Gregg (R-NH)Hagel (R-NE)Harkin (D-IA)Hatch (R-UT)
Helms (R-NC)Hollings (D-SC)Hutchinson (R-AR)Hutchison (R-TX)Inhofe (R-OK)Johnson (D-SD)
Kerry (D-MA)Kohl (D-WI)Kyl (R-AZ)Landrieu (D-LA)Lieberman (D-CT)Lincoln (D-AR)Lott (R-MS)
Lugar (R-IN)McCain (R-AZ)McConnell (R-KY)Miller (D-GA)Murkowski (R-AK)Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)Nickles (R-OK)Reid (D-NV)Roberts (R-KS)Rockefeller (D-WV)Santorum (R-PA)
Schumer (D-NY)Sessions (R-AL)Shelby (R-AL)Smith (R-NH)Smith (R-OR)Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)Stevens (R-AK)Thomas (R-WY)Thompson (R-TN)Thurmond (R-SC)
Torricelli (D-NJ)Voinovich (R-OH)Warner (R-VA)

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 AM on 03/27/2008

What does it matter who pays? If it is a fact finding mission, and their observation truly reflect the existing conditions, it does not matter. In fact they have been vindicated by subsequent investigations regarding the Iraq war. If Saddam advanced the money, it is because he wanted to stem US rush into war on unreasonable grounds.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 AM on 03/27/2008

When the party in question is paying for the trip via well compensated intermediaries, does that not turn on the warning sirens in your head? Or, are you just a "democrat good, republican bad" party loyalist hack?

The fact that they had to be vindicated ex post facto doesn't indicate the inherent innocence of these three politicians, and it sure as hell doesn't lend credence to their politicization of the buildup. Sometimes people end up being right, but for the wrong reasons or simply circumstance.

According to multiple former Hussein aides, the real reason for Hussein's head fake about WMDs was not to prod the US into an invasion or defy the UN, but to keep Iran from getting ambitious, being the Iraqi military was all but dismantled by the UN sanctions and the 1980s war is still a sore spot in the region. It was nothing more than a ruse for the sake of Iraq's national defense.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 AM on 03/27/2008

McDermott happens to be my Congressman, and he is above reproach. If he says he didn't know, I'll trust him on this one.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 AM on 03/27/2008

Well we know CNN's Eason Jordan had a quid pro quo with Saddam.
Will Baghdad Jim ever reveal his?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 AM on 03/27/2008

Will shrub/cheney ever reveal theirs with the Saudis? With the telecom industry? With the military/industrial complex? With the... Need I go on?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 AM on 03/27/2008

Bonior was always a very nasty man. Is he still in Obama's campaign?

And Jim IllegalWiretap McDermott, well, he is just typical traitorous Democrat scum.
Say, did he ask those people if there was a warrant for those illegal recordings?

From his home state ...
"No sooner had McDermott spoken than the Washington, D.C., correspondent for al-Jazeera, the Arab world's communications leader, fired off this line:

"Arabs are not alone in believing U.S. conspiracy theories ... ." "

Posted 12:21 AM on 03/27/2008 Moderated out 12:21:01 AM on 03/27/2008

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 AM on 03/27/2008

Do you have some point beyond this gibberish? If so, just come out and say it and quit trying to be cute. That is, if you have a point beyond your moronic straw man defense of corrupt republicans.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 AM on 03/27/2008

I truely feel sorry for you when you wake up and realize you have been supporting people who have taken over our government and used it's military for political and monatery gain.

Read what Karen Kwiatkowski, Ph.D., a retired USAF lieutenant colonel has to say about her eye witness account of the actions in the Pentagon before the war in Iraq.

Will you then turn that misplaced angry toward those who really deserve it or will you keep drinking the koolaide?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:57 AM on 03/27/2008

They made Saddam pay for their trip?
Sounds pretty savy to me.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 AM on 03/27/2008

Bonior was always a very nasty man Is he still in Obama's campaign?

And Jim IllegalWiretap McDermott, well, he is just typical Democrat scum.
Say, did he ask those people if there was a warrant for those illegal recordings?

From his home state ...
"No sooner had McDermott spoken than the Washington, D.C., correspondent for al-Jazeera, the Arab world's communications leader, fired off this line:

"Arabs are not alone in believing U.S. conspiracy theories ... ." "

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 AM on 03/27/2008

As George Galloway once said when facing the same kind of attacks based on what is probably the same documents:

"You have nothing on me, Senator, except my name on lists of names from Iraq, many of which have been drawn up after the installation of your puppet government in Baghdad.. . You have my name on lists provided to you by the Duelfer inquiry, provided to him by the convicted bank robber, and fraudster and conman Ahmed Chalabi who many people to their credit in your country now realise played a decisive role in leading your country into the disaster in Iraq. . . And if you had any evidence that I had ever engaged in any actual oil transaction, if you had any evidence that anybody ever gave me any money, it would be before the public and before this committee today. . .

What counts is not the names on the paper, what counts is where's the money. Senator? Who paid me hundreds of thousands of dollars of money? The answer to that is nobody. And if you had anybody who ever paid me a penny, you would have produced them today."

This is a neocon political witch hunt based on documents forged by the supporters of Ahmed Chalabi.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 AM on 03/27/2008

They tried to stop a war that 90% of the world agrees was started on a set of hand picked neo-con lies and, they made Saddam foot the bill?
What's the big deal again?
Would it have been better if these Democrats gave Halliburton yet another wasteful NO BID CONTRACT to fly them over?
Or maybe the neo-cons would have liked it better if they saddled the beleaguered American taxpayers with yet another bill.

Man, I really wish these neo-cons children would grow up!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 AM on 03/27/2008

And who, pray tell, paid for this little trip?

http://www.subliminalnews.com/assets/Rummy-and-Saddam2.jpg

Yup, the Reagan White House made the United States Taxpayers pay for that Rummy/Saddam jaunt.

At least these three Democrats didn't ask WE THE PEOPLE to fund their trip to visit Saddam.
Nope, they made him pay.
Sounds exactly like fiscally responsible peace loving Democrats I want on Capital Hill.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 PM on 03/26/2008

Just remember, if the first George Bush hadn't "CUT AND RUN" from Saddam during Gulf War I, this wasteful Iraq Oil War wouldn't even be an issue!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 PM on 03/26/2008

the problem is obvious. the gop considers no potential democrat transgression too trivial- from socks the cat's christmas card list to this bit of nonsense.

conversely

no gop transgression is TOO BIG for this idiot democratic congress to call THEM on it.

it just never ends. until the democrats get their heads out of their asses and start PROSCECUTING REAL CRIME by this CRIMINAL administration, we will continue to get distracted with nonsense/

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 PM on 03/26/2008

Funny how this little factoid surfaces now.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 PM on 03/26/2008

Well Peter, it's an election year, and anything to try and discredit democrats is okay.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 AM on 03/27/2008

Why? It's not newsworthy, and it doesn't relate to anything.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 AM on 03/27/2008

I like the misleading picture of GOP Hasert when it suggests that it was Dems that were financed by Sadam. Why would a brutal dictator finance anti war politicians if it is true?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 AM on 03/27/2008

The man in the photo is Jim McDermott. He's on the right.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 AM on 03/27/2008

That ain't Hastert. That's Baghdad Jim McDermott.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 AM on 03/27/2008

So, let me get this straight...

These politicians supposedly had a humanitarian visit to another country paid for by that country's government... and they didn't know it, supposedly, because that fact was concealed from them?

And the reason why it is "supposedly", is because none of these facts have actually been proven yet in a court of law?

And the country that supposedly sponsored their trip was basically not a threat to America or its allies, didn't possess any WMDs, and had absolutely no ties to Al-Qaeda, right?!

Got it.

So... what was the problem again?!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 PM on 03/26/2008

"And the reason why it is "supposedly", is because none of these facts have actually been proven yet in a court of law?"

Thanks for the vigorous defense of Rove.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 03/27/2008

Humanitarian visit. You libs are a riot.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 03/27/2008

No shipments of baby formula were allowed except by certain controlled businesses.
Where are those WMD'S??????????

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 AM on 03/27/2008

yeah a real knee slapper. dont let the dead soldiers or the rest of the bunch of drug addicts, sexual deviants and lunatics lining up for the vision of jesus on an orange peel distract you.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 AM on 03/27/2008

"IRAQ HAS WMDS!" And you neo-cons are war criminals!!!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 AM on 03/27/2008

"So, what's the problem?"

Neo-cons are children!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 03/26/2008

These are the same sort of claims that George Galloway faced. His testimony in front of the U.S. Senate made it very clear that these documents were likely amongst the many counterfeit documents that came out of Iraq after that country's fall, many floated by Ahmed Chalabi in order to strengthen the case for the neocons.

We're most likely looking at unproven '04 neocon attacks being used here to build a case... and yet, how many people have been proven to have recieved these mysterious X million barrels of oil from Saddam?! Galloway certainly has no such funds, and his record has been looked at intensely by the British government.

And based on just the idea of a trial, we're talking about smearing two Democratic politicians here? In the run-up to election season?

Something stinks here. Bigtime.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 PM on 03/26/2008

Who is smearing them?Most congressmen find out before they take a trip especially to Iraq who is paying for it.I am talking about the 600,000 documents that just came out.It show a direct connection.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 AM on 03/27/2008

Who is smearing them? Federal prosecutors, that's who. The congressmen did find out who was paying for the trip. It was paid for by a charity called "Life for Relief and Development". Also, you say that you are talking about the 600,000 documents that just came out, but you are the only one doing so. "It show a direct connection". Says who? There's certainly nothing about 600,000 documents in the article above. Al-Hanooti said he couldn't discuss the specifics of the case since he had seen none of the evidence against him. No-one is giving any hints about what the evidence might be, though it seems to be a safe guess that it's the same "evidence" that was brought up against George Galloway. Do you know something that the rest of us don't?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 AM on 03/27/2008

Patriotism is the last refuge of scoundrels. Believe it. It's an overblown emotional issue..the whole patriot thing. What is of our people is a value judgment at best.
The right wing comments here mirror their generic campaign against anyone. Traitors, treasonous, unamerican. It doesn't matter, anything they can twist that way they will against anybody they can, including you. . It's as old or older than John McCain for Gods sake!
The (Bush)state department approved the trip and they properly listed who they were told were paying for it. Yep, real treasonous, real scandalous.
The right needs a new way to play because they are boring me with their juvenile dribble.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 PM on 03/26/2008

Do you hear that clunking sound? I think you're noise machine is broken.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 03/26/2008

how many trips did h