Obama, Clinton Offer Economic Plans

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama, Clinton Offer Economic Plans stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DEVLIN BARRETT and BETH FOUHY | March 27, 2008 08:14 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Democratic presidential hopeful, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., rallies the crowd at a campaign rally at Terry Sanford High School in Fayetteville, N.C., Thursday, March 27, 2008. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

NEW YORK — Democrat Barack Obama said Thursday a firmer government hand is needed on Wall Street and a $30 billion stimulus is needed to rescue homeowners and the jobless. Rival Hillary Rodham Clinton called for a new job retraining program to remedy what both candidates derided as Republican indifference to a sputtering economy.

Both Obama and Clinton argued that Republican nominee-in-waiting John McCain isn't ready or willing to handle an economic emergency.

"The phone is ringing, and he would just let it ring and ring," Clinton said, echoing the "3 a.m. phone call" TV ad she used earlier to suggest she was more qualified than Obama to handle a national security crisis. Speaking in Raleigh, N.C., she chastised McCain for opposing government intervention in the nation's credit and mortgage crisis.

Clinton focused on job insecurity and said the government needed to take more responsibility for helping displaced workers. The state holds its primary May 5.

"Our government is more focused on how you lost your job than how you can find a new one," Clinton said. "And while we have been rightly focused on trying to help people who are out of work, there's been too little thought and effort to help people gain new skills while they still have their existing jobs."

Among other things, the former first lady called for a new program to extend federal aid known as Pell Grants to workers enrolled in education programs aimed at updating their skills. She also promoted a pre-emptive training initiative to allow workers concerned about potential threats to their jobs to receive grants to help transition into other industries.

While many of the two Democrats' ideas on the economy overlap, Obama laid out six different areas where he would stiffen regulations of the financial system. He proposed relief for homeowners and the long-term unemployed as part of an additional $30 billion stimulus package, much like the one Clinton offered last week.

He said outdated government regulations have fallen dangerously behind the realities of modern finance.

Story continues below

"We do American business _ and the American people _ no favors when we turn a blind eye to excessive leverage and dangerous risks," Obama said.

The presidential candidate spoke not far from Wall Street, which has been suffering from the aftereffects of the collapse of the housing market and a credit crunch. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, the almost candidate, warmly introduced Obama but stopped short of an endorsement.

The economic setbacks of recent months, Obama argued, show hardships long felt by middle class Americans had now spread everywhere.

"Pain trickles up," he said.

"If we can extend a hand to banks on Wall Street, we can extend a hand to Americans who are struggling," he said.

Bemoaning the nation's economic woes, Obama, like Clinton, dismissed McCain's approach as pure hands-off. On Tuesday, McCain derided government intervention to save and reward banks or small borrowers who behave irresponsibly though he offered few immediate alternatives for fixing the country's growing housing crisis. Obama said McCain's plan "amounts to little more than watching this crisis happen."

Instead, Obama said, the next president should:

_Expand oversight to any institution that borrows from the government.

_Toughen capital requirements for complex financial instruments like mortgage securities.

_Streamline regulatory agencies to end overlap and competition among regulators.

While he laid out a half-dozen principles for closer scrutiny of the financial markets, he did not detail how the different agencies should be organized or exactly how the government should go about peering over the shoulders of bank executives, though aides said later the Federal Reserve would have to assume a greater role.

Although Obama blamed both Republican and Democratic administrations for letting markets get out of control, he took a particular swipe at Clinton's husband, former President Bill Clinton, without naming him explicitly. Obama said outdated bank regulation needed to be reformed in the 1990s, but "by the time the Glass-Steagall Act was repealed in 1999, the $300 million lobbying effort that drove deregulation was more about facilitating mergers than creating an efficient regulatory framework." President Clinton signed that repeal.

"Unfortunately, instead of establishing a 21st century regulatory framework, we simply dismantled the old one, aided by a legal but corrupt bargain in which campaign money all too often shaped policy and watered down oversight," Obama said in a thinly veiled reference to Bill Clinton's oft-repeated promise to build a bridge to the 21st century.

Both Democrats reserved most of their criticism for McCain, but Clinton policy director Neera Tanden later dismissed Obama's proposals as either mimicking ideas the New York senator had already offered, or, in the case of regulatory changes, a "broad series of vague principles."

Obama advisers said the regulatory changes he was offering are designed to be starting points for legislative and executive changes to come.

Even before the Democrats delivered their speeches, McCain said in a statement, "There is a tendency for liberals to seek big government programs that sock it to American taxpayers while failing to solve the very real problems we face."

The political debate comes as a new government report shows the economy nearly sputtered out at the end of the year and is probably faring even worse amid continuing housing, credit and financial crises.

The Commerce Department reported that gross domestic product _ the value of all goods and services produced in the country _ increased at a feeble 0.6 percent annual rate in the October-to-December quarter. The reading _ unchanged from a previous estimate a month ago _ provided stark evidence of just how much the economy has weakened. In the prior quarter, the economy clocked in at a sizzling 4.9 percent growth rate.

___

Associated Press Writer Beth Fouhy reported from Raleigh, N.C. Associated Press Writer Ann Sanner in Washington contributed to this report.

NEW YORK — Democrat Barack Obama said Thursday a firmer government hand is needed on Wall Street and a $30 billion stimulus is needed to rescue homeowners and the jobless. Rival Hillary Rodham C...
NEW YORK — Democrat Barack Obama said Thursday a firmer government hand is needed on Wall Street and a $30 billion stimulus is needed to rescue homeowners and the jobless. Rival Hillary Rodham C...
Filed by Nico Pitney  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
14
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

Why would anyone believe they know anything about monetary policy or economics?

Neither Obama, McCain nor Clinton have served on any economic boards. Ron Paul, is currently the ranking member of the House Financial Services Committee's Subcommittee on Domestic and International Monetary Policy.

Want to fix the economy?

Ignore the news and ignore the opinions. The fact is, not one single delegate has voted yet. In addition, it all only comes down to the electorate.

Listen to the experts -> http://www.europac.net/Schiff-SquawkBox-10-26-05_lg.asp

Vote Ron Paul, restore the republic, be a patriot, give your country 15 minutes and hear him out -> http://www.ronpaul2008.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 AM on 03/28/2008

Funny..Barrack as usual had to wait until the adults came out with their plan to know what he should do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 03/27/2008

Hillary the Movie...A MUST SEE!! Who is the REAL Hillary Clinton?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8464923602139974671

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 03/27/2008

O.k., some (about half) of this is distorted, according to information that I know to be true. Half is enough, though. I wouldn't accept this 100% as it is being presented.

Here's just one rather innocuous example of half the story being told as the whole truth, when it is not. Remember the Sandy Berger - National Archives documents flap? These guys are still presenting this as if he destroyed original documents. However, when you visit the Archives and request documents, even if you have the clearance to see them, what you get are copies, not originals. It is illegal to remove these copies from the premises, of course, but the idea that Berger took and destroyed documents to hide something is just ludicrous. Also, the document copies that he took were of documents that he himself originally produced. He took them so that he could make notes at his leisure later, and then destroyed the copies because they were classified and illegally taken from the Archives.

The entire documentary is this way, telling only half the story, the most damning half.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 03/27/2008
- LoadedDice I'm a Fan of LoadedDice 2 fans permalink

Barack, as usual, was dead on. What HRC doesn't get (among other things) is that "approach" is critical. If a problem (in this case an extraordinarily complex one) is not framed coherently, clearly and comprehensively, no grab-bag of ad hoc policy points (e.g., HRC's ubiquitous 4-point programs) can hope to build consensus or provide the clarity we're looking for.

In his speech, Obama demonstrated a deep understanding of the economic forces in play and a knowledge of the legacy of deregulatory legislation that can fairly be described as masterful. By once again putting the notion of "us" at the center of public policy thinking, he continues to flesh out a paradigm of governance that is inclusive, visionary and, above all, salutary.

By comparison, no didactic litany of policy points and 4-point plans--based on an ad hoc, jury-rigged, top-down ("trust me") and outmoded approach to governance--will ever be confused with a mission statement that invites or compel "us" to sign on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 03/27/2008

You might want to note that he was pretty vague and most of his points were mentioned yesterday by the Treasury department.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 03/27/2008

Clinton was real specific. The bottom line is she wants to provide "lawsuit protection against mortgage companies:
"Right now, many mortgage companies are reluctant to help families restructure their mortgages because they're afraid of being sued by the investment banks, the private equity firms and others who actually own the mortgage papers...
...That's why I will be proposing legislation, when Congress returns, to provide mortgage companies with protection against the threat of such lawsuits."
That's her #1 answer to this mess. McCain wants to do basically nothing and Clinton wants to provide lawsuit protection. More of the same that got us into the current mess. I'll take Obama's ideas for more oversight any day to either Hillary or McCain!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 03/27/2008

You abject idiots. The government intervention by the Left and the Pseudo Right is what created these problems and bubble in the first place.!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:25 PM on 03/27/2008
- realistxxx I'm a Fan of realistxxx 3 fans permalink

Two questions:

1) Your credentials are?

2) Your solutions are?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 03/27/2008
- LoadedDice I'm a Fan of LoadedDice 2 fans permalink

Amazing, aren't they? ...Self-taught faith-based economists. (Maybe another used-car dealer or exterminator who sees himself as an aspiring plutocrat. ...Or a militia-member from Idaho. ...etc., ad nauseum.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 03/27/2008

Why should the government do anything at all? What about the freaking responsibility on the part of the irresponsible homeowners who took on too much house, agreed to sub-prime mortgages or just mortgage agreements they either didn’t read or didn’t understand? What about the many bankers who used the sub-prime loans to package attractive collateralized debt for their investors? They're the ones to take responsibility.

Meanwhile, it’s because banks over the last few years loaned money to the undeserving that we - the ones who pay our mortgages on time - are now suffering economically.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 03/27/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect