Chris Matthews Really Plays Hardball, Demands New Guest Name Sources For Obama Claim

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Huffington Post   |  Rachel Sklar and Danny Shea   |   March 28, 2008 06:33 PM


Wow - talk about playing Hardball. Tonight Chris Matthews absolutely went off on guest Crystal McCreary Anthony, host of BET-J's "My Two Cents", demanding that she provide sources for her statement that Barack Obama had taken some heat today for anti-Semitic comments sourced to a surrogate. Well, she didn't exactly say it quite so succinctly. She talked about "senior Barack Obama advisors" who "were making some anti-Israel comments" and raised the question of "does Barack Obama have issues with Jewish people, does his campaign."

Exaggeration? Yes. Inelegant? Yes. Incorrect? Not really, insofar as Obama advisor General Tony McPeak has come under fire this week from Jewish groups for perceived anti-Israel comments blaming influential U.S. Jews for hindering a Middle East peace plan, and considering that yesterday new information surfaced about anti-Israel articles published in the newsletter of Trinity United Church of Christ, where Jeremiah Wright is pastor and Obama is a longtime parishioner. This was news that ran today and yesterday across mainstream news sources — including MSNBC.

So one would have thought that Matthews and other guests Chrystia Freeland of the FT and WaPo's Dana Milbank would have known what she was getting at. Instead, Matthews leapt on Anthony's comments, demanding that she source them, taking a flustered (and obviously less than prepared Anthony by surprise):

MATTHEWS: Who's pushing that?
ANTHONY: The blogophere.
MATTHEWS: No, but who's pushing it?
ANTHONY: Um, well, is it the Republicans pushing it?
MATTHEWS: You tell me. You just told us about it, you just put it on the television.
ANTHONY: People who have serious issues with Jeremiah Wright's comments that he made....
MATTHEWS: It didn't come from the Sandman, it didn't come from Jesus, it didn't come from anybody good, it came from someone meaning to do him harm - who was it?
ANTHONY (Stammers)
MATTHEWS: I like to know the source of these when you throw them on the air like this, Crystal - you're new to this show, don't put something on the air unless you give me a source for it - where did this come from?

Anthony agreed with Matthews and volunteered that she was sure she'd seen it in the New York Daily News, saying "it's out there, though. It won't be very difficult to find."

She's right — it's not difficult to find, it just takes a quickie Google, and she's also right that right-wing sources have definitely been on this. I am guessing that Milbank and Freeland knew what she was getting at, and probably Matthews' "Hardball" producers did too. Matthews probably should have been aware of breaking campaign news that day. We're thinking his response was a little extreme, especially his warning to her exactly what was expected of a guest on his show. Watch the video below and let us know your thoughts in comments .




Update: After reading through the comments, I just wanted to clarify that I didn't consider this issue to be so much about Obama as what I found to be odd about Matthews' response, because I watch a lot of Hardball and I have never seen him press someone for sources like that on a matter that was in the headlines that day. That said, when allegations of anti-Semitism are involved, everyone is (and ought to be) very, very careful, and as I mentioned above, Anthony misstated the matter and could not elaborate with facts when pressed to do so. Answering "the blogosphere" isn't acceptable as a response, though of course it's easy because somewhere in the blogosphere someone is always pushing something! What I found odd though was the fact that neither of the other guests jumped in to clarify (though Freeland tried to break in at one point) and that Matthews evinced no recognition of what she was referring to (and it was also sort of random when he noted that the comments didn't come from 'the Sandman, Jesus or anyone good' -- an odd sort of normative judgment to make. Also, he interrupted her answering his question when he said that). So that is what I found odd. But I do want to make clear that I agree that guests on these shows need to come in prepared and know what they're talking about. I suspect that Anthony will never, ever make that mistake again.



All Sorts Of Background:
Obama's "Jewish Problem" (?)
[Marc Ambinder - The Atlantic]
No, Marc, Obama Does Have A Jewish Problem [Hotline Blogometer]*
OBAMA: Not Kosher? [Hotline Blogometer]*
Top Obama adviser: NYC, Miami Jews 'the problem'
[WorldNet Daily]
Obama: I disagree with aide who blamed 'NY, Miami' for failed peace talks [Ha'aretz]
Clinton Camp Circulates Article that Accuses McPeak of Being Anti-Semitic [NPR]
Hillary's Team Crosses The Line [Salon]

*Note that these are round-ups - in this case, round-ups of conservative opinion on the topic.


 
Comments
458
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (16 pages total)



THE WAR IN IRAQ IS HAVING SERIOUS NEGATIVE EFFECTS ON OUR ECONOMY and those who voted for the war (i.e. hillary) should be to blame, in part, for the state of the US economy.

Look how the WAR IN IRAQ is affecting the US economy...

$3,000,000,000� 3 billion dollars PER WEEK! That is the amount America is paying for the Iraq War PER WEEK, money that should have been used here, at home.

Add to this:

Interest. We are financing the war with borrowed money (e.g. treasuries) that carries interest; so in actuality, the war is costing the United States MORE THAN 3 billion dollars PER WEEK.

Higher oil and energy prices. Instability in Iraq is adding roughly 30 dollars per barrel as a premium.

High utility bills. Due to high oil prices, demand shifts to other sources of energy - gas, coal, etc. - and greater demand will raise the equilibrium price of all sources of energy

Our dollar is weak and getting weaker. Since we have a trade deficit and is growing in large part to the rising cost of imported oil, the value of goods and services we import exceeds the value of goods we export. Everything we buy that's made abroad will cost more, Ceteris Peribus, because the dollar is weak.

Lastly, how do you think the world views our country since the argument was made for war? The evidence was weak and circumstantial, yet we rushed into war with Iraq thanks to hillary"s authorization.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:57 PM on 04/01/2008

I wish someoen would clarify for me does disagreeing with something Israrel does mean you are anti semetic. Much in the same way that criticizing America means you are Unpatriotic. I want to know where these ideas are coming from are they written in a book somewhere codified in laws so that we can read it and know whats accepatble and what isnt.

Carol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 04/01/2008

Chris Matthews over at Obama TV... I mean CNN, should be
so demanding when someone says something negative about
Hillary Clinton.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:39 PM on 04/01/2008

Clarity is good and I applaud Chris for seeking it, I just think that man likes Obama just a little too much.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 04/01/2008

Actually he went after taht Texas State Senator to name a law that Obama had written or passed and basically ambushed the guy-- and at the same time gave the Hillary supporter a total pass as she talked about "aal the things" Hillary had done to help chldren without demanding some specific examples....I thought that was really lame and biased on his part in Hillary's favor --Hillary even quoted it in one of the debates-event hough it was totally misleading-- (just because one dumb Texan was ill prepared said nothing about Obama's legislative accomplishments -which actually dwarf any of Hillary's lame legislative efforts)

So it was good that he challenged this sort of half-a&&ed attempt to smear Obama by a clear pro Hillary "pundit"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 04/01/2008

Or maybe she was taling about Rev. Wright and his anti Semitic rants and raves, ya think???

Go Hillary!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 PM on 04/01/2008

I' don't agree with the idea of my country, right or wrong, I want my country to be right, which I
why I consider Bush to be such a disaster. I'm certainly not willing to go along with the idea
of Israel, right or wrong, and that does not make me an anti Semite, nor in my first example
unpatriotic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 04/01/2008

I heard he has a youtube clip out now called "Obama Boy" Our media suxs

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 04/01/2008

uht -oh someone was hurting his boyfriends reputation on TV?? and on his program no less.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 04/01/2008

I wonder why Hillary won't agree to a college tour show with Matthews? I guess she is waiting to see how Obama and McCain do. Maybe she might get tough questiions. or maybe she might get booed off the stage.
Maybe FOX news will do a Nursing Home tour......She should do well there. LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 04/01/2008

Andrea MItchel:

from one old newsman to ... well... you know. Anyway... my point is: you need to grow a "set"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 04/01/2008

i've seen him do it many times. NOT a REAL BIG FAN of his, but he isn't wild about people just tossing crap around from a bad game of "telephone". if you are going to pitch a fastball like the one she did... attribution baby!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 04/01/2008

I LIKE his style.,... we, as a country, NEED a newsman that will not let bullshit go
undenied!!!!
If ALL newsjournalists were that dogged, we PROBABLY wouldn't be in HALF the mess we are NOW!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 04/01/2008

Perhaps ms. cma should invest a bit more time on her child and a Lot less time in "the blogosphere".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 PM on 04/01/2008

The story would be if the Lobby--that represents 30% of Jews and should be specifically identified as such in fairness to mainstream Jews--did not slime someone not under their total control. The story would be the media acting as if this isn't totally predictable, and treating the public like fools. But that is "free" speech as defined by corporate media.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 04/01/2008

We Americans too often can't get past the difference between opinions on foreign policy toward Israel and anti-Semitism

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 04/01/2008

I think Chris was right on the money. Especially knowing that Crystal McCreary Anthony's boss at BET (Black Entertainment Network) is one of the 20 Hillary 'rich fat cats" that sent the threatening letter to speaker Nancy Pilosi. Ms. Anthony was clearly trying to sling mud at Obama for her boss, and Chris called her on it. Good for him!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 04/01/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (16 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect